foster/bitcoin-bitcoin-core
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-08 10:31:50 -05:00
Code Issues Activity

[rpc] return full string for package_msg and package-error

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
glozow 2023-12-15 18:04:01 +00:00
parent 158623b8e0
commit 9a29d470fb
3 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/rpc/mempool.cpp
View file

@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan testmempoolaccept()
result_inner.pushKV("txid", tx->GetHash().GetHex());
result_inner.pushKV("wtxid", tx->GetWitnessHash().GetHex());
if (package_result.m_state.GetResult() == PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY) {
result_inner.pushKV("package-error", package_result.m_state.GetRejectReason());
result_inner.pushKV("package-error", package_result.m_state.ToString());
}
auto it = package_result.m_tx_results.find(tx->GetWitnessHash());
if (exit_early || it == package_result.m_tx_results.end()) {
@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ static RPCHelpMan submitpackage()
case PackageValidationResult::PCKG_TX:
{
// Package-wide error we want to return, but we also want to return individual responses
package_msg = package_result.m_state.GetRejectReason();
package_msg = package_result.m_state.ToString();
CHECK_NONFATAL(package_result.m_tx_results.size() == txns.size() ||
package_result.m_tx_results.empty());
break;

2
test/functional/mempool_package_limits.py
View file

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ def check_package_limits(func):
testres_error_expected = node.testmempoolaccept(rawtxs=package_hex)
assert_equal(len(testres_error_expected), len(package_hex))
for txres in testres_error_expected:
assert_equal(txres["package-error"], "package-mempool-limits")
assert "package-mempool-limits" in txres["package-error"]
# Clear mempool and check that the package passes now
self.generate(node, 1)

3
test/functional/mempool_sigoplimit.py
View file

@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ class BytesPerSigOpTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# But together, it's exceeding limits in the *package* context. If sigops adjusted vsize wasn't being checked
# here, it would get further in validation and give too-long-mempool-chain error instead.
packet_test = self.nodes[0].testmempoolaccept([tx_parent.serialize().hex(), tx_child.serialize().hex()])
assert_equal([x["package-error"] for x in packet_test], ["package-mempool-limits", "package-mempool-limits"])
expected_package_error = f"package-mempool-limits, package size {2*20*5000} exceeds ancestor size limit [limit: 101000]"
assert_equal([x["package-error"] for x in packet_test], [expected_package_error] * 2)
# When we actually try to submit, the parent makes it into the mempool, but the child would exceed ancestor vsize limits
res = self.nodes[0].submitpackage([tx_parent.serialize().hex(), tx_child.serialize().hex()])