Exposing address manager table entries in a hidden RPC allows to introspect
addrman tables in tests and during development.
As response JSON object the following FORMAT1 is choosen:
{
"table": {
"<bucket>/<position>": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
"<bucket>/<position>": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
"<bucket>/<position>": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
...
}
}
An alternative would be FORMAT2
{
"table": {
"bucket": {
"position": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
"position": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
..
},
"bucket": {
"position": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
..
},
}
}
FORMAT1 and FORMAT2 have different encodings for the location of the
address in the address manager. While FORMAT2 might be easier to process
for downstream tools, it also mimics internal addrman mappings, which
might change at some point. Users not interested in the address location
can ignore the location key. They don't have to adapt to a new RPC
response format, when the internal addrman layout changes. Additionally,
FORMAT1 is also slightly easier to to iterate in downstream tools. The
RPC response-building implemenation complexcity is lower with FORMAT1
as we can more easily build a "<bucket>/<position>" key than a multiple
"bucket" objects with multiple "position" objects (FORMAT2).
b3db8c9d5c rpc: bumpfee, improve doc for 'reduce_output' arg (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes #28180. Resulted from discussions with S3RK, achow101, and Murch.
The current argument name and description are dangerous as it don't
describe the case where the user selects the recipient output as the
change address. This one could end up been increased by the inputs
minus outputs remainder. Which, when `bumpfee` adds new inputs
to the transaction, leads the process to send more coins to the
recipient. Which is not what the user would expect from a
'reduce_output' param naming.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK b3db8c9d5c
achow101:
ACK b3db8c9d5c
murchandamus:
ACK b3db8c9d5c
Tree-SHA512: 91f607e2f5849041d7c099afdddae11af8bed5b1ac90c9d22921267f272e21b44e107d6968e037f05f958a61fe29e94e5fb44b224fb3606f197f83ec4ba3b1e7
The current argument name and description are dangerous as it don't
describe the case where the user selects the recipient output as the
change address. This one could end up been increased by the inputs
minus outputs remainder. Which, when bumpfee adds new inputs
to the transaction, leads the process to send more coins to the
recipient. Which is not what the user would expect from a
'reduce_output' param naming.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
a99e9e655a doc: add release note (ismaelsadeeq)
2b4edf889a test: check `descriptorprocesspsbt` return hex encoded tx (ismaelsadeeq)
c405207a18 rpc: `descriptorprocesspsbt` return hex encoded tx (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Coming from [#28414 comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28414#pullrequestreview-1618684391) Same thing also for `descriptorprocesspsbt`.
Before this PR `descriptorprocesspsbt` returns a boolean `complete` which indicates that the psbt is final, users then have to call `finalizepsbt` to get the hex encoded network transaction.
In this PR if the psbt is complete the return object also has the hex encoded network transaction ready for broadcast with `sendrawtransaction`.
This save users calling `finalizepsbt` with the descriptor, if it is already complete.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a99e9e655a
pinheadmz:
ACK a99e9e655a
ishaanam:
ACK a99e9e655a
Tree-SHA512: c3f1b1391d4df05216c463127cd593f8703840430a99febb54890bc66fadabf9d9530860605f347ec54c1694019173247a0e7a9eb879d3cbb420f9e8d9839b75
f52cb02f70 doc: make it clear that `node` in `addnode` refers to the node's address (brunoerg)
effd1efefb test: `addnode` with an invalid command should throw an error (brunoerg)
56b27b8487 rpc, refactor: clean-up `addnode` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- Adds test coverage for an invalid `command` in `addnode`.
- Rename `test_getaddednodeinfo` to `test_addnode_getaddednodeinfo` and its log since this function also tests `addnode` and it doesn't worth to split into 2 ones.
- Makes it clear in docs that `node` in `addnode` refers to the node's address. It seemed a little weird for me "The node (see getpeerinfo for nodes)", it could mean a lot of things e.g. the node id.
- Some small improv/clean-up: use `const` where possible, rename some vars, and remove the check for nullance for `command` since it's a non-optional field.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f52cb02f70
jonatack:
ACK f52cb02f70
theStack:
re-ACK f52cb02f70
Tree-SHA512: e4a69e58b784e233463945b4d55a401957f9fe4562c129f59216a44f44fb3221d3449ac578fb35e665ca654c6ade2e741b72c3df78040f7527229c77b6c5b82e
28bac81a34 test: add functional test for getaddrmaninfo (stratospher)
c8eb8dae51 rpc: Introduce getaddrmaninfo for count of addresses stored in new/tried table (stratospher)
Pull request description:
implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26907. split off from #26988 to keep RPC, CLI discussions separate.
This PR introduces a new RPC `getaddrmaninfo`which returns the count of addresses in the new/tried table of a node's addrman broken down by network type. This would be useful for users who want to see the distribution of addresses from different networks across new/tried table in the addrman.
```jsx
$ getaddrmaninfo
Result:
{ (json object) json object with network type as keys
"network" : { (json object) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p, cjdns)
"new" : n, (numeric) number of addresses in new table
"tried" : n, (numeric) number of addresses in tried table
"total" : n (numeric) total number of addresses in both new/tried tables from a network
},
...
}
```
### additional context from [original PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988)
1. network coverage tests were skipped because there’s a small chance that addresses from different networks could hash to the same bucket and cause count of different network addresses in the tests to fail. see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988#discussion_r1137596851.
2. #26988 uses this RPC in -addrinfo CLI. Slight preference for keeping the RPC hidden since this info will mostly be useful to only super users. see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988#discussion_r1173964808.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 28bac81a34
willcl-ark:
reACK 28bac81a34
achow101:
ACK 28bac81a34
brunoerg:
reACK 28bac81a34
theStack:
Code-review ACK 28bac81a34
Tree-SHA512: 346390167e1ebed7ca5c79328ea452633736aff8b7feefea77460e04d4489059334ae78a3f757f32f5fb7827b309d7186bebab3c3760b3dfb016d564a647371a
as it was only needed for GetServicesNames(). This potentially avoids needlessly
compiling the 500 lines of protocol.h in the 35 files other than rpc/net.cpp
that include rpc/util.h.
Drop an unneeded CPubKey forward declaration. The other IWYU suggestions would
require more extensive changes in other files.
Add 3 already-missing include headers in other translation units that are needed
to compile without protocol.h in rpc/util.h, as it includes netaddress.h, which
in turn includes util/strencodings.h.
P2PK scripts are not PKHash destinations, they should have their own
type.
This also results in no longer showing a p2pkh address for p2pk outputs.
However for backwards compatibility, ListCoinst will still do this
conversion.
Make sure that nothing else can change WitnessUnknown's data members by
making them private. Also change the program to use a vector rather than
C-style array.
as string_view is optimized to be trivially copiable, and in these use cases we
only perform read operations on the passed object.
These utility methods are called by quite a few RPCs and tests, as well as by each other.
$ git grep "ParseHashV\|ParseHashO\|ParseHexV\|ParseHexO" | wc -l
61
b3a93b409e test: add functional test for deadlock situation (Martin Zumsande)
3557aa4d0a test: add basic tests for sendmsgtopeer to rpc_net.py (Martin Zumsande)
a9a1d69391 rpc: add test-only sendmsgtopeer rpc (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This adds a `sendmsgtopeer` rpc (for testing only) that allows a node to send a message (provided in hex) to a peer.
While we would usually use a `p2p` object instead of a node for this in the test framework, that isn't possible in situations where this message needs to trigger an actual interaction of multiple nodes.
Use this rpc to add test coverage for the bug fixed in #27981 (that just got merged):
The test lets two nodes (almost) simultaneously send a single large (4MB) p2p message to each other, which would have caused a deadlock previously (making this test fail), but succeeds now.
As can be seen from the discussion in #27981, it was not easy to reproduce this bug without `sendmsgtopeer`. I would imagine that `sendmsgtopeer` could also be helpful in various other test constellations.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK b3a93b409e
sipa:
ACK b3a93b409e
achow101:
ACK b3a93b409e
Tree-SHA512: 6e22e72402f3c4dd70cddb9e96ea988444720f7a164031df159fbdd48056c8ac77ac53def045d9208a3ca07437c7c8e34f8b4ebc7066c0a84d81cd53f2f4fa5f
This rpc can be used when we want a node to send a message, but
cannot use a python P2P object, for example for testing of low-level
net transport behavior.
This change makes IsInitialBlockDownload and NotifyHeaderTip functions no
longer tied to individual Chainstate objects. It makes them work with the
ChainstateManager object instead so code is simpler and it is no longer
possible to call them incorrectly with an inactive Chainstate.
This change also makes m_cached_finished_ibd caching easier to reason about,
because now there is only one cached value instead of two (for background and
snapshot chainstates) so the cached IBD state now no longer gets reset when a
snapshot is loaded.
There should be no change in behavior because these functions were always
called on the active ChainState objects.
These changes were discussed previously
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27746#discussion_r1246868905 and
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27746#discussion_r1237552792 as
possible followups for that PR.
5e3e83b005 RPC/Mining: Document template_request better for getblocktemplate (Luke Dashjr)
de319c6175 RPC/rpcdoccheck: Error if a oneline_description has a quote for a non-string (Luke Dashjr)
7c61e9df90 Bugfix: RPC: Remove quotes from non-string oneline descriptions (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Various JSON Object parameters had a `oneline_description` with quote characters. Fix those, and extend `rpcdoccheck` to detect them.
Also, slightly improve GBT's oneline description for template_request.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e3e83b005
Tree-SHA512: 363d1669a661d0acfc19fddb57e777d781c7246f330cf62160e77dde10a6adcb0249db748127067da1afe1b7d17c71cf611d9fdc3664d6bf5b3f30105637769a
91d924ede1 Rename script/standard.{cpp/h} to script/solver.{cpp/h} (Andrew Chow)
bacdb2e208 Clean up script/standard.{h/cpp} includes (Andrew Chow)
f3c9078b4c Clean up things that include script/standard.h (Andrew Chow)
8bbe257bac MOVEONLY: Move datacarrier defaults to policy.h (Andrew Chow)
7a172c76d2 Move CTxDestination to its own file (Andrew Chow)
145f36ec81 Move Taproot{SpendData/Builder} to signingprovider.{h/cpp} (Andrew Chow)
86ea8bed54 Move CScriptID to script.{h/cpp} (Andrew Chow)
b81ebff0d9 Remove ScriptHash from CScriptID constructor (Andrew Chow)
cba69dda3d Move MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS from script/standard.h to policy/policy.h (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Some future work needs to touch things in script/standard.{h/cpp}, however it is unclear if it is safe to do so as they are included in several different places that could effect standardness and consensus. It contains a mix of policy parameters, consensus parameters, and utilities only used by the wallet. This PR breaks up the various components and renames the files to clearly separate everything.
* `CTxDestination` is moved to a new file `src/addresstype.{cpp/h}`
* `TaprootSpendData` and `TaprootBuilder` (and their utility functions and structs) are moved to `SigningProvider` as these are used only during signing.
* `CScriptID` is moved to `script/script.h` to be next to `CScript`.
* `MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS` is moved to `interpreter.h`
* The parameters `DEFAULT_ACCEPT_DATACARRIER` and `MAX_OP_RETURN_RELAY` are moved to `policy.h`
* `standard.{cpp/h}` is renamed to `solver.{cpp/h}` since that's all that's left in the file after the above moves
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 91d924ede1
ajtowns:
ACK 91d924ede1
MarcoFalke:
ACK 91d924ede1😇
murchandamus:
ACK 91d924ede1
darosior:
Code review ACK 91d924ede1.
theStack:
Code-review ACK 91d924ede1
Tree-SHA512: d347439890c652081f6a303d99b2bde6c371c96e7f4127c5db469764a17d39981f19884679ba883e28b733fde6142351dd8288c7bc61c379b7eefe7fa7acca1a
fa776e61cd Add importmempool RPC (MarcoFalke)
fa20d734a2 refactor: Add and use kernel::ImportMempoolOptions (MarcoFalke)
fa8866990d doc: Clarify the getmempoolinfo.loaded RPC field documentation (MarcoFalke)
6888886cec Remove Chainstate::LoadMempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently it is possible to import a mempool by placing it in the datadir and starting the node. However this has many issues:
* Users aren't expected to fiddle with the datadir, possibly corrupting it
* An existing mempool file in the datadir may be overwritten
* The node needs to be restarted
* Importing an untrusted file this way is dangerous, because it can corrupt the mempool
Fix all issues by adding a new RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
utACK fa776e61cd
achow101:
ACK fa776e61cd
glozow:
reACK fa776e61cd
Tree-SHA512: fcb1a92d6460839283c546c47a2d930c363ac1013c4c50dc5215ddf9fe5e51921d23fe0abfae0a5a7631983cfc7e2fff3788b70f95937d0a989a203be4d67546
d8f1222ac5 refactor: Correct dbwrapper key naming (TheCharlatan)
be8f159ac5 build: Remove leveldb from BITCOIN_INCLUDES (TheCharlatan)
c95b37d641 refactor: Move CDBWrapper leveldb members to their own context struct (TheCharlatan)
c534a615e9 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBWrapper::EstimateSize implementation (TheCharlatan)
586448888b refactor: Move HandleError to dbwrapper implementation (TheCharlatan)
dede0eef7a refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBWrapper::Exists implementation (TheCharlatan)
a5c2eb5748 refactor: Fix logging.h includes (TheCharlatan)
84058e0eed refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBWrapper::Read implementation (TheCharlatan)
e4af2408f2 refactor: Pimpl leveldb::Iterator for CDBIterator (TheCharlatan)
ef941ff128 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBIterator::GetValue implementation (TheCharlatan)
b7a1ab5cb4 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBIterator::GetKey implementation (TheCharlatan)
d7437908cd refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBIterator::Seek implementation (TheCharlatan)
ea8135de7e refactor: Pimpl leveldb::batch for CDBBatch (TheCharlatan)
b9870c920d refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBatch::Erase implementation (TheCharlatan)
532ee812a4 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBBatch::Write implementation (TheCharlatan)
afc534df9a refactor: Wrap DestroyDB in dbwrapper helper (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Leveldb headers are currently included in the `dbwrapper.h` file and thus available to many of Bitcoin Core's source files. However, leveldb-specific functionality should be abstracted by the `dbwrapper` and does not need to be available to the rest of the code. Having leveldb included in a widely-used header such as `dbwrapper.h` bloats the entire project's header tree.
The `dbwrapper` is a key component of the libbitcoinkernel library. Future users of this library would not want to contend with having the leveldb headers exposed and potentially polluting their project's namespace.
For these reasons, the leveldb headers are removed from the `dbwrapper` by moving leveldb-specific code to the implementation file and creating a [pimpl](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/pimpl) where leveldb member variables are indispensable. As a final step, the leveldb include flags are removed from the `BITCOIN_INCLUDES` and moved to places where the dbwrapper is compiled.
---
This pull request is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587), and more specifically its stage 1 step 3 "Decouple most non-consensus headers from libbitcoinkernel".
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK d8f1222ac5
MarcoFalke:
ACK d8f1222ac5🔠
Tree-SHA512: 0f58309be165af0162e648233451cd80fda88726fc10c0da7bfe4ec2ffa9afe63fbf7ffae9493698d3f39653b4ad870c372eee652ecc90ab1c29d86c387070f3
1. Use const where possible;
2. Rename variables to make them clearer;
3. There is no need to check whether `command` is null since it's a non-optional field.
fabef121b0 refactor: Use EnsureAnyNodeContext (MarcoFalke)
fa1640617e test: Add SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue to mockscheduler RPC (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There should be no risk or downside in adding a call to `SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue` here. In fact, it will make tests less brittle. For example,
* If one sets the timeouts in `test/functional/feature_fee_estimation.py` to `0`, on `master` the test will fail and here it will pass.
* It may avoid a rare (theoretic) intermittent issue in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28108/files#r1268966663
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fabef121b0
furszy:
Code review ACK fabef121. Convinced by checking all current tests usages.
Tree-SHA512: c9e9a536a8721d1b3f267a66b40578b34948892301affdcad121ef8e02bf17037305d0dd53aa94b1b064753e66f9cfb31823b916b707a9d812627f502b818003
This check is already done by the rpc parser. Re-doing it is adding dead
code. Instead, throwing an exception when the assumption does not hold
is the already correct behavior.
To make the fuzz test more accurate and not swallow all runtime errors,
add a check that the passed in UniValue sighash argument is either a
string or null.
Co-authored-by: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
6960c81cbf kernel: Remove Univalue from kernel library (TheCharlatan)
10eb3a9faa kernel: Split ParseSighashString (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Besides the build system changes, this is a mostly move-only change for moving the few UniValue-related functions out of kernel files.
UniValue is not required by any of the kernel components and a JSON library should not need to be part of a consensus library.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6960c81cbf
theuni:
Re-ACK 6960c81cbf
stickies-v:
re-ACK 6960c81cbf
Tree-SHA512: d92e4cb4e12134c94b517751bd746d39f9b8da528ec3a1c94aaedcce93274a3bae9277832e8a7c0243c13df0397ca70ae7bbb24ede200018c569f8d81103c1da
node_context is never null, but if it was, it would lead to a nullptr
dereference in node_context->scheduler. Just use EnsureAnyNodeContext
everywhere for more robust, consistent, and correct code.
