mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-02-02 09:46:52 -05:00
assumeutxo: fail early if snapshot block hash doesn't match AssumeUTXO parameters
This commit is contained in:
parent
78b7e95518
commit
9620cb4493
2 changed files with 8 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -2737,6 +2737,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan loadtxoutset()
|
|||
[&](const RPCHelpMan& self, const JSONRPCRequest& request) -> UniValue
|
||||
{
|
||||
NodeContext& node = EnsureAnyNodeContext(request.context);
|
||||
ChainstateManager& chainman = EnsureChainman(node);
|
||||
fs::path path{AbsPathForConfigVal(EnsureArgsman(node), fs::u8path(request.params[0].get_str()))};
|
||||
|
||||
FILE* file{fsbridge::fopen(path, "rb")};
|
||||
|
@ -2751,14 +2752,16 @@ static RPCHelpMan loadtxoutset()
|
|||
afile >> metadata;
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 base_blockhash = metadata.m_base_blockhash;
|
||||
if (!chainman.GetParams().AssumeutxoForBlockhash(base_blockhash).has_value()) {
|
||||
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INTERNAL_ERROR, strprintf("Unable to load UTXO snapshot, "
|
||||
"assumeutxo block hash in snapshot metadata not recognized (%s)", base_blockhash.ToString()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
int max_secs_to_wait_for_headers = 60 * 10;
|
||||
CBlockIndex* snapshot_start_block = nullptr;
|
||||
|
||||
LogPrintf("[snapshot] waiting to see blockheader %s in headers chain before snapshot activation\n",
|
||||
base_blockhash.ToString());
|
||||
|
||||
ChainstateManager& chainman = EnsureChainman(node);
|
||||
|
||||
while (max_secs_to_wait_for_headers > 0) {
|
||||
snapshot_start_block = WITH_LOCK(::cs_main,
|
||||
return chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(base_blockhash));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -73,17 +73,12 @@ class AssumeutxoTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|||
bad_snapshot_path = valid_snapshot_path + '.mod'
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info(" - snapshot file refering to a block that is not in the assumeutxo parameters")
|
||||
# we can only test this with a block that is already known, as otherwise the `loadtxoutset` RPC
|
||||
# would time out (waiting to see the hash in the headers chain), rather than error immediately
|
||||
bad_snapshot_height = SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT - 1
|
||||
bad_snapshot_block_hash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(SNAPSHOT_BASE_HEIGHT - 1)
|
||||
with open(bad_snapshot_path, 'wb') as f:
|
||||
bad_snapshot_block_hash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(bad_snapshot_height)
|
||||
# block hash of the snapshot base is stored right at the start (first 32 bytes)
|
||||
f.write(bytes.fromhex(bad_snapshot_block_hash)[::-1] + valid_snapshot_contents[32:])
|
||||
|
||||
expected_log = f"assumeutxo height in snapshot metadata not recognized ({bad_snapshot_height}) - refusing to load snapshot"
|
||||
with self.nodes[1].assert_debug_log([expected_log]):
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-32603, "Unable to load UTXO snapshot", self.nodes[1].loadtxoutset, bad_snapshot_path)
|
||||
error_details = f"assumeutxo block hash in snapshot metadata not recognized ({bad_snapshot_block_hash})"
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-32603, f"Unable to load UTXO snapshot, {error_details}", self.nodes[1].loadtxoutset, bad_snapshot_path)
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info(" - snapshot file with wrong number of coins")
|
||||
valid_num_coins = struct.unpack("<I", valid_snapshot_contents[32:32 + 4])[0]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue