An overload of MigrateLegacyToDescriptor is added which takes the wallet
name. The original that took a wallet pointer is still available, it
just gets the name, closes the wallet, and calls the new overload.
Since we no longer store a ref to the global `ArgsManager`
inside the wallet, we can move the util/system.h
include to the cpp.
This dependency removal opened a can of worms, as few
other places were, invalidly, depending on the wallet's
header including it.
`m_relock_mutex` is introduced so that the passphrase is not
deleted from memory when the timeout provided in
`walletpassphrase` is up, but the wallet is still rescanning.
Wallet passphrases are needed to top up the keypool during a
rescan. The following RPCs need the passphrase when rescanning:
- `importdescriptors`
- `rescanblockchain`
The following RPCs use the information about whether or not the
passphrase is being used to ensure that full rescans are able to
take place:
- `walletlock`
- `encryptwallet`
- `walletpassphrasechange`
To directly return a CRIPEMD160 hash from data.
Incidentally, decoding this acronym:
* RIPEMD -> RIPE Message Digest
* RIPE -> RACE Integrity Primitives Evaluation
* RACE -> Research and Development in Advanced Communications Technologies in Europe
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e "/Deprecated alias for OMITTED, can be removed/d" src/rpc/util.h src/rpc/util.cpp
sed -i -e "s/OMITTED_NAMED_ARG/OMITTED/g" $(git grep -l "OMITTED_NAMED_ARG" src/)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This enables the type check and fixes the wrong docs.
Otherwise the enabled check would lead to test errors, such as:
> "wallet_labels.py", line 96, in run_test
> node.sendmany(
>
> test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException:
> JSON value of type null is not of expected type string (-3)
fa9f6d7bcd rpc: Run type check against RPCArgs (MarcoFalke)
faf96721a6 test: Fix wrong types passed to RPCs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It seems brittle to require `RPCTypeCheck` being called inside the code logic. Without compile-time enforcement this will lead to places where it is forgotten and thus to inconsistencies and bugs. Fix this by removing the calls to `RPCTypeCheck` and doing the check internally.
The changes should be reviewed as refactoring changes. However, if they change behavior, it will be a bugfix. For example the changes here happen to also detect/fix bugs like the one fixed in commit 3b5fb6e77a.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa9f6d7bcd
Tree-SHA512: fb2c0981fe6e24da3ca7dbc06898730779ea4e02ea485458505a281cf421015e44dad0221a04023fc547ea2c660d94657909843fc85d92b847611ec097532439
65e78bda7c test: Invalid label name coverage (Aurèle Oulès)
552b51e682 refactor: Add sanity checks in LabelFromValue (Aurèle Oulès)
67e7ba8e1a rpc: Sanitize label name in various RPCs (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
The following RPCs did not sanitize the optional label name:
- importprivkey
- importaddress
- importpubkey
- importmulti
- importdescriptors
- listsinceblock
Thus is was possible to import an address with a label `*` which should not be possible.
The wildcard label is used for backwards compatibility in the `listtransactions` rpc.
I added test coverage for these RPCs.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 65e78bda7c
achow101:
ACK 65e78bda7c
furszy:
diff ACK 65e78bd
stickies-v:
re-ACK 65e78bda7c
theStack:
re-ACK 65e78bda7c
Tree-SHA512: ad99f2824d4cfae352166b76da4ca0069b7c2eccf81aaa0654be25bbb3c6e5d6b005d93960f3f4154155f80e12be2d0cebd5529922ae3d2a36ee4eed82440b31
927b8d4e0c rpc: Correct RPCHelpMan for fundrawtransaction's input_weights field (jdjkelly@gmail.com)
Pull request description:
`input_weights` is incorrectly documented as a fixed length JSON array, but it is actually a JSON array of JSON objects - this commit changes `input_weights` to use `RPCArg::Type::OBJ`
The behavior of `input_weights` as an object exists as a functional test in [wallet_fundrawtransaction.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 927b8d4e0c
Tree-SHA512: 384f5e16be36dba670d64d96f16f1fde2d0d51357e1094ae13eb71d004af0f4dc8bac965b4d2d724ccf64fb671faad37b73055152a9882af24f65dfceaf1e5fb
04609284ad rpc: Improve error when wallet is already loaded (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Currently, trying to load a descriptor (sqlite) wallet that is already loaded throws the following error:
> error code: -4
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. SQLiteDatabase: Unable to obtain an exclusive lock on the database, is it being used by another instance of Bitcoin Core?
I don't think it is very clear what it means for a user.
While a legacy wallet would throw:
> error code: -35
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. Refusing to load database. Data file '/home/user/.bitcoin/signet/wallets/test_wallet/wallet.dat' is already loaded.
This PR changes the error message for both types of wallet to:
> error code: -35
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. Wallet "test_wallet" is already loaded.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 04609284ad
hernanmarino:
ACK 0460928
theStack:
Tested ACK 04609284ad
Tree-SHA512: a8f3d5133bfaef7417a6c05d160910ea08f32ac62bfdf7f5ec305ff5b62e9113b55f385abab4d5a4ad711aabcb1eb7ef746eb41f841b196e8fb5393ab3ccc01e
input_weights is incorrectly documented as a fixed length JSON array,
but it is actually a JSON array of JSON objects - this commit changes
input_weights to use RPCArg::Type::OBJ
The field 'comment' appears twice in TransactionDescriptionString,
incorrectly - this commit removes the instance of the comment field
without a description, preserving the one with a description
564b580bf0 test: Introduce MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP constant (Aurèle Oulès)
71d9a7c03b test: Wallet imports on pruned nodes (Aurèle Oulès)
e6906fcf9e rpc: Enable wallet import on pruned nodes (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Reopens #16037
I have rebased the PR, addressed the comments of the original PR and added a functional test.
> Before this change importwallet fails if any block is pruned. This PR makes it possible to importwallet if all required blocks aren't pruned. This is possible because the dump format includes key timestamps.
For reviewers:
`python test/functional/wallet_pruning.py --nocleanup` will generate a large blockchain (~700MB) that can be used to manually test wallet imports on a pruned node. Node0 is not pruned, while node1 is.
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
ACK 564b580bf0
achow101:
reACK 564b580bf0
furszy:
ACK 564b580
w0xlt:
ACK 564b580bf0
Tree-SHA512: b345a6c455fcb6581cdaa5f7a55d79e763a55cb08c81d66be5b12794985d79cd51b9b39bdcd0f7ba0a2a2643e9b2ddc49310ff03d16b430df2f74e990800eabf
5e65a216d1 wallet: Explicitly say migratewallet on encrypted wallets is unsupported (Andrew Chow)
88afc73ae0 tests: Test for migrating encrypted wallets (Andrew Chow)
86ef7b3c7b wallet: Avoid null pointer deref when cleaning up migratewallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When `migratewallet` fails, we do an automatic cleanup in order to reset everything so that the user does not experience any interruptions. However, this apparently has a segfault in it, caused by the the pointers to the watchonly and solvables wallets being nullptr. If those wallets are not created (either not needed, or failed early on), we will accidentally attempt to dereference these nullptrs, which causes a segfault.
This failure can be easily reached by trying to migrate an encrypted wallet. Currently, we can't migrate encrypted wallets because of how we unload wallets before migrating, and therefore forget the encryption key if the wallet was unlocked. So any encrypted wallets will fail, entering the cleanup, and because watchonly and solvables wallets don't exist yet, the segfault is reached.
This PR fixes this by not putting those nullptrs in a place that we will end up dereferencing them later. It also adds a test that uses the encrypted wallet issue.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
reACK 5e65a216d1
stickies-v:
ACK [5e65a21](5e65a216d1)
furszy:
diff ACK 5e65a21
Tree-SHA512: f75643797220d4232ad3ab8cb4b46d0f3667f00486e910ca748c9b6d174d446968f1ec4dd7f907da1be9566088849da7edcd8cd8f12de671c3241b513deb8e80
Note is added for following rpc commands:
importprivkey, importpubkey, importwallet, dumpprivkey,
dumpwallet, importmulti, addmultisigaddress, sethdseed
fa84df1f03 scripted-diff: wallet: rename AvailableCoinsParams members to snake_case (furszy)
61c2265629 wallet: group AvailableCoins filtering parameters in a single struct (furszy)
f0f6a3577b RPC: listunspent, add "include immature coinbase" flag (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple PR; adds a "include_immature_coinbase" flag to `listunspent` to include the immature coinbase UTXOs on the response. Requested by #25728.
ACKs for top commit:
danielabrozzoni:
reACK fa84df1f03
achow101:
ACK fa84df1f03
aureleoules:
reACK fa84df1f03
kouloumos:
reACK fa84df1f03
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa84df1f03
Tree-SHA512: 0f3544cb8cfd0378a5c74594480f78e9e919c6cfb73a83e0f3112f8a0132a9147cf846f999eab522cea9ef5bd3ffd60690ea2ca367dde457b0554d7f38aec792
eb679a7896 rpc: make `address` field optional (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26338.
This PR makes optional the `address` field in the response of `listtransactions` and `listsinceblock` RPC.
