43b8777dc3 refactor: move run_command from util to common (Cory Fields)
192325a77d kernel: move RunCommandParseJSON to its own file (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Because libbitcoinkernel does not include this new object, this has the side-effect of eliminating its unnecessary `boost::process` dependency.
This leaves libbitcoinkernel with 3 remaining boost dependencies:
- `boost::date_time` for `util/time.cpp`, which I'll separate out next. Exactly like this PR.
- `boost::signals2` for which I have a POC re-implementation here: https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/commits/replace-boost-signals
- `boost::multi_index` which I'm not sure about yet.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 43b8777dc3. Could consider squashing the two commits, so the code just moves once instead of twice.
fanquake:
ACK 43b8777dc3
Tree-SHA512: f2a46cac34aaadfb8a1442316152ad354f6990021b82c78d80cae9fd43cd026209ffd62132eaa99d5d0f8cf34e996b6737d318a9d9a3f1d2ff8d17d697abf26d
faa15527d7 test: Use dedicated mempool in TestBasicMining (MacroFake)
fafab384a0 test: Use dedicated mempool in TestPackageSelection (MacroFake)
fa4055d79c test: Use dedicated mempool in TestPrioritisedMining (MacroFake)
fa29218285 test: Pass mempool reference to AssemblerForTest (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This cleans up the miner tests:
* Removes duplicate/redundant and thus confusing chainparams object.
* Uses a fresh mempool for each subtest instead of using the "global" one from the testing setup. This makes it easier to follow the tests in smaller scopes. Also it makes sure the mempool is truly cleared by reconstructing it. Finally, this removes calls to `clear`, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19909
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK faa15527d7
Tree-SHA512: ced1260f6ab70fba74b0fac7ff4fc7adfddcd2f3bee785249d2a4a9055ac253eff9090edbda7a17e72a71a81b56ff708d5ff64e1f57ebc7b7747d6c88fec51e3
33b12e5df6 docs: improve docs where MemPoolLimits is used (stickies-v)
6945853c0b test: use NoLimits() in MempoolIndexingTest (stickies-v)
3a86f24a4c refactor: mempool: use CTxMempool::Limits (stickies-v)
b85af25f87 refactor: mempool: add MemPoolLimits::NoLimits() (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Mempool currently considers 4 limits regarding ancestor and descendant count and size, which get passed around between functions quite a bit. This PR uses `CTxMemPool::Limits` introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25290 to simplify those signatures and callsites.
The purpose of this PR is to improve readability and maintenance, without behaviour change.
As noted in the first commit "refactor: mempool: change MemPoolLimits members to uint", we currently have an underflow issue where a user could pass a negative `-limitancestorsize`, which is eventually cast to an unsigned integer. This behaviour already exists. Because it's orthogonal and to minimize scope, I think this should be fixed in a separate PR.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 33b12e5df6, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
glozow:
reACK 33b12e5df6
Tree-SHA512: 591c6dcee1894f1c3ca28b34a680eeadcf0d40cda92451b4a422c03087b27d682b5e30ba4367abd75a99b5ccb115b7884b0026958d3c7dddab030549db5a4056
Forward the validation of the port from `ParseUInt16(...)`.
Consider port 0 as invalid.
Add suitable test for the `SplitHostPort` function.
Add doxygen description to the `SplitHostPort` function.
The (100, 1000000, 1000, 1000000) limits are arbitrarily high and
don't restrict anything, they are just meant to calculate ancestors
properly. Using NoLimits() makes this intent more clear and simplifies
the code.
8a6b6dfcd8 fuzz: pass max fee into ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry (fanquake)
eb15569280 fuzz: add util/mempool/h.cpp (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Moving the heavy (Boost) mempool code out of fuzz/util.h. Means that (for ex) a crypto_common fuzz unit doesn't need to care about seeing endless Boost headers. This results in a ~10% speedup (for me) when compiling the fuzz tests. Your results may vary.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8a6b6dfcd8🍮
Tree-SHA512: 27dc9d9581ac0b1b319cc0dc08fe5f8fbf9269386a5cb23f6fd5d8231bf015ed942ab4414d8001220541be0013756354578ddab1fec607c6fba04daf421bc870
Quoting ryanofsky: "util can be the library for things included in the kernel
which the kernel can depend on, and common can be the library for other code
that needs to be shared internally, but should not be part of the kernel or
shared externally."
079cf88c0d refactor: move Boost datetime usage to wallet (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This means we don't need Boost Datetime in a `--disable-wallet` build, and it isn't included in the kernel (via time.h/cpp). Split from a larger boost removal branch/effort.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 079cf88c0d
aureleoules:
re-ACK 079cf88c0d - rebased and two additional unit tests since my last review.
jarolrod:
crACK 079cf88c0d
Tree-SHA512: c84f47158a4f21902f211c059d8c4bd55ffe95a256835deee723653be08cca49eeddfc33a2316b0cd31805e81cf77eaa39c6c9dcff4cda11a26ba4c1c143974e
fa4ba04c15 fuzz: Remove no-op call to get() (MacroFake)
fa642286b8 fuzz: Avoid timeout in bitdeque fuzz target (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
I'd guess that any bug should be discoverable within `10` ops. However, `900` seems also better than no limit at all, which causes timeouts such as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=50892
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK fa4ba04c15
Tree-SHA512: f6bd25e78d5f04c6f88e9300c2fa3d0993a0911cb0fd1b414077adc0edde1a06ad72af5e2f50f0ab1324f91999ae57d879686c545b2e6c19ae7f637a8804bd48
d575a675cc net_processing: add thread safety annotation for m_highest_fast_announce (Anthony Towns)
0ae7987f68 net_processing: add thread safety annotations for PeerManagerImpl members accessed only via the msgproc thread (Anthony Towns)
a66a7ccb82 net_processing: add thread safety annotations for Peer members accessed only via the msgproc thread (Anthony Towns)
bf12abe454 net: drop cs_sendProcessing (Anthony Towns)
1e78f566d5 net: add NetEventsInterface::g_msgproc_mutex (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
There are many cases where we assume message processing is single-threaded in order for how we access node-related memory to be safe. Add an explicit mutex that we can use to document this, which allows the compiler to catch any cases where we try to access that memory from other threads and break that assumption.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d575a675cc 📽
dergoegge:
Code review ACK d575a675cc
w0xlt:
ACK d575a675cc
vasild:
ACK d575a675cc modulo the missing runtime checks
Tree-SHA512: b886d1aa4adf318ae64e32ccaf3d508dbb79d6eed3f1fa9d8b2ed96f3c72a3d38cd0f12e05826c9832a2a1302988adfd2b43ea9691aa844f37d8f5c37ff20e05
b6a65568df Fix issues identified by codespell 2.2.1 and update ignored words (Jon Atack)
8f2010de6e Bump codespell version to 2.2.1 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as well as one in `test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py` not seen by the spelling linter.
Can be tested locally by running `test/lint/lint-spelling.py` on this branch versus on master and by checking the CI linter result.
ACKs for top commit:
satsie:
ACK b6a65568df
Tree-SHA512: ab4ba029a9a5de5926fa5d336bd3b21245acf0649c6aa69a48c223bd22327e13beb32e970f66f54db58cd318731b643e1c7ace9a89776ed2a069cddc02363b71
and also fix spelling in test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py not caught by the
spelling linter and fix up a paragraph we are touching here in test/README.md.
There are many cases where we assume message processing is
single-threaded in order for how we access node-related memory to be
safe. Add an explicit mutex that we can use to document this, which allows
the compiler to catch any cases where we try to access that memory from
other threads and break that assumption.
in TestingSetup(). This is used in the following commit to test
reinitializing chainstates after snapshot validation and cleanup.
Best reviewed with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
This CreateAndActivateUTXOSnapshot parameter is necessary once we
perform snapshot completion within ABC, since the existing UpdateTip
test will fail because the IBD chain that has generated the snapshot
will exceed the base of the snapshot.
Being able to test snapshots being loaded into a mostly-uninitialized
datadir allows for more realistic unittest scenarios.
Add functionality for activating a snapshot-based chainstate if one is
detected on-disk.
Also cautiously initialize chainstate cache usages so that we don't
somehow blow past our cache allowances during initialization, then
rebalance at the end of init.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
This changes the snapshot's leveldb chainstate dir name from
`chainstate_[blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`. This simplifies
later logic that loads snapshot data, and enforces the limitation
of a single snapshot at any given time.
Since we still need to persis the blockhash of the base block, we
write that out to a file (`chainstate_snapshot/base_blockhash`) for
later use during initialization, so that we can reinitialize the
snapshot chainstate.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
00eeb31c76 scripted-diff: rename CChainState -> Chainstate (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Alright alright alright, I know: we hate refactors. We especially hate cosmetic refactors.
Nobody knows better than I that changing broad swaths of code out from under our already-abused collaborators, only to send a cascade of rebase bankruptcies, is annoying at best and sadistic at worst. And for a rename! The indignation!
But just for a second, imagine yourself. Programming `bitcoin/bitcoin`, on a sandy beach beneath a lapis lazuli sky. You go to type the name of what is probably the most commonly used data structure in the codebase, and you *only hit shift once*.
What could you do in such a world? You could do anything. [The only limit is yourself.](https://zombo.com/)
---
So maybe you like the idea of this patch but really don't want to deal with rebasing. You're in luck!
Here're the commands that will bail you out of rebase bankruptcy:
```sh
git rebase -i $(git merge-base HEAD master) \
-x 'sed -i "s/CChainState/Chainstate/g" $(git ls-files | grep -E ".*\.(py|cpp|h)$") && git commit --amend --no-edit'
# <commit changed?>
git add -u && git rebase --continue
```
---
~~Anyway I'm not sure how serious I am about this, but I figured it was worth proposing.~~ I have decided I am very serious about this.
Maybe we can have nice things every once in a while?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 00eeb31c76
hebasto:
ACK 00eeb31c76
glozow:
ACK 00eeb31c76, thanks for being the one to propose this
w0xlt:
ACK 00eeb31c76
Tree-SHA512: b828a99780614a9b74f7a9c347ce0687de6f8d75232840f5ffc26e02bbb25a3b1f5f9deabbe44f82ada01459586ee8452a3ee2da05d1b3c48558c8df6f49e1b1
faa3d38ec6 refactor: Pass reference to LookUpStats (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
I find it confusing to have an interface that accepts nullptr, but immediately crashes the program when someone does pass nullptr.
Fix that.
Also some include fixups.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK faa3d38ec6
Tree-SHA512: f90b649e9991e137b83a9899258ee73605719c081a6b789ac27fe7fe73eb70fbb41d89479bcd536d5c3ad788a5795de8451bc1b94e5c9267dcf9636d9e4a1109
