73f0a6cbd0 doc: detail -rpccookieperms option (willcl-ark)
d2afa2690c test: add rpccookieperms test (willcl-ark)
f467aede78 init: add option for rpccookie permissions (willcl-ark)
7df03f1a92 util: add perm string helper functions (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up #26088 by aureleoules which adds a bitcoind launch option `-rpccookieperms` to set the file permissions of the cookie generated by bitcoin core.
Example usage to make the generated cookie group-readable: `./src/bitcoind -rpccookieperms=group`.
Accepted values for `-rpccookieperms` are `[owner|group|all]`. We let `fs::perms` handle platform-specific permissions changes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 73f0a6cbd0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 73f0a6cbd0. Main change since last review is no longer throwing a skip exception in the rpc test on windows, so other checks can run after it, and overall test result is passing, not skipped. Also were clarifying renames and documentation improvements.
tdb3:
cr ACK 73f0a6cbd0
Tree-SHA512: e800d59a44aca10e1c58ca69bf3fdde9f6ccf5eab4b7b962645af6d6bc0cfa3a357701e409c8c60d8d7744fcd33a91e77ada11790aa88cd7811ef60fab86ab11
For JSON-RPC 2.0 requests we need to distinguish between
a missing "id" field and "id":null. This is accomplished
by making the JSONRPCRequest id property a
std::optional<UniValue> with a default value of
UniValue::VNULL.
A side-effect of this change for non-2.0 requests is that request which do not
specify an "id" field will no longer return "id": null in the response.
CRPCTable::dumpArgMap currently works by casting RPC command unique_id
integer field to a function pointer, and then calling the function. The
unique_id field wasn't supposed to be used this way (it's meant to be
used to detect RPC aliases), and this code segfaults in the rpc_help.py
test in multiprocess PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102
because wallet RPC functions aren't directly accessible from the node
process.
Fix this by adding a new GET_ARGS request mode to retrieve argument
information similar to the way the GET_HELP mode retrieves help
information.
Replace with RPC request reference to new WalletContext struct similar to the
existing NodeContext struct and reference.
This PR is a followup to 25ad2c623ahttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18740 removing the g_rpc_node global.
Some later PRs will follow this up and move more wallet globals to the
WalletContext struct.
Co-authored-by: João Barbosa <joao.paulo.barbosa@gmail.com>
5edad5ce5d test: add -getinfo multiwallet functional tests (Jon Atack)
903b6c117f rpc: drop unused JSONRPCProcessBatchReply size arg, refactor (Jon Atack)
afce85eb99 cli: use GetWalletBalances() functionality for -getinfo (Jon Atack)
9f01849a49 cli: create GetWalletBalances() to fetch multiwallet balances (Jon Atack)
743077544b cli: lift -rpcwallet logic up to CommandLineRPC() (Jon Atack)
29f2cbdeb7 cli: extract connection exception handler, -rpcwait logic (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR is a client-side version of #18453, per review feedback there and [review club discussions](https://bitcoincore.reviews/18453#meeting-log). It updates `bitcoin-cli -getinfo` on the client side to display wallet name and balance for the loaded wallets when more than one is loaded (e.g. you are in "multiwallet mode") and `-rpcwallet=` is not passed; otherwise, behavior is unchanged.
before
```json
$ bitcoin-cli -getinfo -regtest
{
"version": 199900,
"blocks": 15599,
"headers": 15599,
"verificationprogress": 1,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 0,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 4.656542373906925e-10,
"chain": "regtest",
"balance": 0.00001000,
"relayfee": 0.00001000
}
```
after
```json
$ bitcoin-cli -getinfo -regtest
{
"version": 199900,
"blocks": 15599,
"headers": 15599,
"verificationprogress": 1,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 0,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 4.656542373906925e-10,
"chain": "regtest",
"balances": {
"": 0.00001000,
"Encrypted": 0.00003500,
"day-to-day": 0.00000120,
"side project": 0.00000094
}
}
```
-----
`Review club` discussion about this PR is here: https://bitcoincore.reviews/18453
This PR can be manually tested by building, creating/loading/unloading several wallets with `bitcoin-cli createwallet/loadwallet/unloadwallet` and running `bitcoin-cli -getinfo` and `bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet=<wallet-name> -getinfo`.
`wallet_multiwallet.py --usecli` provides regression test coverage on this change, along with `interface_bitcoin_cli.py` where this PR adds test coverage.
Credit to Wladimir J. van der Laan for the idea in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17314 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18453#issuecomment-605431806.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Tested ACK 5edad5ce5d.
jnewbery:
utACK 5edad5ce5d
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 5edad5ce5d
Tree-SHA512: 4ca36c5f6c49936b40afb605c44459c1d5b80b5bd84df634007ca276b3f6c102a0cb382f9d528370363ee32c94b0d7ffa15184578eaf8de74179e566c5c5cee5
