Since #25273, the behavior of 'inserting change at a random
position' is instructed by passing std::nullopt instead of -1.
Also, added missing documentation about the meaning of
'change_pos=std::nullopt' inside 'CWallet::CreateTransaction()'
LoadWallet() must only be called immediately after a CWallet is
constructed, or not at all. Doing so after any other CWallet member
functions have been called may cause pointers and other objects
setup by other those functions to become invalidated.
Since these tests and benchmarks are using completely new wallets with
mock databases, it's not necessary to call LoadWallet() anyways, so
these can be dropped.
This should fix the bug reported in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28246#discussion_r1371640502,
which caused the GUI to not detect the destination type of recipients,
thus picking the wrong change destination type.
Also, add missing lifetimebound attribute to a getter method.
As the benchmarks inside wallet_create_tx.cpp assert the
wallet balance at the end, they require all
blocks to be scanned by the wallet. So, we need
to ensure that no blocks are skipped by the recently
added wallet birth time functionality.
This just means setting the wallet birthtime to the
genesis block time. So the wallet is always older than
any new block.
Since we have a mockable wallet database, we don't really need to be
using BDB or SQLite's in-memory database capabilities. It doesn't really
help us to be using those as we aren't doing anything that requires one
type of db over the other, and will just prefer SQLite if it's
available.
MockableDatabase is suitable for these uses, so use
CreateMockableWalletDatabase to use that.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)/CreateMockableWalletDatabase()/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase/CreateMockableWalletDatabase/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
The previous behavior for getAvailableBalance when coin control
has selected coins was to return the sum of them. Instead, we
are currently returning the wallet's available total balance minus
the selected coins total amount.
This turns into a GUI-only issue for the "use available balance"
button when the user manually select coins in the send screen.
Reason:
We missed to update the GetAvailableBalance function to include
the coin control selected coins on #25685.
Context:
Since #25685 we skip the selected coins inside `AvailableCoins`,
the reason is that there is no need to traverse the wallet's
txes map just to get coins that can directly be fetched by
their id.
3a4f8bc242 bench: add benchmark for wallet 'AvailableCoins' function. (furszy)
Pull request description:
#### Rationale
`AvailableCoins` is part of several important flows for the wallet; from RPC commands that create transactions like `fundrawtransaction`, `send`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, get the available balance, list the available coins with `listunspent` etc. to GUI connected processes that perform the same or similar actions: tx creation, available balance calculation, present the spendable coins in the coin control dialog.
As we are improving this process in #24699, #25005 and there are more structural changes coming on the way. This benchmark aims to ensure us that, at least, there are no regressions (obviously performance improvements are great but, at least for me, this heads into the direction of having a base metric to compare future structural changes).
#### Implementation Notes
There are 5 new benchmarks, one per wallet supported output type (LEGACY, P2SH_SEGWIT, BECH32, BECH32M), plus a multi-output-type wallet benchmark which contains outputs from all the descriptor types.
The test, by default, fills-up the wallet with 1k transactions, 2k outputs. Mainly to not consume much time if the user just want to verify that no substantial regressions were introduced. But, my expectation for those who are focused on this process is to use a much higher number locally to really note the differences across commits.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3a4f8bc242
hernanmarino:
ACK 3a4f8bc242
aureleoules:
ACK 3a4f8bc242
Tree-SHA512: d0bb4c165f1efa181b47cb31561e6217eff9135bcd1b6761a7292f9018e456d13d18a1b886c2e2268d35c52f9e1fd8e0f252972424e5c5f00c280620b79c5a1b
files share the same purpose, and we shouldn't have wallet code
inside the test directory.
This later is needed to use wallet util functions in the bench
and test binaries without be forced to duplicate them.
Goal 1:
Benchmark the transaction creation process for pre-selected-inputs only.
Setting `m_allow_other_inputs=false` to disallow the wallet to include coins automatically.
Goal 2:
Benchmark the transaction creation process for pre-selected-inputs and coin selection.
-----------------------
Benchmark Setup:
1) Generates a 5k blockchain, loading the wallet with 5k transactions with two outputs each.
2) Fetch 4 random UTXO from the wallet's available coins and pre-select them as inputs inside CoinControl.
Benchmark (Goal 1):
Call `CreateTransaction` providing the coin control, who has set `m_allow_other_inputs=false` and
the manually selected coins.
Benchmark (Goal 2):
Call `CreateTransaction` providing the coin control, who has set `m_allow_other_inputs=true` and
the manually selected coins.
