f68cba29b3 blockman: Replace m_reindexing with m_blockfiles_indexed (Ryan Ofsky)
1b1c6dcca0 test: Add functional test for continuing a reindex (TheCharlatan)
201c1a9282 indexes: Don't wipe indexes again when already reindexing (TheCharlatan)
804f09dfa1 kernel: Add less confusing reindex options (Ryan Ofsky)
e172553223 validation: Remove needs_init from LoadBlockIndex (TheCharlatan)
533eab7d67 bugfix: Streamline setting reindex option (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
When restarting `bitcoind` during an ongoing reindex without setting the `-reindex` flag again, the block and coins db is left intact, but any data from the optional indexes is discarded. While not a bug per se, wiping the data again is
wasteful, both in terms of having to write it again, as well as potentially leading to longer startup times. So keep the index data instead when continuing a prior reindex.
Also includes a bugfix and smaller code cleanups around the reindexing code. The bug was introduced in b47bd95920: "kernel: De-globalize fReindex".
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK f68cba29b3
fjahr:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3
furszy:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3. Only changes since last review were cherry-picking suggested commits that rename variables, improving comments, and making some tweaks to test code.
Tree-SHA512: b252228cc76e9f1eaac56d5bd9e4eac23408e0fc04aeffd97a85417f046229364673ee1ca7410b9b6e7b692b03f13ece17c42a10176da0d7e975a8915deb98ca
This adds a bitset module that implements a BitSet<N> class, a variant
of std::bitset with a few additional features that cannot be implemented
in a wrapper without performance loss (specifically, finding first and
last bit set, or iterating over all set bits).
As per doc/developer-notes#logging, LogError should be used for
severe problems that require the node to shut down.
Co-Authored-By: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
fa780e1c25 build: Remove --enable-gprof (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is unclear what benefit this option has, given that:
* `gprof` requires re-compilation (`perf` and other tools can instead be used on existing executables)
* `gprof` requires hardening to be disabled
* `gprof` doesn't work with `clang`
* `perf` is documented in the dev-notes, and test notes, and embedded into the functional test framework; `gprof` isn't
* Anyone really wanting to use it could pass the required flags to `./configure`
* I couldn't find any mention of the use of `gprof` in the discussions in this repo, apart from the initial pull request adding it (cfaac2a60f)
* Keeping it means that it needs to be maintained and ported to CMake
Fix all issues by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa780e1c25
hebasto:
ACK fa780e1c25, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
willcl-ark:
crACK fa780e1c25
Tree-SHA512: 0a9ff363ac2bec8b743878a4e3147f18bc16823d00c5007568432c36320bd0199b13b6d0ce828a9a83c2cc434c058afaa64eb2eccfbd93ed85b81ce10c41760c
15796d4b61 build: warn on self-assignment (Cory Fields)
53372f2176 refactor: disable self-assign warning for tests (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Belt-and suspenders after #30234. Self-assignment should be safe _and_ discouraged.
We used to opt out of this warning because something deep in our serialization/byteswapping code could self-assign, but that doesn't appear to be the case anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 15796d4b61
fanquake:
ACK 15796d4b61 - not a huge fan of inline pragma usage, but this seems fine, given it's to work around an already-fixed compiler bug, and we'll only be carrying it for a shortish time in any case.
Tree-SHA512: 1f95f7c730b974ad1da55ebd381040bac312f2f380fff9d569ebab91d7c1963592a84d1613d81d96238c6f5a66aa40deebba68a76f6b24b02150d0a77c769654
1f6ab1215b minor: remove unnecessary semicolons from RPC content type examples (Matthew Zipkin)
b225295298 test: use json-rpc 2.0 in all functional tests by default (Matthew Zipkin)
391843b029 bitcoin-cli: use json-rpc 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
d39bdf3397 test: remove unused variable in interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
0ead71df8c doc: update and link for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to #27101.
- Addresses [post-merge comments ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27101#discussion_r1606723428)
- bitcoin-cli uses JSON-RPC 2.0
- functional tests use JSON-RPC 2.0 by default (exceptions are in the regression tests added by #27101)
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
cbergqvist:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
Tree-SHA512: 49bf14c70464081280216ece538a2f5ec810bac80a86a83ad3284f0f1b017edf755a1a74a45be279effe00218170cafde7c2de58aed07097a95c2c6b837a6b6c
In order to ensure that the change of nVersion to a uint32_t in the
previous commit has no effect, rename nVersion to version in this commit
so that reviewers can easily spot if a spot was missed or if there is a
check somewhere whose semantics have changed.
This is a just a mechanical change, renaming and inverting the meaning
of the indexing variable.
"m_blockfiles_indexed" is a more straightforward name for this variable
because this variable just indicates whether or not
<datadir>/blocks/blk?????.dat files have been indexed in the
<datadir>/blocks/index LevelDB database. The name "m_reindexing" was
more confusing, it could be true even if -reindex was not specified, and
false when it was specified. Also, the previous name unnecessarily
required thinking about the whole reindexing process just to understand
simple checks in validation code about whether blocks were indexed.
The motivation for this change is to follow up on previous commits,
moving away from having multiple variables called "reindex" internally,
and instead naming variables individually after what they do and
represent.
Before this change continuing a reindex without the -reindex flag set
would leave the block and coins db intact, but discard the data of the
optional indexes. While not a bug per se, wiping the data again is
wasteful, both in terms of having to write it again, and potentially
leading to longer startup times.
When initially running a reindex, both the block index and any further
activated indexes are wiped. On an index's Init(), both the best block
stored by the index and the chain's tip are null. An index's m_synced
member is therefore true. This means that it will process blocks through
validation events while the reindex is running.
Currently, if the reindex is continued without the user re-specifying
the reindex flag, the block index is preserved but further index data is
wiped. This leads to the stored best block being null, but the chain tip
existing. The m_synced member will be set to false. The index will not
process blocks through the validation interface, but instead use the
background sync once the reindex is completed.
If the index is preserved (this change) after a restart its best block
may potentially match the chain tip. The m_synced member will be set to
true and the index can process validation events during the rest of the
reindex.
Drop confusing kernel options:
BlockManagerOpts::reindex
ChainstateLoadOptions::reindex
ChainstateLoadOptions::reindex_chainstate
Replacing them with more straightforward options:
ChainstateLoadOptions::wipe_block_tree_db
ChainstateLoadOptions::wipe_chainstate_db
Having two options called "reindex" which did slightly different things
was needlessly confusing (one option wiped the block tree database, and
the other caused block files to be rescanned). Also the previous set of
options did not allow rebuilding the block database without also
rebuilding the chainstate database, when it should be possible to do
those independently.
30a01134cd [doc] update bips.md for 431 (glozow)
9dbe6a03f0 [test] wallet uses CURRENT_VERSION which is 2 (glozow)
539404fe0f [policy] make v3 transactions standard (glozow)
052ede75af [refactor] use TRUC_VERSION in place of 3 (glozow)
Pull request description:
Make `nVersion=3` (which is currently nonstandard on mainnet) standard.
Note that we will treat these transactions as Topologically Restricted Until Confirmation (TRUC). Spec is in BIP 431 and implementation is in #28948, #29306, and #29873
See #27463 for overall project tracking, and #29319 for information about relevance to cluster mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK 30a01134c
achow101:
ACK 30a01134cd
instagibbs:
utACK 30a01134cd
murchandamus:
ACK 30a01134cd
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 30a01134cd🛰️
Tree-SHA512: 2a4aec0442c860e792a061d83e36483c1f1b426f946efbdf664c8db97a596e498b535707e1d3a900218429486ea69fd4552e3d476526a6883cbd5556c6534b48
It does not control any actual logic and the log message as well as the
comment are obsolete, since no database initialization takes place there
anymore. Log messages indicating when indexes and chainstate databases
are loaded exist in other places.
Reverts a bug introduced in b47bd95920
"kernel: De-globalize fReindex". The change leads to a GUI user being
prompted to re-index on a chainstate loading failure more than once as
well as the node actually not reindexing if the user chooses to. Fix
this by setting the reindexing option instead of the atomic, which can
be safely re-used to indicate that a reindex should be attempted.
The bug specifically is caused by the chainman, and thus the blockman
and its m_reindexing atomic being destroyed on every iteration of
the for loop.
The reindex option for ChainstateLoadOptions is currently also set in a
confusing way. By using the reindex atomic, it is not obvious in which
scenario it is true or false.
The atomic is controlled by both the user passing the -reindex option,
the user chosing to reindex if something went wrong during chainstate
loading when running the gui, and by reading the reindexing flag from
the block tree database in LoadBlockIndexDB. In practice this read is
done through the chainstate module's CompleteChainstateInitialization's
call to LoadBlockIndex. Since this is only done after the reindex option
is set already, it does not have an effect on it.
Make this clear by using the reindex option from the blockman opts which
is only controlled by the user.
This is an STL-like container that interface-wise looks like std::deque, but
is backed by a (fixed size, with vector-like capacity/reserve) circular buffer.
This new test uses the `vExtraTxnForCompact` (`extra_txn`) vector of
optional orphan/conflicted/etc. transactions to provide a transaction
in a compact block that was not otherwise present in our mempool.
This also covers an improbable nullptr deref bug addressed in
bf031a517c (#29752) where the
`extra_txn` vec/circular-buffer was sometimes null-initialized and
not yet filled when dereferenced in `PartiallyDownloadedBlock::InitData`.
8801e319d5 refactor: remove unused `CKey::Negate` method (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and it's also unlikely that for any other proposal we'd ever need to negate private keys at this abstraction level. I'd argue that this operation is usually something that should happen within a secp256k1 module (like e.g. done in MuSig2, Silent Payments...).
(If there is really demand in the future, it's also trivial to reintroduce the method.)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 8801e319d5
sipa:
ACK 8801e319d5
achow101:
ACK 8801e319d5
Tree-SHA512: 7bc1566399635c5c6e4940a2724c865d5443eb190024379099330c023c516f1e4f423ed9e8c42bc93413b723a5464ec79d3f879f58c0e598fe24f495238df4ec
2451a217dd test: addmultisigaddress, coverage for script size limits (furszy)
53302a0981 bugfix: addmultisigaddress, add unsupported operation for redeem scripts over 520 bytes (furszy)
9be6065cc0 test: coverage for 16-20 segwit multisig scripts (furszy)
9d9a91c4ea rpc: bugfix, incorrect segwit redeem script size used in signrawtransactionwithkey (furszy)
0c9fedfc45 fix incorrect multisig redeem script size limit for segwit (furszy)
f7a173b578 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_sortedmulti_descriptors_bip67' (furszy)
4f33dbd8f8 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_mixing_uncompressed_and_compressed_keys' (furszy)
25a81705d3 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove unnecessary checkbalances() (furszy)
b5a3289433 test: refactor, multiple cleanups in rpc_createmultisig.py (furszy)
3635d43268 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove manual wallet initialization (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28250#issuecomment-1674830104 and more.
Currently, redeem scripts longer than 520 bytes, which are technically valid under segwit rules, have flaws in the following processes:
1) The multisig creation process fails to deduce the output descriptor, resulting in the generation of an incorrect descriptor. Additionally, the accompanying user warning is also inaccurate.
2) The `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC command fail to sign them.
3) The legacy wallet `addmultisigaddress` wrongly discards them.
The issue arises because most of these flows are utilizing the legacy spkm keystore, which imposes
the [p2sh max redeem script size rule](ded6873340/src/script/signingprovider.cpp (L160)) on all scripts. Which blocks segwit redeem scripts longer than
the max element size in all the previously mentioned processes (`createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, and
`signrawtransactionwithkey`).
This PR fixes the problem, enabling the creation of multisig output descriptors involving more than 15 keys and
allowing the signing of these scripts, along with other post-segwit redeem scripts that surpass the 520-byte
p2sh limit.
Important note:
Instead of adding support for these longer redeem scripts in the legacy wallet, an "unsupported operation"
error has been added. The reasons behind this decision are:
1) The introduction of this feature brings about a compatibility-breaking change that requires downgrade
protection; older wallets would be unable to interact with these "new" legacy wallets.
2) Considering the ongoing deprecation of the legacy spkm, this issue provides another compelling
reason to transition towards descriptors.
Testing notes:
To easily verify each of the fixes, I decoupled the tests into standalone commits. So they can be
cherry-picked on top of master. Where `rpc_createmultisig.py` (with and without the `--legacy-wallet`
arg) will fail without the bugs fixes commits.
Extra note:
The initial commits improves the `rpc_createmultisig.py` test in many ways. I found this test very
antiquated, screaming for an update and cleanup.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK 2451a217dd
theStack:
Code-review ACK 2451a217dd
achow101:
ACK 2451a217dd
Tree-SHA512: 71794533cbd46b3a1079fb4e9d190d3ea3b615de0cbfa443466e14f05e4616ca90e12ce2bf07113515ea8113e64a560ad572bb9ea9d4835b6fb67b6ae596167f
d7290d662f fuzz: wallet, add target for Crypter (Ayush Singh)
Pull request description:
This PR adds fuzz coverage for `wallet/crypter`.
Motivation: Issue [27272](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27272#issue-1628327906)
I ran this for a long time with Sanitizers on and had no crashes; the average `exec/sec` also looks good to me. However, I would really appreciate it if some of the reviewers could try it on their machines too, and give their feedback.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK d7290d662f
achow101:
ACK d7290d662f
brunoerg:
utACK d7290d662f
Tree-SHA512: f5c496cabdd3263a7e1ad49eeff702725336f76bf19a82e5dbbead082e990889dd43c851d0d2d6ab740f44b8ec2aa06defd9ff6b02be68b5f8b4eaf963f88599
7f3f6c6dc8 refactor: replace hardcoded numbers (Lőrinc)
5676aec1e1 refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as an Enum (josibake)
Pull request description:
Broken out from #28122
---
Bech32(m) was defined with a 90 character limit so that certain guarantees for error detection could be made for segwit addresses (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki#checksum-design).
However, there is nothing about the encoding scheme itself that requires a limit of 90 and in practice bech32(m) is being used without the 90 char limit (e.g. lightning invoices, silent payments). Further, increasing the character limit doesn't do away with error detection, it simply changes the guarantee.
The primary motivation for this change is for being able to parse BIP352 v0 silent payment addresses (see 622c7a98b9), which require up to 118 characters. In addition to BIP352, modeling the character limit as an enum allows us to easily support new address types that use bech32m and specify their own character limit.
ACKs for top commit:
paplorinc:
re-ACK 7f3f6c6dc8
achow101:
ACK 7f3f6c6dc8
theuni:
utACK 7f3f6c6dc8
Tree-SHA512: 9c793d657448c1f795093b9f7d4d6dfa431598f48d54e1c899a69fb2f43aeb68b40ca2ff08864eefeeb6627d4171877234b5df0056ff2a2b84415bc3558bd280
fa3169b073 rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The index-based Arg accessor is redundant with the name-based one. It does not provide any benefit to the code reader, or otherwise, so remove it.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa3169b073, addressed doc nits
achow101:
ACK fa3169b073
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3169b073. One changes since last review are some documentation improvements
Tree-SHA512: f9da1c049dbf38c3b47a8caf8d24d195c2d4b88c7ec45a9ccfb78f1e39f29cb86869f84b308f6e49856b074c06604ab634c90eb89c9c93d2a8169e070aa1bd40
71aae72e1f test: test sendall does ancestor aware funding (ishaanam)
36757941a0 wallet, rpc: implement ancestor aware funding for sendall (ishaanam)
544131f3fb rpc, test: test sendall spends unconfirmed change and unconfirmed inputs when specified (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends unconfirmed change
- Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends regular unconfirmed inputs when specified by user
- Adds ancestor aware funding to `sendall` by using `calculateCombinedBumpFee` and adjusting the effective value accordingly
- Adds a functional test for ancestor aware funding in `sendall`
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK 71aae72e1f
achow101:
ACK 71aae72e1f
furszy:
ACK 71aae72e1f
Tree-SHA512: acaeb7c65166ce53123a1d6cb5012197202246acc02ef9f37a28154cc93afdbd77c25e840ab79bdc7e0b88904014a43ab1ddea79d5337dc310ea210634ab61f0
bd34dd85e7 Use `exact_target` shorthand in coinselector_tests (Murch)
7aa7e30441 Fold GetSelectionWaste() into ComputeAndSetWaste() (Murch)
Pull request description:
PR #26152 moved waste calculation into SelectionResult to be able to correct the waste score on basis of the bump_fee_group_discount for overlapping ancestries. This left two functions with largely overlapping purpose, where one was simply a wrapper of the other. This PR cleans up the overlap, and fixes the double-meaning of `change_cost` where the `GetChange()` function assumed that no change was created when `change_cost` was set to 0. This behavior was exploited in a bunch of tests, but is problematic, because a `change_cost` of 0 is permitted with custom settings for feerate and discard_feerate (i.e. when they’re both 0).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK bd34dd85e7
furszy:
Code ACK bd34dd85e7
ismaelsadeeq:
Code Review ACK bd34dd85e7
Tree-SHA512: 83a2688d45d719dc61a64b5180fe136107faccf401a59df65245c05d701748a03e85ed56fde8c9b7ef39a3ab54374dd3718c559bda5b3f55dafedfd7fed25161
22d0f1a27e [fuzz] Avoid endless waiting in FuzzedSock::{Wait,WaitMany} (marcofleon)
a7fceda68b [fuzz] Make peeking through FuzzedSock::Recv fuzzer friendly (dergoegge)
865cdf3692 [fuzz] Use fuzzer friendly ConsumeRandomLengthByteVector in FuzzedSock::Recv (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
`FuzzedSock` has a few issues that block a fuzzer from making progress. See commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
Tested ACK 22d0f1a27e
brunoerg:
utACK 22d0f1a27e
Tree-SHA512: 2d66fc94ba58b6652ae234bd1dcd33b7d685b5054fe83e0cd624b053dd51519c23148f43a865ab8c8bc5fc2dc25e701952831b99159687474978a90348faa4c5
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport
protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still
BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and
it's also unlikely that any other proposal would need to negate private
keys at this abstraction level.
(If there is really demand, it's trivial to reintroduce the method.)
3c08e11c3e doc: JSON-RPC request Content-Type is application/json (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Specify json content type in RPC examples.
Picks up #29946. Which needed rebasing and the commit message fixing,
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3c08e11c3e
tdb3:
ACK for 3c08e11c3e
Tree-SHA512: 770bbbc0fb324cb63628980b13583cabf02e75079851850170587fb6eca41a70b01dcedaf1926bb6488eb9816a3cc6616fe8cee8c4b7e09aa39b7df5834ca0ec
e3249f2111 fuzz: add more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan`:
- Check `GetKey` and `HasPrivKey` after adding descriptor key.
- Cover `GetEndRange` and `GetKeyPoolSize`.
- Cover `MarkUnusedAddresses` with the scripts from ScriptPubKeys and `GetMetadata` with the destinations from them.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
Tested ACK e3249f2111. I ran the updated harness for ~9 hours on an empty corpus, generated a coverage report, and checked that the new functions mentioned were hit. Coverage of `scriptpubkeyman.cpp` increased.
murchandamus:
Tested ACK e3249f2111
Tree-SHA512: cfab91f6c8401174842e79209c0e9225c08f011fe9b41d0a58bcec716ae4545eaf803867f899ed7b5fbcefea45711f91894e36df082ba19732dd310cd9e61a79
Currently, when the FuzzedDataProvider of a FuzzedSock runs out of data,
FuzzedSock::Wait and WaitMany will simulate endless waiting as the
requested events are never simulated as occured.
Fix this by simulating event occurence when ConsumeBool() returns false
(e.g. when the data provider runs out).
Co-authored-by: dergoegge <n.goeggi@gmail.com>
FuzzedSock only supports peeking at one byte at a time, which is not
fuzzer friendly when trying to receive long data.
Fix this by supporting peek data of arbitrary length instead of only one
byte.
8defc182a3 scripted-diff: Replace nNextSweep with m_next_sweep (marcofleon)
0048680467 increase txorphan harness stability (marcofleon)
Pull request description:
This moves `nNextSweep` from being a static variable in `LimitOrphans` to being a member of the `TxOrphanage` class. This improves the stability of the `txorphan` fuzz harness, as each orphanage (created every iteration) now has its own value for `nNextSweep`.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK 8defc182a3
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 8defc182a3
glozow:
utACK 8defc182a3, I can rebase on this pretty easily
Tree-SHA512: 54d4a5074def764f6c895308b94e417662d2f21f157925421131745f22743907df59971f4ce545063658cd74ec133792cdd8df96ae3e69af8314e9b0ff899d48
