To directly return a CRIPEMD160 hash from data.
Incidentally, decoding this acronym:
* RIPEMD -> RIPE Message Digest
* RIPE -> RACE Integrity Primitives Evaluation
* RACE -> Research and Development in Advanced Communications Technologies in Europe
89c1491d35 wallet: if only have one output type, don't perform "mixed" coin selection (furszy)
Pull request description:
For wallets that only have one output type, we are currently performing the same
selection process over the same coins twice.
The "mixed coin selection" doesn't add any value to the result
(there is nothing to mix if the available coins struct has only one type).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 89c1491d35
john-moffett:
ACK 89c1491d35
kristapsk:
cr utACK 89c1491d35
Tree-SHA512: 672eaeed3ba911d13fa61a46f719c8fe1ebe4d2dc7d723040e71937c693659411bc99cdbd9f0014e836b70eebeff1b8ca861f4d81d39e6f79f437364a526edbe
e75d227632 Minor fix: Don't directly delete abandoned txes (John Moffett)
Pull request description:
This fully closes bitcoin/bitcoin#12179. Currently, when a user abandons a transaction by clicking "Abandon Transaction" in the context menu, a call is made to remove it from the GUI view:
`model->getTransactionTableModel()->updateTransaction(hashQStr, CT_UPDATED, false);`
(The `false` parameter is for `bool showTransaction`)
This behavior is probably unwanted, as the transaction is not actually removed from the wallet and would show up again if the node is restarted.
However, the previous line, `model->wallet().abandonTransaction(hash);`, changes the underlying model and calls `NotifyTransactionChanged(wtx.GetHash(), CT_UPDATED);`, which queues a signal that eventually calls back to `updateTransaction`, this time with `showTransaction` set to `true`. This runs on a separate thread, so it gets called *after* the 'subsequent' `updateTransaction`. The transaction gets removed from the GUI and immediately added back.
In a nutshell, `updateTransaction` gets called twice. The first (direct) call deletes the transaction from the GUI. The second (sent via a queued signal) brings it back to the GUI. The first direct call is redundant and unwanted. Worse, if the `abandonTransaction` call fails for any reason, the transaction still gets removed from the GUI. (This is what caused bitcoin#12179. It can still be triggered if, eg., a user clicks "Abandon Transaction" the moment after a new block is found.)
There are no conditions (to my knowledge) where an abandoned transaction should be directly removed from the GUI. If the underlying model changes, the deletion should be reflected anyway by the queued signal to `updateTransaction`.
The behavior is borne out by the QT logs. To reproduce, send a transaction with RBF enabled, then bump the fee, then 'abandon transaction' on the first transaction. The logs will show something like this:
```
2022-11-28T14:48:00Z [qt] GUI: "NotifyTransactionChanged: 2c5811484f1adec92a739a5e70b453b03eaed0f7cc0538fbd0ee1589e586b951 status= 1"
2022-11-28T14:48:00Z [qt] GUI: "TransactionTablePriv::updateWallet: 2c5811484f1adec92a739a5e70b453b03eaed0f7cc0538fbd0ee1589e586b951 1"
2022-11-28T14:48:00Z [qt] GUI: " inModel=1 Index=381-382 showTransaction=0 derivedStatus=2"
2022-11-28T14:48:00Z [qt] GUI: "TransactionTablePriv::updateWallet: 2c5811484f1adec92a739a5e70b453b03eaed0f7cc0538fbd0ee1589e586b951 1"
2022-11-28T14:48:00Z [qt] GUI: " inModel=0 Index=381-381 showTransaction=1 derivedStatus=0"
```
Notice the duplicate `updateWallet` calls with different `showTransaction` values.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK e75d227632
jarolrod:
tACK e75d227632
Tree-SHA512: 00f150f747c2ee1605af861a21d5c3b9773a4a9985e8dab62e48bd32885b1bfa4e8cbf805ad61af77aec9d3ccefaed3f4311a29086aa8c22d55d5326ba68ece6
798430d127 wallet: Sanity check fee paid cannot be negative (Andrew Chow)
c1a84f108e wallet: Move fee underpayment check to after fee setting (Andrew Chow)
e5daf976d5 wallet: Rename nFeeRet in CreateTransactionInternal to current_fee (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the fee underpayment check occurs right after we calculate what the transaction's fee should be. However the fee paid by the transaction at that time does not always match. Notably, when doing SFFO, the fee paid at that time will almost always be less than the fee required, which then required having a bypass of the underpayment check that results in SFFO payments going through when they should not.
This PR moves the underpayment check to after fees have been finalized so that we always check whether the fee is being underpaid. This removes the exception for SFFO and unifies this behavior for both SFFO and non-SFFO txs.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
Code review ACK 798430d127
furszy:
Code review ACK 798430d
glozow:
utACK 798430d127, code looks correct to me
Tree-SHA512: 720e8a3dbdc9937b12ee7881eb2ad58332c9584520da87ef3080e6f9d6220ce8d3bd8b9317b4877e56a229113437340852976db8f64df0d5cc50723fa04b02f0
8c3ff7d52a test: Suggested cleanups for rpc_namedparams test (Ryan Ofsky)
d1ca563825 bitcoin-cli: Make it an error to specify the "args" parameter two different ways (Ryan Ofsky)
6bd1d20b8c rpc: Make it an error server-side to specify same named parameter multiple times (Ryan Ofsky)
e2c3b18e67 test: Add RPC tests for same named parameter specified more than once (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Make the JSON-RPC server reject requests with the same named parameter specified multiple times, instead of silently overwriting earlier parameter values with later ones.
Generally JSON keys are supposed to unique, and their order isn't supposed to be significant, so having the server silently discard duplicate keys is error-prone. Most likely if an RPC client is sending a request with duplicate keys it means something is wrong with the request and there should be an error.
After this change, named parameters are still allowed to specified multiple times on the `bitcoin-cli` command line, since `bitcoin-cli` automatically replaces earlier values with later values before sending the JSON-RPC request. This makes sense, since it's not unusual for the order of command line options to be significant or for later command line options to override earlier ones.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8c3ff7d52a 🗂
kristapsk:
ACK 8c3ff7d52a
stickies-v:
ACK 8c3ff7d52
Tree-SHA512: 2d1357dcc2c171da287aeefc7b333ba4e67babfb64fc14d7fa0940256e18010a2a65054f3bf7fa1571b144d2de8b82d53076111b5f97ba29320cfe84b6ed986f
956c67059c refactor, doc: Improve SetupAddressRelay call in version processing (Martin Zumsande)
3c43d9db1e p2p: Don't self-advertise during VERSION processing (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This picks up the last commit from #19843.
Previously, we would prepare to self-announce to a new peer while parsing a `version` message from that peer.
This is redundant, because we do something very similar in `MaybeSendAddr()`, which is called from `SendMessages()` after
the version handshake is finished.
There are a couple of differences:
1) `MaybeSendAddr()` self-advertises to all peers we do address relay with, not just outbound ones.
2) `GetLocalAddrForPeer()` called from `MaybeSendAddr()` makes a probabilistic decision to either advertise what they think we are or what we think we are, while `PushAddress()` on `version` deterministically only does the former if the address from the latter is unroutable.
3) During `version` processing, we haven't received a potential sendaddrv2 message from our peer yet, so self-advertisements with addresses from addrV2-only networks would always be dropped in `PushAddress()`.
Since it's confusing to have two slightly different mechanisms for self-advertising, and the one in `MaybeSendAddr()` is better, remove the one in `version`.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
ACK 956c670
naumenkogs:
ACK 956c67059c
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 956c67059c
Tree-SHA512: 933d40615289f055c022170dde7bad0ac0a1d4be377538bfe9ba64375cfeb03bcd803901591f0739ac4850c880e8475a68fd1ab0330800030ab7f19e38c00274
8f5c560e11 refactor: Refactored RequestMethodString function to follow developer notes (JoaoAJMatos)
7fd3b9491b refactor: Deleted unreachable code in httpserver.cpp (JoaoAJMatos)
Pull request description:
Some of the code in httpserver.cpp was unreachable, and didn't follow the developer notes.
Continuation of [#26570 ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26570)
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK [8f5c560](8f5c560e11)
Tree-SHA512: ba8cf4c6dde9e2bb0ca9d63a0de86dfa37b070803dde71ac8384c261045835697a2335652cf5894511b3af8fd99f30e1cbda4e4234815b8b39538ade90fab3f9
293849a260 univalue: Remove confusing getBool method (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Drop `UniValue::getBool` method because it is easy to confuse with the `UniValue::get_bool` method, and could potentially cause bugs. Unlike `get_bool`, `getBool` doesn't ensure that the value is a boolean and returns false for all integer, string, array, and object values instead of throwing an exception.
The `getBool` method is also redundant because it is an alias for `isTrue`. There were only 5 `getBool()` calls in the codebase, so this commit replaces them with `isTrue()` or `get_bool()` calls as appropriate.
These changes were originally made by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26213 but were dropped to limit the scope of that PR.
ACKs for top commit:
justinpickering:
ACK 293849a260
sipa:
utACK 293849a260
w0xlt:
ACK 293849a260
hebasto:
ACK 293849a260, also verified that the removed `getBool` method is not mentioned in any docs:
furszy:
ACK 293849a2
Tree-SHA512: 9fbfe5e2083410f123b18703a0cc0161ecbbb4958f331c9ff808dcfcc6ad499b0e896abd16fb8ea200c53ba29878db9812ce141e59cc5e0fd174741b0bcb192d
We need to check that the fee is not negative even before it is
finalized. The setting of fees for SFFO may adjust the fee to be
"correct" and no longer negative, but erroneously reduce the amounts too
far. So we need to check this condition before we do those adjustments.
It doesn't make sense to be checking whether the fee paid is underpaying
before we've finished setting the fees. So do that after we have done
the reduction for SFFO and change adjustment for fee overpayment.
Drop UniValue::getBool method because it is easy to confuse with the
UniValue::get_bool method, and could potentially cause bugs. Unlike get_bool,
getBool doesn't ensure that the value is a boolean and returns false for all
integer, string, array, and object values instead of throwing an exceptions.
The getBool method is also redundant because it is an alias for isTrue. There
were only 5 getBool() calls in the codebase, so this commit replaces them with
isTrue() or get_bool() calls as appropriate.
These changes were originally made by MarcoFalke in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26213 but were dropped to limit the
scope of that PR.
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
fa579f3063 refactor: Pass reference to last header, not pointer (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It is never a nullptr, otherwise an assertion would fire in UpdatePeerStateForReceivedHeaders.
Passing a reference makes the code easier to read and less brittle.
ACKs for top commit:
john-moffett:
ACK fa579f3
aureleoules:
ACK fa579f3063
Tree-SHA512: 9725195663a31df57ae46bb7b11211cc4963a8f3d100f60332bfd4a3f3327a73ac978b3172e3007793cfc508dfc7c3a81aab57a275a6963a5ab662ce85743fd0
07dfbb5bb8 Make static nLastFlush and nLastWrite Chainstate members (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Fixes #22189.
The `static std::multimap<uint256, FlatFilePos> mapBlocksUnknownParent; ` referenced in the issue was already fixed by #25571. I don't believe Chainstate references any other static variables.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 07dfbb5bb8 ([`jamesob/ackr/26513.1.aureleoules.make_static_nlastflush_a`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/26513.1.aureleoules.make_static_nlastflush_a))
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 07dfbb5bb8
Tree-SHA512: 0f26463c079bbc5e0e62707d4ca4c8c9bbb99edfa3391d48d4915d24e2a1190873ecd4f9f11da25b44527671cdc82c41fd8234d56a4592a246989448d34406b0
d7f61e7d59 rpc: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in gettxoutproof (Andrew Toth)
4d92b5aaba rpc: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in GetUndoChecked and getblockstats (Andrew Toth)
efd82aec8a rpc: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in blockToJSON (Andrew Toth)
f00808e932 rpc: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in GetBlockChecked and getblock (Andrew Toth)
7d253c943f zmq: remove LOCK(cs_main) from NotifyBlock (Andrew Toth)
c75e3d2772 rest: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in rest_block (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
Picking up from #21006.
After commit ccd8ef65f9 it is no longer required to hold `cs_main` when calling `ReadBlockFromDisk`. This can be verified in `master` at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/node/blockstorage.cpp#L755. Same can be seen for `UndoReadFromDisk` https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/node/blockstorage.cpp#L485.
The first commit moves `ReadBlockFromDisk` outside the lock scope in `rest_block`, where we can see a huge performance improvement when fetching blocks with multiple threads.
My test setup, on an Intel i7 with 8 cores (16 threads):
1. Start a fully synced bitcoind, with this `bitcoin.conf`:
```
rest=1
rpcthreads=16
rpcworkqueue=64
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=password
```
2. Run ApacheBench: 10000 requests, 16 parallel threads, fetching block nr. 750000 in binary:
```
ab -n 10000 -c 16 "http://127.0.0.1:8332/rest/block/0000000000000000000592a974b1b9f087cb77628bb4a097d5c2c11b3476a58e.bin"
```
Time per request (mean)
183 ms on master
30 ms this branch
So this can process 6.1 times as many requests, and saturates all the cores instead of keeping them partly idle waiting in the lock. With 8 threads the mean times were 90 ms on master and 19 ms on this branch, a speedup of 4.7x.
Big thanks to martinus for finding this and the original PR.
The second commit is from a suggestion on the original PR by jonatack to remove the unnecessary `LOCK(cs_main)` in the zmq notifier's `NotifyBlock`.
I also found that this approach could be applied to rpcs `getblock` (including `verbosity=3`), `getblockstats`, and `gettxoutproof` with similar very good results. The above benchmarks steps need to be modified slightly for RPC. Run the following ApacheBench command with different request data in a file named `data.json`:
```
ab -p data.json -n 10000 -c 16 -A user:password "http://127.0.0.1:8332/"
```
For `getblock`, use the following in `data.json`:
```
{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getblock", "params": ["0000000000000000000592a974b1b9f087cb77628bb4a097d5c2c11b3476a58e"]}
```
master - 184 ms mean request time
branch - 28 ms mean request time
For `getblock` with verbosity level 3, use the following in `data.json`:
```
{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getblock", "params": ["0000000000000000000592a974b1b9f087cb77628bb4a097d5c2c11b3476a58e", 3]}
```
This verbosity level fetches an undo file from disk, so it benefits from this approach as well. However, a lot of time is spent serializing to JSON so the performance gain is not as severe.
master - 818 ms mean request time
branch - 505 ms mean request time
For `getblockstats`, use the following in `data.json`:
```
{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getblockstats", "params": ["0000000000000000000592a974b1b9f087cb77628bb4a097d5c2c11b3476a58e", ["minfeerate","avgfeerate"]]}
```
This request used a lock on reading both a block and undo file, so the results are very good.
master - 244 ms mean request time
branch - 28 ms mean request time
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK d7f61e7d59💫
hebasto:
ACK d7f61e7d59, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK. Did not make benchmarking though.
Tree-SHA512: 305ac945b4571c5f47646d4f0e78180d7a3d40b2f70ee43e4b3e00c96a465f6d0b9c750b8e85c89ed833e557e2cdb5896743f07ef90e4e53d4ad85452b545886
4e362c2b72 doc: add release note for 25934 (brunoerg)
fe488b4c4b test: add coverage for `label` in `listsinceblock` (brunoerg)
722e9a418d wallet, rpc: add `label` to `listsinceblock` (brunoerg)
852891ff98 refactor, wallet: use optional for `label` in `ListTransactions` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds `label` parameter to `listsinceblock` to be able to fetch all incoming transactions having the specified label since a specific block.
It's possible to use it in `listtransactions`, however, it's only possible to set the number of transactions to return, not a specific block to fetch from. `getreceivedbylabel` only returns the total amount received, not the txs info. `listreceivedbylabel` doesn't list all the informations about the transactions and it's not possible to fetch since a block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4e362c2b72
w0xlt:
ACK 4e362c2b72
aureleoules:
ACK 4e362c2b72
Tree-SHA512: fbde5db8cebf7a27804154fa61997b5155ad512e978cebb78c17acab9efcb624ea5f39d649899d12e5e675f80d4d0064cae8132b864de0d93a8d1e6fbcb9a737
This makes the code more robust, see previous commit.
In general replacing isTrue with get_bool is not equivalent because
get_bool can throw exceptions, but in this case, exceptions won't happen
because of RPCTypeCheck() and isNull() checks in the preceding code.
b19c4124b3 refactor: Rename ambiguous interfaces::MakeHandler functions (Ryan Ofsky)
dd6e8bd71c build: remove BOOST_CPPFLAGS from libbitcoin_util (fanquake)
82e272a109 refactor: Move src/interfaces/*.cpp files to libbitcoin_common.a (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
These belong in `libbitcoin_common.a`, not `libbitcoin_util.a`, because they aren't general-purpose utilities, they just contain some common glue code that is used by both the node and the wallet. Another reason not to include these in `libbitcoin_util.a` is to prevent them from being used by the kernel library.
Also rename ambiguous `MakeHandler` functions to `MakeCleanupHandler` and `MakeSignalHandler`. Cleanup function handler was introduced after boost signals handler, so original naming didn't make much sense.
This just contains a move-only commit, and a rename commit. There are no actual code or behavior changes.
This PR is an alternative to #26293, and solves the same issue of removing a boost dependency from the _util_ library. The advantages of this PR compared to #26293 are that it keeps the source directory structure more flat, and it avoids having to change #includes all over the codebase.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK b19c4124b3
Tree-SHA512: b3a1d33eedceda7ad852c6d6f35700159d156d96071e59acae2bc325467fef81476f860a8855ea39cf3ea706a1df2a341f34fb2dcb032c31a3b0e9cf14103b6a
fa825bd227 util: Include full version id in bug reports (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This will show the unique id of the full source code when the bug occurred, which can help debugging
ACKs for top commit:
1440000bytes:
utACK fa825bd227
theStack:
ACK fa825bd227
john-moffett:
ACK fa825bd227
Tree-SHA512: a7a775718f5f9796b5cffafbb3ace8adb5c163414ec584a57143157fc9dfb86f799e3b9c8365fcb831ee1e9eafc59d699d1653d772c68392de421b3de74dcd61
5d332da2cf doc: Drop no longer relevant comment (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The comment was introduced in 4cf3411056, and since 7e4bd19785 it has been no longer relevant.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 5d332da2cf
Tree-SHA512: 6d32561336993b1ff7d7c524d090ac52aefb40078ed706ca4c6d5026cc3f63244c49c0e00e45ff192ba0e9f1527faf63249aa18bc8aa677b9e053d387e0f4027
38941a703e refactor: Move `txmempool_entry.h` --> `kernel/mempool_entry.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses the https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17786#discussion_r1027818360:
> why not move it to the right place, that is to `kernel/txmempool_entry.h`?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 38941a703e📊
Tree-SHA512: 0145974b63b67ca1d9d89af2dd9d4438beca480c16a563f330da05fec49b8394d7ba20ed83cf7d50b2e19454e006978ebed42b0e07887b98d00210f3201ce9ba
203886c443 Fixup clang-tidy named argument comments (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Fix comments so they are checked/consistent.
Fix incorrect comments.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 203886c443, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: e1257840f91fe39842e2b19299c1633604697b8584fe44b1977ada33cdde5433c877ed0b669fa334e20b04971dc89cd47d58b2783b6f7004521f01d05a1245da
3eb041f014 wallet: Change coin selection fee assert to error (Andrew Chow)
c6e7f224c1 util: Add StrFormatInternalBug and STR_INTERNAL_BUG (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Returning an error instead of asserting for the low fee check will be better as it does not crash the node and instructs users to report the bug.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK 3eb041f014
aureleoules:
ACK 3eb041f014
furszy:
ACK 3eb041f0
Tree-SHA512: 118c13d7cdfce492080edd4cb12e6d960695377b978c7573f9c58b6d918664afd0e8e591eed0605d08ac756fa8eceed456349de5f3a025174069abf369bb5a5f
d885bb2f6e test: Test exclusion of OP_RETURN from getblockstats (Fabian Jahr)
ba9d288b24 test: Fix getblockstats test data generator (Fabian Jahr)
2ca5a496c2 rpc: Improve getblockstats (Fabian Jahr)
cb94db119f validation, index: Add unspendable coinbase helper functions (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes #19885
The genesis block does not have undo data saved to disk so the RPC errored because of that.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d885bb2f6e
aureleoules:
ACK d885bb2f6e
stickies-v:
ACK d885bb2f6
Tree-SHA512: f37bda736ed605b7a41a81eeb4bfbb5d2b8518f847819e5d6a090548a61caf1455623e15165d72589ab3f4478252b00e7b624f9313ad6708cac06dd5edb62e9a
3198e4239e test: check that loading descriptor wallet with legacy entries throws error (Sebastian Falbesoner)
349ed2a0ee wallet: throw error if legacy entries are present on loading descriptor wallets (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Loading a descriptor wallet currently leads to a segfault if a legacy key type entry is present that can be deserialized successfully and needs SPKman-interaction. To reproduce with a "cscript" entry (see second commit for details):
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli createwallet crashme
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli unloadwallet crashme
$ sqlite3 ~/.bitcoin/wallets/crashme/wallet.dat
SQLite version 3.38.2 2022-03-26 13:51:10
Enter ".help" for usage hints.
sqlite> INSERT INTO main VALUES(x'07637363726970740000000000000000000000000000000000000000', x'00');
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet crashme
--- bitcoind output: ---
2022-11-06T13:51:01Z Using SQLite Version 3.38.2
2022-11-06T13:51:01Z Using wallet /home/honey/.bitcoin/wallets/crashme
2022-11-06T13:51:01Z init message: Loading wallet…
2022-11-06T13:51:01Z [crashme] Wallet file version = 10500, last client version = 249900
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
```
Background: In the wallet key-value-loading routine, most legacy type entries require a `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan` instance after successful deserialization. On a descriptor wallet, creating that (via method `GetOrCreateLegacyScriptPubKeyMan`) fails and then leads to a null-pointer dereference crash. E.g. for CSCRIPT: 50422b770a/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L589-L594)
~~This PR fixes this by simply ignoring legacy entries if the wallet flags indicate that we have a descriptor wallet. The second commits adds a regression test to the descriptor wallet's functional test (fortunately Python includes sqlite3 support in the standard library).~~
~~Probably it would be even better to throw a warning to the user if unexpected legacy entries are found in descriptor wallets, but I think as a first mitigation everything is obvisouly better than crashing. As far as I'm aware, descriptor wallets created/migrated by Bitcoin Core should never end up in a state containing legacy type entries though.~~
This PR fixes this by throwing an error if legacy entries are found in descriptor wallets on loading.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3198e4239e
aureleoules:
ACK 3198e4239e
Tree-SHA512: ee43da3f61248e0fde55d9a705869202cb83df678ebf4816f0e77263f0beac0d7bae9490465d1753159efb093ee37182931d76b2e2b6e8c6f8761285700ace1c
7362f8e5e2 refactor: make CoinsResult total amounts members private (furszy)
3282fad599 wallet: add assert to SelectionResult::Merge for safety (S3RK)
c4e3b7d6a1 wallet: SelectCoins, return early if wallet's UTXOs cannot cover the target (furszy)
cac2725fd0 test: bugfix, coinselector_test, use 'CoinsResult::Erase/Add' instead of direct member access (furszy)
cf79384697 test: Coin Selection, duplicated preset inputs selection (furszy)
341ba7ffd8 test: wallet, coverage for CoinsResult::Erase function (furszy)
f930aefff9 wallet: bugfix, 'CoinsResult::Erase' is erasing only one output of the set (furszy)
Pull request description:
This comes with #26559.
Solving few bugs inside the wallet's transaction creation
process and adding test coverage for them.
Plus, making use of the `CoinsResult::total_amount` cached value
inside the Coin Selection process to return early if we don't have
enough funds to cover the target amount.
### Bugs
1) The `CoinsResult::Erase` method removes only one
output from the available coins vector (there is a [loop break](c1061be14a/src/wallet/spend.cpp (L112))
that should have never been there) and not all the preset inputs.
Which on master is not a problem, because since [#25685](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25685)
we are no longer using the method. But, it's a bug on v24
(check [#26559](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26559)).
This method it's being fixed and not removed because I'm later using it to solve
another bug inside this PR.
2) As we update the total cached amount of the `CoinsResult` object inside
`AvailableCoins` and we don't use such function inside the coin selection
tests (we manually load up the `CoinsResult` object), there is a discrepancy
between the outputs that we add/erase and the total amount cached value.
### Improvements
* This makes use of the `CoinsResult` total amount field to early return
with an "Insufficient funds" error inside Coin Selection if the tx target
amount is greater than the sum of all the wallet available coins plus the
preset inputs amounts (we don't need to perform the entire coin selection
process if we already know that there aren't enough funds inside our wallet).
### Test Coverage
1) Adds test coverage for the duplicated preset input selection bug that we have in v24.
Where the wallet invalidly selects the preset inputs twice during the Coin Selection
process. Which ends up with a "good" Coin Selection result that does not cover the
total tx target amount. Which, alone, crashes the wallet due an insane fee.
But.. to make it worst, adding the subtract fee from output functionality
to this mix ends up with the wallet by-passing the "insane" fee assertion,
decreasing the output amount to fulfill the insane fee, and.. sadly,
broadcasting the tx to the network.
2) Adds test coverage for the `CoinsResult::Erase` method.
------------------------------------
TO DO:
* [ ] Update [#26559 ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26559) description.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7362f8e5e2
glozow:
ACK 7362f8e5e2, I assume there will be a followup PR to add coin selection sanity checks and we can discuss the best way to do that there.
josibake:
ACK [7362f8e](7362f8e5e2)
Tree-SHA512: 37a6828ea10d8d36c8d5873ceede7c8bef72ae4c34bef21721fa9dad83ad6dba93711c3170a26ab6e05bdbc267bb17433da08ccb83b82956d05fb16090328cba
f39d9269eb rpc: warn that nodes ignore requests for old stale blocks (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Adds warning to RPC help that `getblockfrompeer` is of little use for stale blocks that are more than a month old.
This is an anti-fingerprinting measure. See `BlockRequestAllowed` in `net_processing`.
It's been in Bitcoin Core since 2014, introduced in #2910 and later improved to not rely on checkpoints.
Older and alternative clients might still serve these blocks, so not throwing an error.
Allowing whitelisted nodes to fetch these blocks anyway might be nice.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK f39d9269eb
Tree-SHA512: db88f9f7521289640c5e629c840dda1c2c3ab70d458e9e7136c60fbaeb02acfb36dc093502d83d4c098c331e22aab81bf8f4c4961d805e3bde0f8f3cfe68d968
