1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an
identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact
(with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely,
always.
55554463c1 fuzz: Use ConsumeWeakEnum in addrman for service flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This has minimally better performance. Reported by me in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20228#discussion_r598081787
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 55554463c1
vasild:
ACK 55554463c1
Tree-SHA512: 4e5f51fe4f2bd7b2f37d0690e41203341ba45c0c9bc9247449cd26cfb5f77dc2ec61df3e4963276f68694e4b3ca3d0a76367a51c4d775501edeb3224d305a261
3d086f42ab test: add ParseUInt16() test coverage (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
`ParseUInt16()` was just added in #21328.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 3d086f42ab: patch looks correct & more coverage is better than less coverage
Tree-SHA512: bf7f96deb7c1531419565907f0ea8a8e32b368d4b823a3e80928b2c118edbf643ea06e357b4b5504a89f855caeed289daa9f823c740231ed6ad1b8ed00285ce8
52dd40a9fe test: add missing netaddress include headers (Jon Atack)
6f09c0f6b5 util: add missing braces and apply clang format to SplitHostPort() (Jon Atack)
2875a764f7 util: add ParseUInt16(), use it in SplitHostPort() (Jon Atack)
6423c8175f p2p, refactor: pass and use uint16_t CService::port as uint16_t (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
As noticed during review today in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20685#discussion_r584873708 of the upcoming I2P network support, `CService::port` is `uint16_t` but is passed around the codebase and into the ctors as `int`, which causes uneeded conversions and casts. We can avoid these (including in the incoming I2P code without further changes to it) by using ports with the correct type. The remaining conversions are pushed out to the user input boundaries where they can be range-checked and raise with user feedback in the next patch.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 52dd40a9fe: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 52dd40a9fe
vasild:
ACK 52dd40a9fe
Tree-SHA512: 203c1cab3189a206c55ecada77b9548b810281cdc533252b8e3330ae0606b467731c75f730ce9deb07cbaab66facf97e1ffd2051084ff9077cba6750366b0432
and an `m_is_onion` struct member to NodeEvictionCandidate and tests.
We'll use these in the peer eviction logic to protect inbound onion peers
in addition to the existing protection of localhost peers.
ebc4ab721b refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13c scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
If `recv(2)` returns an error (`-1`) and sets `errno` to a temporary
error like `EAGAIN` a proper application code is expected to retry the
operation.
If the fuzz data is exhausted, then `FuzzedSock::Recv()` will keep
returning `-1` and setting `errno` to the first element of
`recv_errnos[]` which happened to be `EAGAIN`. This may continue forever
or cause the fuzz test to run for a long time before some higher level
application "receive timeout" is triggered.
Thus, put `ECONNREFUSED` as first element of `recv_errnos[]`.
A conforming `recv(2)` call is supposed to return the same data on a
call following `recv(..., MSG_PEEK)`. Extend `FuzzedSock::Recv()` to do
that.
For simplicity we only return 1 byte when `MSG_PEEK` is used. If we
would return a buffer of N bytes, then we would have to keep track how
many of them were consumed on subsequent non-`MSG_PEEK` calls.
We want `Get()` to always return the same value, otherwise it will look
like the `FuzzedSock` implementation itself is broken. So assign
`m_socket` a random number in the `FuzzedSock` constructor.
There is nothing to fuzz about the `Get()` and `Release()` methods, so
use the ones from the base class `Sock`.
`Reset()` is just setting our socket to `INVALID_SOCKET`. We don't want
to use the base `Reset()` because it will close `m_socket` and given
that our `m_socket` is just a random number it may end up closing a real
opened file descriptor if it coincides with our random `m_socket`.
76782e560b refactor: reuse test string with embedded null char in util_tests (Jon Atack)
24c6546946 test: add ParseUInt8() unit and fuzz test coverage (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
We have unit test and fuzzer coverage for
- `ParseInt64()`
- `ParseInt32()`
- `ParseUInt64()`
- `ParseUInt32()`
but not `ParseUInt8()`, so this pull adds it.
I was tempted to add a commit that applies clang formatting to the file, or one that updates the C-style casts to named casts, but resisted the temptation unless reviewers request it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 76782e560b
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 76782e560b
Tree-SHA512: 1d7948b3385632094a3b0f0e38f87dccddabf74002e68aa055a51408866b057828ffa15c4b22aa9adde458155fbb5e443b66a9dbf3d7713358fc98a14d64bdcf
Remove the implicit MissingDataBehavior::ASSERT_FAIL in the
*TransationSignatureChecker constructors, and instead specify
it explicit in all call sites:
* Test code uses ASSERT_FAIL
* Validation uses ASSERT_FAIL (through CachingTransactionSignatureChecker)
(including signet)
* libconsensus uses FAIL, matching the existing behavior of the
non-amount API (and the extended required data for taproot validation
is not available yet)
* Signing code uses FAIL
68afd3eeec tests: Add fuzzing harness for LoadMempool(...) and DumpMempool(...) (practicalswift)
91af6b97c9 validation: Make DumpMempool(...) and LoadMempool(...) easier to test/fuzz/mock (practicalswift)
af322c7494 tests: Set errno in FuzzedFileProvider. Implement seek(..., ..., SEEK_END). (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `LoadMempool(...)` and `DumpMempool(...)`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested re-ACK 68afd3eeec
Tree-SHA512: 4b5fcaa87e6eb478611d3b68eb6859645a5e121e7e3b056ad2815699dace0a6123706ff542def371b47f4ab3ce2b8a29782026d84fb505827121e9b4cc7dac31
e528075189 tests: Add fuzzing harness for Lookup(...)/LookupHost(...)/LookupNumeric(...)/LookupSubNet(...) (practicalswift)
c6b4bfb4b3 net: Make DNS lookup code testable (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Make DNS lookup mockable/testable/fuzzable.
Add fuzzing harness for `Lookup(…)`/`LookupHost(…)`/`LookupNumeric(…)`/`LookupSubNet(…)`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
cr ACK e528075189
vasild:
ACK e528075189
Tree-SHA512: 9984c2e2fedc3c1e1c3dbd701bb739ebd2f01766e6e83543dae5ae43eb8646c452bba0e101dd2f06079e5258bd5846c7d27a60ed5d77c1682b54c9544ffad443
1a6323bdbe doc: update developer notes for removal of MakeUnique (fanquake)
3ba2840e7e scripted-diff: remove MakeUnique<T>() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Since requiring C++17, this is just pointless abstraction. I think we should just "tear the band-aid off" and remove it. Similar to the changes happening in #21366.
Also, having a comment saying this is deprecated doesn't prevent it's usage in new code. i.e : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20946#discussion_r561949731.
The repository is fairly quiet at the moment, so any potential complaints about having to rebase should be minimal. Might as well get this over and done with.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 1a6323bdbe
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1a6323bdbe: patch looks correct
ajtowns:
ACK 1a6323bdbe -- code review only
glozow:
ACK 1a6323bdbe looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 4a14b9611b60b9b3026b54d6f5a2dce4c5d9b63a7b93d7de1307512df736503ed84bac66e7b93372c76e3117f49bf9f29cd473d3a47cb41fb2775bc10234736f
a67983cd6d net_processing: Add review-only assertion to PeerManager (Carl Dong)
272d993e75 scripted-diff: net_processing: Use existing chainman (Carl Dong)
021a04a469 net_processing: Move some static functions to PeerManager (Carl Dong)
91c5b68acd node/ifaces: ChainImpl: Use existing NodeContext member (Carl Dong)
8a1d580b21 node/ifaces: NodeImpl: Use existing NodeContext member (Carl Dong)
4cde4a701b node: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
106bcd4f39 node/coinstats: Pass in BlockManager to GetUTXOStats (Carl Dong)
2c3ba00693 miner: Pass in blockman to ::RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
2afcf24408 miner: Remove old CreateNewBlock w/o chainstate param (Carl Dong)
46b7f29340 scripted-diff: Invoke CreateNewBlock with chainstate (Carl Dong)
d0de61b764 miner: Pass in chainstate to BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock (Carl Dong)
a04aac493f validation: Remove extraneous LoadGenesisBlock function prototype (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #21055 | [Bundle 3/n] Prune g_chainman usage in mempool-related validation functions
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a67983cd6d
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a67983cd6d. Only change since last review new first commit fixing header declaration, and rebase
glozow:
code review ACK a67983cd6d
Tree-SHA512: dce182a18b88be80cbf50978d4ba8fa6ab0f01e861d09bae0ae9364051bb78f9334859d164b185b07f1d70a583e739557fab6d820cac8c37b3855b85c2a6771b
