bitcoin-bitcoin-core/src/test/uint256_tests.cpp

#include <stdint.h>

#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>

#include "uint256.h"

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(uint256_tests)

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(uint256_equality)
{
    uint256 num1 = 10;
    uint256 num2 = 11;
    BOOST_CHECK(num1+1 == num2);

    uint64_t num3 = 10;
    BOOST_CHECK(num1 == num3);
    BOOST_CHECK(num1+num2 == num3+num2);
}

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
Use standard C99 (and Qt) types for 64-bit integers 2011-12-20 16:52:59 -05:00			`#include <stdint.h>`

Fix testing setup There were some problems with the existing testing setup: - Makefile rules for test-file compilation used CFLAGS instead of CXXFLAGS in makefile.unix 2011-07-31 20:00:38 +02:00			`#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>`

Rework unit tests so test_bitcoin.cpp does not #include them all 2011-10-11 19:50:06 -04:00			`#include "uint256.h"`
Boost unit-testing framework. make -f makefile.{unix,osx,mingw} test_bitcoin to compile dumb, do-almost-nothing placeholder unit tests. 2011-06-27 14:05:02 -04:00
			`BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(uint256_tests)`

Cleanup test suite output to be more useful. 2011-08-02 17:34:23 +02:00			`BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(uint256_equality)`
Boost unit-testing framework. make -f makefile.{unix,osx,mingw} test_bitcoin to compile dumb, do-almost-nothing placeholder unit tests. 2011-06-27 14:05:02 -04:00			`{`
			`uint256 num1 = 10;`
			`uint256 num2 = 11;`
			`BOOST_CHECK(num1+1 == num2);`

Use standard C99 (and Qt) types for 64-bit integers 2011-12-20 16:52:59 -05:00			`uint64_t num3 = 10;`
Boost unit-testing framework. make -f makefile.{unix,osx,mingw} test_bitcoin to compile dumb, do-almost-nothing placeholder unit tests. 2011-06-27 14:05:02 -04:00			`BOOST_CHECK(num1 == num3);`
			`BOOST_CHECK(num1+num2 == num3+num2);`
			`}`

			`BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()`