fa9af21878 scripted-diff: Use getInt<T> over get_int/get_int64 (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems better to see the return type directly and be able to modify it easier, as the return type is used for exceptions (in-range checking and parsing feedback).
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa9af21878
Tree-SHA512: 284aa2527d0f663ca01550115025c9c64c787531d595f866c718f6ad09b9b0cac1e683a7d77f8009b75de990fd37166b44063ffa83fba8a04e9a31600b4c2725
a62e84438d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
4fad7e46d9 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo)
9cc8e876e4 refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled.
As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
Code review ACK a62e84438d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious.
Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace
all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed.
Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
This increase the maximum number of pubkeys to 20 (valid in P2WSH and
P2SH-P2WSH) and only checks the redeemScript doesn't exceed
MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE for P2SH, as this checked is removed under
Segwit context.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
9048c58e10 Remove pointer cast in CRPCTable::dumpArgMap (Russell Yanofsky)
14f3d9b908 refactor: Add RPC server ExecuteCommands function (Russell Yanofsky)
6158a6d397 refactor: Replace JSONRPCRequest fHelp field with mode field (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is needed to fix the `rpc_help.py` test failing in #10102: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5469433013469184?command=ci#L2275
The [`CRPCTable::dumpArgMap`](16b784d953/src/rpc/server.cpp (L492)) method currently works by casting RPC `unique_id` integer field to a function pointer, and then calling it. The `unique_id` field wasn't supposed to be used this way (it's meant to be used to detect RPC aliases) and as a result, this code segfaults in the `rpc_help.py` test in multiprocess PR #10102 because wallet RPC functions aren't directly accessible from the node process.
Fix this by adding a new `GET_ARGS` RPC request mode to retrieve argument information similar to the way the `GET_HELP` mode retrieves help information.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 9048c58e10👑
Tree-SHA512: cd1a01c1daa5bde2c2455b63548371ee4cf39688313969ad2016d9a0fd4344102e3fd43034058f253364518e9632d57cf21abffad0d6a2c0c94b7a6921cbe615
e987ae5a55 test: Add test for deterministic UTXO set hash results (Fabian Jahr)
6ccc8fc067 test: Add test for gettxoutsetinfo RPC with MuHash (Fabian Jahr)
0d3b2f643d rpc: Add hash_type MUHASH to gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
2474645f3b refactor: Separate hash and stats calculation in coinstats (Fabian Jahr)
a1fcceac69 refactor: Improve encapsulation between MuHash3072 and Num3072 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is another Pr in the series PRs for Coinstatsindex (see overview in #18000). This PR adds the `hash_type` option `muhash` to `gettxoutsetinfo` through which the user can calculate the serialized muhash of the utxo set. This PR does not use the index yet.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK e987ae5
achow101:
ACK e987ae5a55
jonatack:
Tested re-ACK e987ae5a55 per `git diff 3506d90 e987ae5`, reviewed diff, debug built, ran gettxoutsetinfo -signet and help on this branch vs master, at height 23127 both returned `hash_serialized_2` of `2b72d65f3b6efb2311f58374ea2b939abf49684d44f4bafda45faa3b5452a454` and this branch returned `muhash` of `c9f1ff12d345ccf9939c6bbf087e6f7399b6115adee1569287e9c5c43dbb475c`
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e987ae5a55. Looks very good. I left one suggestion to simplify code, but feel free to ignore it here and maybe consider it for later since PR has already had a lot of review.
Tree-SHA512: 9a739ce375e73749fa69a467262b60d3e5314ef384e2d7150b3bbc8e4125cd9fd1db95306623bb9a632fcbaf5d9d2bf2f5cc43bf717d4ff5e2c9c4b52dd9296c
CRPCTable::dumpArgMap currently works by casting RPC command unique_id
integer field to a function pointer, and then calling the function. The
unique_id field wasn't supposed to be used this way (it's meant to be
used to detect RPC aliases), and this code segfaults in the rpc_help.py
test in multiprocess PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102
because wallet RPC functions aren't directly accessible from the node
process.
Fix this by adding a new GET_ARGS request mode to retrieve argument
information similar to the way the GET_HELP mode retrieves help
information.
fa77de2baa rpc: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (misc) (MarcoFalke)
fa50bdc755 rpc: Limit echo to 10 args (MarcoFalke)
fa89ca9b5b refactor: Use C++11 range based for loops to simplify rpc code (MarcoFalke)
fa459bdc87 rpc: Treat all args after a hidden arg as hidden as well (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is split out from #18531 to just touch the RPC methods in misc. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa77de2baa
fjahr:
tested ACK fa77de2baa
theStack:
ACK fa77de2baa
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa77de2baa. Pretty straightfoward changes
Tree-SHA512: badae1606518c0b55ce2c0bb9025d14f05556532375eb20fd6f3bfadae1e5e6568860bff8599d037e655bf1d23f1f464ca17f4db10a6ab3d502b6e9e61c7b3d3
fa7592bfa8 rpc: Update server to use new RPCHelpMan (MarcoFalke)
aaaaad5627 rpc: Add option to hide RPCArg (MarcoFalke)
fa9708f94c rpc: Assert that passed arg names are equal to hardcoded ones (MarcoFalke)
faaeb2b0b3 rpc: Add CRPCCommand constructor which takes RPCHelpMan (MarcoFalke)
fa8ec00061 rpc: Check that left section is not multiline (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is split out from #18531 to just touch the RPC methods in server. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa7592bfa8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa7592bfa8. Looks great! Just some hidden arg and Check() and comment cleanups since last review
Tree-SHA512: e64b6a212f4a3aeedeee47557559bde104d5fd40cdc1746b27eb2f3d4c8885d5e6e4dd287595ea11cdbc6a939654fe103cae765fd505875444d851f0abb11308
40506bf93f test: Test gettxouttsetinfo hash_type option (Fabian Jahr)
f17a4d1c4d rpc: Add hash_type NONE to gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
a712cf6f68 rpc: gettxoutsetinfo can specify hash_type (only legacy option for now) (Fabian Jahr)
605884ef21 refactor: Extract GetBogoSize function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is another intermediate part of the Coinstats Index (tracked in #18000).
Sjors suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18000#issuecomment-641423019) that the part of the changes in #19145 that don't rely on the new `hash_type` muhash, i.e. that are for `hash_type=none`, could be merged separately from everything involving muhash. So these changes are extracted from #19145 here and can be merged without any other requirements.
Building the index with no UTXO set hash is still valuable because `gettxoutsetinfo` can still be used to audit the `total_amount` for example. By itself this PR is not a huge improvement, `hash_type=none` is speeding up `gettxoutsetinfo` by about 10%, but it enables the implementation of an index on top of it in a follow-up and that means large parts of the index code of Coinstats Index can be merged while reviews for the hashing algorithm might take longer.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 40506bf93f 🖨
Sjors:
tACK 40506bf93f
Tree-SHA512: 3964c2b8eed427511b1aa9b2ef285dff27dc4d1537d72c3911e435b6e6b40912232da4acb3a09bd19a0372ddffa44103388d8a650169d95a4a727b970d210add
- Move the decision whether to translate an error message to where it is
defined. This simplifies call sites: no more `InitError(Untranslated(...))`.
- Make all functions in `util/error.h` consistently return a
`bilingual_str`. We've decided to use this as error message type so
let's roll with it.
This has no functional changes: no messages are changed, no new
translation messages are defined.
