fa00447442 scripted-diff: Use clang-tidy syntax for C++ named arguments (MarcoFalke)
fae13c3989 doc: Use clang-tidy comments in crypto_tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Incorrect named args are source of bugs, like #22979.
To allow them being checked by `clang-tidy`, use a format it can understand.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK fa00447442
rajarshimaitra:
ACK fa00447442
jonatack:
ACK fa00447442
fanquake:
ACK fa00447442
Tree-SHA512: 4d23a8363da81dfea21a4cd8516ab5e0dc70119e4d503f3f240f38573218b2c2e84083b97e956c62942d78b2f17490f8b3b2e8077d257644fda1d901e2b80507
There is no change in behavior. This just helps prepare for the
transition from boost::filesystem to std::filesystem by avoiding calls
to methods which will be unsafe after the transaction to std::filesystem
to due lack of a boost::filesystem::path::imbue equivalent and inability
to set a predictable locale.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kiminuo <kiminuo@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
fa4db8671b test: Activate all regtest softforks at height 1, unless overridden (MarcoFalke)
faad1e5ffd Introduce -testactivationheight=name@height setting (MarcoFalke)
fadb2ef2fa test: Add extra_args argument to TestChain100Setup constructor (MarcoFalke)
faa46986aa test: Remove version argument from build_next_block in p2p_segwit test (MarcoFalke)
fa086ef539 test: Remove unused ~TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All softforks that are active at the tip of mainnet, should also be active from genesis in regtest. Otherwise their rules might not be enforced in user testing, thus making their testing less useful.
To still allow tests to check pre-softfork rules, a runtime argument can change the activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa4db8671b
theStack:
re-ACK fa4db8671b
Tree-SHA512: 6397d46ff56ebc48c007a4cda633904d6ac085bc76b4ecf83097c546c7eec93ac0c44b88083b2611b9091c8d1fb8ee1e314065de078ef15e922c015de7ade8bf
673a5bd337 test: validation: add unittest for UpdateTip behavior (James O'Beirne)
2705570109 test: refactor: separate CreateBlock in TestChain100Setup (James O'Beirne)
298bf5d563 test: refactor: declare NoMalleation const auto (James O'Beirne)
071200993f move-only: unittest: add test/util/chainstate.h (James O'Beirne)
8f5710fd0a validation: fix CheckBlockIndex for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
5a807736da validation: insert assumed-valid block index entries into candidates (James O'Beirne)
01a9b8fe71 validation: set BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID during snapshot load (James O'Beirne)
42b2520db9 chain: add BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID for use with assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
b217020df7 validation: change UpdateTip for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
665072a36d doc: add comment for g_best_block (James O'Beirne)
ac4051d891 refactor: remove unused assumeutxo methods (James O'Beirne)
9f6bb53935 validation: add chainman ref to CChainState (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Modify UpdateTip and CheckBlockIndex for use with multiple chainstates. Includes a new unittest verifying `g_best_block` behavior (previously untested at the unit level) and various changes necessary for running and testing `ProcessNewBlock()`-like behavior on the background validation chainstate.
This changeset introduces a new block index `nStatus` flag called `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID`, and it is applied to block index entries that are beneath the UTXO snapshot base block upon snapshot load. Once each block is validated (during async background validation), the flag is removed. This allows us to avoid (ab)using `BLOCK_VALID_*` flags for snapshot chain block entries, and preserves the original meaning of those flags.
Note: this PR previously incorporated changes to `LoadBlockIndex()` and `RewindBlockIndex()` as noted in Russ' comments below, but once I generated the changes necessary to test the UpdateTip change, I decided to split this changes out into another PR due to the size of this one.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 673a5bd337
jonatack:
Code-review re-ACK 673a5bd337 reviewed diff, rebased to master/debug build/ran unit+functional tests
naumenkogs:
ACK 673a5bd337
fjahr:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337
ariard:
utACK 673a5bd3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337. Just linker fix and split commit changes mentioned https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526#issuecomment-921064563 since last review
benthecarman:
ACK 673a5bd337
Tree-SHA512: 0a6dc23d041b27ed9fd0ee1f3e5971b92fb1d2df2fc9b655d5dc48594235321ab1798d06de2ec55482ac3966a9ed56de8d56e9e29cae75bbe8690bafc2dda383
e4709c7b56 Start using init makeNode, makeChain, etc methods (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Use `interfaces::Init::make*` methods instead of `interfaces::Make*` functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different executable without having to change any code. (So for example `bitcoin-gui` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that communicates with a `bitcoin-node` subprocess, while `bitcoin-qt` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that controls node code in the same process.)
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
reACK e4709c7b56
achow101:
ACK e4709c7b56
benthecarman:
utACK e4709c7b56
Tree-SHA512: 580c1979dbb2ef444157c8e53041e70d15ddeee77e5cbdb34f70b6d228cc2d2fe3843825f172da84e506200c58f7e0932f7cd4c006bb5058c1f4e43259394834
Use interfaces::Init::make* methods instead of interfaces::Make*
functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different
executables without having to change any code. (So for example
bitcoin-gui can make an interfaces::Node pointer that communicates with
a bitcoin-node subprocess, while bitcoin-qt can make an interfaces::Node
pointer that starts node code in the same process.)
a4d78546b0 [addrman] Make addrman consistency checks a runtime option (John Newbery)
10aac24145 [tests] Make deterministic addrman use nKey = 1 (John Newbery)
fa9710f62c [addrman] Add deterministic argument to CAddrMan ctor (John Newbery)
ee458d84fc Add missing const to CAddrMan::Check_() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
CAddrMan has internal consistency checks. Currently, these are only run when the program is compiled with the `DEBUG_ADDRMAN` option. This option is not enabled on any of our CI builds, and it's likely that no-one is running them at all.
This PR makes consistency checks a (hidden) runtime option that can be enabled with `-checkaddrman`, where `-checkaddrman=n` will result in the consistency checks running every n operations (similar to `-checkmempool=n`). We set the ratio to 1/100 for our unit tests, and leave it disabled by default for all networks. Additionally, a consistency check failure now asserts, rather than logging and continuing. This matches the behavior of CTxMemPool and TxRequestTracker, where a failed consistency check asserts.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK a4d78546b0 per `git diff 00fd089 a4d7854`, tested by adding logging similar to #22479 and running with `-checkaddrman=<n>` for various values 0/1/10/100 etc, tested the updated docs with `bitcoind -help-debug | grep -A2 "checkaddrman\|checkmempool"` and verified rebased on master that compiling with `CPPFLAGS="-DDEBUG_ADDRMAN"` no longer causes the build to error.
mzumsande:
Code-review ACK a4d78546b0
theStack:
Code-review ACK a4d78546b0
Tree-SHA512: eaee003f7a99154822c5b5efbc62008d32c1efbecc6fec6e183427f6b2ae5d30b3be7924e3a7271b1a1de91517f5bd2a70011d45358c3105c6a0702f12b70f7c
Currently addrman consistency checks are a compile time option, and are not
enabled in our CI. It's unlikely anyone is running these consistency checks.
Make them a runtime option instead, where users can enable addrman
consistency checks every n operations (similar to mempool tests). Update
the addrman unit tests to do internal consistency checks every 100
operations (checking on every operations causes the test runtime to
increase by several seconds).
Also assert on a failed addrman consistency check to terminate program
execution.
92993aa5cf Change SignTransaction's input_errors to use bilingual_str (Andrew Chow)
171366e89b Use bilingual_str for address fetching functions (Andrew Chow)
9571c69b51 Add bilingual_str::clear() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
In a couple of places in the wallet, errors are `std::string`. In order for these errors to be translated, change them to use `bilingual_str`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 92993aa5cf, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22337#pullrequestreview-694542729) review, verified with
klementtan:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf
Tree-SHA512: 5400e419dd87db8c49b67ed0964de2d44b58010a566ca246f2f0760ed9ef6a9b6f6df7a6adcb211b315b74c727bfe8c7d07eb5690b5922fa5828ceef4c83461f
Don't schedule class PeerManagerImpl's background tasks from its
constructor, but instead do that from a separate method,
StartScheduledTasks(), that can be called later at the end of startup,
after other things, such as the active chain, are initialzed.
Since we now have multiple chainstate objects, only one of them is active at any given
time. An active chainstate has a mempool, but there's no point to others having one.
This change will simplify proposed assumeutxo semantics. See the discussion here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
fa0d9211ef refactor: Remove chainparams arg from CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
fa38947125 refactor: Remove ::Params() global from inside CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `::Params()` global is verbose and confusing. Also it makes tests a bit harder to write because they'd have to mock a global.
Fix all issues by simply using a member variable that points to the right params.
(Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=.`)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa0d9211ef
kiminuo:
utACK fa0d9211
theStack:
ACK fa0d9211ef🍉
Tree-SHA512: 44676b19c9ed471ccb536331d3029bad192d7d50f394fd7b8527ec431452aeec8c4494164b9cf8e16e0123c4463b16be864366c6b599370032c17262625a0356
Save the banlist in `banlist.json` instead of `banlist.dat`.
This makes it possible to store Tor v3 entries in the banlist on disk
(and any other addresses that cannot be serialized in addrv1 format).
Only read `banlist.dat` if it exists and `banlist.json` does not
exist (first start after an upgrade).
Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20904
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19748
6f994882de validation: Farewell, global Chainstate! (Carl Dong)
972c5166ee qt/test: Reset chainman in ~ChainstateManager instead (Carl Dong)
6c3b5dc0c1 scripted-diff: tree-wide: Remove all review-only assertions (Carl Dong)
3e82abb8dd tree-wide: Remove stray review-only assertion (Carl Dong)
f323248aba qt/test: Use existing chainman in ::TestGUI (can be scripted-diff) (Carl Dong)
6c15de129c scripted-diff: wallet/test: Use existing chainman (Carl Dong)
ee0ab1e959 fuzz: Initialize a TestingSetup for test_one_input (Carl Dong)
0d61634c06 scripted-diff: test: Use existing chainman in unit tests (Carl Dong)
e197076219 test: Pass in CoinsTip to ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags (Carl Dong)
4d99b61014 test/miner_tests: Pass in chain tip to CreateBlockIndex (Carl Dong)
f0dd5e6bb4 test/util: Use existing chainman in ::PrepareBlock (Carl Dong)
464c313e30 init: Use existing chainman (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #21767
à la Mr. Sandman
```
Mr. Chainman, bring me a tip (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Make it the most work that I've ever seen (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Rewind old tip till we're at the fork point (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Then tell it that it's time to call Con-nectTip
Chainman, I'm so alone (bung, bung, bung, bung)
No local objects to call my own (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Please make sure I have a ref
Mr. Chainman, bring me a tip!
```
This is the last bundle in the #20158 series. Thanks everyone for their diligent review.
I would like to call attention to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21766, where a few leftover improvements were collated.
- Remove globals:
- `ChainstateManager g_chainman`
- `CChainState& ChainstateActive()`
- `CChain& ChainActive()`
- Remove all review-only assertions.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
reACK 6f994882de based on the contents of
ariard:
Code Review ACK 6f99488.
jnewbery:
utACK 6f994882de
achow101:
Code Review ACK 6f994882de
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 6f994882de.
Tree-SHA512: 4052ea79360cf0efd81ad0ee3f982e1d93aab1837dcec75f875a56ceda085de078bb3099a2137935d7cc2222004ad88da94b605ef5efef35cb6bc733725debe6
7a799c9c2b index: refactor-only: Reuse CChain ref (Carl Dong)
db33cde80f index: Add chainstate member to BaseIndex (Carl Dong)
f4a47a1feb bench: Use existing chainman in AssembleBlock (Carl Dong)
91226eb917 bench: Use existing NodeContext in DuplicateInputs (Carl Dong)
e6b4aa6eb5 miner: Pass in chainman to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
9ecade1425 rest: Add GetChainman function and use it (Carl Dong)
fc1c282845 rpc/blockchain: Use existing blockman in gettxoutsetinfo (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
The first 2 commits are fixups addressing review for the last bundle: #21391
NEW note:
1. I have opened #21766 which keeps track of potential improvements where the flaws already existed before the de-globalization work, please post on that issue about these improvements, thanks!
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 7a799c9
ariard:
Code Review ACK 7a799c9
fjahr:
re-ACK 7a799c9c2b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 7a799c9c2b🌠
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7a799c9c2b. Basically no change since last review except fixed rebase conflicts and a new comment about REST Ensure()
jamesob:
conditional ACK 7a799c9c2b ([`jamesob/ackr/21767.1.dongcarl.bundle_6_n_prune_g_chai`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21767.1.dongcarl.bundle_6_n_prune_g_chai))
Tree-SHA512: 531c00ddcb318817457db2812d9a9d930bc664e58e6f7f1c746350732b031dd624270bfa6b9f49d8056aeb6321d973f0e38e4ff914acd6768edd8602c017d10e
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes #18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close #21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
Pass in chainman instead of prev_block so that we can enforce the
block.hashPrevBlock refers to prev_block invariant in the function
itself.
We should probably rethink BlockAssembler's API and somehow include
commitment regeneration functionality in there. Something like a variant
of CreateNewBlock that takes in a std::vector<TxRef> and return a CBlock
instead of CBlockTemplate. That could avoid reaching for
LookupBlockIndex at all.
This allows us to easily create transaction chains for package
validation. We don't test_accept if submit=false because we want to be
able to make transactions that wouldn't pass ATMP (i.e. a child
transaction in a package would fail due to missing inputs).
792be53d3e refactor: Replace std::bind with lambdas (Hennadii Stepanov)
a508f718f3 refactor: Use appropriate thread constructor (Hennadii Stepanov)
30e4448215 refactor: Make TraceThread a non-template free function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR does not change behavior.
Its goal is to improve readability and maintainability of the code.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 792be53d3e
jonatack:
tACK 792be53d3e
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 792be53d3e
Tree-SHA512: a03142f04f370f6bc02bd3ddfa870819b51740fcd028772241d68c84087f95a2d78207cbd5edb3f7c636fcf2d76192d9c59873f8f0af451d3b05c0cf9cf234df
586190f0b4 rpc/rest: Take and reuse local Chain/ChainState obj (Carl Dong)
bc3bd36902 rpc: style: Improve BuriedForkDescPushBack signature (Carl Dong)
f99913969f rpc: Remove unnecessary casting of block height (Carl Dong)
6a3d192020 rpc: Tidy up local references (see commit message) (Carl Dong)
038854f31e rest/rpc: Remove now-unused old Ensure functions (Carl Dong)
6fb65b49f4 scripted-diff: rest/rpc: Use renamed EnsureAny*() (Carl Dong)
1570c7ee98 rpc: Add renamed EnsureAny*() functions (Carl Dong)
306b1cd3ee rpc: Add alt Ensure* functions acepting NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d7824acdb9 rest: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
3f08934799 rest: Pass in NodeContext to rest_block (Carl Dong)
7be0671b95 rpc/rawtx: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
60dc05afc6 rpc/mining: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d485e815e2 rpc/blockchain: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d0abf0bf42 rpc/*,rest: Add review-only assertion to EnsureChainman (Carl Dong)
cced0f46c9 miner: Pass in previous CBlockIndex to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #21270 | [Bundle 4/n] Prune g_chainman usage in validation-adjacent modules
- [x] #21525 | [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 586190f0b4. Since last review, no changes to existing commits, just some simple new commits added: three new commits renaming std::any Ensure functions (scripted diff commit and manual pre/post commits), and one new commit factoring out a repeated `ActiveChain()` call made in a loop. Thanks for the updates!
jnewbery:
utACK 586190f0b4
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 586190f0b4🍯
Tree-SHA512: 64b677fb50141805b55c3f1afe68fcd298f9a071a359bdcd63256d52e334f83e462f31fb3ebee9b630da8f1d912a03a128cfc38179e7aaec29a055744a98478c
Seems odd to have an option for non-deterministic tests
when the goal should be for all tests to be deterministic.
Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space`.
