mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-02-03 09:56:38 -05:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26381: test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_sendtxrcncl.py
fa3da8307b
test: Check debug log as well in p2p_sendtxrcncl.py (MacroFake)fae0439486
test: Check correct disconnect reason in p2p_sendtxrcncl.py (MacroFake)fa590cfaae
test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_sendtxrcncl.py (MacroFake) Pull request description: Should fix https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26364 I can't reproduce this, but my guess would be that `PeerNoVerack::on_version`, which sends the `wtxidrelay` message, is executed in the event loop and thus may run after the main thread sending `msg_verack`. Also, fix another bug. Finally, add some `assert_debug_log` to ensure the right code branch is executed (and not some random, unrelated disconnect). ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACKfa3da8307b
Tree-SHA512: ee2988372223ea22e94e9783ef6d37114a3945991b6d60f0157917f3850fb7077c566564c3771d915ee74ab28202a3b73c6d89ddec6e2c918462db9a3c02e6cf
This commit is contained in:
commit
69b10212ea
1 changed files with 23 additions and 19 deletions
|
@ -107,37 +107,39 @@ class SendTxRcnclTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg())
|
||||
self.wait_until(lambda : "sendtxrcncl" in self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()[-1]["bytesrecv_per_msg"])
|
||||
self.log.info('second SENDTXRCNCL triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg())
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["(sendtxrcncl received from already registered peer); disconnecting"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg())
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL with initiator=responder=0 triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_no_role = create_sendtxrcncl_msg()
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_no_role.initiator = False
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_no_role.responder = False
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(PeerNoVerack(), send_version=True, wait_for_verack=False)
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_no_role)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["txreconciliation protocol violation"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_no_role)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL with initiator=0 and responder=1 from inbound triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_wrong_role = create_sendtxrcncl_msg(initiator=False)
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(PeerNoVerack(), send_version=True, wait_for_verack=False)
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_wrong_role)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["txreconciliation protocol violation"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_wrong_role)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL with version=0 triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_low_version = create_sendtxrcncl_msg()
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_low_version.version = 0
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(PeerNoVerack(), send_version=True, wait_for_verack=False)
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_low_version)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["txreconciliation protocol violation"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_low_version)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('sending SENDTXRCNCL after sending VERACK triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
# We use PeerNoVerack even though verack is sent right after, to make sure it was actually
|
||||
# sent before sendtxrcncl is sent.
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(PeerNoVerack(), send_version=True, wait_for_verack=False)
|
||||
peer.send_and_ping(msg_verack())
|
||||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg())
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["sendtxrcncl received after verack"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg())
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL without WTXIDRELAY is ignored (recon state is erased after VERACK)')
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(PeerNoVerack(wtxidrelay=False), send_version=True, wait_for_verack=False)
|
||||
|
@ -164,15 +166,17 @@ class SendTxRcnclTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL if block-relay-only triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_outbound_p2p_connection(
|
||||
PeerNoVerack(), wait_for_verack=False, p2p_idx=3, connection_type="block-relay-only")
|
||||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg(initiator=False))
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["we indicated no tx relay; disconnecting"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(create_sendtxrcncl_msg(initiator=False))
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL with initiator=1 and responder=0 from outbound triggers a disconnect')
|
||||
sendtxrcncl_wrong_role = create_sendtxrcncl_msg(initiator=True)
|
||||
peer = self.nodes[0].add_outbound_p2p_connection(
|
||||
P2PInterface(), wait_for_verack=False, p2p_idx=4, connection_type="outbound-full-relay")
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_wrong_role)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
PeerNoVerack(), wait_for_verack=False, p2p_idx=4, connection_type="outbound-full-relay")
|
||||
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["txreconciliation protocol violation"]):
|
||||
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_wrong_role)
|
||||
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL not sent if -txreconciliation flag is not set')
|
||||
self.restart_node(0, [])
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue