f2fc03ec85 refactor: use braced init for integer constants instead of c style casts (Pasta)
Pull request description:
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23810 for more context. This is broken out from that PR, as it is less breaking, and should be trivial to review and merge.
EDIT: Long term, the intention is to remove all C-style casts, as they can dangerously introduce reinterpret_casts. This is one step which removes a number of trivially removable C-style casts
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK f2fc03ec85
Tree-SHA512: 2fd11b92c9147e3f970ec3e130e3b3dce70e707ff02950a8c697d4b111ddcbbfa16915393db20cfc8f384bc76f13241c9b994a187987fcecd16a61f8cc0af14c
21ad4e26ec test: add coverage for cross-chain wallet restore (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8c7222bda3 wallet: fix GUI crash on cross-chain legacy wallet restore (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Restoring a wallet backup from another chain should result in a dedicated error message (we have _"Wallet files should not be reused across chains. Restart bitcoind with -walletcrosschain to override."_ for that). Unfortunately this is currently not the case for legacy wallet restores, as in the course of cleaning up the newly created wallet directory a `filesystem_error` exception is thrown due to the directory not being empty; the wallet database did indeed load successfully (otherwise we wouldn't know that the chain doesn't match) and hence BDB-related files and directories are already created in the wallet directory.
For bitcoind, this leads to a very confusing error message:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli restorewallet test123 ~/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/regtest_wallet/wallet.dat
error code: -1
error message: filesystem error: in remove: Directory not empty ["/home/thestack/.bitcoin/wallets/test123"]
```
Even worse, the GUI crashes in such a scenario:
```
libc++abi: terminating with uncaught exception of type std::__1::__fs::filesystem::filesystem_error: filesystem error: in remove: Directory not empty ["/home/thestack/.bitcoin/wallets/foobar"]
Abort trap (core dumped)
```
Fix this by simply deleting the whole folder via `fs::remove_all`. With this, the expected error message appears both for the `restorewallet` RPC call and in the GUI (as a message-box):
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli restorewallet test123 ~/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/regtest_wallet/wallet.dat
error code: -4
error message:
Wallet loading failed. Wallet files should not be reused across chains. Restart bitcoind with -walletcrosschain to override.
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 21ad4e26ec
aureleoules:
ACK 21ad4e26ec
furszy:
utACK 21ad4e26
Tree-SHA512: 313f6494c2fbe823bff9b975cb2d9410bb518977a1e59a5159ee9836bc012947fa50b56be0e41b1a2f50d9c0c7f4fddfdf4fbe479d8a59a6ee44bb389c804abc
55696a0ac3 wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` (w0xlt)
bf19069c53 wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionAddedToMempool` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR removes `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` and `transactionAddedToMempool`.
`mempool_sequence` is not used in these methods, only in ZMQ notifications.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 55696a0ac3
Tree-SHA512: 621e89230bcb6edfed83e2758601a2b093822fc2dc4e9bfb00487e340f2bc4c5ac3bf6df3ca00b7fe55bb3df15858820f2bf698f403d2e48b915dd9eb47b63e0
927b8d4e0c rpc: Correct RPCHelpMan for fundrawtransaction's input_weights field (jdjkelly@gmail.com)
Pull request description:
`input_weights` is incorrectly documented as a fixed length JSON array, but it is actually a JSON array of JSON objects - this commit changes `input_weights` to use `RPCArg::Type::OBJ`
The behavior of `input_weights` as an object exists as a functional test in [wallet_fundrawtransaction.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 927b8d4e0c
Tree-SHA512: 384f5e16be36dba670d64d96f16f1fde2d0d51357e1094ae13eb71d004af0f4dc8bac965b4d2d724ccf64fb671faad37b73055152a9882af24f65dfceaf1e5fb
76dc547ee7 gui: create tx, launch error dialog if backend throws runtime_error (furszy)
f4d79477ff wallet: coin selection, add duplicated inputs checks (furszy)
0aa065b14e wallet: return accurate error messages from Coin Selection (furszy)
7e8340ab1a wallet: make SelectCoins flow return util::Result (furszy)
e5e147fe97 wallet: refactor eight consecutive 'AttemptSelection' calls into a loop (furszy)
Pull request description:
Work decoupled from #25806, which cleanup and improves the Coin Selection flow further.
Adding the capability to propagate specific error messages from the Coin Selection process to the user.
Instead of always returning the general "Insufficient funds" message which is not always accurate to what happened internally.
Letting us instruct the user how to proceed under certain circumstances.
The following error messages were added:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return:
-> "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight. Please try sending
a smaller amount or manually consolidating your wallet's UTXOs".
2) If the user pre-selected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return:
-> "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the transaction
target. Please allow other inputs to be automatically selected or include
more coins manually".
3) The double-counted preset inputs during Coin Selection error will now
throw an "internal bug detected" message instead of crashing the node.
The essence of this work comes from several comments:
1. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26560#discussion_r1037395665
2. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729#discussion_r940619491
3. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25269#pullrequestreview-1135240825
4. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23144 (which is connected to #24845)
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
crACK 76dc547ee7
achow101:
ACK 76dc547ee7
aureleoules:
ACK 76dc547ee7
theStack:
ACK 76dc547ee7🌇
Tree-SHA512: 9de30792d7a5849cae77747aa978e70390b66ee9d082779a56088a024f82e725b0af050e6603aece0ac8229f6d73bc471ba97b4ab69dc7eddf419f5f56ae89a5
04609284ad rpc: Improve error when wallet is already loaded (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Currently, trying to load a descriptor (sqlite) wallet that is already loaded throws the following error:
> error code: -4
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. SQLiteDatabase: Unable to obtain an exclusive lock on the database, is it being used by another instance of Bitcoin Core?
I don't think it is very clear what it means for a user.
While a legacy wallet would throw:
> error code: -35
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. Refusing to load database. Data file '/home/user/.bitcoin/signet/wallets/test_wallet/wallet.dat' is already loaded.
This PR changes the error message for both types of wallet to:
> error code: -35
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. Wallet "test_wallet" is already loaded.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 04609284ad
hernanmarino:
ACK 0460928
theStack:
Tested ACK 04609284ad
Tree-SHA512: a8f3d5133bfaef7417a6c05d160910ea08f32ac62bfdf7f5ec305ff5b62e9113b55f385abab4d5a4ad711aabcb1eb7ef746eb41f841b196e8fb5393ab3ccc01e
9622fe64b8 test: move coins result test to wallet_tests.cpp (furszy)
f69347d058 test: extend and simplify availablecoins_tests (furszy)
212ccdf2c2 wallet: AvailableCoins, add arg to include/skip locked coins (furszy)
Pull request description:
Negative PR with extended test coverage :).
1) Cleaned duplicated code and added coverage for the 'AvailableCoins' incremental result.
2) The class `AvailableCoinsTestingSetup` inside `availablecoins_tests.cpp` is a plain copy
of `ListCoinsTestingSetup` that is inside `wallet_tests.cpp`.
So, deleted the file and moved the `BasicOutputTypesTest` test case to `wallet_tests.cpp`.
3) Added arg to include/skip locked coins from the `AvailableCoins` result. This is needed for point (1) as otherwise the wallet will spend the coins that we recently created due its closeness to the recipient amount.
Note: this last point comes from #25659 where I'm using the same functionality to clean/speedup another flow as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9622fe64b8
theStack:
ACK 9622fe64b8
aureleoules:
reACK 9622fe64b8, nice cleanup!
Tree-SHA512: 1ed9133120bfe8815455d1ad317bb0ff96e11a0cc34ee8098716ab9b001749168fa649212b2fa14b330c1686cb1f29039ff1f88ae306db68881b0428c038f388
81d4a2b14f refactor: Move feerate comparison invariant outside of the loop (yancy)
365aca4045 refactor: Simplify feerate comparison statement (yancy)
Pull request description:
This is a small nit, however I think it's more understandable to write:
`utxo_pool.at(0).fee > utxo_pool.at(0).long_term_fee`
vs
`(utxo_pool.at(0).fee - utxo_pool.at(0).long_term_fee) > 0`
ACKs for top commit:
Xekyo:
ACK 81d4a2b14f
achow101:
ACK 81d4a2b14f
aureleoules:
ACK 81d4a2b14f
Tree-SHA512: 3e89377989c36716b53114fe40178261671dde5688075fab1c21ec173ac310f8c84ed6af90354d7c329176cb7262dfcaa7191fd19847d3b7147a9a10c3e31176
f496528556 walletdb: refactor: drop unused `FindWalletTx` parameter and rename (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Since commit 3340dbadd3 ("Remove -zapwallettxes"), the `FindWalletTx` helper is only needed to read tx hashes, so drop the other parameter and rename the method accordingly.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
code review ACK f496528556
achow101:
ACK f496528556
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK f496528556
Tree-SHA512: ead85bc724462f9e920f9d7fe89679931361187579ffd6e63427c8bf5305cd5f71da24ed84f3b1bd22a12be46b5abec13f11822e71a3e1a63bf6cf49de950ab5
input_weights is incorrectly documented as a fixed length JSON array,
but it is actually a JSON array of JSON objects - this commit changes
input_weights to use RPCArg::Type::OBJ
The field 'comment' appears twice in TransactionDescriptionString,
incorrectly - this commit removes the instance of the comment field
without a description, preserving the one with a description
Currently `migratewallet` migrates the address book (i.e. labels and
purposes) for watchonly and solvable wallets only in RAM, but doesn't
persist them on disk. Fix this by adding another loop for both of the
special wallet types after which writes the corresponding NAME and
PURPOSE entries to the database in a single batch.
