This CreateAndActivateUTXOSnapshot parameter is necessary once we
perform snapshot completion within ABC, since the existing UpdateTip
test will fail because the IBD chain that has generated the snapshot
will exceed the base of the snapshot.
Being able to test snapshots being loaded into a mostly-uninitialized
datadir allows for more realistic unittest scenarios.
In order to prevent memory DoS, we must ensure that we don't accept a new
header into memory until we've performed anti-DoS checks, such as verifying
that the header is part of a sufficiently high work chain. This commit adds a
new argument to AcceptBlockHeader() so that we can ensure that all call-sites
which might cause a new header to be accepted into memory have to grapple with
the question of whether the header is safe to accept, or needs further
validation.
This patch also fixes two places where low-difficulty-headers could have been
processed without such validation (processing an unrequested block from the
network, and processing a compact block).
Credit to Niklas Gögge for noticing this issue, and thanks to Sjors Provoost
for test code.
Use {Chain,}TestingSetup's existing {Chainstate,Block}Manager and avoid
unnecessarily creating a local one.
This also helps reduce the code diff for a later commit where we change
{Chainstate,Block}Manager's constructor signature.
After this commit, there should be no explicit instantiation of
CTxMemPool in src/test other than those in fuzz/ and setup_common
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex="CTxMemPool\s+([^;({]+)(|\(\)|\{\});" \
&& git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src/test \
| grep -v -e "^src/test/util/setup_common.cpp$" \
-e "^src/test/fuzz/" \
| xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@CTxMemPool\& \1 = *Assert(m_node.mempool);@g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This decouples validation.cpp from netaddress.cpp (transitively,
timedata.cpp, and asmap.cpp).
This is important for libbitcoinkernel as:
- There is no reason for the consensus engine to be coupled with
netaddress, timedata, and asmap
- Users of libbitcoinkernel can now easily supply their own
std::function that provides the adjusted time.
See the src/Makefile.am changes for some satisfying removals.
[META] Although it seems like we don't need it for just one option,
we're going to introduce another member to this struct *in the
next commit*. In future patchsets for libbitcoinkernel decoupling
it from ArgsManager, even more members will be added here.
This is needed to turn globals into member variables. Otherwise, this
will lead to issues:
runtime error: reference binding to null pointer of type 'CBlockFileInfo'
#0 in std::vector<CBlockFileInfo, std::allocator<CBlockFileInfo> >::operator[](unsigned long) /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1046:2
#1 in BlockManager::FlushBlockFile(bool, bool) src/node/blockstorage.cpp:540:47
#2 in CChainState::FlushStateToDisk(BlockValidationState&, FlushStateMode, int) src/validation.cpp:2262:28
#3 in CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches(unsigned long, unsigned long) src/validation.cpp:4414:15
#4 in validation_chainstate_tests::validation_chainstate_resize_caches::test_method() src/test/validation_chainstate_tests.cpp:66:12
This changes background_cs from being a pointer to a reference to work
around a gcc false warning. Also, this makes the test easier to read.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23101
Can be reviewed with --ignore-all-space.
673a5bd337 test: validation: add unittest for UpdateTip behavior (James O'Beirne)
2705570109 test: refactor: separate CreateBlock in TestChain100Setup (James O'Beirne)
298bf5d563 test: refactor: declare NoMalleation const auto (James O'Beirne)
071200993f move-only: unittest: add test/util/chainstate.h (James O'Beirne)
8f5710fd0a validation: fix CheckBlockIndex for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
5a807736da validation: insert assumed-valid block index entries into candidates (James O'Beirne)
01a9b8fe71 validation: set BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID during snapshot load (James O'Beirne)
42b2520db9 chain: add BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID for use with assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
b217020df7 validation: change UpdateTip for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
665072a36d doc: add comment for g_best_block (James O'Beirne)
ac4051d891 refactor: remove unused assumeutxo methods (James O'Beirne)
9f6bb53935 validation: add chainman ref to CChainState (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Modify UpdateTip and CheckBlockIndex for use with multiple chainstates. Includes a new unittest verifying `g_best_block` behavior (previously untested at the unit level) and various changes necessary for running and testing `ProcessNewBlock()`-like behavior on the background validation chainstate.
This changeset introduces a new block index `nStatus` flag called `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID`, and it is applied to block index entries that are beneath the UTXO snapshot base block upon snapshot load. Once each block is validated (during async background validation), the flag is removed. This allows us to avoid (ab)using `BLOCK_VALID_*` flags for snapshot chain block entries, and preserves the original meaning of those flags.
Note: this PR previously incorporated changes to `LoadBlockIndex()` and `RewindBlockIndex()` as noted in Russ' comments below, but once I generated the changes necessary to test the UpdateTip change, I decided to split this changes out into another PR due to the size of this one.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 673a5bd337
jonatack:
Code-review re-ACK 673a5bd337 reviewed diff, rebased to master/debug build/ran unit+functional tests
naumenkogs:
ACK 673a5bd337
fjahr:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337
ariard:
utACK 673a5bd3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337. Just linker fix and split commit changes mentioned https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526#issuecomment-921064563 since last review
benthecarman:
ACK 673a5bd337
Tree-SHA512: 0a6dc23d041b27ed9fd0ee1f3e5971b92fb1d2df2fc9b655d5dc48594235321ab1798d06de2ec55482ac3966a9ed56de8d56e9e29cae75bbe8690bafc2dda383
Since we now have multiple chainstate objects, only one of them is active at any given
time. An active chainstate has a mempool, but there's no point to others having one.
This change will simplify proposed assumeutxo semantics. See the discussion here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>