... and move them to where they are really needed.
This was found by IWYU:
txmempool.h should remove these lines:
- #include <random.h> // lines 29-29
- class CBlockIndex; // lines 43-43
- class Chainstate; // lines 45-45
Also, move the stdlib section to the right place. Can be reviewed with:
--color-moved=dimmed-zebra
Add Options as a member to BlockAssembler to avoid having to assign
all the options individually.
Additionally brings the struct more in line with how we typically
define default and ArgManager values, as e.g. with
ChainstateManager::Options and and CTxMemPool::Options
04528054fc [bench] BlockAssembler with mempool packages (glozow)
6ce265acf4 [test util] lock cs_main before pool.cs in PopulateMempool (glozow)
8791410662 [test util] randomize fee in PopulateMempool (glozow)
cba5934eb6 [miner] allow bypassing TestBlockValidity (glozow)
c058852308 [refactor] parameterize BlockAssembler::Options in PrepareBlock (glozow)
a2de971ba1 [refactor] add helper to apply ArgsManager to BlockAssembler::Options (glozow)
Pull request description:
Performance of block template building matters as miners likely want to be able to start mining on a block with transactions asap after a block is found. We would want to know if a mempool PR accidentally caused, for example, a 100x slowdown. An `AssembleBlock()` bench exists, but it operates on a mempool with 101 transactions, each with 0 ancestors or descendants and with the same fee. Adding a bench with a more complex mempool is useful because (1) it's more realistic (2) updating packages can potentially cause the algorithm to take a long time.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
Tested ACK [0452805](04528054fc)
achow101:
ACK 04528054fc
stickies-v:
ACK 04528054f
Tree-SHA512: 38c138d6a75616651f9b1faf4e3a1cd833437a486f4e84308fbee958e8462bb570582c88f7ba7ab99d80191e97855ac2cf27c43cc21585d3e4b0e227effe2fb5
Allows us to test BlockAssembler on transactions without signatures or
mature coinbases (which is what PopulateMempool creates). Also means
that `TestBlockValidity()` is not included in the bench timing.
This allows us to both manually manipulate options and grab values from
ArgsManager (i.e. -blockmaxweight and -blockmintxfee config options)
when constructing BlockAssembler::Options. Prior to this change, the
only way to apply the config options is by ctoring BlockAssembler with
no options, which calls DefaultOptions().
...also adjust callers
Changes:
- In BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock, we now only lock m_mempool->cs and
call addPackageTxs if m_mempool is not nullptr
- BlockAssembler::addPackageTxs now takes in a mempool reference, and is
annotated to require that mempool's lock.
- In TestChain100Setup::CreateBlock and generateblock, don't construct
an empty mempool, just pass in a nullptr for mempool
Since UpdatePackagesForAdded is a helper function that's only used in
addPackageTxs we can make it static and avoid the unnecessary interface
and in-header lock annotation.
SkipMapTxEntry is a short helper function that's only used in
addPackageTxs, we can just inline it, keep the comments, and avoid the
unnecessary interface and lock annotations.
e4303c337c [unit test] prioritisation in mining (glozow)
7a8d60676b [miner] bug fix: update for parent inclusion using modified fee (glozow)
0f9a44461c MOVEONLY: group miner tests into MinerTestingSetup functions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Came up while reviewing #24364, where some of us incorrectly assumed that we use the same fee deduction in `CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry::nModFeesWithAncestors` when first constructing an entry and in `update_for_parent_inclusion`.
Actually, the behavior is this: when a mempool entry's ancestor is included in the block template, we create a `CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry` for it, subtracting the ancestor's modified fees from `nModFeesWithAncestors`. If another ancestor is included, we update it again, but use the ancestor's _base_ fees instead.
I can't explain why we use `GetFee` in one place and `GetModifiedFee` in the other, but I'm quite certain we should be using the same one for both.
And should it be base or modified fees? Modified, otherwise the child inherits the prioritisation of the parent, but only until the parent gets mined. If we want prioritisation to cascade down to current in-mempool descendants, we should probably document that in the `prioritsetransaction` helpstring and implement it in `CTxMemPool::mapDeltas`, not as a quirk in the mining code?
Wrote a test in which a mempool entry has 2 ancestors, both prioritised, and both included in a block template individually. This test should fail without the s/GetFee/GetModifiedFee commit.
ACKs for top commit:
ccdle12:
tested ACK e4303c3
MarcoFalke:
ACK e4303c337c🚗
Tree-SHA512: 4cd94106fbc9353e9f9b6d5af268ecda5aec7539245298c940ca220606dd0737264505bfaae1f83d94765cc2d9e1a6e913a765048fe6c19292482241761a6762
Given the low possibility of a reorg reverting the segwit soft fork,
there is no need to check whether segwit is active here. Also,
TestBlockValidity is run on the block template after it has been
created.
