d3a56be77a Revert "gui: Avoid Wallet::GetBalance in WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged" (Russell Yanofsky)
bf0a510981 gui: Avoid wallet tryGetBalances calls before TransactionChanged or BlockTip notifications (Russell Yanofsky)
2bc9b92ed8 Cancel wallet balance timer when shutdown requested (Russell Yanofsky)
83f69fab3a Switch transaction table to use wallet height not node height (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Main commit `gui: Avoid wallet tryGetBalances calls` is one-line change to `WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged` that returns early if there hasn't been a new `TransactionChanged` or `BlockTip` notification since the previous poll call. This is the same behavior that was implemented in #18160, now implemented in a simpler way.
The other commits are a straight revert of #18160, and two tweaks to avoid relying on `WalletModel::m_client_model` lifetime which were causing travis failures with earlier versions of this PR.
Motivation for this change is to be able to revert #18160 and cut down on unnecessary cross-process calls that happen when #18160 is combined with #10102
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK d3a56be77a
Tree-SHA512: 3cd31ca515e77c3bd7160d3f1ea0dce5050d4038b2aa441b6f66b8599bd413d81ca5542a197806e773d6092dd1d26830932b1cecbc95298b1f1ab41099e2f12f
412d5fe879 QA: feature_segwit: Check that template "rules" includes "!segwit" as appropriate (Luke Dashjr)
2abe8cc3b7 Bugfix: Include "csv","!segwit" in "rules" (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
#16060 removed CSV & segwit from versionbits, breaking the "rules" key returned by GBT.
Without this, miners don't know they're mining segwit blocks, and should fall back to pre-segwit block creation.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 412d5fe879
jnewbery:
Tested ACK 412d5fe879.
Tree-SHA512: 825d72e257dc0dd4941f2fe498d8d4f4f2a21b9505cd21a8f9eb7fb5d6d7dd9219347928cf90bb57a777920ce24295859763e64fa8a22ebb58fc2380f80f5615
a0d0f1c6c3 refactor: Remove Node:: queries from GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
06d519f0b4 qt: Add SynchronizationState enum to signal parameter (Hennadii Stepanov)
3c709aa69d refactor: Remove Node::getReindex() call from GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
1dab574edf refactor: Pass SynchronizationState enum to GUI (Hennadii Stepanov)
2bec309ad6 refactor: Remove unused bool parameter in RPCNotifyBlockChange() (Hennadii Stepanov)
1df77014d8 refactor: Remove unused bool parameter in BlockNotifyGenesisWait() (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is a followup of #18121 and:
- addresses confusion about GUI notification throttling conditions (**luke-jr**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18121#discussion_r378552386), **ryanofsky**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18121#discussion_r378975960))
- removes `isInitialBlockDownload()` call from the GUI back to the node (on macOS). See: **ryanofsky**'s [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18121#pullrequestreview-357730284)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Core Review ACK a0d0f1c6c3 (modulo [question](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18152#pullrequestreview-414140601)).
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a0d0f1c6c3. Only changes since last review were rebase and tweaking SynchronizationState enum declaration as suggested (thanks!)
Tree-SHA512: b6a712a710666e763aeee0d5440de1391a4c6c8f7fa661888773e1ba59e9e0f83654ee384d4edc704031be7eb25616e5eca2a6e26058d3efb7f64c47f9ed7316
fa243be1dc log: Remove "No rpcpassword set" from logs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
rpcpassword is deprecated and not recommended anymore. So remove it from the logs, which indicate that an rpcpassword should be set and cause confusion. See #18998.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa243be1dc. New log message makes more sense
elichai:
Re Code Review ACK (Checked the diff) fa243be1dc
Tree-SHA512: de3e0800a204b15a59a59a7e6f345013ee9d38e8c5d0c9a94d6142780faa9cce672ed358c7571f53c1eb843bf5afb0b7bcbfd289d3b9e2e0bf8ff2fd361e98a9
2896c412fa Do not answer GETDATA for to-be-announced tx (Pieter Wuille)
f2f32a3dee Push down use of cs_main into FindTxForGetData (Pieter Wuille)
c6131bf407 Abstract logic to determine whether to answer tx GETDATA (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR intends to improve transaction-origin privacy.
In general, we should try to not leak information about what transactions we have (recently) learned about before deciding to announce them to our peers. There is a controlled transaction dissemination process that reveals our transactions to peers that has various safeguards for privacy (it's rate-limited, delayed & batched, deterministically sorted, ...), and ideally there is no way to test which transactions we have before that controlled process reveals them. The handling of the `mempool` BIP35 message has protections in this regard as well, as it would be an obvious way to bypass these protections (handled asynchronously after a delay, also deterministically sorted).
However, currently, if we receive a GETDATA for a transaction that we have not yet announced to the requester, we will still respond to it if it was announced to *some* other peer already (because it needs to be in `mapRelay`, which only happens on the first announcement). This is a slight privacy leak.
Thankfully, this seems easy to solve: `setInventontoryTxToSend` keeps track of the txids we have yet to announce to a peer - which almost(*) exactly corresponds to the transactions we know of that we haven't revealed to that peer. By checking whether a txid is in that set before responding to a GETDATA, we can filter these out.
(*) Locally resubmitted or rebroadcasted transactions may end up in setInventoryTxToSend while the peer already knows we have them, which could result in us incorrectly claiming we don't have such transactions if coincidentally requested right after we schedule reannouncing them, but before they're actually INVed. This is made even harder by the fact that filterInventoryKnown will generally keep known reannouncements out of setInventoryTxToSend unless it overflows (which needs 50000 INVs in either direction before it happens).
The condition for responding now becomes:
```
(not in setInventoryTxToSend) AND
(
(in relay map) OR
(
(in mempool) AND
(old enough that it could have expired from relay map) AND
(older than our last getmempool response)
)
)
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 2896c41
ajtowns:
ACK 2896c412fa
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 2896c412fa
jonatack:
ACK 2896c412fa per `git diff 2b3f101 2896c41` only change since previous review is moving the recency check up to be verified first in `FindTxForGetData`, as it was originally in 353a391 (good catch), before looking up the transaction in the relay pool.
jnewbery:
code review ACK 2896c412fa
Tree-SHA512: e7d5bc006e626f60a2c108a9334f3bbb67205ace04a7450a1e4d4db1d85922a7589e0524500b7b4953762cf70554c4a08eec62c7b38b486cbca3d86321600868
cd34038cbd Switch from Optional<T> to std::optional<T> (C++17). Run clang-format. (practicalswift)
fb559c1170 tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in util/translation.h (practicalswift)
b74f3d6c45 tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in consensus/validation.h (practicalswift)
c0bbf8193d tests: Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in primitives/block.h (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `consensus/validation.h`
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `primitives/block.h`
* Fill fuzzing coverage gaps for functions in `util/translation.h`
* Switch from `Optional<T>` to `std::optional<T>` (C++17). Run `clang-format`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d6aa4634c3953ade173589a8239bd230eb317ef897835a8557acb73df01b25e5e17bf46f837838e59ec04c1f3d3b7d1309ba68c8a264d17b938215512c9e6085
0000ea3265 test: Add test for GetRandMillis and GetRandMicros (MarcoFalke)
fa0e5b89cf Add templated GetRandomDuration<> (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A naive implementation of this template is dangerous, because the call site might accidentally omit the template parameter:
```cpp
template <typename D>
D GetRandDur(const D& duration_max)
{
return D{GetRand(duration_max.count())};
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_time_GetRandTime)
{
std::chrono::seconds rand_hour = GetRandDur(std::chrono::hours{1});
// Want seconds to be in range [0..1hour), but always get zero :((((
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(rand_hour.count(), 0);
}
```
Luckily `std::common_type` is already specialised in the standard lib for `std::chrono::duration` (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/duration/common_type). And its effect seem to be that the call site must always specify the template argument explicitly.
So instead of implementing the function for each duration type by hand, replace it with a templated version that is safe to use.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0000ea3265
promag:
Code review ACK 0000ea3265.
jonatack:
ACK 0000ea3 thanks for the improved documentation. Code review, built, ran `src/test/test_bitcoin -t random_tests -l test_suite` for the new unit tests, `git diff fa05a4c 0000ea3` since previous review:
hebasto:
ACK 0000ea3265 with non-blocking [nit](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18781#discussion_r424924671).
Tree-SHA512: e89d46e31452be6ea14269ecbbb2cdd9ae83b4412cd14dff7d1084283092722a2f847cb501e8054394e4a3eff852f9c87f6d694fd008b3f7e8458cb5a3068af7
050e2ee6f2 test: Remove const to work around compiler error on xenial (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Fix the following error in travis:
test/validationinterface_tests.cpp:26:36: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const BlockValidationState' without a user-provided default constructor
const BlockValidationState state_dummy;
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Tested ACK 050e2ee6f2 on xenial with clang version 3.8.0-2ubuntu4 (tags/RELEASE_380/final)
fanquake:
ACK 050e2ee6f2 - I see why we didn't hit this on master. We are installing the `clang-8` packages for the tsan job. However on the 0.20 branch we are still just installing `clang`, which is 3.8.
Tree-SHA512: 8a1d57289dbe9895ab79f81ca87b4fd723426b8d72f3a34bec9553226fba69f6dc19551c1f1d52db6c4b2652164a02ddc60f3187c3e2ad7bcacb0aaca7fa690a
746736639e [net processing] Only send a getheaders for one block in an INV (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Headers-first is the primary method of announcement on the network. If a node fell back sending blocks by inv, it's probably for a re-org. The final block hash provided should be the highest, so send a getheaders and then fetch the blocks we need to catch up.
Sending many GETHEADERS messages to the peer would cause them to send a large number of potentially large HEADERS messages with redundant data, which is a waste of bandwidth.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 746736639e
mzumsande:
utACK 746736639e as per ajtowns' reasoning.
naumenkogs:
utACK 7467366
ajtowns:
ACK 746736639e
jonatack:
ACK 746736639e
Tree-SHA512: 59e243b80d3f0873709dfacb2e4ffba34689aad7de31ec7f69a64e0e3a0756235a0150e4082ff5de823949ba4411ee1aed2344b4749b62e0eb1ea906e41f5ea9
fa1f840596 rpcwallet: Replace pwallet-> with wallet. (MarcoFalke)
fa182a8794 rpcwallet: Replace boost::optional<T>::emplace with simple assignment of T{} (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Closes #18943
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa1f840596
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa1f840596 and thanks for using a standalone commit for the fix
promag:
Code review ACK fa1f840596.
hebasto:
ACK fa1f840596, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 0838485d1f93f737ce5bf12740669dcafeebb78dbc3fa15dbcc511edce64bf024f60f0497a04149a1e799d893d57b0c9ffe442020c1b9cfc3c69db731f50e712
Fix the following error in travis:
test/validationinterface_tests.cpp:26:36: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const BlockValidationState' without a user-provided default constructor
const BlockValidationState state_dummy;
7777f2a4bb miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke)
fa5ceb25fc test: Remove UninterruptibleSleep from test and replace it by SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (MarcoFalke)
fa770ce7fe validationinterface: Rework documentation, Rename pwalletIn to callbacks (MarcoFalke)
fab6d060ce test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When a validationinterface has itself unregistered in one thread, but is about to get executed in another thread [1], there is a race:
* The validationinterface destructing itself
* The validationinterface getting dereferenced for execution
[1] 64139803f1/src/validationinterface.cpp (L82-L83)
This happens in the miner. More generally it happens everywhere where at least one thread is generating notifications and another one is unregistering a validationinterface.
This issue has been fixed in commit ab31b9d6fe, but the fix has not been applied to the miner.
Example where this happened in practice: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675322230#L4414
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb
Tree-SHA512: 8087119243c71ba18a823a63515f3730d127162625d8729024278b447af29e2ff206f4840ee3d90bf84f93a2c5ab73b76c7e7044c83aa93b5b51047a166ec3d3
This commit is (intentionally) adding a broken test. The test is broken
because it registering a subscriber object that can go out of scope
while events are still being sent.
To run the broken test and reproduce the bug:
- Remove comment /** and */
- ./configure --with-sanitizers=address
- export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0
- make
- while ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t validationinterface_tests/unregister_validation_interface_race --catch_system_errors=no ; do true; done
df6bde031b test: remove glibc fdelt sanity check (fanquake)
8bf1540cc2 build: remove fdelt_chk backwards compatibility code (fanquake)
Pull request description:
ae30d40e50
The return type of [`fdelt_chk`](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=debug/fdelt_chk.c;h=f62ce7349707cb68f55831c1c591fd7387a90258;hb=HEAD) changed from `unsigned long int` to `long int` in glibc 2.16. See [this commit](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=ceb9e56b3d1f8c1922e0526c2e841373843460e2). Now that we require [glibc >=2.17](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17538) we can remove our back-compat code.
ab7bce584a
While looking at the above changes, I noticed that our glibc fdelt sanity check doesn't seem to be checking anything. `fdelt_warn()` also isn't something we'd want to actually "trigger" at runtime, as doing so would cause `bitcoind` to abort.
The comments:
> // trigger: Call FD_SET to trigger __fdelt_chk. FORTIFY_SOURCE must be defined
> // as >0 and optimizations must be set to at least -O2.
suggest calling FD_SET to check the invocation of `fdelt_chk` (this is [aliased with fdelt_warn in glibc](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=debug/fdelt_chk.c;h=f62ce7349707cb68f55831c1c591fd7387a90258;hb=HEAD)). However just calling `FD_SET()` will not necessarily cause the compiler to insert a call to `fd_warn()`.
Whether or not GCC (recent Clang should work, but may use different heuristics) inserts a call to `fdelt_warn()` depends on if the compiler can determine if the value passed in is a compile time constant (using [`__builtin_constant_p`](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html)) and whether the value is < 0 or >= `FD_SETSIZE`. The glibc implementation is [here](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=misc/bits/select2.h;h=7e17430ed94dd1679af10afa3d74795f9c97c0e8;hb=HEAD). This means our check should never cause a call to be inserted.
Compiling master without `--glibc-back-compat` (if you do pass `--glibc-back-compat` the outcome is still the same; however the abort will only happen with >=`FD_SETSIZE` as that is what our [fdelt_warn()](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/compat/glibc_compat.cpp#L24) checks for), there are no calls to `fdelt_warn()` inserted by the compiler:
```bash
objdump -dC bitcoind | grep sanity_fdelt
...
0000000000399d20 <sanity_test_fdelt()>:
399d20: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp
399d27: b9 10 00 00 00 mov $0x10,%ecx
399d2c: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
399d33: 00 00
399d35: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp)
399d3c: 00
399d3d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
399d3f: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi
399d42: fc cld
399d43: f3 48 ab rep stos %rax,%es:(%rdi)
399d46: 48 8b 84 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rax
399d4d: 00
399d4e: 64 48 33 04 25 28 00 xor %fs:0x28,%rax
399d55: 00 00
399d57: 75 0d jne 399d66 <sanity_test_fdelt()+0x46>
399d59: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
399d5e: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp
399d65: c3 retq
399d66: e8 85 df c8 ff callq 27cf0 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
399d6b: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
```
If you modify the sanity test to pass `-1` or `FD_SETSIZE` to `FD_SET`, you'll see calls to `fdelt_warn` inserted, and the runtime behaviour is an abort as expected.
```diff
diff --git a/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp b/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp
index 87140d0c7..16974bfa0 100644
--- a/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp
+++ b/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ bool sanity_test_fdelt()
{
fd_set fds;
FD_ZERO(&fds);
- FD_SET(0, &fds);
+ FD_SET(FD_SETSIZE, &fds);
return FD_ISSET(0, &fds);
}
#endif
```
```bash
0000000000399d20 <sanity_test_fdelt()>:
399d20: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp
399d27: b9 10 00 00 00 mov $0x10,%ecx
399d2c: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
399d33: 00 00
399d35: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp)
399d3c: 00
399d3d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
399d3f: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi
399d42: fc cld
399d43: f3 48 ab rep stos %rax,%es:(%rdi)
399d46: 48 c7 c7 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdi
399d4d: e8 3e ff ff ff callq 399c90 <__fdelt_warn>
399d52: 0f b6 04 24 movzbl (%rsp),%eax
399d56: 83 e0 01 and $0x1,%eax
399d59: 48 8b 94 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rdx
399d60: 00
399d61: 64 48 33 14 25 28 00 xor %fs:0x28,%rdx
399d68: 00 00
399d6a: 75 08 jne 399d74 <sanity_test_fdelt()+0x54>
399d6c: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp
399d73: c3 retq
399d74: e8 77 df c8 ff callq 27cf0 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
399d79: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
```
```bash
src/bitcoind
*** buffer overflow detected ***: src/bitcoind terminated
Aborted
```
I think the test should should be removed and replaced (if possible) with additional checks in security-check.py. I was thinking about adding a version of [this script](https://github.com/fanquake/core-review/blob/master/fortify.py) as part of the output, but that needs more thought. I'll address this in a follow up.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df6bde031b
Tree-SHA512: d8b3af4f4eb2d6c767ca6e72ece51d0ab9042e1bbdfcbbdb7ad713414df21489ba3217662b531b8bfdac0265d2ce5431abfae6e861b6187d182ff26c6e59b32d
9f59dde974 rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback (João Barbosa)
a2e6db5c4f rpc: Add mutex to guard deadlineTimers (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes an early relocking race condition from #18811 where old relock callback runs after new wallet unlock code and nRelockTime update but before rpcRunLater call, causing early relock and incorrect nRelockTime time
Issue introduced in #18487.
Fixes #18811.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9f59dde974
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9f59dde974. No changes since last review except squashing commits.
jonatack:
ACK 9f59dde974
Tree-SHA512: 2f7fc03e5ab6037337f2d82dfad432495cc337c77d07c968ee2355105db6292f24543c03456f5402e0e759577a4327758f9372f7ea29de6d56dc3695fda9b379
a8b5f1b133 gui: Fix manual coin control with multiple wallets loaded (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR ensures each loaded wallet has a dedicated coin control in the send view which is manipulated by the coin control dialog.
This is an alternative to #17457. Two main differences are:
- scope reduced - no unnecessary changes unrelated to the fix;
- approach taken - coin control instance now belongs to the send view.
All problems raised in #17457 reviews no longer apply due to the approach taken - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17457#pullrequestreview-319297589 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17457#issuecomment-555920829)
No change in behavior if only one wallet is loaded.
Closes #15725.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK a8b5f1b133
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a8b5f1b133. Code changes are very straightforward, just replacing global CCoinControl object with SendCoinsDialog member. Not sure if this means coin control settings are reset between payments. It would be good to note in the PR description or release notes if single wallet behavior is affected
hebasto:
ACK a8b5f1b133
Sjors:
tACK a8b5f1b133
Tree-SHA512: 3ad9c51bab6f28ec0e90efbd6f43fa510c81dafb2eff0b8c3724efcee3e030054a10be013e27cefe35763374c5f6d7af8c02658736964f733d7e38b646b5df65
e8123eae40 gui: Fix itemWalletAddress leak when not tree mode (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Taken from #17457, the first commit is a similar to 88a94f7bb8 but for test binary, and the second commit fixes a leak where `CCoinControlWidgetItem` are unnecessarily created and leaked.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK e8123eae40
hebasto:
ACK e8123eae40, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 8b43cb29de103842ce5f048de51222919540d3212d2873c16731145e856178644041924ad0e9a58c2ff08f209a9b4ac26dc9965289eb719da233c0984f93631e
839add193b build: Enable -Wsuggest-override (Hennadii Stepanov)
de5e91c303 refactor: Add BerkeleyDatabaseVersion() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From GCC [docs](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html):
> `-Wsuggest-override`
> Warn about overriding virtual functions that are not marked with the override keyword.
~This PR is based on #16722 (the first commit).~ See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16722#issuecomment-584111086
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 839add193b
vasild:
ACK 839add193
practicalswift:
ACK 839add193b assuming Travis is happy: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 1e8cc085da30d41536deff9b181962c1882314ab252c2ad958294087ae1e5a0dfa4886bdbe36f21cf6ae71df776a8420f349f007d4b5b49fd79ba98ce308965a
Headers-first is the primary method of announcement on the network. If a
node fell back sending blocks by inv, it's probably for a re-org. The
final block hash provided should be the highest, so send a getheaders
and then fetch the blocks we need to catch up.
e3047edfb6 test: use p2p constants in denial of service tests (fanquake)
25d8264c95 p2p: add MAX_FEELER_CONNECTIONS constant (tryphe)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #16003.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK e3047ed
Tree-SHA512: 14fc15292be4db2e825a0331dd189a48713464f622a91c589122c1a7135bcfd37a61e64af1e76d32880ded09c24efd54d3c823467d6c35367a380e0be33bd35f
23083856a5 [test] Add test for cfcheckpt (Jim Posen)
f9e00bb25a [net processing] Message handling for getcfcheckpt. (Jim Posen)
9ccaaba11e [init] Add -peerblockfilters option (Jim Posen)
Pull request description:
Serve cfcheckpt messages if basic block filter index is enabled and `-peercfilters` is set.
`NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS` is not signaled to peers, but functionality can be used for testing and serving pre-configured clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 23083856a5 the only change since my review @ 967e2b1 is an update required for #16224 that was merged yesterday.
fjahr:
re-ACK 23083856a5
jkczyz:
re-ACK 23083856a5
ariard:
re-Code Review ACK 2308385
clarkmoody:
Tested ACK 23083856a
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 23083856a5🌳
theStack:
ACK 23083856a5
Tree-SHA512: 8c751bbd7d1c31a413096462ae025c3d2f3163c7016cbec472a5f5ec267f8dd19a2dfc4d749876d7409c1db546e6fdd16461c6863effcfa0d3e993edcfa92a08
83da576f44 net: use CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE, add missing include (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as suggested 16 months ago by Gleb Naumenko in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15197#issuecomment-456181865.
`static constexpr CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE` is already used in this file, `src/net.cpp`, in 2 instances. This commit replaces the remaining 2 integer values in the file with it and adds the explicit include header.
Co-authored by: Gleb Naumenko <naumenko.gs@gmail.com>
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 83da576
practicalswift:
ACK 83da576f44 -- patch looks correct
theStack:
ACK 83da576f44 -- verified that its just magic number elimination refactoring and additionally checked that all tests pass 👍
Tree-SHA512: 5b915483bca4ea162c259865a1b615d73b88a1b1db3f82db05f770d10b8a42494d948f5b21badbcce2d9efa5915b8cbb6af83073867c23d2f152c0d35ac37b96
9847e205bf [docs] Improve commenting in ProcessGetData() (John Newbery)
2f032556e0 [test] test that an invalid GETDATA doesn't prevent processing of future messages (Amiti Uttarwar)
e257cf71c8 [net processing] ignore unknown INV types in GETDATA messages (Amiti Uttarwar)
047ceac142 [net processing] ignore tx GETDATA from blocks-only peers (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Currently we'll stall peers that send us an unknown INV type in a GETDATA message. Be a bit more friendly and just drop the invalid request.
Ditto for blocks-relay-only peers that send us a GETDATA for a transaction.
There's a test for the first part. The second is difficult to test in the functional test framework since we aren't able to make blocks-relay-only connections.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 9847e205bf
brakmic:
ACK 9847e205bf
luke-jr:
utACK 9847e205bf
naumenkogs:
utACK 9847e20
ajtowns:
utACK 9847e205bf
Tree-SHA512: 6007f2fd839ffe737727f6fb8e8f083b2d9e05a510748f1d40b8f9be8fdf7b5419a36d8f1039923eec1ba2983e8f6f0436ec5fc196d9f6dcb0657f2ff8ff8e4c
d044e0ec7d refactor: Remove override for final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
1551cea2d5 refactor: Use override for non-final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Two commits are split out from #16710 to make reviewing [easier](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16710#issuecomment-625760894).
From [C++ FAQ](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines.html#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final):
> C.128: Virtual functions should specify exactly one of virtual, override, or final
> **Reason** Readability. Detection of mistakes. Writing explicit `virtual`, `override`, or `final` is self-documenting and enables the compiler to catch mismatch of types and/or names between base and derived classes. However, writing more than one of these three is both redundant and a potential source of errors.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d044e0ec7d: consistent use of `override` prevents bugs + patch looks correct + Travis happy
MarcoFalke:
ACK d044e0ec7d, based on my understanding that adding `override` or `final` to a function must always be correct, unless it doesn't compile!?
vasild:
ACK d044e0ec7
Tree-SHA512: 245fd9b99b8b5cbf8694061f892cb3435f3378c97ebed9f9401ce86d21890211f2234bcc39c9f0f79a4d2806cb31bf8ce41a0f9c2acef4f3a2ac5beca6b077cf
68537275bd build: Enable -Werror=sign-compare (Ben Woosley)
eac6a3080d refactor: Rework asmap Interpret to avoid ptrdiff_t (Ben Woosley)
df37377e30 test: Fix outstanding -Wsign-compare errors (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Disallowing sign-comparison mismatches can help to prevent the introduction of overflow and interpretation bugs.
In this case, ~all~ most existing violations are in the tests, and most simply required annotating the literal as unsigned for comparison.
This was previously prevented by violations in leveldb which were fixed upstream and merged in #17398. You can test that by building this branch against: 22d11187ee vs 75fb37ce68
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 68537275bd
practicalswift:
ACK 68537275bd
Tree-SHA512: 14b5daa38c496fb51548feb30fb4dd179e6f76a8d355f52bc8e2a18f2f9340f0bc98dcf36d8b3d6521045d013891c3103749a4eda88ceef00202a6a0cf93f73c
