CTxDestination is really our internal representation of an address and
doesn't really have anything to do with standard script types, so move
them to their own file.
2022917223 Add secp256k1_selftest call (Pieter Wuille)
3bfca788b0 Remove explicit enabling of default modules (Pieter Wuille)
4462cb0498 Adapt to libsecp256k1 API changes (Pieter Wuille)
9d47e7b71b Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 44c2452fd3..21ffe4b22a (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Now that libsecp256k1 has a release (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-December/021271.html), update the subtree to match it.
The changes themselves are not very impactful for Bitcoin Core, but include:
* It's no longer needed to specify whether contexts are for signing or verification or both (all contexts support everything), so make use of that in this PR.
* Verification operations can use the static context now, removing the need for some infrastructure in pubkey.cpp to make sure a context exists.
* Most modules are now enabled by default, so we can drop explicit enabling for them.
* CI improvements (in particular, MSVC and more recent MacOS)
* Introduction of an internal int128 type, which has no effect for GCC/Clang builds, but enables 128-bit multiplication in MSVC, giving a ~20% speedup there (but still slower than GCC/Clang).
* Release process changes (process documentation, changelog, ...).
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 2022917223, but 4462cb0498 could use more eyes on it.
achow101:
ACK 2022917223
jonasnick:
utACK 2022917223
Tree-SHA512: 8a9fe28852abe74abd6f96fef16a94d5a427b1d99bff4caab1699014d24698aab9b966a5364a46ed1001c07a7c1d825154ed4e6557c7decce952b77330a8616b
* Use SECP256K1_CONTEXT_NONE when creating signing context, as
SECP256K1_CONTEXT_SIGN is deprecated and unnecessary.
* Use secp256k1_static_context where applicable.
3e9d0bea8d build: only run high priority benchmarks in 'make check' (furszy)
466b54bd4a bench: surround main() execution with try/catch (furszy)
3da7cd2a76 bench: explicitly make all current benchmarks "high" priority (furszy)
05b8c76232 bench: add "priority level" to the benchmark framework (furszy)
f1593780b8 bench: place benchmark implementation inside benchmark namespace (furszy)
Pull request description:
This is from today's meeting, a simple "priority level" for the benchmark framework.
Will allow us to run certain benchmarks while skip non-prioritized ones in `make check`.
By default, `bench_bitcoin` will run all the benchmarks. `make check`will only run the high priority ones,
and have marked all the existent benchmarks as "high priority" to retain the current behavior.
Could test it by modifying any benchmark priority to something different from "high", and
run `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=high` and/or `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=medium,low`
(the first command will skip the modified bench while the second one will include it).
Note: the second commit could be avoided by having a default arg value for the priority
level but.. an explicit set in every `BENCHMARK` macro call makes it less error-prone.
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
achow101:
ACK 3e9d0bea8d
theStack:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
stickies-v:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
Tree-SHA512: ece59bf424c5fc1db335f84caa507476fb8ad8c6151880f1f8289562e17023aae5b5e7de03e8cbba6337bf09215f9be331e9ef51c791c43bce43f7446813b054
