mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-02-02 09:46:52 -05:00
Merge #19583: p2p: clean up Misbehaving()
a8865f8b72
[net processing] Tidy up Misbehaving() (John Newbery)d15b3afb4c
[net processing] Always supply debug message to Misbehaving() (John Newbery)634144a1c2
[net processing] Fixup MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect() style (John Newbery) Pull request description: This PR makes a few minor clean-ups to `Misbehaving()` in preparation to move it out of the cs_main lock. There are very minor logging changes but otherwise no functional changes. ACKs for top commit: troygiorshev: tACKa8865f8b72
jonatack: ACKa8865f8
fjahr: Code review ACKa8865f8b72
promag: Code review ACKa8865f8b72
. Tree-SHA512: 98fb4f5f76399715545a1ea19290dcebfc8cb4eff72a1d3555dd3de6e184040bb8668c9651dab21db0dfd8e674e53a5977105ef76547146c9f6fa6b4b9d2ba59
This commit is contained in:
commit
2979a7aff0
1 changed files with 24 additions and 28 deletions
|
@ -157,9 +157,6 @@ std::map<uint256, std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator> g_orphans_by_wtxid GUA
|
|||
|
||||
void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Increase a node's misbehavior score. */
|
||||
void Misbehaving(NodeId nodeid, int howmuch, const std::string& message="") EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main);
|
||||
|
||||
// Internal stuff
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
/** Number of nodes with fSyncStarted. */
|
||||
|
@ -1062,23 +1059,22 @@ unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans)
|
|||
* Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node
|
||||
* to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void Misbehaving(NodeId pnode, int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
|
||||
void Misbehaving(const NodeId pnode, const int howmuch, const std::string& message) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_main)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (howmuch == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
assert(howmuch > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
CNodeState *state = State(pnode);
|
||||
if (state == nullptr)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
CNodeState* const state = State(pnode);
|
||||
if (state == nullptr) return;
|
||||
|
||||
state->nMisbehavior += howmuch;
|
||||
std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
|
||||
const std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
|
||||
if (state->nMisbehavior >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD && state->nMisbehavior - howmuch < DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d) DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
|
||||
state->m_should_discourage = true;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "%s: %s peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", __func__, state->name, pnode, state->nMisbehavior-howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s\n", pnode, state->nMisbehavior - howmuch, state->nMisbehavior, message_prefixed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -1799,7 +1795,7 @@ inline void static SendBlockTransactions(const CBlock& block, const BlockTransac
|
|||
for (size_t i = 0; i < req.indexes.size(); i++) {
|
||||
if (req.indexes[i] >= block.vtx.size()) {
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices", pfrom.GetId()));
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
resp.txn[i] = block.vtx[req.indexes[i]];
|
||||
|
@ -1848,7 +1844,7 @@ static void ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, CConnman& connman, ChainstateMan
|
|||
UpdateBlockAvailability(pfrom.GetId(), headers.back().GetHash());
|
||||
|
||||
if (nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders % MAX_UNCONNECTING_HEADERS == 0) {
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 20, strprintf("%d non-connecting headers", nodestate->nUnconnectingHeaders));
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2307,7 +2303,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
if (pfrom.nVersion != 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "redundant version message");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2468,7 +2464,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
if (pfrom.nVersion == 0) {
|
||||
// Must have a version message before anything else
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-version message before version handshake");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2535,7 +2531,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
if (!pfrom.fSuccessfullyConnected) {
|
||||
// Must have a verack message before anything else
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 1, "non-verack message before version handshake");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3203,7 +3199,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.InitData(cmpctblock, vExtraTxnForCompact);
|
||||
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
|
||||
MarkBlockAsReceived(pindex->GetBlockHash()); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block\n", pfrom.GetId()));
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
|
||||
// Duplicate txindexes, the block is now in-flight, so just request it
|
||||
|
@ -3336,7 +3332,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.FillBlock(*pblock, resp.txn);
|
||||
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
|
||||
MarkBlockAsReceived(resp.blockhash); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, strprintf("Peer %d sent us invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions\n", pfrom.GetId()));
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
|
||||
// Might have collided, fall back to getdata now :(
|
||||
|
@ -3605,7 +3601,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
{
|
||||
// There is no excuse for sending a too-large filter
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "too-large bloom filter");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (pfrom.m_tx_relay != nullptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -3639,7 +3635,7 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
}
|
||||
if (bad) {
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100);
|
||||
Misbehaving(pfrom.GetId(), 100, "bad filteradd message");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3723,32 +3719,32 @@ void ProcessMessage(
|
|||
*/
|
||||
bool PeerLogicValidation::MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(CNode& pnode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()};
|
||||
const NodeId peer_id{pnode.GetId()};
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
CNodeState &state = *State(peer_id);
|
||||
CNodeState& state = *State(peer_id);
|
||||
|
||||
// There's nothing to do if the m_should_discourage flag isn't set
|
||||
if (!state.m_should_discourage) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Reset m_should_discourage
|
||||
state.m_should_discourage = false;
|
||||
} // cs_main
|
||||
|
||||
if (pnode.HasPermission(PF_NOBAN)) {
|
||||
// Peer has the NOBAN permission flag - log but don't disconnect
|
||||
// We never disconnect or discourage peers for bad behavior if they have the NOBAN permission flag
|
||||
LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing noban peer %d!\n", peer_id);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (pnode.m_manual_connection) {
|
||||
// Peer is a manual connection - log but don't disconnect
|
||||
// We never disconnect or discourage manual peers for bad behavior
|
||||
LogPrintf("Warning: not punishing manually connected peer %d!\n", peer_id);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (pnode.addr.IsLocal()) {
|
||||
// Peer is on a local address. Disconnect this peer, but don't discourage the local address
|
||||
// We disconnect local peers for bad behavior but don't discourage (since that would discourage
|
||||
// all peers on the same local address)
|
||||
LogPrintf("Warning: disconnecting but not discouraging local peer %d!\n", peer_id);
|
||||
pnode.fDisconnect = true;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue