8dd5946c0b add functional test (Larry Ruane)
b5a80fa7e4 util: Handle HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE in bitcoin-cli (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
If `bitcoind` is processing 16 RPC requests, attempting to submit another request using `bitcoin-cli` produces this less-than-helpful error message: `error: couldn't parse reply from server`. This PR changes the error to: `error: server response: Work queue depth exceeded`.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 8dd5946c0b
luke-jr:
utACK 8dd5946c0b (no changes since previous utACK)
hebasto:
re-ACK 8dd5946c0b, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18335#pullrequestreview-460621350) review.
darosior:
ACK 8dd5946c0b
Tree-SHA512: 33e25f6ff05d9b56fae2bdb68b132557bb8e995f5438ac4fbbc53c304c5152a98aa43c43600c31d8a6a2830cbd48bf8ec7d89dce50190b29ec00a43830126913
52dd40a9fe test: add missing netaddress include headers (Jon Atack)
6f09c0f6b5 util: add missing braces and apply clang format to SplitHostPort() (Jon Atack)
2875a764f7 util: add ParseUInt16(), use it in SplitHostPort() (Jon Atack)
6423c8175f p2p, refactor: pass and use uint16_t CService::port as uint16_t (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
As noticed during review today in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20685#discussion_r584873708 of the upcoming I2P network support, `CService::port` is `uint16_t` but is passed around the codebase and into the ctors as `int`, which causes uneeded conversions and casts. We can avoid these (including in the incoming I2P code without further changes to it) by using ports with the correct type. The remaining conversions are pushed out to the user input boundaries where they can be range-checked and raise with user feedback in the next patch.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 52dd40a9fe: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 52dd40a9fe
vasild:
ACK 52dd40a9fe
Tree-SHA512: 203c1cab3189a206c55ecada77b9548b810281cdc533252b8e3330ae0606b467731c75f730ce9deb07cbaab66facf97e1ffd2051084ff9077cba6750366b0432
Now that we have a reliable way to detect inbound onion peers, this commit
updates our existing eviction protection of 1/4 localhost peers to instead
protect up to 1/4 onion peers (connected via our tor control service), sorted by
longest uptime. Any remaining slots of the 1/4 are then allocated to protect
localhost peers, or 2 localhost peers if no slots remain and 2 or more onion
peers are protected, sorted by longest uptime.
The goal is to avoid penalizing onion peers, due to their higher min ping times
relative to IPv4 and IPv6 peers, and improve our diversity of peer connections.
Thank you to Gregory Maxwell, Suhas Daftuar, Vasil Dimov and Pieter Wuille
for valuable review feedback that shaped the direction.
and an `m_is_onion` struct member to NodeEvictionCandidate and tests.
We'll use these in the peer eviction logic to protect inbound onion peers
in addition to the existing protection of localhost peers.
An unordered set can tell if an element is present in ~O(1) time (constant on
average, worst case linear to the size of the container), which speeds up and
simplifies the lookup in IsEvicted().
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
out of net_tests, because the eviction tests:
- are a different domain of test coverage, with different dependencies
- run more slowly than the net tests
- will be growing in size, in this PR branch and in the future, as eviction
test coverage is improved
to allow deterministic unit testing of the ratio-based peer eviction protection
logic, which protects peers having longer connection times and those connected
via higher-latency networks.
Add documentation.
fa81773243 style-only: Remove whitespace (MarcoFalke)
fae77b9e6d net: Simplify ProcessGetBlockData execution by removing send flag. (Patrick Strateman)
fae7c0429f log: Clarify that block request below NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED_MIN_BLOCKS disconnects (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
* Clarify that "ignoring" really means "disconnect" in the log
* Revive a refactor I took from #13670
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa81773243
sipa:
utACK fa81773243
Tree-SHA512: 0a4fcb979cb82c4e26012881eeaf903c38dfbb85d461476c01e35294760744746a79c48ffad827fe31c1b830f40c6e4240529c71e375146e4d0313c3b7d784ca
fa2a80bf12 refactor: Pass PeerManagerImpl members only once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Member variables are already passed to methods via `this`, so no need to pass them another time as function parameter.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa2a80bf12
amitiuttarwar:
utACK fa2a80bf12
Tree-SHA512: 1743825c7560cc748235e3db03e4cea02ad1f670f1b898d7757da644f12693ba9bb2d3eb09b64b3d10dd2e68f52dea31e26d5e97bdc013759baa0515d3c7055c
680eb56d82 [net processing] Don't pass CConnman to RelayTransactions (John Newbery)
a38a4e8f03 [net processing] Move RelayTransaction into PeerManager (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is the first part of #21160. It moves the RelayTransaction() function to be a member function of the PeerManager class. This is required in order to move the transaction inventory data into the Peer object, since Peer objects are only accessible from within PeerManager.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 680eb56d82
Tree-SHA512: 8c93491a4392b6369bb7f090de326a63cd62a088de59026e202f226f64ded50a0cf1a95ed703328860f02a9d2f64d3a87ca1bca9a6075b978bd111d384766235
ebc4ab721b refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13c scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
57ff5a42ab doc: specify minimum HWI version (Sjors Provoost)
03308b2bfa rpc: don't require wallet for enumeratesigners (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
HWI just released 2.0. See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/releases/tag/2.0.0
As of #16546 we already rely on features that are in 2.0 and not in the previous 1.* releases:
* `--chain` param
This shouldn't be a problem, because HWI 2.0 has been released before we release v22.
Misc improvements:
* document that HWI 2.0 is required
* drop wallet requirement for `enumeratesigners`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 57ff5a42ab
Tree-SHA512: 3fb6ba20894e52a116f89525a5f5a1f61d363ccd904e1cffd0e6d095640fc6d2edf0388cd6ae20f83bbc31e5f458255ec090b6e823798d426eba3e45b4336bf9
f9cd2bfbcc Rename CoinSelectionParams::effective_fee to m_effective_feerate (Andrew Chow)
bdd0c2934b wallet: Move discard feerate fetching to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
448d04b931 wallet: Move long term feerate setting to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
e2f429e6bb wallet: Replace nFeeRateNeeded with effective_fee (Andrew Chow)
1a6a0b0dfb wallet: Use existing feerate instead of getting a new one (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
During coin selection, there are various places where we need to have a feerate. We need the feerate for the transaction itself, the discard fee rate, and long term feerate. Fetching these each time we need them can lead to a race condition where two feerates that should be the same are actually different. One particular instance where this can happen is during the loop in `CreateTransactionInternal`. After inputs are chosen, the expected transaction fee is calculated using a newly fetched feerate. If `pick_new_inputs == false`, the loop will go again with the assumption that the fee for the transaction remains the same. However because the feerate is fetched again, it is possible that it actually isn't and this causes coin selection to fail.
Instead of fetching the feerate each time it is needed, we fetch them all at once at the top of `CreateTransactionInternal`, store them in `CoinSelectionParams`, and use them where needed.
While some of these fee rates probably don't need this caching, I've done it for consistency and the guarantee that they remain the same.
Fixes #19229
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK f9cd2bfbcc
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK f9cd2bfbcc
Xekyo:
tACK f9cd2bfbcc
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK f9cd2bfbcc
Tree-SHA512: be83ff64ba473c3cdd3469c812e214659b6e2a9584c22ed2b1595618fce0d4b35d0901e61068cd1069fc1a8fb911db01dd7312d05c3b8cbafbe2504ab7a3e863
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Make sure that all fee calculations use the same feerate.
coin_selection_params.effective_fee is the variable we use for all fee
calculations, so get rid of remaining nFeeRateNeeded usages and just
directly set coin_selection_params.effective_fee.
Does not change behavior.
During each loop of CreateTransaction, instead of constantly getting a
new feerate, use the feerate that we have already fetched for all
fee calculations. Thix fixes a race condition where the feerate required
changes during each iteration of the loop.
This commit changes behavior as the "Fee estimation failed" error will
now take priority over "Signing transaction failed".
4d008f908e Always add -daemonwait to known command line arguments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This is a follow up of #21007.
When `AC_CHECK_DECLS([fork])` fails:
- on master (8e6532053f):
```
$ src/bitcoind -daemonwait
Error: Error parsing command line arguments: Invalid parameter -daemonwait
```
- with this PR:
```
$ src/bitcoind -daemonwait
Error: -daemon is not supported on this operating system
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4d008f908e
Tree-SHA512: 7fcb5e9d76958adcf57e04fa74bd2a98d62459d81a3c57a97bd74c346cbf47c53e560a15455fb024e912c3b44e8487a83499e993b282871ba069953e665d88a9
Add a regression test for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21407.
The test creates a socket that, upon read, returns some data, but never
the expected terminator `\n`, injects that socket into the I2P code and
expects `i2p::sam::Session::Connect()` to fail, printing a specific
error message to the log.
Change the types of `i2p::Connection::sock` and
`i2p::sam::Session::m_control_sock` from `Sock` to
`std::unique_ptr<Sock>`.
Using pointers would allow us to sneak `FuzzedSock` instead of `Sock`
and have the methods of the former called.
After this change a test only needs to replace `CreateSock()` with
a function that returns `FuzzedSock`.
Change `ConnectSocketDirectly()` to take a `Sock` argument instead of a
bare `SOCKET`. With this, use the `Sock`'s (possibly mocked) methods
`Connect()`, `Wait()` and `GetSockOpt()` instead of calling the OS
functions directly.
If `recv(2)` returns an error (`-1`) and sets `errno` to a temporary
error like `EAGAIN` a proper application code is expected to retry the
operation.
If the fuzz data is exhausted, then `FuzzedSock::Recv()` will keep
returning `-1` and setting `errno` to the first element of
`recv_errnos[]` which happened to be `EAGAIN`. This may continue forever
or cause the fuzz test to run for a long time before some higher level
application "receive timeout" is triggered.
Thus, put `ECONNREFUSED` as first element of `recv_errnos[]`.
A conforming `recv(2)` call is supposed to return the same data on a
call following `recv(..., MSG_PEEK)`. Extend `FuzzedSock::Recv()` to do
that.
For simplicity we only return 1 byte when `MSG_PEEK` is used. If we
would return a buffer of N bytes, then we would have to keep track how
many of them were consumed on subsequent non-`MSG_PEEK` calls.
We want `Get()` to always return the same value, otherwise it will look
like the `FuzzedSock` implementation itself is broken. So assign
`m_socket` a random number in the `FuzzedSock` constructor.
There is nothing to fuzz about the `Get()` and `Release()` methods, so
use the ones from the base class `Sock`.
`Reset()` is just setting our socket to `INVALID_SOCKET`. We don't want
to use the base `Reset()` because it will close `m_socket` and given
that our `m_socket` is just a random number it may end up closing a real
opened file descriptor if it coincides with our random `m_socket`.
7059e6d822 test: add a test to ensure RecvUntilTerminator() limit works (Vasil Dimov)
80a5a8ea2b i2p: limit the size of incoming messages (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Put a limit on the amount of data `Sock::RecvUntilTerminator()` can read
if no terminator is received.
In the case of I2P this avoids a runaway (or malicious) I2P proxy
sending us tons of data without a terminator before a timeout is
triggered.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK 7059e6d822
Tree-SHA512: 21f3f3468c765c726cdc877eae847cdb4dbe225d94c5bd1849bd752c9761fac881c554f16ea7a685ad40312159d554e126c481e21c5fd83a6d947060b920373d
