0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-10 10:52:31 -05:00
Commit graph

109 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
furszy
111ea3ab71
wallet: refactor GetNewDestination, use BResult 2022-07-08 11:18:35 -03:00
furszy
22351725bc
send: refactor CreateTransaction flow to return a BResult<CTransactionRef> 2022-07-08 11:18:35 -03:00
furszy
198fcca162
wallet: refactor, include 'FeeCalculation' inside 'CreatedTransactionResult' 2022-07-08 11:18:35 -03:00
Andrew Chow
b9f9ed4640
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25337: refactor: encapsulate wallet's address book access
d69045e291 test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a642 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122f refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499 refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae41 wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)

Pull request description:

  ### Context

  The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.

  ### Problem

  Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.

  ### Solution

  Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.

  -------------------------------------------------------

  Extra Note:

  This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK d69045e291
  theStack:
    ACK d69045e291 
  w0xlt:
    ACK d69045e291

Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a
2022-07-08 10:16:08 -04:00
furszy
324f00a642
refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address
Plus remove open bracket jump line
2022-06-22 12:51:30 -03:00
furszy
b459fc122f
refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access 2022-06-22 12:51:30 -03:00
furszy
fa9f2ab8fd
refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality
Mainly to not access 'm_address_book' externally.
2022-06-22 12:51:30 -03:00
furszy
83e42c4b94
refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' 2022-06-21 10:23:20 -03:00
furszy
09649bc95d
refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup 2022-06-21 10:23:20 -03:00
furszy
d338712886
scripted-diff: rename fAllowOtherInputs -> m_allow_other_inputs
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/fAllowOtherInputs/m_allow_other_inputs/g' -- $(git grep --files-with-matches 'fAllowOtherInputs')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2022-06-19 20:32:51 -03:00
furszy
25749f1df7
wallet: unify “allow/block other inputs“ concept
Seeking to make the `CoinControl` option less confusing/redundant.

In #16377 the `CoinControl` flag ‘m_add_inputs’ was added to tell the coin filtering and selection process two things:
	- Coin Filtering: Only use the provided inputs. Skip the Rest.
	- Coin Selection: Search the wtxs-outputs and append all the `CoinControl` selected outpoints to the selection result (skipping all the available output checks). Nothing else.

Meanwhile, in `CoinControl` we already have a flag ‘fAllowOtherInputs’ which is already saying:
	- Coin Filtering: Only use the provided inputs. Skip the Rest.
	- Coin Selection: If false, no selection process -> append all the `CoinControl` selected outpoints to the selection result (while they passed all the `AvailableCoins` checks and are available in the 'vCoins' vector).

As can notice, the first point in the coin filtering process is duplicated in the two option flags. And the second one, is slightly different merely because it takes into account whether the coin is on the `AvailableCoins` vector or not.
So it makes sense to merge ‘m_add_inputs’ and ‘fAllowOtherInputs’ into a single field for the coin filtering process while introduce other changes to add the missing/skipped coins into 'vCoins' vector if they were manually selected by the user (follow-up commits).
2022-06-19 20:02:35 -03:00
Andrew Chow
8be652e439
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25005: wallet: remove extra wtx lookup in 'AvailableCoins' + several code cleanups.
fd5c996d16 wallet: GetAvailableBalance, remove double walk-through every available coin (furszy)
162d4ad10f wallet: add 'only_spendable' filter to AvailableCoins (furszy)
cdf185ccfb wallet: remove unused IsSpentKey(hash, index) method (furszy)
4b83bf8dbc wallet: avoid extra IsSpentKey -> GetWalletTx lookups (furszy)
3d8a282257 wallet: decouple IsSpentKey(scriptPubKey) from IsSpentKey(hash, n) (furszy)
a06fa94ff8 wallet: IsSpent, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) (furszy)
91902b7720 wallet: IsLockedCoin, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) (furszy)
9472ca0a65 wallet: AvailableCoins, don't call 'wtx.tx->vout[i]' multiple times (furszy)
4ce235ef8f wallet: return 'CoinsResult' struct in `AvailableCoins` (furszy)

Pull request description:

  This started in #24845 but grew out of scope of it.

  So, points tackled:

  1) Avoid extra `GetWalletTx` lookups inside `AvailableCoins -> IsSpentKey`.
      `IsSpentKey` was receiving the tx hash and index to internally lookup the tx inside the wallet's map. As all the `IsSpentKey` function callers already have the wtx available, them can provide the `scriptPubKey` directly.

  2) Most of the time, we call `Wallet::AvailableCoins`, and later on the process, skip the non-spendable coins from the result in subsequent for-loops. So to speedup the process: introduced the ability to filter by "only_spendable" coins inside `Wallet::AvailableCoins` directly.
  (the non-spendable coins skip examples are inside `AttemptSelection->GroupOutputs` and `GetAvailableBalance`).

  4) Refactored `AvailableCoins` in several ways:

     a) Now it will return a new struct `CoinsResult` instead of receiving the vCoins vector reference (which was being cleared at the beginning of the method anyway). --> this is coming from #24845 but cherry-picked it here too to make the following commits look nicer.

     b) Unified all the 'wtx.tx->vout[I]' calls into a single call (coming from this comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24699#discussion_r854163032).

  5) The wallet `IsLockedCoin` and `IsSpent` methods now accept an `OutPoint` instead of a hash:index. Which let me cleanup a bunch of extra code.

  6) Speeded up the wallet 'GetAvailableBalance': filtering `AvailableCoins` by spendable outputs only and using the 'AvailableCoins' retrieved `total_amount` instead of looping over all the retrieved coins once more.

  -------------------------------------------------------

  Side topic, all this process will look even nicer with #25218

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK fd5c996d16
  brunoerg:
    crACK fd5c996d16
  w0xlt:
    Code Review ACK fd5c996d16

Tree-SHA512: 376a85476f907f4f7d1fc3de74b3dbe159b8cc24687374d8739711ad202ea07a33e86f4e66dece836da3ae6985147119fe584f6e672f11d0450ba6bd165b3220
2022-06-17 18:02:33 -04:00
Andrew Chow
b0c8306349
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24649: wallet: do not count wallet utxos as external
7832e9438f test: fundrawtransaction preset input weight calculation (S3RK)
c3981e379f wallet: do not count wallet utxos as external (S3RK)

Pull request description:

  Correctly differentiating between external vs non-external utxos in coin control produces more accurate weight and fee estimations.

  Weight for external utxos is estimated based on the maximum signature size, while for the wallet utxos we expect minimal signature due to signature grinding.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    re-ACK 7832e9438f
  Xekyo:
    re-ACK 7832e9438f
  furszy:
    ACK 7832e943

Tree-SHA512: bb5635b0bd85fa9a76922a53ad3fa062286424c06a695a0e87407c665713e80a33555b644fbb13bcc1ab503dcd7f53aacbdc368d69ac0ecff8005603623ac94f
2022-06-16 14:11:19 -04:00
BrokenProgrammer
e3609cdc01 doc: Update importaddress mention incompatibility with descriptor wallet 2022-06-14 20:54:45 +02:00
furszy
4b83bf8dbc
wallet: avoid extra IsSpentKey -> GetWalletTx lookups 2022-06-08 11:22:40 -03:00
furszy
a06fa94ff8
wallet: IsSpent, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) 2022-06-08 11:22:39 -03:00
furszy
91902b7720
wallet: IsLockedCoin, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) 2022-06-08 10:26:48 -03:00
furszy
4ce235ef8f
wallet: return 'CoinsResult' struct in AvailableCoins
Instead of accepting a `vCoins` reference that is cleared at the beginning of the method.

Note:
This new struct, down the commits line, will contain other `AvailableCoins` useful results.
2022-06-08 10:25:16 -03:00
laanwj
06ea2783a2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25220: rpc: fix incorrect warning for address type p2sh-segwit in createmultisig
3a9b9bb38e test: ensure createmultisig and addmultisigaddress are not returning any warning for expected cases (brunoerg)
eaf6f630c0 rpc: fix inappropriate warning for address type p2sh-segwit in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (brunoerg)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #25127

  If there are any uncompressed keys when calling `AddAndGetMultisigDestination`, it will just default to a legacy address regardless of the chosen `address_type`. So, #23113 added a warnings field which will warn the user why their address format is different.

  However, when creating a multisig (p2sh-segwit), it is returning an inappropriate warning, because when getting the output type from destination (`OutputTypeFromDestination`), it returns `ScriptHash` for both legacy and `P2SH_SEGWIT`. So, since `P2SH_SEGWIT` is different from `ScriptHash`, it returns the warning:
  192d639a6b/src/rpc/output_script.cpp (L166-L169)

  So, to avoid this mistake I changed `OutputTypeFromDestination` to `descriptor->GetOutputType()` to get the appropriate output type.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK 3a9b9bb38e
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 3a9b9bb38e

Tree-SHA512: 49f717479c2b8906277e7591ddd4747f7961c2d5c77494b5124045de9036a4277d46b9ad99279d51f0c4484284c445f1e1d3c55c49bbf0716741bad426a89369
2022-06-06 17:13:22 +02:00
brunoerg
eaf6f630c0 rpc: fix inappropriate warning for address type p2sh-segwit in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress 2022-06-06 09:46:02 -03:00
Kolby Moroz Liebl
210cd592cd
doc: Fix typo in importdescriptors 2022-06-04 18:48:30 -06:00
Andrew Chow
3368f84c43
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25083: Set effective_value when initializing a COutput
6fbb0edac2 Set effective_value when initializing a COutput (ishaanam)

Pull request description:

  Previously in COutput, effective_value was initialized as the absolute value of the txout and the fee as 0. effective_value along with the fee was calculated outside of the COutput constructor and set after the object had been initialized.
  These changes will allow either the fee or the feerate to be passed in a COutput constructor and the fee and effective_value are calculated and set in the constructor. As a result, AvailableCoins also needs to be passed the feerate when utxos are being spent. When balance is calculated or the coins are being listed and feerate is neither available nor required, AvailableCoinsListUnspent is used instead, which runs AvailableCoins while providing the default value for `feerate`. Unit tests for the calculation of effective value have also been added.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    re-ACK 6fbb0edac2
  Xekyo:
    re-ACK 6fbb0edac2
  w0xlt:
    Code Review ACK 6fbb0edac2
  furszy:
    Looks good, have been touching this area lately, code review ACK 6fbb0eda.

Tree-SHA512: 5943ee4f4b0c1dcfe146f2fc22853e607259d6d53156b80a8a8f4baa70760a8b25ab822777b7f5d21ecb02dac08bdee704a9a918d5660276d6994b19a284b256
2022-05-23 12:55:24 -04:00
Andrew Chow
5ebff43025
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25122: rpc: getreceivedbylabel, return early if no addresses were found in the address book
baa3ddc49c doc: add release notes about `getreceivedbylabel` returning an error if the label is not in the address book. (furszy)
8897a21658 rpc: getreceivedbylabel, don't loop over the entire wallet txs map if no destinations were found for the input label. (furszy)

Pull request description:

  Built on top of #23662, coming from comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23662#pullrequestreview-971407999.

  If `wallet.GetLabelAddresses()` returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have stored destinations with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
  Otherwise, we are walking through all the wallet txs + outputs for no reason (`output_scripts` is empty).

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK baa3ddc49c
  theStack:
    re-ACK baa3ddc49c
  w0xlt:
    ACK baa3ddc49c

Tree-SHA512: 00e10365b179bf008da2f3ef8fbb3ee04a330426374020e3f2d0151b16991baba4ef2b944e4659452f3e4d6cb20f128d0918ddf0453933a25a4d9fd8414a1911
2022-05-23 12:15:14 -04:00
ishaanam
6fbb0edac2 Set effective_value when initializing a COutput
Previously in COutput, effective_value was initialized as the absolute
value of the txout, and fee as 0. effective_value along with fee were
calculated outside of the COutput constructor and set after the
object had been initialized. These changes will allow either the fee
or the feerate to be passed in a COutput constructor. If either are
provided, fee and effective_value are calculated and set in the
constructor. As a result, AvailableCoins also needs to be passed the
feerate when utxos are being spent. When balance is calculated or the
coins are being listed and feerate is neither available nor required,
AvailableCoinsListUnspent is used instead, which runs AvailableCoins
while providing the default value for feerate. Unit tests for the
calculation of effective value have also been added.
2022-05-21 11:25:54 -04:00
furszy
8897a21658
rpc: getreceivedbylabel, don't loop over the entire wallet txs map if no destinations were found for the input label.
If wallet.GetLabelAddresses() returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have addresses with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
2022-05-20 16:32:09 -03:00
MacroFake
a7e3afb221
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25171: rpc: wallet: remove -deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase logic
a4703ce9d7 doc: add release notes about removal of the `deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ef0aa74836 rpc: wallet: remove `-deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase` logic (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Including coinbase transactions in `receivedby` RPCs and adding the `-deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase` was done in PR #14707 (released in v23.0). For the next release v24.0, this configuration option can be removed.

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK a4703ce9d7

Tree-SHA512: 97cd4e78501e64f678c78d2ebb5be5376688c023e34fced71dd24e432d27aa31a74b5483545f49ba0bdf48656d8b8b7bee74e3db26cf6daf112613f1caa4dfa4
2022-05-20 08:48:09 +01:00
fanquake
0de36941ec
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25153: scripted-diff: Use getInt<T> over get_int/get_int64
fa9af21878 scripted-diff: Use getInt<T> over get_int/get_int64 (MacroFake)

Pull request description:

  Seems better to see the return type directly and be able to modify it easier, as the return type is used for exceptions (in-range checking and parsing feedback).

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK fa9af21878

Tree-SHA512: 284aa2527d0f663ca01550115025c9c64c787531d595f866c718f6ad09b9b0cac1e683a7d77f8009b75de990fd37166b44063ffa83fba8a04e9a31600b4c2725
2022-05-19 16:32:56 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
ef0aa74836 rpc: wallet: remove -deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase logic 2022-05-19 16:10:59 +02:00
MacroFake
7b3343f300
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25108: tidy: add modernize-use-default-member-init
ac6fbf2c83 tidy: use modernize-use-default-member-init (fanquake)
7aa40f5563 refactor: use C++11 default initializers (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  Refactor and then enable [`modernize-use-default-member-init`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-default-member-init.html) in our `clang-tidy` job.

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 536b406f20639f8c588fe9e96175ec60c7bb825506b2670b562370b2f572801c24203c483443be3c199e1b958c0765d4532e57c57a4e78689162a1dd422d844f
2022-05-18 19:19:55 +02:00
MacroFake
fa9af21878
scripted-diff: Use getInt<T> over get_int/get_int64
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
 sed -i 's|\<get_int64\>|getInt<int64_t>|g' $(git grep -l get_int ':(exclude)src/univalue')
 sed -i 's|\<get_int\>|getInt<int>|g'       $(git grep -l get_int ':(exclude)src/univalue')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2022-05-18 19:15:03 +02:00
MacroFake
629e250cbd
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25148: refactor: Remove NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS from non-test/benchmarking code
a55db4ea1c Add more proper thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
8cfe93e3fc Add proper thread safety annotation to `CWallet::GetTxConflicts()` (Hennadii Stepanov)
ca446f2c59 Add proper thread safety annotation to `CachedTxGetAvailableCredit()` (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  In non-test/benchmarking code, there are three cases of the `NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS` annotation which are accompanied with `TODO` comments.

  This PR adds proper thread safety annotations instead of `NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS`.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK a55db4ea1c

Tree-SHA512: 806d72eebc1edf088bfa435c8cd11465be0de6789798dd92abd008425516768acb864a73d834a49d412bb10f7fccfb47473f998cb72739dab6caeef6bcfaf191
2022-05-18 16:23:43 +02:00
S3RK
c3981e379f wallet: do not count wallet utxos as external 2022-05-18 08:25:04 +02:00
fanquake
7aa40f5563
refactor: use C++11 default initializers 2022-05-17 17:18:58 +01:00
fanquake
1ab389b1ba
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#20640: wallet, refactor: return out-params of CreateTransaction() as optional struct
4c5ceb040c wallet: CreateTransaction(): return out-params as (optional) struct (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c9fdaa5e3a wallet: CreateTransactionInternal(): return out-params as (optional) struct (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  The method `CWallet::CreateTransaction` currently returns several values in the form of out-parameters:
  * the actual newly created transaction (`CTransactionRef& tx`)
  * its required fee (`CAmount& nFeeRate`)
  * the position of the change output (`int& nChangePosInOut`) -- as the name suggests, this is both an in- and out-param

  By returning these values in an optional structure (which returns no value a.k.a. `std::nullopt` if an error occured), the interfaces is shorter, cleaner (requested change position is now in-param and can be passed by value) and callers don't have to create dummy variables for results that they are not interested in.

  Note that the names of the replaced out-variables were kept in `CreateTransactionInternal` to keep the diff minimal. Also, the fee calculation data (`FeeCalculation& fee_calc_out`) would be another candidate to put into the structure, but `FeeCalculation` is currently an opaque data type in the wallet interface and I think it should stay that way.

  As a potential follow-up, I think it would make sense to also do the same refactoring for `CWallet::FundTransaction`, which has a very similar parameter structure.

  Suggested by laanwj in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20588#issuecomment-739838428.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    re-ACK 4c5ceb040c
  Xekyo:
    ACK 4c5ceb040c
  w0xlt:
    crACK 4c5ceb040c

Tree-SHA512: 27e5348bbf4f698713002d40c834dcda59c711c93207113e14522fc6d9ae7f4d8edf1ef6d214c5dd62bb52943d342878960ca333728828bf39b645a27d55d524
2022-05-17 11:04:43 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
8cfe93e3fc
Add proper thread safety annotation to CWallet::GetTxConflicts() 2022-05-16 20:51:39 +02:00
Andrew Chow
187504b038
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23662: rpc: improve getreceivedby{address,label} performance
f336ff7f21 rpc: avoid expensive `IsMine` calls in `GetReceived` tally (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7b65af2a4 rpc: avoid scriptPubKey<->CTxDestination conversions in `GetReceived` tally (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  The RPC calls `getreceivedbyaddress`/`getreceivedbylabel` both use the internal helper function `GetReceived` which was introduced in PR #17579 to deduplicate tallying code. For every wallet-related transaction output, the following unnecessary operations are currently performed in the tally loop, leading to a quite bad performance (as reported in #23645):
  - converting from CScript -> TxDestination (`ExtractDestination(...)`), converting from TxDestination -> CScript (`CWallet::IsMine(const CTxDestination& dest)`); this can be avoided by directly using output scripts in the search set instead of addresses (first commit)
  - checking if the iterated output script belongs to the wallet by calling `IsMine`; this can be avoided by only adding addresses to the search set which fulfil `IsMine` in the first place (second commit)

  ### Benchmark results
  The functional test [wallet_pr23662.py](https://github.com/theStack/bitcoin/blob/pr23662_benchmarks/test/functional/wallet_pr23662.py) (not part of this PR) creates transactions with 15000 different addresses:
  - 5000 outputs (500 txs with 10 outputs each) with label set, IsMine set (received)
  - 5000 outputs (500 txs with 10 outputs each) with label set, IsMine not set (sent)
  - 5000 outputs (500 txs with 10 outputs each) without label set, IsMine not set (sent)

  Then, the time is measured for calling `getreceivedbyaddress` and `getreceivedbylabel`, the latter with two variants. Results on my machine:

  | branch             | `getreceivedbyaddress` (single) | `getreceivedbylabel` (single) | `getreceivedbylabel` (10000) |
  |--------------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|
  | master             |             406.13ms            |          425.33ms             |          446.58ms            |
  | PR (first commit)  |             367.18ms            |          365.81ms             |          426.33ms            |
  | PR (second commit) |               3.96ms            |            4.83ms             |          339.69ms            |

  Fixes #23645.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK f336ff7f21
  w0xlt:
    ACK f336ff7f21
  furszy:
    Code ACK f336ff7f

Tree-SHA512: 9cbf402b9e269713bd3feda9e31719d9dca8a0dfd526de12fd3d561711589195d0c50143432c65dae279c4eab90a4fc3f99e29fbc0452fefe05113e92d129b8f
2022-05-16 14:35:42 -04:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
4c5ceb040c wallet: CreateTransaction(): return out-params as (optional) struct 2022-05-16 17:46:34 +02:00
fanquake
f4005af3ec
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24977: rpc: Explain active and internal in listdescriptors
4637bbe448 rpc: Explain active and internal in listdescriptors (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  The current help text for active and internal in listdescriptors is not particularly helpful. They require the reader to already know what those terms mean. This help text is updated to actually explain the definitions of those words in context of a descriptor wallet.

ACKs for top commit:
  S3RK:
    ACK 4637bbe448
  jarolrod:
    ACK 4637bbe448
  w0xlt:
    ACK 4637bbe448

Tree-SHA512: 0af2c04f3b9920799cf616ad618bde9248eb9f74cc28f443b5b0f6646deba76e9b1415aca0865ad3bcc24aa6af0e9d07ad7b7cd80f0fe80838cf847f1b944426
2022-04-26 15:09:39 +01:00
laanwj
23ebd7a802
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24959: Remove not needed clang-format off comments
fa870e3d4c Remove not needed clang-format off comments (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  It seems odd to disable clang-format and force manual formatting when there is no need for it. So remove the clang-format comments and other unneeded comments.

  Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space`

  Looks like this was initially added in commit d9d79576f4 to accommodate a linter that has since been removed and replaced by a functional test.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa870e3d4c
  fanquake:
    ACK fa870e3d4c

Tree-SHA512: 0f8f97c12f5dbe517dd96c10b10ce1b8772d8daed33e6b41f73ea1040e89888cf3b8c0ad7b20319e366fe30c71e8b181c89098ae7f6a3deb8647e1b4731db815
2022-04-26 15:11:37 +02:00
fanquake
f436bfd126
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22953: refactor: introduce single-separator split helper (boost::split replacement)
a62e84438d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
4fad7e46d9 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo)
9cc8e876e4 refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled.

  As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical.

ACKs for top commit:
  martinus:
    Code review ACK a62e84438d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious.

Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
2022-04-26 09:54:49 +01:00
Andrew Chow
4637bbe448 rpc: Explain active and internal in listdescriptors
The current help text for active and internal in listdescriptors is not
particularly helpful. They require the reader to already know what those
terms mean. This help text is updated to actually explain the
definitions of those words in context of a descriptor wallet.
2022-04-25 09:48:03 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fa870e3d4c
Remove not needed clang-format off comments
Can be reviewed with --word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space
2022-04-25 10:55:07 +02:00
MarcoFalke
b1c5991eeb
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24812: util/check: Add CHECK_NONFATAL identity function and NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE macro
ee02c8bd9a util/check: Add CHECK_NONFATAL identity function, NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE AND UNREACHABLE macros (Aurèle Oulès)

Pull request description:

  This PR replaces the macro `CHECK_NONFATAL` with an identity function.
  I simplified the usage of `CHECK_NONFATAL` where applicable in `src/rpc`.
  This function is useful in sanity checks for RPC and command-line interfaces.

  Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24804#discussion_r846182474.

  Also adds `UNREACHABLE_NONFATAL` macro.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK ee02c8bd9a
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK ee02c8bd9a 🍨

Tree-SHA512: 3cba09223cd7b22e62fe5d0b46c4a024c1d9957d4268ba6d3fb07fcc0a5854fc0886bb3266184e6a7df5df91373b3e84edd6adf6999c4e934aeef8c043b01aa2
2022-04-24 12:00:05 +02:00
Aurèle Oulès
ee02c8bd9a util/check: Add CHECK_NONFATAL identity function, NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE AND UNREACHABLE macros 2022-04-16 15:07:41 +02:00
Andrew Chow
17ab31aa46 rpc, wallet: setwalletflags warnings are optional
Without this, trying to disable a wallet flag results in an Internal bug
detected.
2022-04-14 14:39:21 -04:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
9cc8e876e4 refactor: introduce single-separator split helper SplitString
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace
all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed.

Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
2022-04-11 22:19:46 +02:00
MarcoFalke
ffffb7a25a
doc: Convert remaining comments to clang-tidy format 2022-04-06 15:37:07 +02:00
fanquake
37a16ffd70
refactor: fix clang-tidy named args usage 2022-04-04 09:01:19 +01:00
Michael Dietz
8b9efebb0a
refactor: use named args when ScriptToUniv or TxToUniv are invoked 2022-03-30 20:00:27 +01:00
MarcoFalke
f4e5d704f2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24118: Add 'sendall' RPC née sweep
bb84b7145b add tests for no recipient and using send_max while inputs are specified (ishaanam)
49090ec402 Add sendall RPC née sweep (Murch)
902793c777 Extract FinishTransaction from send() (Murch)
6d2208a3f6 Extract interpretation of fee estimation arguments (Murch)
a31d75e5fb Elaborate error messages for outdated options (Murch)
35ed094e4b Extract prevention of outdated option names (Murch)

Pull request description:

  Add sendall RPC née sweep

  _Motivation_
  Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
  recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
  commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
  without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
  leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
  many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
  `sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.

  Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
  proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
  operation.
  • sendall:
    Use _given UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
  • SFFO:
    Use a _given budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.

  While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending a given set of
  UTXOs such as paying the value from one or more specific UTXOs, emptying
  a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some cases in
  which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
  which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
  easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual
  computation of the appropriate change amount.

  As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
  different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
  numerous wallet tests.

  _Sendall call details_
  The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific
  subset of the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns
  the funds to one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified
  with a given amount or receive an equal share of the remaining
  unassigned funds. At least one recipient must be provided without
  assigned amount to collect the remainder. The `sendall` call will
  never create change. The call has a `send_max` option that changes the
  default behavior of spending all UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to
  maximizing the output amount of the transaction by skipping uneconomic
  UTXOs. The `send_max` option is incompatible with providing a specific
  set of inputs.

  ---
  Edit: Replaced OP with latest commit message to reflect my updated motivation of the proposal.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    re-ACK bb84b7145b

Tree-SHA512: 20aaf75d268cb4b144f5d6437d33ec7b5f989256b3daeeb768ae1e7f39dc6b962af8223c5cb42ecc72dc38cecd921c53c077bc0ec300b994e902412213dd2cc3
2022-03-30 15:02:49 +02:00