Restoring a wallet backup from another chain should obviously result
in a dedicated error message (we have "Wallet files should not be
reused across chains. Restart bitcoind with -walletcrosschain to
override." for that). Unfortunately this is currently not the case
for legacy wallet restores, as in the course of cleaning up the
newly created wallet directory a `filesystem_error` exception is
thrown due to the directory not being empty; the wallet database did
indeed load successfully (otherwise we wouldn't know that the chain doesn't
match) and hence BDB-related files and directories are created in the wallet
directory.
For bitcoind, this leads to a very confusing error message:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli restorewallet test123 ~/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/regtest_wallet/wallet.dat
error code: -1
error message: filesystem error: in remove: Directory not empty ["/home/thestack/.bitcoin/wallets/test123"]
```
Even worse, the GUI crashes in such a scenario:
```
libc++abi: terminating with uncaught exception of type std::__1::__fs::filesystem::filesystem_error: filesystem error: in remove: Directory not empty ["/home/thestack/.bitcoin/wallets/foobar"]
Abort trap (core dumped)
```
Fix this by simply deleting the whole folder via `fs::remove_all`.
As no process should be able to trigger this error
using the regular transaction creation process, throw
a runtime_error if happens to tell users/devs to
report the bug if happens.
and not the general "Insufficient funds" when the wallet
actually have funds.
Two new error messages:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return: "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight".
2) If the user preselected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return: "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the
transaction target".
564b580bf0 test: Introduce MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP constant (Aurèle Oulès)
71d9a7c03b test: Wallet imports on pruned nodes (Aurèle Oulès)
e6906fcf9e rpc: Enable wallet import on pruned nodes (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Reopens #16037
I have rebased the PR, addressed the comments of the original PR and added a functional test.
> Before this change importwallet fails if any block is pruned. This PR makes it possible to importwallet if all required blocks aren't pruned. This is possible because the dump format includes key timestamps.
For reviewers:
`python test/functional/wallet_pruning.py --nocleanup` will generate a large blockchain (~700MB) that can be used to manually test wallet imports on a pruned node. Node0 is not pruned, while node1 is.
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
ACK 564b580bf0
achow101:
reACK 564b580bf0
furszy:
ACK 564b580
w0xlt:
ACK 564b580bf0
Tree-SHA512: b345a6c455fcb6581cdaa5f7a55d79e763a55cb08c81d66be5b12794985d79cd51b9b39bdcd0f7ba0a2a2643e9b2ddc49310ff03d16b430df2f74e990800eabf
Next()'s result is a tri-state - failed, more to go, complete. Replace
the way that this is returned with an enum with values FAIL, MORE, and
DONE rather than with two booleans.
To be eligible for fee-bumping, a transaction must not have any
of its outputs (eg - change) spent in other unconfirmed transactions
in the wallet. However, this check should not apply to abandoned
transactions.
A new test case is added to cover this case.
Since commit 3340dbadd3 ("Remove
-zapwallettxes"), the `FindWalletTx` helper is only needed to read tx
hashes, so drop the other parameter and rename the method accordingly.
89c1491d35 wallet: if only have one output type, don't perform "mixed" coin selection (furszy)
Pull request description:
For wallets that only have one output type, we are currently performing the same
selection process over the same coins twice.
The "mixed coin selection" doesn't add any value to the result
(there is nothing to mix if the available coins struct has only one type).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 89c1491d35
john-moffett:
ACK 89c1491d35
kristapsk:
cr utACK 89c1491d35
Tree-SHA512: 672eaeed3ba911d13fa61a46f719c8fe1ebe4d2dc7d723040e71937c693659411bc99cdbd9f0014e836b70eebeff1b8ca861f4d81d39e6f79f437364a526edbe
Instead of having DatabaseBatch deal with opening and closing database
cursors, have a separate RAII class that deals with those.
For now, DatabaseBatch manages DatabaseCursor, but this will change
later.
If a wallet has key birthdates that are more recent than the currrent
chain tip, or a bestblock height higher than the current tip, we should
not attempt to rescan as there is nothing to scan for.
798430d127 wallet: Sanity check fee paid cannot be negative (Andrew Chow)
c1a84f108e wallet: Move fee underpayment check to after fee setting (Andrew Chow)
e5daf976d5 wallet: Rename nFeeRet in CreateTransactionInternal to current_fee (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the fee underpayment check occurs right after we calculate what the transaction's fee should be. However the fee paid by the transaction at that time does not always match. Notably, when doing SFFO, the fee paid at that time will almost always be less than the fee required, which then required having a bypass of the underpayment check that results in SFFO payments going through when they should not.
This PR moves the underpayment check to after fees have been finalized so that we always check whether the fee is being underpaid. This removes the exception for SFFO and unifies this behavior for both SFFO and non-SFFO txs.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
Code review ACK 798430d127
furszy:
Code review ACK 798430d
glozow:
utACK 798430d127, code looks correct to me
Tree-SHA512: 720e8a3dbdc9937b12ee7881eb2ad58332c9584520da87ef3080e6f9d6220ce8d3bd8b9317b4877e56a229113437340852976db8f64df0d5cc50723fa04b02f0
We need to check that the fee is not negative even before it is
finalized. The setting of fees for SFFO may adjust the fee to be
"correct" and no longer negative, but erroneously reduce the amounts too
far. So we need to check this condition before we do those adjustments.
It doesn't make sense to be checking whether the fee paid is underpaying
before we've finished setting the fees. So do that after we have done
the reduction for SFFO and change adjustment for fee overpayment.
4e362c2b72 doc: add release note for 25934 (brunoerg)
fe488b4c4b test: add coverage for `label` in `listsinceblock` (brunoerg)
722e9a418d wallet, rpc: add `label` to `listsinceblock` (brunoerg)
852891ff98 refactor, wallet: use optional for `label` in `ListTransactions` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds `label` parameter to `listsinceblock` to be able to fetch all incoming transactions having the specified label since a specific block.
It's possible to use it in `listtransactions`, however, it's only possible to set the number of transactions to return, not a specific block to fetch from. `getreceivedbylabel` only returns the total amount received, not the txs info. `listreceivedbylabel` doesn't list all the informations about the transactions and it's not possible to fetch since a block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4e362c2b72
w0xlt:
ACK 4e362c2b72
aureleoules:
ACK 4e362c2b72
Tree-SHA512: fbde5db8cebf7a27804154fa61997b5155ad512e978cebb78c17acab9efcb624ea5f39d649899d12e5e675f80d4d0064cae8132b864de0d93a8d1e6fbcb9a737
b19c4124b3 refactor: Rename ambiguous interfaces::MakeHandler functions (Ryan Ofsky)
dd6e8bd71c build: remove BOOST_CPPFLAGS from libbitcoin_util (fanquake)
82e272a109 refactor: Move src/interfaces/*.cpp files to libbitcoin_common.a (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
These belong in `libbitcoin_common.a`, not `libbitcoin_util.a`, because they aren't general-purpose utilities, they just contain some common glue code that is used by both the node and the wallet. Another reason not to include these in `libbitcoin_util.a` is to prevent them from being used by the kernel library.
Also rename ambiguous `MakeHandler` functions to `MakeCleanupHandler` and `MakeSignalHandler`. Cleanup function handler was introduced after boost signals handler, so original naming didn't make much sense.
This just contains a move-only commit, and a rename commit. There are no actual code or behavior changes.
This PR is an alternative to #26293, and solves the same issue of removing a boost dependency from the _util_ library. The advantages of this PR compared to #26293 are that it keeps the source directory structure more flat, and it avoids having to change #includes all over the codebase.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK b19c4124b3
Tree-SHA512: b3a1d33eedceda7ad852c6d6f35700159d156d96071e59acae2bc325467fef81476f860a8855ea39cf3ea706a1df2a341f34fb2dcb032c31a3b0e9cf14103b6a
