mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-02-09 10:43:19 -05:00
[net processing] Don't add AlreadyHave txs to recentRejects
Now, we only add a transaction to our recentRejects filter if we didn't already have it, meaning that it is added at most once, as intended.
This commit is contained in:
parent
55b1ffcd25
commit
d419fdedbe
2 changed files with 29 additions and 20 deletions
|
@ -2946,13 +2946,9 @@ void PeerManager::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDat
|
||||||
pfrom.AddKnownTx(txid);
|
pfrom.AddKnownTx(txid);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TxValidationState state;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
m_txrequest.ReceivedResponse(pfrom.GetId(), txid);
|
m_txrequest.ReceivedResponse(pfrom.GetId(), txid);
|
||||||
if (tx.HasWitness()) m_txrequest.ReceivedResponse(pfrom.GetId(), wtxid);
|
if (tx.HasWitness()) m_txrequest.ReceivedResponse(pfrom.GetId(), wtxid);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> lRemovedTxn;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// We do the AlreadyHaveTx() check using wtxid, rather than txid - in the
|
// We do the AlreadyHaveTx() check using wtxid, rather than txid - in the
|
||||||
// absence of witness malleation, this is strictly better, because the
|
// absence of witness malleation, this is strictly better, because the
|
||||||
// recent rejects filter may contain the wtxid but rarely contains
|
// recent rejects filter may contain the wtxid but rarely contains
|
||||||
|
@ -2965,8 +2961,25 @@ void PeerManager::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDat
|
||||||
// already; and an adversary can already relay us old transactions
|
// already; and an adversary can already relay us old transactions
|
||||||
// (older than our recency filter) if trying to DoS us, without any need
|
// (older than our recency filter) if trying to DoS us, without any need
|
||||||
// for witness malleation.
|
// for witness malleation.
|
||||||
if (!AlreadyHaveTx(GenTxid(/* is_wtxid=*/true, wtxid), m_mempool) &&
|
if (AlreadyHaveTx(GenTxid(/* is_wtxid=*/true, wtxid), m_mempool)) {
|
||||||
AcceptToMemoryPool(m_mempool, state, ptx, &lRemovedTxn, false /* bypass_limits */)) {
|
if (pfrom.HasPermission(PF_FORCERELAY)) {
|
||||||
|
// Always relay transactions received from peers with forcerelay
|
||||||
|
// permission, even if they were already in the mempool, allowing
|
||||||
|
// the node to function as a gateway for nodes hidden behind it.
|
||||||
|
if (!m_mempool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
|
||||||
|
LogPrintf("Not relaying non-mempool transaction %s from forcerelay peer=%d\n", tx.GetHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
LogPrintf("Force relaying tx %s from peer=%d\n", tx.GetHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
|
||||||
|
RelayTransaction(tx.GetHash(), tx.GetWitnessHash(), m_connman);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TxValidationState state;
|
||||||
|
std::list<CTransactionRef> lRemovedTxn;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (AcceptToMemoryPool(m_mempool, state, ptx, &lRemovedTxn, false /* bypass_limits */)) {
|
||||||
m_mempool.check(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
|
m_mempool.check(&::ChainstateActive().CoinsTip());
|
||||||
// As this version of the transaction was acceptable, we can forget about any
|
// As this version of the transaction was acceptable, we can forget about any
|
||||||
// requests for it.
|
// requests for it.
|
||||||
|
@ -3088,19 +3101,6 @@ void PeerManager::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDat
|
||||||
AddToCompactExtraTransactions(ptx);
|
AddToCompactExtraTransactions(ptx);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (pfrom.HasPermission(PF_FORCERELAY)) {
|
|
||||||
// Always relay transactions received from peers with forcerelay permission, even
|
|
||||||
// if they were already in the mempool,
|
|
||||||
// allowing the node to function as a gateway for
|
|
||||||
// nodes hidden behind it.
|
|
||||||
if (!m_mempool.exists(tx.GetHash())) {
|
|
||||||
LogPrintf("Not relaying non-mempool transaction %s from forcerelay peer=%d\n", tx.GetHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
LogPrintf("Force relaying tx %s from peer=%d\n", tx.GetHash().ToString(), pfrom.GetId());
|
|
||||||
RelayTransaction(tx.GetHash(), tx.GetWitnessHash(), m_connman);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// If a tx has been detected by recentRejects, we will have reached
|
// If a tx has been detected by recentRejects, we will have reached
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -153,11 +153,20 @@ class P2PPermissionsTests(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||||
self.log.debug("Check that node[1] will not send an invalid tx to node[0]")
|
self.log.debug("Check that node[1] will not send an invalid tx to node[0]")
|
||||||
tx.vout[0].nValue += 1
|
tx.vout[0].nValue += 1
|
||||||
txid = tx.rehash()
|
txid = tx.rehash()
|
||||||
|
# Send the transaction twice. The first time, it'll be rejected by ATMP because it conflicts
|
||||||
|
# with a mempool transaction. The second time, it'll be in the recentRejects filter.
|
||||||
p2p_rebroadcast_wallet.send_txs_and_test(
|
p2p_rebroadcast_wallet.send_txs_and_test(
|
||||||
[tx],
|
[tx],
|
||||||
self.nodes[1],
|
self.nodes[1],
|
||||||
success=False,
|
success=False,
|
||||||
reject_reason='Not relaying non-mempool transaction {} from forcerelay peer=0'.format(txid),
|
reject_reason='{} from peer=0 was not accepted: txn-mempool-conflict'.format(txid)
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
p2p_rebroadcast_wallet.send_txs_and_test(
|
||||||
|
[tx],
|
||||||
|
self.nodes[1],
|
||||||
|
success=False,
|
||||||
|
reject_reason='Not relaying non-mempool transaction {} from forcerelay peer=0'.format(txid)
|
||||||
)
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def checkpermission(self, args, expectedPermissions, whitelisted):
|
def checkpermission(self, args, expectedPermissions, whitelisted):
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue