mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-02-08 10:31:50 -05:00
Avoid explicitly computing diagram; compare based on chunks
This commit is contained in:
Pieter Wuille
parent
ba7c67f609
commit
b22901dfa9
9 changed files with 142 additions and 192 deletions
|
|
@ -191,13 +191,13 @@ std::optional<std::pair<DiagramCheckError, std::string>> ImprovesFeerateDiagram(
|
|||
int64_t replacement_vsize)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Require that the replacement strictly improves the mempool's feerate diagram.
|
||||
const auto diagram_results{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(replacement_fees, replacement_vsize, direct_conflicts, all_conflicts)};
|
||||
const auto chunk_results{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(replacement_fees, replacement_vsize, direct_conflicts, all_conflicts)};
|
||||
|
||||
if (!diagram_results.has_value()) {
|
||||
return std::make_pair(DiagramCheckError::UNCALCULABLE, util::ErrorString(diagram_results).original);
|
||||
if (!chunk_results.has_value()) {
|
||||
return std::make_pair(DiagramCheckError::UNCALCULABLE, util::ErrorString(chunk_results).original);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(diagram_results.value().second, diagram_results.value().first))) {
|
||||
if (!std::is_gt(CompareChunks(chunk_results.value().second, chunk_results.value().first))) {
|
||||
return std::make_pair(DiagramCheckError::FAILURE, "insufficient feerate: does not improve feerate diagram");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return std::nullopt;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -82,43 +82,4 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feefrac_operators)
|
|||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(build_diagram_test)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FeeFrac p1{1000, 100};
|
||||
FeeFrac empty{0, 0};
|
||||
FeeFrac zero_fee{0, 1};
|
||||
FeeFrac oversized_1{4611686000000, 4000000};
|
||||
FeeFrac oversized_2{184467440000000, 100000};
|
||||
|
||||
// Diagram-building will reorder chunks
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> chunks;
|
||||
chunks.push_back(p1);
|
||||
chunks.push_back(zero_fee);
|
||||
chunks.push_back(empty);
|
||||
chunks.push_back(oversized_1);
|
||||
chunks.push_back(oversized_2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Caller in charge of sorting chunks in case chunk size limit
|
||||
// differs from cluster size limit
|
||||
std::sort(chunks.begin(), chunks.end(), [](const FeeFrac& a, const FeeFrac& b) { return a > b; });
|
||||
|
||||
// Chunks are now sorted in reverse order (largest first)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chunks[0] == empty); // empty is considered "highest" fee
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chunks[1] == oversized_2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chunks[2] == oversized_1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chunks[3] == p1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(chunks[4] == zero_fee);
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> generated_diagram{BuildDiagramFromChunks(chunks)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram.size() == 1 + chunks.size());
|
||||
|
||||
// Prepended with an empty, then the chunks summed in order as above
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram[0] == empty);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram[1] == empty);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram[2] == oversized_2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram[3] == oversized_2 + oversized_1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram[4] == oversized_2 + oversized_1 + p1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(generated_diagram[5] == oversized_2 + oversized_1 + p1 + zero_fee);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -16,6 +16,20 @@
|
|||
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
|
||||
/** Takes the pre-computed and topologically-valid chunks and generates a fee diagram which starts at FeeFrac of (0, 0) */
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> BuildDiagramFromChunks(const Span<const FeeFrac> chunks)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> diagram;
|
||||
diagram.reserve(chunks.size() + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
diagram.emplace_back(0, 0);
|
||||
for (auto& chunk : chunks) {
|
||||
diagram.emplace_back(diagram.back() + chunk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return diagram;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/** Evaluate a diagram at a specific size, returning the fee as a fraction.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Fees in diagram cannot exceed 2^32, as the returned evaluation could overflow
|
||||
|
|
@ -103,7 +117,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(build_and_compare_feerate_diagram)
|
|||
assert(diagram1.front() == empty);
|
||||
assert(diagram2.front() == empty);
|
||||
|
||||
auto real = CompareFeerateDiagram(diagram1, diagram2);
|
||||
auto real = CompareChunks(chunks1, chunks2);
|
||||
auto sim = CompareDiagrams(diagram1, diagram2);
|
||||
assert(real == sim);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -82,17 +82,6 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(rbf, .init = initialize_rbf)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CheckDiagramConcave(std::vector<FeeFrac>& diagram)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Diagrams are in monotonically-decreasing feerate order.
|
||||
FeeFrac last_chunk = diagram.front();
|
||||
for (size_t i = 1; i<diagram.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
FeeFrac next_chunk = diagram[i] - diagram[i-1];
|
||||
assert(next_chunk <= last_chunk);
|
||||
last_chunk = next_chunk;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
FUZZ_TARGET(package_rbf, .init = initialize_package_rbf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data_provider(buffer.data(), buffer.size());
|
||||
|
|
@ -107,7 +96,7 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(package_rbf, .init = initialize_package_rbf)
|
|||
std::vector<CTransaction> mempool_txs;
|
||||
size_t iter{0};
|
||||
|
||||
int64_t replacement_vsize = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<int64_t>(1, 1000000);
|
||||
int32_t replacement_vsize = fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<int32_t>(1, 1000000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Keep track of the total vsize of CTxMemPoolEntry's being added to the mempool to avoid overflow
|
||||
// Add replacement_vsize since this is added to new diagram during RBF check
|
||||
|
|
@ -167,32 +156,33 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(package_rbf, .init = initialize_package_rbf)
|
|||
pool.CalculateDescendants(txiter, all_conflicts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Calculate the feerate diagrams for a replacement.
|
||||
// Calculate the chunks for a replacement.
|
||||
CAmount replacement_fees = ConsumeMoney(fuzzed_data_provider);
|
||||
auto calc_results{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(replacement_fees, replacement_vsize, direct_conflicts, all_conflicts)};
|
||||
auto calc_results{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(replacement_fees, replacement_vsize, direct_conflicts, all_conflicts)};
|
||||
|
||||
if (calc_results.has_value()) {
|
||||
// Sanity checks on the diagrams.
|
||||
// Sanity checks on the chunks.
|
||||
|
||||
// Diagrams start at 0.
|
||||
assert(calc_results->first.front().size == 0);
|
||||
assert(calc_results->first.front().fee == 0);
|
||||
assert(calc_results->second.front().size == 0);
|
||||
assert(calc_results->second.front().fee == 0);
|
||||
|
||||
CheckDiagramConcave(calc_results->first);
|
||||
CheckDiagramConcave(calc_results->second);
|
||||
|
||||
CAmount replaced_fee{0};
|
||||
int64_t replaced_size{0};
|
||||
for (auto txiter : all_conflicts) {
|
||||
replaced_fee += txiter->GetModifiedFee();
|
||||
replaced_size += txiter->GetTxSize();
|
||||
// Feerates are monotonically decreasing.
|
||||
FeeFrac first_sum;
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < calc_results->first.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
first_sum += calc_results->first[i];
|
||||
if (i) assert(!(calc_results->first[i - 1] << calc_results->first[i]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The total fee of the new diagram should be the total fee of the old
|
||||
// diagram - replaced_fee + replacement_fees
|
||||
assert(calc_results->first.back().fee - replaced_fee + replacement_fees == calc_results->second.back().fee);
|
||||
assert(calc_results->first.back().size - replaced_size + replacement_vsize == calc_results->second.back().size);
|
||||
FeeFrac second_sum;
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < calc_results->second.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
second_sum += calc_results->second[i];
|
||||
if (i) assert(!(calc_results->second[i - 1] << calc_results->second[i]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
FeeFrac replaced;
|
||||
for (auto txiter : all_conflicts) {
|
||||
replaced.fee += txiter->GetModifiedFee();
|
||||
replaced.size += txiter->GetTxSize();
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The total fee & size of the new diagram minus replaced fee & size should be the total
|
||||
// fee & size of the old diagram minus replacement fee & size.
|
||||
assert((first_sum - replaced) == (second_sum - FeeFrac{replacement_fees, replacement_vsize}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If internals report error, wrapper should too
|
||||
|
|
@ -201,10 +191,12 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(package_rbf, .init = initialize_package_rbf)
|
|||
assert(err_tuple.value().first == DiagramCheckError::UNCALCULABLE);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Diagram check succeeded
|
||||
auto old_sum = std::accumulate(calc_results->first.begin(), calc_results->first.end(), FeeFrac{});
|
||||
auto new_sum = std::accumulate(calc_results->second.begin(), calc_results->second.end(), FeeFrac{});
|
||||
if (!err_tuple.has_value()) {
|
||||
// New diagram's final fee should always match or exceed old diagram's
|
||||
assert(calc_results->first.back().fee <= calc_results->second.back().fee);
|
||||
} else if (calc_results->first.back().fee > calc_results->second.back().fee) {
|
||||
assert(old_sum.fee <= new_sum.fee);
|
||||
} else if (old_sum.fee > new_sum.fee) {
|
||||
// Or it failed, and if old diagram had higher fees, it should be a failure
|
||||
assert(err_tuple.value().first == DiagramCheckError::FAILURE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -426,21 +426,21 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
|
||||
// Replacement of size 1
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_one{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/0, /*replacement_vsize=*/1, {entry_low}, {entry_low})};
|
||||
const auto replace_one{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/0, /*replacement_vsize=*/1, {entry_low}, {entry_low})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one.has_value());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(low_fee, low_size)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one->first == expected_old_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(0, 1)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one->second == expected_new_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_chunks{{low_fee, low_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one->first == expected_old_chunks);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_chunks{{0, 1}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one->second == expected_new_chunks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Non-zero replacement fee/size
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_one_fee{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low})};
|
||||
const auto replace_one_fee{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one_fee.has_value());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(low_fee, low_size)};
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_diagram{{low_fee, low_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one_fee->first == expected_old_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size)};
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_diagram{{high_fee, low_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_one_fee->second == expected_new_diagram);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -451,22 +451,22 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
const auto high_size = entry_high->GetTxSize();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_single_chunk{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low, entry_high})};
|
||||
const auto replace_single_chunk{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low, entry_high})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_single_chunk.has_value());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size + high_size)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_single_chunk->first == expected_old_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_single_chunk->second == expected_new_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_chunks{{low_fee + high_fee, low_size + high_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_single_chunk->first == expected_old_chunks);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_chunks{{high_fee, low_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_single_chunk->second == expected_new_chunks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Conflict with the 2nd tx, resulting in new diagram with three entries
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_cpfp_child{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_high}, {entry_high})};
|
||||
const auto replace_cpfp_child{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_high}, {entry_high})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_cpfp_child.has_value());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size + high_size)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_cpfp_child->first == expected_old_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size), FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size + low_size)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_cpfp_child->second == expected_new_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_chunks{{low_fee + high_fee, low_size + high_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_cpfp_child->first == expected_old_chunks);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_chunks{{high_fee, low_size}, {low_fee, low_size}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_cpfp_child->second == expected_new_chunks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// third transaction causes the topology check to fail
|
||||
|
|
@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
const auto normal_size = entry_normal->GetTxSize();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_too_large{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/normal_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/normal_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low, entry_high, entry_normal})};
|
||||
const auto replace_too_large{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/normal_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/normal_size, {entry_low}, {entry_low, entry_high, entry_normal})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!replace_too_large.has_value());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(util::ErrorString(replace_too_large).original, strprintf("%s has 2 descendants, max 1 allowed", low_tx->GetHash().GetHex()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -493,12 +493,12 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
const auto low_size_2 = entry_low_2->GetTxSize();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_two_chunks_single_cluster{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_high_2}, {entry_high_2, entry_low_2})};
|
||||
const auto replace_two_chunks_single_cluster{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {entry_high_2}, {entry_high_2, entry_low_2})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_two_chunks_single_cluster.has_value());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(high_fee, high_size_2), FeeFrac(low_fee + high_fee, low_size_2 + high_size_2)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_two_chunks_single_cluster->first == expected_old_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_diagram{FeeFrac(0, 0), FeeFrac(high_fee, low_size_2)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_two_chunks_single_cluster->second == expected_new_diagram);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_old_chunks{{high_fee, high_size_2}, {low_fee, low_size_2}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_two_chunks_single_cluster->first == expected_old_chunks);
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> expected_new_chunks{{high_fee, low_size_2}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_two_chunks_single_cluster->second == expected_new_chunks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// You can have more than two direct conflicts if the there are multiple affected clusters, all of size 2 or less
|
||||
|
|
@ -515,10 +515,10 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
const auto conflict_3_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_3->GetHash()).value();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_multiple_clusters{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry})};
|
||||
const auto replace_multiple_clusters{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry})};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters.has_value());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters->first.size() == 4);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters->second.size() == 2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters->first.size() == 3);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters->second.size() == 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a child transaction to conflict_1 and make it cluster size 2, two chunks due to same feerate
|
||||
|
|
@ -527,11 +527,11 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
const auto conflict_1_child_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_1_child->GetHash()).value();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_multiple_clusters_2{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry, conflict_1_child_entry})};
|
||||
const auto replace_multiple_clusters_2{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry, conflict_1_child_entry})};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters_2.has_value());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters_2->first.size() == 5);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters_2->second.size() == 2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters_2->first.size() == 4);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(replace_multiple_clusters_2->second.size() == 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add another descendant to conflict_1, making the cluster size > 2 should fail at this point.
|
||||
|
|
@ -540,86 +540,86 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(calc_feerate_diagram_rbf, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
const auto conflict_1_grand_child_entry = pool.GetIter(conflict_1_child->GetHash()).value();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
const auto replace_cluster_size_3{pool.CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry, conflict_1_child_entry, conflict_1_grand_child_entry})};
|
||||
const auto replace_cluster_size_3{pool.CalculateChunksForRBF(/*replacement_fees=*/high_fee, /*replacement_vsize=*/low_size, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry}, {conflict_1_entry, conflict_2_entry, conflict_3_entry, conflict_1_child_entry, conflict_1_grand_child_entry})};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!replace_cluster_size_3.has_value());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(util::ErrorString(replace_cluster_size_3).original, strprintf("%s has 2 descendants, max 1 allowed", conflict_1->GetHash().GetHex()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_diagram_utilities)
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_chunks_utilities)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Sanity check the correctness of the feerate diagram comparison.
|
||||
// Sanity check the correctness of the feerate chunks comparison.
|
||||
|
||||
// A strictly better case.
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> old_diagram{{FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}}};
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> new_diagram{{FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1000, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}}};
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> old_chunks{{{950, 300}, {100, 100}}};
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> new_chunks{{{1000, 300}, {50, 100}}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Incomparable diagrams
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1000, 300}, FeeFrac{1000, 400}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{1000, 300}, {0, 100}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
|
||||
// Strictly better but smaller size.
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1100, 300}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{1100, 300}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// New diagram is strictly better due to the first chunk, even though
|
||||
// second chunk contributes no fees
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1100, 100}, FeeFrac{1100, 200}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{1100, 100}, {0, 100}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Feerate of first new chunk is better with, but second chunk is worse
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{750, 100}, FeeFrac{999, 350}, FeeFrac{1150, 1000}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{750, 100}, {249, 250}, {151, 650}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we make the second chunk slightly better, the new diagram now wins.
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{750, 100}, FeeFrac{1000, 350}, FeeFrac{1150, 500}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{750, 100}, {250, 250}, {150, 150}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Identical diagrams, cannot be strictly better
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_eq(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_eq(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_eq(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_eq(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Same aggregate fee, but different total size (trigger single tail fee check step)
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 399}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 99}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}};
|
||||
|
||||
// No change in evaluation when tail check needed.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Trigger multiple tail fee check steps
|
||||
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 399}};
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}, FeeFrac{1050, 401}, FeeFrac{1050, 402}};
|
||||
old_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 99}};
|
||||
new_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks)));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks)));
|
||||
|
||||
// Multiple tail fee check steps, unordered result
|
||||
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}, FeeFrac{1050, 401}, FeeFrac{1050, 402}, FeeFrac{1051, 403}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
new_chunks = {{950, 300}, {100, 100}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareChunks(old_chunks, new_chunks) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(CompareChunks(new_chunks, old_chunks) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ std::optional<std::string> CTxMemPool::CheckConflictTopology(const setEntries& d
|
|||
return std::nullopt;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
util::Result<std::pair<std::vector<FeeFrac>, std::vector<FeeFrac>>> CTxMemPool::CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(CAmount replacement_fees, int64_t replacement_vsize, const setEntries& direct_conflicts, const setEntries& all_conflicts)
|
||||
util::Result<std::pair<std::vector<FeeFrac>, std::vector<FeeFrac>>> CTxMemPool::CalculateChunksForRBF(CAmount replacement_fees, int64_t replacement_vsize, const setEntries& direct_conflicts, const setEntries& all_conflicts)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assume(replacement_vsize > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1335,7 +1335,6 @@ util::Result<std::pair<std::vector<FeeFrac>, std::vector<FeeFrac>>> CTxMemPool::
|
|||
|
||||
// No topology restrictions post-chunking; sort
|
||||
std::sort(old_chunks.begin(), old_chunks.end(), std::greater());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> old_diagram = BuildDiagramFromChunks(old_chunks);
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> new_chunks;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1365,6 +1364,5 @@ util::Result<std::pair<std::vector<FeeFrac>, std::vector<FeeFrac>>> CTxMemPool::
|
|||
|
||||
// No topology restrictions post-chunking; sort
|
||||
std::sort(new_chunks.begin(), new_chunks.end(), std::greater());
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> new_diagram = BuildDiagramFromChunks(new_chunks);
|
||||
return std::make_pair(old_diagram, new_diagram);
|
||||
return std::make_pair(old_chunks, new_chunks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ public:
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Calculate the old and new mempool feerate diagrams relating to the
|
||||
* Calculate the sorted chunks for the old and new mempool relating to the
|
||||
* clusters that would be affected by a potential replacement transaction.
|
||||
* (replacement_fees, replacement_vsize) values are gathered from a
|
||||
* proposed set of replacement transactions that are considered as a single
|
||||
|
|
@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ public:
|
|||
* @param[in] all_conflicts All transactions that would be removed
|
||||
* @return old and new diagram pair respectively, or an error string if the conflicts don't match a calculable topology
|
||||
*/
|
||||
util::Result<std::pair<std::vector<FeeFrac>, std::vector<FeeFrac>>> CalculateFeerateDiagramsForRBF(CAmount replacement_fees, int64_t replacement_vsize, const setEntries& direct_conflicts, const setEntries& all_conflicts) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
|
||||
util::Result<std::pair<std::vector<FeeFrac>, std::vector<FeeFrac>>> CalculateChunksForRBF(CAmount replacement_fees, int64_t replacement_vsize, const setEntries& direct_conflicts, const setEntries& all_conflicts) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check that all direct conflicts are in a cluster size of two or less. Each
|
||||
* direct conflict may be in a separate cluster.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,39 +7,26 @@
|
|||
#include <array>
|
||||
#include <vector>
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> BuildDiagramFromChunks(const Span<const FeeFrac> chunks)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> diagram;
|
||||
diagram.reserve(chunks.size() + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
diagram.emplace_back(0, 0);
|
||||
for (auto& chunk : chunks) {
|
||||
diagram.emplace_back(diagram.back() + chunk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return diagram;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::partial_ordering CompareFeerateDiagram(Span<const FeeFrac> dia0, Span<const FeeFrac> dia1)
|
||||
std::partial_ordering CompareChunks(Span<const FeeFrac> chunks0, Span<const FeeFrac> chunks1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/** Array to allow indexed access to input diagrams. */
|
||||
const std::array<Span<const FeeFrac>, 2> dias = {dia0, dia1};
|
||||
const std::array<Span<const FeeFrac>, 2> chunk = {chunks0, chunks1};
|
||||
/** How many elements we have processed in each input. */
|
||||
size_t next_index[2] = {1, 1};
|
||||
size_t next_index[2] = {0, 0};
|
||||
/** Accumulated fee/sizes in diagrams, up to next_index[i] - 1. */
|
||||
FeeFrac accum[2];
|
||||
/** Whether the corresponding input is strictly better than the other at least in one place. */
|
||||
bool better_somewhere[2] = {false, false};
|
||||
/** Get the first unprocessed point in diagram number dia. */
|
||||
const auto next_point = [&](int dia) { return dias[dia][next_index[dia]]; };
|
||||
const auto next_point = [&](int dia) { return chunk[dia][next_index[dia]] + accum[dia]; };
|
||||
/** Get the last processed point in diagram number dia. */
|
||||
const auto prev_point = [&](int dia) { return dias[dia][next_index[dia] - 1]; };
|
||||
|
||||
// Diagrams should be non-empty, and first elements zero in size and fee
|
||||
Assert(!dia0.empty() && !dia1.empty());
|
||||
Assert(prev_point(0).IsEmpty());
|
||||
Assert(prev_point(1).IsEmpty());
|
||||
const auto prev_point = [&](int dia) { return accum[dia]; };
|
||||
/** Move to the next point in diagram number dia. */
|
||||
const auto advance = [&](int dia) { accum[dia] += chunk[dia][next_index[dia]++]; };
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
bool done_0 = next_index[0] == dias[0].size();
|
||||
bool done_1 = next_index[1] == dias[1].size();
|
||||
bool done_0 = next_index[0] == chunk[0].size();
|
||||
bool done_1 = next_index[1] == chunk[1].size();
|
||||
if (done_0 && done_1) break;
|
||||
|
||||
// Determine which diagram has the first unprocessed point. If a single side is finished, use the
|
||||
|
|
@ -69,17 +56,16 @@ std::partial_ordering CompareFeerateDiagram(Span<const FeeFrac> dia0, Span<const
|
|||
|
||||
// If B and P have the same size, B can be marked as processed (in addition to P, see
|
||||
// below), as we've already performed a comparison at this size.
|
||||
if (point_b.size == point_p.size) ++next_index[!unproc_side];
|
||||
if (point_b.size == point_p.size) advance(!unproc_side);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If P lies above AB, unproc_side is better in P. If P lies below AB, then !unproc_side is
|
||||
// better in P.
|
||||
if (std::is_gt(cmp)) better_somewhere[unproc_side] = true;
|
||||
if (std::is_lt(cmp)) better_somewhere[!unproc_side] = true;
|
||||
++next_index[unproc_side];
|
||||
advance(unproc_side);
|
||||
|
||||
// If both diagrams are better somewhere, they are incomparable.
|
||||
if (better_somewhere[0] && better_somewhere[1]) return std::partial_ordering::unordered;
|
||||
|
||||
} while(true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise compare the better_somewhere values.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -146,15 +146,14 @@ struct FeeFrac
|
|||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/** Takes the pre-computed and topologically-valid chunks and generates a fee diagram which starts at FeeFrac of (0, 0) */
|
||||
std::vector<FeeFrac> BuildDiagramFromChunks(Span<const FeeFrac> chunks);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Compares two feerate diagrams. The shorter one is implicitly
|
||||
* extended with a horizontal straight line.
|
||||
/** Compare the feerate diagrams implied by the provided sorted chunks data.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A feerate diagram consists of a list of (fee, size) points with the property that size
|
||||
* is strictly increasing and that the first entry is (0, 0).
|
||||
* The implied diagram for each starts at (0, 0), then contains for each chunk the cumulative fee
|
||||
* and size up to that chunk, and then extends infinitely to the right with a horizontal line.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The caller must guarantee that the sum of the FeeFracs in either of the chunks' data set do not
|
||||
* overflow (so sum fees < 2^63, and sum sizes < 2^31).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
std::partial_ordering CompareFeerateDiagram(Span<const FeeFrac> dia0, Span<const FeeFrac> dia1);
|
||||
std::partial_ordering CompareChunks(Span<const FeeFrac> chunks0, Span<const FeeFrac> chunks1);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif // BITCOIN_UTIL_FEEFRAC_H
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue