5b878be742 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a5 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
Many edge cases exist when parents in a child-with-parents package can
spend each other. However, this pattern should also be uncommon in
normal use cases.
While allowing submitted packages to be slightly larger than what
may be allowed in the mempool to allow simpler reasoning
about contextual-less checks vs chain limits.
32c1dd1ad6 [test] mempool coins disappearing mid-package evaluation (glozow)
a67f460c3f [refactor] split setup in mempool_limit test (glozow)
d08696120e [test framework] add ability to spend only confirmed utxos (glozow)
3ea71feb11 [validation] don't LimitMempoolSize in any subpackage submissions (glozow)
d227b7234c [validation] return correct result when already-in-mempool tx gets evicted (glozow)
9698b81828 [refactor] back-fill results in AcceptPackage (glozow)
8ad7ad3392 [validation] make PackageMempoolAcceptResult members mutable (glozow)
03b87c11ca [validation] add AcceptSubPackage to delegate Accept* calls and clean up m_view (glozow)
3f01a3dab1 [CCoinsViewMemPool] track non-base coins and allow Reset (glozow)
7d7f7a1189 [policy] check for duplicate txids in package (glozow)
Pull request description:
While we are evaluating a package, we split it into "subpackages" for evaluation (currently subpackages all have size 1 except the last one). If a subpackage has size 1, we may add a tx to mempool and call `LimitMempoolSize()`, which evicts transactions if the mempool gets full. We handle the case where the just-submitted transaction is evicted immediately, but we don't handle the case in which a transaction from a previous subpackage (either just submitted or already in mempool) is evicted. Mainly, since the coins created by the evicted transaction are cached in `m_view`, we don't realize the UTXO has disappeared until `CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache` asserts that they exist. Also, the returned `PackageMempoolAcceptResult` reports that the transaction is in mempool even though it isn't anymore.
Fix this by not calling `LimitMempoolSize()` until the very end, and editing the results map with "mempool full" if things fall out.
Pointed out by instagibbs in faeed687e5 on top of the v3 PR.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 32c1dd1ad6
Tree-SHA512: 61e7f69db4712e5e5bfa27d037ab66bdd97f1bf60a8d9ffb96adb1f0609af012c810d681102ee5c7baec7b5fe8cb7c304a60c63ccc445d00d86a2b7f0e7ddb90
Duplicates of normal transactions would be found by looking for
conflicting inputs, but this doesn't catch identical empty transactions.
These wouldn't be valid but exiting early is good and AcceptPackage's
result sanity checks assume non-duplicate transactions.
1b09cc5959 Make post-p2sh consensus rules mandatory for tx relay (Anthony Towns)
69c31bc748 doc, policy: Clarify comment on STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The `MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS` constant was introduced in #3843 to distinguish between block consensus rules and relay standardness rules. However it was not actually used in the consensus code path: instead it only differentiates between the failure being reported as `TX_CONSENSUS` and `mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed` vs `TX_NOT_STANDARD` and `non-mandatory-script-verify-flag`.
This updates the list of mandatory flags to include the post-p2sh soft forks that are enforced as consensus rules via `GetBlockScriptFlags()`. The effect of this change is that validation.cpp will report `TX_CONSENSUS` failures for txs that fail dersig/csv/cltv/nulldummy/witness/taproot checks, instead of `TX_NOT_STANDARD`, which in turn adds `Misbehaving(100)` via `MaybePunishNodeForTx` in `net_processing`.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK 1b09cc5959
darosior:
ACK 1b09cc5959
achow101:
ACK 1b09cc5959
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 1b09cc5959
Tree-SHA512: d3e5868e8cece478f2e934956ba0c231d8bb9c2daefd0df1f817774e292049902cfc1d0cd76dbd2e7722627a93eab2d7046ff678199aac70a2b01642e69349f1
11d650060a feerate: For GetFeePerK() return nSatoshisPerK instead of round trip through GetFee (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Returning the sats/kvb does not need to round trip through GetFee(1000) since the feerate is already stored as sats/kvb.
Fixes #27913, although this does bring up a larger question of how we should handle such large feerates in fuzzing.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
Code ACK 11d65006
Tree-SHA512: bec1a0d4b572a0c810cf7eb4e97d729d67e96835c2d576a909f755b053a9707c2f1b3df9adb8f08a9c4d310cdbb8b1e1b42b9c004bd1ade02a07d8ce9e902138
If -acceptstalefeeestimates option is passed stale fee estimates can now
be read when operating in regtest environments.
Additionally, this commit updates all declarations of the CBlockPolicyEstimator
class to include a the second constructor variable.
Since the kernel library no longer depends on the system file, move it
to the common library instead in accordance to the diagram in
doc/design/libraries.md.
This is an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system
into their own common file.
Config file related functions are moved to common/config.cpp.
The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the
libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs
into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on
it. See doc/design/libraries.md for more information on this rationale.
The fs.* files are already part of the libbitcoin_util library. With the
introduction of the fs_helpers.* it makes sense to move fs.* into the
util/ directory as well.
47c4b1f52a mempool: log/halt when CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails unexpectedly (stickies-v)
5481f65849 mempool: add AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors helper function (stickies-v)
f911bdfff9 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateMemPoolAncestors (stickies-v)
66e028f739 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Upon reviewing the documentation for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors`, I noticed `setAncestors` was meant to be an `out` parameter but actually is an `in,out` parameter, as can be observed by adding `assert(setAncestors.empty());` as the first line in the function and running `make check`. This PR fixes this unexpected behaviour and introduces refactoring improvements to make intents and effects of the code more clear.
## Unexpected behaviour
This behaviour occurs only in the package acceptance path, currently only triggered by `testmempoolaccept` and `submitpackage` RPCs.
In `MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions()`, we first call `PreChecks()` and then `SubmitPackage()` with the same `Workspace ws` reference. `PreChecks` leaves `ws.m_ancestors` in a potentially non-empty state, before it is passed on to `MemPoolAccept::SubmitPackage`. `SubmitPackage` is the only place where `setAncestors` isn't guaranteed to be empty before calling `CalculateMemPoolAncestors`. The most straightforward fix is to just forcefully clear `setAncestors` at the beginning of CalculateMemPoolAncestors, which is done in the first bugfix commit.
## Improvements
### Return value instead of out-parameters
This PR updates the function signatures for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors` and `CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits` to use a `util::Result` return type and eliminate both the `setAncestors` `in,out`-parameter as well as the error string. It simplifies the code and makes the intent and effects more explicit.
### Observability
There are 7 instances where we currently call `CalculateMemPoolAncestors` without actually checking if the function succeeded because we assume that it can't fail, such as in [miner.cpp](69b10212ea/src/node/miner.cpp (L399)). This PR adds a new wrapper `AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors` function that logs such unexpected failures, or in case of debug builds even halts the program. It's not crucial to the objective, more of an observability improvement that seems sensible to add on here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
w0xlt:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
glozow:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
furszy:
light code review ACK 47c4b1f5
aureleoules:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
Tree-SHA512: d908dad00d1a5645eb865c4877cc0bae74b9cd3332a3641eb4a285431aef119f9fc78172d38b55c592168a73dae83242e6af3348815f7b37cbe2d448a3a58648
b2aa9e8528 Add release note for MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE relaxation (Greg Sanders)
8c5b3646b5 Relax MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE to 65 non-witness bytes (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Since the original fix was set to be a "reasonable" transaction to reduce allocations and the true motivation later revealed, it makes sense to relax this check to something more principled.
There are more exotic transaction patterns that could take advantage of a relaxed requirement, such as 1 input, 1 output OP_RETURN to burn a utxo to fees for CPFP purposes when change isn't practical.
Two changes could be accomplished:
1) Anything not 64 bytes could be allowed
2) Anything above 64 bytes could be allowed
In the Great Consensus Cleanup, suggestion (2)
was proposed as a consensus change, and is the simpler of the two suggestions. It would not allow an "empty" OP_RETURN but would reduce the required padding from 22 bytes to 5.
The functional test is also modified to test the actual case
we care about: 64 bytes
Related mailing list discussions here:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-October/020995.html
And a couple years earlier:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2020-May/017883.html
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK b2aa9e8528
glozow:
reACK b2aa9e8528
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK b2aa9e8528
jonatack:
ACK b2aa9e8528 with some suggestions
Tree-SHA512: c1ec1af9ddcf31b2272209a4f1ee0c5607399f8172e5a1dfd4604cf98bfb933810dd9369a5917ad122add003327c9fcf6ee26995de3aca41d5c42dba527991ad
Since the original fix was set to be a "reasonable" transaction
to reduce allocations and the true motivation later revealed,
it makes sense to relax this check to something more principled.
There are more exotic transaction patterns that could take advantage
of a relaxed requirement, such as 1 input, 1 output OP_RETURN to burn
a utxo to fees for CPFP purposes when change isn't practical.
Two changes could be accomplished:
1) Anything not 64 bytes could be allowed
2) Anything above 64 bytes could be allowed
In the Great Consensus Cleanup, suggestion (2) was the route taken.
It would not allow an "empty" OP_RETURN
but would reduce the required padding from 22 bytes to 5.
The functional test is also modified to test the actual case
we care about: 64 bytes
When CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails unexpectedly (e.g. it exceeds
ancestor/descendant limits even though we expect no limits to be applied),
add an error log entry for increased visibility. For debug builds,
the application will even halt completely since this is not supposed
to happen.
8173f160e0 style: rename variables to match coding style (Vasil Dimov)
8b4ad203d0 fees: make FeeFilterRounder::feeset const (Vasil Dimov)
e7a5bf6be7 fees: make the class FeeFilterRounder thread-safe (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Make the class `FeeFilterRounder` thread-safe so that its methods can be called concurrently by different threads on the same object. Currently it has just one method (`round()`).
The second commit is optional, but it improves readability, showing that the `feeset` member will never be changed, thus does not need protection from concurrent access.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 8173f160e0
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8173f160e0
promag:
Code review ACK 8173f160e0
Tree-SHA512: 94b809997c485c0d114fa702d0406b980be8eaaebcfefa56808ed670aa943959c2f16cfd0ef72b4752fe2a409a23af1b4b7f2f236e51212957759569e3bbbefd
fabf1cdb20 Use steady clock for bench logging (MacroFake)
faed342a23 scripted-diff: Rename time symbols (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Instead of using `0.001` and similar constants to "convert" an int64_t to milliseconds, use the type-safe `Ticks<>` helper. Also, use steady clock instead of system clock, since the durations are used for benchmarking.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fabf1cdb20 - validation bench output still looks sane.
Tree-SHA512: e6525b5fdad6045ca500c56014897d7428ad288aaf375933d3b5939feddf257f6910d562eb66ebcde9186bef9a604ee8d763a318253838318d59df2a285be7c2
Simplifies function signatures by removing repetition of all the
ancestor/descendant limits, and increases readability by being
more verbose by naming the limits, while still reducing the LoC.
Our RBF policy is different from the rules specified in BIP125. For
example, the BIP does not mention Rule 6, and our Rule 4 uses the
(configurable) incremental relay feerate (distinct from the
minimum relay feerate). Those interested in our policy should refer to
doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md instead. These rules may also
continue to diverge with package RBF and other RBF improvements. Keep
references to the BIP125 signaling wrt sequence numbers, since that is
still correct and widely used. It is helpful to refer to this as "BIP125
signaling" since it is unambiguous and succint, especially if we have
multiple ways to signal replaceability in the future.
The rule numbers in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md correspond
largely to those of BIP 125, so we can still refer to them like "Rule 5."
Our RBF policy is different from the rules specified in BIP125 (refer to
doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md instead), and will continue to
diverge with package RBF. Keep references to BIP125 sequence number,
since that is still useful and correct.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { sed -i "s:\<$1\>:$2:g" $(git grep -l "\<$1\>" ./src ./test); }
ren m_allow_bip125_replacement m_allow_replacement
ren allow_bip125_replacement allow_replacement
ren MAX_BIP125_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES MAX_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
