These were added as part of #9366 to fix issues with Protobuf.
Now that we no-longer use Protobuf, there's no reason to maintain a
duplicate set of byteswap tests for qt.
257f55c119 qt, refactor: Drop redundant setEditTriggers(NoEditTriggers) calls (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The models of the both views have no `Qt::ItemIsEditable` flag:
3c87dbe95c/src/qt/peertablemodel.cpp (L218-L224)3c87dbe95c/src/qt/bantablemodel.cpp (L148-L154)
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
utACK 257f55c119, seems reasonable.
jarolrod:
ACK 257f55c119, looks correct.
Tree-SHA512: 4356e4d785055935fba452488a5d97ed95995def97b26ab18af43a545835f9e9d4c347e4cad7952aa725179cf6e775a2208c48730feebf40e3b1a7ba5f402af0
915e34112b qt: fix issue when disabling the auto-enabled blank wallet checkbox (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
As detailed by #151, On `master` a user can create the confusing scenario where you have a disabled `Encrypt Wallet` checkbox and a selected `Disable Private Keys` checkbox after unselecting the auto-enabled `Blank Wallet` checkbox.
This commit makes it so that when the `Blank Wallet` checkbox is auto-selected after the user selects `Disable Private keys`, unselecting it will also unselect the `Disable Private Keys` checkbox, which in turn re-enables the `Encrypt Wallet` checkbox.
Below are screenshots comparing the behavior of selecting `Disable Private Keys` then unselecting the `Blank Wallet` between `master` and this `PR`:
**Master:**
| Select `Disable Private Keys` | Unselect `Blank Wallet` |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|  |  |
**PR:**
| Select `Disable Private Keys` | Unselect `Blank Wallet` |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|  |  |
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 915e34112b
Talkless:
ACK 915e34112b
Tree-SHA512: ce6ecbc35b94a08cabf0b8a24dbdfc874d82cc8918cc8623dce8172c7fc9c75d63a13b036bae5f7ab2c090f8d020574a542285d1651600813faf5d91e2506a8d
4f2653a890 test: Use deterministic chain in utxo set hash test (Fabian Jahr)
4973c5175c test: Remove wallet dependency of utxo set hash test (Fabian Jahr)
1a27af1d7b rpc: Improve gettxoutsetinfo help (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-ups to #19145:
- Small improvement on the help text of RPC gettxoutsetinfo
- Using deterministic blockchain in the test `functional/feature_utxo_set_hash.py`
- Removing wallet dependency in the test `functional/feature_utxo_set_hash.py`
Split out of #19521.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4f2653a890👲
Tree-SHA512: 92927b3aa22b6324eb4fc9d346755313dec44d973aa69a0ebf80a8569b5f3a7cf3539721ebdba183737534b9e29b3e33f412515890f0d0b819878032a3bba8f9
fa818ca202 fuzz: [refactor] Use PickValue where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`PickValue` is a bit less typing, so I think it should be used where possible
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa818ca202: patch looks correct and `PickValue` is better :)
Tree-SHA512: 49ed030694e3b7676654f1615f033287d26e2f0bc29647e1db56e0d84e14d29080f3e1898f5df8d644d834b8ded3ce713d2425ea86a37c9279d01f86ad03c202
246774e264 depends: fix Qt precompiled headers bug (Igor Cota)
8e7ad4146d depends: disable Qt Vulkan support on Android (Igor Cota)
ba46adaa1a CI: add Android APK build to cirrus (Igor Cota)
7563720e30 CI: add Android APK build script (Igor Cota)
ebfb10cb75 Qt: add Android packaging support (Igor Cota)
Pull request description:
This PR is the third and final piece of the basic Android support puzzle - it depends on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16110 and is related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16883. It introduces an `android` directory under `qt` and a simple way to build an Android package of `bitcoin-qt`:
1. Build depends for Android as described in the [README](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/README.md)
2. Configure with one of the resulting prefixes
3. Run `make && make apk` in `src/qt`
The resulting APK files will be in `android/build/outputs/apk`. You can install them manually or with [adb](https://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/adb). One can also open the `android` directory in Android Studio for that integrated development and debugging experience. `BitcoinQtActivity` is your starting point.
Under the hood makefile `apk` target:
1. Renames the `bitcoin-qt` binary to `libbitcoin-qt.so` and copies it over to a folder under `android/libs` depending on which prefix and corresponding [ABI](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html#sa) `bitcoin-qt` was built for
2. Takes `libc++_shared.so` from the Android NDK and puts in the same place. It [must be included](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/cpp-support) in the APK
3. Extracts Qt for Android Java support files from the `qtbase` archive in `depends/sources` to `android/src`
There is also just a tiny bit of `ifdef`'d code to make the Qt Widgets menus usable. It's not pretty but it works and is a stepping stone towards https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16883.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 246774e264
laanwj:
Code review ACK 246774e264
Tree-SHA512: ba30a746576a167545223c35a51ae60bb0838818779fc152c210f5af1413961b2a6ab6af520ff92cbc8dcd5dcb663e81ca960f021218430c1f76397ed4cead6c
804ac10631 remove unnecessary newline from initWarning() argument (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
Run: `src/bitcoind -wallet=nosuchfile`
Without this patch, `debug.log` contains:
```
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z Warning: Skipping -wallet path that doesn't exist. Failed to load database path '/home/larry/.bitcoin/wallets/nosuchfile'. Path does not exist.
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z init message: Loading banlist...
```
With this patch, the empty line isn't present. This PR fixes a similar problem with `src/bitcoind -conf=nosuchfile`
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 804ac10631: patch looks correct!
jarolrod:
tACK 804ac10631, nice catch!
theStack:
Code-review ACK 804ac10631
Tree-SHA512: dfcbaaa72ca24ac40233ac56840cfba8827853711d3df6e229ce940686f2ebf8bf0560bafcaa73a4d82d179a5050af0d3cabdc47b3b1dfd6aaadf718a6635f11
This commit makes it so that when the `Blank Wallet` checkbox is auto-selected after the user selects 'Disable Private' keys, unselecting it will also unselect the 'Disable Private Keys' checkbox, which in turn re-enables the 'Encrypt Wallet' checkbox.
fac921f23f fuzz: Fix tx_pool target to properly fuzz immature outpoints (MarcoFalke)
fa2b95f861 fuzz: Style fixups (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also includes a commit for minor style fixups
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK fac921f23f this fixes it 👍
Tree-SHA512: 1575ba115b2009b653921511c163bd846cd381d6fc92b04a899c0686d23a02bdcdd95c81776b515b80ae187bcec3ccaca3aa88fcecbec888f73ca2d875eef506
d09ebc4723 Fix wrong(1024) divisor for 1000-based prefixes (wodry)
Pull request description:
v.0.21.0
I saw in the GUI peer window in the "received" column `1007 KB`, and after increasing to >=1024 I guess, it switched to `1 MB`. I would have expected the display unit to change from KB to MB already at value >=1000.
I looked into the code, and the values appear to be power-of-2 byte values, so the switching at >=1024 and not >=1000 seems correct.
But the unit display is not precisely correct, binary prefixes should be used for power-of-2 byte values.
To be correct, this PR changes ~~KB/MB/GB to KiB/MiB/GiB.~~ KB to kB and the divisor from 1024 to 1000.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK d09ebc4723, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (Qt 5.12.8) the both "Network Traffic" and "Peers" tabs of the "Node Window".
jarolrod:
ACK d09ebc4723
leonardojobim:
Tested ACK d09ebc4723 on Ubuntu 20.04 Qt 5.12.8
Tree-SHA512: 8f830b08cc3fd36dc8a18f1192959fe55d1644938044bf31d770f7c3bf8475fba6da5019a2d2024d5b2c81a8dab112f360c555367814a14f4d05c89d130f25b0
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an
identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact
(with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely,
always.
1404c57403 [doc] Coin: explain that IsSpent() can also mean never existed (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This can be especially confusing where `AccessCoin()` is used with logic like this:
```c++
while (iter.n < MAX_OUTPUTS_PER_BLOCK) {
const Coin& alternate = view.AccessCoin(iter);
if (!alternate.IsSpent()) return alternate;
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 1404c57403
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1404c57403
jnewbery:
utACK 1404c57403
Tree-SHA512: 418618dd7e08bd5cc8360e3501d0f57e34100e5101ad3b8e0a819923fa860f44c7f2fada0f8447a1af3c2601fd72bfe619b91ff2f26f7133ceaeb0c98b017b12
55554463c1 fuzz: Use ConsumeWeakEnum in addrman for service flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This has minimally better performance. Reported by me in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20228#discussion_r598081787
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 55554463c1
vasild:
ACK 55554463c1
Tree-SHA512: 4e5f51fe4f2bd7b2f37d0690e41203341ba45c0c9bc9247449cd26cfb5f77dc2ec61df3e4963276f68694e4b3ca3d0a76367a51c4d775501edeb3224d305a261
fa4cebadcf util: Make Assume() usable as unary expression (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Assume shouldn't behave different at the call site depending on build flags. Currently compilation fails if it is used as expression. Fix that by using the lambda approach from `Assert()` without the `assert()`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa4cebadcf
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4cebadcf: patch looks correct and commit hash starts with `fa`
Tree-SHA512: 9ec9ac8d410cdaf5e4e28df571a89e3d23d38e05a7027bb726cae3da6e9314734277e5a218e9e090cc17e10db763da71052c229ad642077ca5824ee42022f3ed
5294f0d5a9 refactor: return std::nullopt instead of {} (fanquake)
Pull request description:
In #21415 [we decided](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21415#issuecomment-800236640) to return `std::optional` rather than `{}` for
uninitialized values. This PR replaces the two remaining usages of `{}`
with `std::nullopt`.
As a side-effect, this also quells the spurious GCC 10.2.x warning that
we've had reported quite a few times. i.e #21318, #21248, #20797.
```bash
txmempool.cpp: In member function ‘CTxMemPool::setEntries CTxMemPool::GetIterSet(const std::set<uint256>&) const’:
txmempool.cpp:898:13: warning: ‘<anonymous>’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
898 | return {};
| ^
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 5294f0d5a9, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 5b776be79ab26e5a3a5fc2b463b394ea5ce6797ed5558424873fa4ecee2898170eff76d6da9d69394d28f8f98974117fc63b922a3e19c52f5294c83073e79bb0
In #21415 we decided to return `std::optional` rather than `{}` for
uninitialized values. This PR repalces the two remaining usages of `{}`
with `std::nullopt`.
As a side-effect, this also quells the spurious GCC 10.2.x warning that
we've had reported quite a few times. i.e #21318, #21248, #20797.
```bash
txmempool.cpp: In member function ‘CTxMemPool::setEntries CTxMemPool::GetIterSet(const std::set<uint256>&) const’:
txmempool.cpp:898:13: warning: ‘<anonymous>’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
898 | return {};
| ^
```
Introduce an android directory under qt and allow one to package bitcoin-qt for Android by running make apk.
Add bitcoin-qt Android build instructions.
3d086f42ab test: add ParseUInt16() test coverage (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
`ParseUInt16()` was just added in #21328.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 3d086f42ab: patch looks correct & more coverage is better than less coverage
Tree-SHA512: bf7f96deb7c1531419565907f0ea8a8e32b368d4b823a3e80928b2c118edbf643ea06e357b4b5504a89f855caeed289daa9f823c740231ed6ad1b8ed00285ce8
787df19b09 validation: don't try to invalidate genesis block (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the block invalidation method (`CChainState::InvalidateBlock`), the code for creating the candidate block map assumes that the passed block's previous block (`pindex->pprev`) is available and otherwise segfaults due to null-pointer deference in `CBlockIndexWorkComparator()` (see analysis by practicalswift in #20914), i.e. it doesn't work with the genesis block. Rather than analyzing all possible code paths and implications for this corner case, simply fail early if the genesis block is passed.
Fixes #20914.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 787df19b09. Tested invalidation of generic on regtest.
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 787df19b09
Tree-SHA512: 978be7cf2bd1c1faebfe945d191ac77dea72791bea826459abd308f77c74c5991efee495a38817c306e488ecd5208b5c888df7d9d044132dd9a06bbbdb256b6c
8dd5946c0b add functional test (Larry Ruane)
b5a80fa7e4 util: Handle HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE in bitcoin-cli (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
If `bitcoind` is processing 16 RPC requests, attempting to submit another request using `bitcoin-cli` produces this less-than-helpful error message: `error: couldn't parse reply from server`. This PR changes the error to: `error: server response: Work queue depth exceeded`.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 8dd5946c0b
luke-jr:
utACK 8dd5946c0b (no changes since previous utACK)
hebasto:
re-ACK 8dd5946c0b, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18335#pullrequestreview-460621350) review.
darosior:
ACK 8dd5946c0b
Tree-SHA512: 33e25f6ff05d9b56fae2bdb68b132557bb8e995f5438ac4fbbc53c304c5152a98aa43c43600c31d8a6a2830cbd48bf8ec7d89dce50190b29ec00a43830126913
