This allows a transaction's weight to be bound under a certain
weight if possible and desired. This can be beneficial for future
RBF attempts, or whenever a more restricted spend topology is
desired.
Co-authored-by: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
746b6d8839 test: Add test for createwalletdescriptor (Ava Chow)
2402b63062 wallet: Test upgrade of pre-taproot wallet to have tr() descriptors (Ava Chow)
460ae1bf67 wallet, rpc: Add createwalletdescriptor RPC (Ava Chow)
8e1a475062 wallet: Be able to retrieve single key from descriptors (Ava Chow)
85b1fb19dd wallet: Add GetActiveHDPubKeys to retrieve xpubs from active descriptors (Ava Chow)
73926f2d31 wallet, descspkm: Refactor wallet descriptor generation to standalone func (Andrew Chow)
54e74f46ea wallet: Refactor function for single DescSPKM setup (Andrew Chow)
3b09d0eb7f tests: Test for gethdkeys (Ava Chow)
5febe28c9e wallet, rpc: Add gethdkeys RPC (Ava Chow)
66632e5c24 wallet: Add IsActiveScriptPubKeyMan (Ava Chow)
fa6a259985 desc spkm: Add functions to retrieve specific private keys (Ava Chow)
fe67841464 descriptor: Be able to get the pubkeys involved in a descriptor (Ava Chow)
ef6745879d key: Add constructor for CExtKey that takes CExtPubKey and CKey (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a `createwalletdescriptor` RPC which allows users to add new automatically generated descriptors to their wallet, e.g. to upgrade a 0.21.x wallet to contain a taproot descriptor. This RPC takes 3 arguments: the output type to create a descriptor for, whether the descriptor will be internal or external, and the HD key to use if the user wishes to use a specific key. The HD key is an optional parameter. If it is not specified, the wallet will use the key shared by the active descriptors, if they are all single key. For most users in the expected upgrade scenario, this should be sufficient. In more advanced cases, the user must specify the HD key to use.
Currently, specified HD keys must already exist in the wallet. To make it easier for the user to know, `gethdkeys` is also added to list out the HD keys in use by all of the descriptors in the wallet. This will include all HD keys, whether we have the private key, for it, which descriptors use it and their activeness, and optionally the extended private key. In this way, users with more complex wallets will be still be able to get HD keys from their wallet for use in other scenarios, and if they want to use `createwalletdescriptor`, they can easily get the keys that they can specify to it.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26728#issuecomment-1866961865
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 746b6d8839
furszy:
ACK 746b6d8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 746b6d8839, and this looks ready to merge. There were various suggested changes since last review where main change seems to be switching `gethdkeys` output to use normalized descriptors (removing hardened path components).
Tree-SHA512: f2849101e6fbf1f59cb031eaaaee97af5b1ae92aaab54c5716940d210f08ab4fc952df2725b636596cd5747b8f5beb1a7a533425bc10d09da02659473516fbda
And thread the feerate value through ProcessNewPackage to
reject individual transactions that exceed the given
feerate. This allows subpackage processing, and is
compatible with future package RBF work.
bc9283c441 [test] Add functional test to test early key response behaviour in BIP 324 (stratospher)
ffe6a56d75 [test] Check whether v2 TestNode performs downgrading (stratospher)
ba737358a3 [test] Add functional tests to test v2 P2P behaviour (stratospher)
4115cf9956 [test] Ignore BIP324 decoy messages (stratospher)
8c054aa04d [test] Allow inbound and outbound connections supporting v2 P2P protocol (stratospher)
382894c3ac [test] Reconnect using v1 P2P when v2 P2P terminates due to magic byte mismatch (stratospher)
a94e350ac0 [test] Build v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
bb7bffed79 [test] Use lock for sending P2P messages in test framework (stratospher)
5b91fb14ab [test] Read v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
05bddb20f5 [test] Perform initial v2 handshake (stratospher)
a049d1bd08 [test] Introduce EncryptedP2PState object in P2PConnection (stratospher)
b89fa59e71 [test] Construct class to handle v2 P2P protocol functions (stratospher)
8d6c848a48 [test] Move MAGIC_BYTES to messages.py (stratospher)
595ad4b168 [test/crypto] Add ECDH (stratospher)
4487b80517 [rpc/net] Allow v2 p2p support in addconnection (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR introduces support for v2 P2P encryption(BIP 324) in the existing functional test framework and adds functional tests for the same.
### commits overview
1. introduces a new class `EncryptedP2PState` to store the keys, functions for performing the initial v2 handshake and encryption/decryption.
3. this class is used by `P2PConnection` in inbound/outbound connections to perform the initial v2 handshake before the v1 version handshake. Only after the initial v2 handshake is performed do application layer P2P messages(version, verack etc..) get exchanged. (in a v2 connection)
- `v2_state` is the object of class `EncryptedP2PState` in `P2PConnection` used to store its keys, session-id etc.
- a node [advertising](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#advertising-to-support-v2-p2p) support for v2 P2P is different from a node actually [supporting v2 P2P](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#supporting-v2-p2p) (differ when false advertisement of services occur)
- introduce a boolean variable `supports_v2_p2p` in `P2PConnection` to denote if it supports v2 P2P.
- introduce a boolean variable `advertises_v2_p2p` to denote whether `P2PConnection` which mimics peer behaviour advertises V2 P2P support. Default option is `False`.
- In the test framework, you can create Inbound and Outbound connections to `TestNode`
1. During **Inbound Connections**, `P2PConnection` is the initiator [`TestNode` <--------- `P2PConnection`]
- Case 1:
- if the `TestNode` advertises/signals v2 P2P support (means `self.nodes[i]` set up with `"-v2transport=1"`), different behaviour will be exhibited based on whether:
1. `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P
2. `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P
- In a real world scenario, the initiator node would intrinsically know if they support v2 P2P based on whatever code they choose to run. However, in the test scenario where we mimic peer behaviour, we have no way of knowing if `P2PConnection` should support v2 P2P or not. So `supports_v2_p2p` boolean variable is used as an option to enable support for v2 P2P in `P2PConnection`.
- Since the `TestNode` advertises v2 P2P support (using "-v2transport=1"), our initiator `P2PConnection` would send:
1. (if the `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
2. (if the `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Case 2:
- if the `TestNode` doesn't signal v2 P2P support; `P2PConnection` being the initiator would send version message to initiate a connection.
2. During **Outbound Connections** [TestNode --------> P2PConnection]
- initiator `TestNode` would send:
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Suppose `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P support when it actually doesn't support v2 P2P (false advertisement scenario)
- `TestNode` sends ellswift + garbage bytes
- `P2PConnection` receives but can't process it and disconnects.
- `TestNode` then tries using v1 P2P and sends version message
- `P2PConnection` receives/processes this successfully and they communicate on v1 P2P
4. the encrypted P2P messages follow a different format - 3 byte length + 1-13 byte message_type + payload + 16 byte MAC
5. includes support for testing decoy messages and v2 connection downgrade(using false advertisement - when a v2 node makes an outbound connection to a node which doesn't support v2 but is advertised as v2 by some malicious
intermediary)
### run the tests
* functional test - `test/functional/p2p_v2_encrypted.py` `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py`
I'm also super grateful to @ dhruv for his really valuable feedback on this branch.
Also written a more elaborate explanation here - https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK bc9283c441
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK bc9283c441
theStack:
Code-review ACK bc9283c441
glozow:
ACK bc9283c441
Tree-SHA512: 9b54ed27e925e1775e0e0d35e959cdbf2a9a1aab7bcf5d027e66f8b59780bdd0458a7a4311ddc7dd67657a4a2a2cd5034ead75524420d58a83f642a8304c9811
This test-only RPC is required when a TestNode initiates
an outbound v2 p2p connection. Add a new arg `v2transport`
so that the node can attempt v2 connections.
The current argument name and description are dangerous as it don't
describe the case where the user selects the recipient output as the
change address. This one could end up been increased by the inputs
minus outputs remainder. Which, when bumpfee adds new inputs
to the transaction, leads the process to send more coins to the
recipient. Which is not what the user would expect from a
'reduce_output' param naming.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
This rpc can be used when we want a node to send a message, but
cannot use a python P2P object, for example for testing of low-level
net transport behavior.
e8c31f135c tests: Test for bumping single output transaction (Andrew Chow)
4f4d4407e3 test: Test bumpfee reduce_output (Andrew Chow)
7d83502d3d bumpfee: Allow original change position to be specified (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When bumping the transaction fee, we will try to find the change output of the transaction in order to have an output whose value we can modify so that we can meet the target feerate. However we do not always find the change output which can cause us to unnecessarily add an additional output to the transaction. We can avoid this issue by outsourcing the determination of change to the user if they so desire.
This PR adds a `orig_change_pos` option to bumpfee which the user can use to specify the index of the change output.
Fixes #11233
Fixes #20795
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
re ACK e8c31f135c
pinheadmz:
re-ACK e8c31f135c
furszy:
Code review ACK e8c31f13
Tree-SHA512: 3a230655934af17f7c1a5953fafb5ef0d687c21355cf284d5e98fece411f589cd69ea505f06d6bdcf82836b08d268c366ad2dd30ae3d71541c9cdf94d1f698ee
If the user used a custom change address, it may not be detected as a
change output, resulting in an additional change output being added to
the bumped transaction. We can avoid this issue by allowing the user to
specify the position of the change output.
Any identifier starting with two _, or one _ followed by a capital letter is reserved for the compiler and thus must not be used. See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/228797/7130273
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s '__pushKV' 'pushKVEnd'
s '_EraseTx' 'EraseTxNoLock'
s '_Other' 'Other'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2cd28e9fef rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
This is an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system
into their own common file.
Config file related functions are moved to common/config.cpp.
The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the
libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs
into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on
it. See doc/design/libraries.md for more information on this rationale.
As per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059,
this function is no longer necessary and we can use UniValue::read() directly.
To avoid code duplication, we keep the function to throw on invalid input data
but rename it to Parse() and remove it from the header.
545ff924ab refactor: use string_view for RPC named argument values (stickies-v)
7727603e44 refactor: reduce unnecessary complexity in ParseNonRFCJSONValue (stickies-v)
1d02e59901 test: add cases to JSON parsing (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Inspired by MarcoFalke's [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#discussion_r1036149426). Main purpose of this PR is to minimize copying (potentially large) RPC named arguments when calling `.substr()` by using `std::string_view` instead of `std::string`. Furthermore, cleans up the code by removing unnecessary complexity in `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` (done first to avoid refactoring required to concatenate `string` and `string_view`), updates some naming and adds a few test cases. Should not introduce any behaviour change.
## Questions
- ~Was there actually any merit to `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` surrounding the value with brackets and then parsing it as an array? I don't see it, and the new approach doesn't fail any tests. Still a bit suspicious about it though.~
- Cleared up by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26506#pullrequestreview-1211984059
- If there are no objections to 7727603e44, I think we should follow up with a PR to rename `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` to a local `Parse()` helper function (that throws if invalid), remove it from `client.h` and merge the test coverage we currently have on `ParseNonRFCJSONValue()` with the coverage we have on `UniValue::read()`.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 545ff924ab
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 545ff924ab📻
Tree-SHA512: b1c89fb010ac9c3054b023cac1acbba2a539a09cf39a7baffbd7f7571ee268d5a6d98701c7ac10d68a814526e8fd0fe96ac1d1fb072f272033e415b753f64a5c
6d0ab07e81 refactor: use convenience fn to auto parse non-string parameters (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Minimizes code duplication and improves function naming by having a single (overloaded) convenience function `ParseIfNonString` that both checks if the parameter is a non-string parameter and automatically parses the value if so.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK 6d0ab07e81
Tree-SHA512: 8cbf68a17cfbdce1e31a19916f447a2965c139fdef00c19e32a9b679f4a4015dfe69ceea0bbe1723711e1c5033ea8d4005d1f4485dfbeea22226140f8cbe8aa3
Minimizes code duplication and improves function naming by having
a single (overloaded) convenience function that both checks if
the parameter is a non-string parameter and automatically parses the
value if so.
MarcoFalke reported the case of positional arguments silently overwriting the
named "args" parameter in bitcoin-cli
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19762#discussion_r1035761471 and this
behavior is confusing and was not intended when support for "args" parameters
was added to bitcoin-cli in #19762.
Instead of letting one "args" value overwrite the other in the client, just
pass the values to the server verbatim, and let the error be handled server
side.
It's nice to be able to use named options and positional arguments together.
Most shell tools accept both, and python functions combine options and
arguments allowing them to be passed with even more flexibility. This change
adds support for python's approach so as a motivating example:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet wallet_name=mywallet load_on_startup=1
Can be shortened to:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet mywallet load_on_startup=1
JSON-RPC standard doesn't have a convention for passing named and positional
parameters together, so this implementation makes one up and interprets any
unused "args" named parameter as a positional parameter array.
* Add optional fee response in BTC to getrawtransaction
* Add optional prevout(s) response to getrawtransaction showing utxos being spent
* Add getrawtransaction_verbosity functional test to validate fields
a6b0c1fcc0 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d14454 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087e rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91 wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK a6b0c1fcc0
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc0
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
It could be unsafe/confusing to create an actual mainnet interface while
package relay doesn't exist. However, a regtest-only interface allows
wallet/application devs to test current package policies.
We add an RPC to fetch the mempool transactions spending given outpoints.
Without this RPC, application developers would need to first call
`getrawmempool` which returns a long list of `txid`, then fetch each of
these txs individually to check whether they spend the given outpoint(s).
This RPC can later be enriched to also find confirmed transactions instead
of being restricted to mempool transactions.
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs,
emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some
cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation
of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of
the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to
one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific
amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At
least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect
the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has
a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all
UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the
transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is
incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.
dce8c4c381 rpc: getblockfrompeer (Sjors Provoost)
b884ababc2 rpc: move Ensure* helpers to server_util.h (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This adds an RPC method to fetch a block directly from a peer. This can used to fetch stale blocks with lower proof of work that are normally ignored by the node (`headers-only` in `getchaintips`).
Usage:
```
bitcoin-cli getblockfrompeer HASH peer_n
```
Closes #20155
Limitations:
* you have to specify which peer to fetch the block from
* the node must already have the header
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK dce8c4c381
fjahr:
re-ACK dce8c4c381
Tree-SHA512: 843ba2b7a308f640770d624d0aa3265fdc5c6ea48e8db32269b96a082b7420f7953d1d8d1ef2e6529392c7172dded9d15639fbc9c24e7bfa5cfb79e13a5498c8