And adds two tests that fail on master, but not on this branch.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK eb679a7896
aureleoules:
ACK eb679a7896
Tree-SHA512: b267439626e2ec3134ae790c849949a4c40ef0cebd20092e8187be3db0a61941b2da10bbbba92ca880b8369f46c1aaa806d057eaa5159325f65cbec7cb33c52f
0582932260 test: add test for fast rescan using block filters (top-up detection) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ca48a4694f rpc: doc: mention rescan speedup using `blockfilterindex=1` in affected wallet RPCs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
3449880b49 wallet: fast rescan: show log message for every non-skipped block (Sebastian Falbesoner)
935c6c4b23 wallet: take use of `FastWalletRescanFilter` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
70b3513904 wallet: add `FastWalletRescanFilter` class for speeding up rescans (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c051026586 wallet: add method for retrieving the end range for a ScriptPubKeyMan (Sebastian Falbesoner)
845279132b wallet: support fetching scriptPubKeys with minimum descriptor range index (Sebastian Falbesoner)
088e38d3bb add chain interface methods for using BIP 157 block filters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
## Description
This PR is another take of using BIP 157 block filters (enabled by `-blockfilterindex=1`) for faster wallet rescans and is a modern revival of #15845. For reviewers new to this topic I can highly recommend to read the corresponding PR review club (https://bitcoincore.reviews/15845).
The basic idea is to skip blocks for deeper inspection (i.e. looking at every single tx for matches) if our block filter doesn't match any of the block's spent or created UTXOs are relevant for our wallet. Note that there can be false-positives (see https://bitcoincore.reviews/15845#l-199 for a PR review club discussion about false-positive rates), but no false-negatives, i.e. it is safe to skip blocks if the filter doesn't match; if the filter *does* match even though there are no wallet-relevant txs in the block, no harm is done, only a little more time is spent extra.
In contrast to #15845, this solution only supports descriptor wallets, which are way more widespread now than back in the time >3 years ago. With that approach, we don't have to ever derive the relevant scriptPubKeys ourselves from keys before populating the filter, and can instead shift the full responsibility to that to the `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` which already takes care of that automatically. Compared to legacy wallets, the `IsMine` logic for descriptor wallets is as trivial as checking if a scriptPubKey is included in the ScriptPubKeyMan's set of scriptPubKeys (`m_map_script_pub_keys`): e191fac4f3/src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.cpp (L1703-L1710)
One of the unaddressed issues of #15845 was that [the filter was only created once outside the loop](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15845#discussion_r343265997) and as such didn't take into account possible top-ups that have happened. This is solved here by keeping a state of ranged `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`'s descriptor end ranges and check at each iteration whether that range has increased since last time. If yes, we update the filter with all scriptPubKeys that have been added since the last filter update with a range index equal or higher than the last end range. Note that finding new scriptPubKeys could be made more efficient than linearly iterating through the whole `m_script_pub_keys` map (e.g. by introducing a bidirectional map), but this would mean introducing additional complexity and state and it's probably not worth it at this time, considering that the performance gain is already significant.
Output scripts from non-ranged `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`s (i.e. ones with a fixed set of output scripts that is never extended) are added only once when the filter is created first.
## Benchmark results
Obviously, the speed-up indirectly correlates with the wallet tx frequency in the scanned range: the more blocks contain wallet-related transactions, the less blocks can be skipped due to block filter detection.
In a [simple benchmark](https://github.com/theStack/bitcoin/blob/fast_rescan_functional_test_benchmark/test/functional/pr25957_benchmark.py), a regtest chain with 1008 blocks (corresponding to 1 week) is mined with 20000 scriptPubKeys contained (25 txs * 800 outputs) each. The blocks each have a weight of ~2500000 WUs and hence are about 62.5% full. A global constant `WALLET_TX_BLOCK_FREQUENCY` defines how often wallet-related txs are included in a block. The created descriptor wallet (default setting of `keypool=1000`, we have 8*1000 = 8000 scriptPubKeys at the start) is backuped via the `backupwallet` RPC before the mining starts and imported via `restorewallet` RPC after. The measured time for taking this import process (which involves a rescan) once with block filters (`-blockfilterindex=1`) and once without block filters (`-blockfilterindex=0`) yield the relevant result numbers for the benchmark.
The following table lists the results, sorted from worst-case (all blocks contain wallte-relevant txs, 0% can be skipped) to best-case (no blocks contain walltet-relevant txs, 100% can be skipped) where the frequencies have been picked arbitrarily:
wallet-related tx frequency; 1 tx per... | ratio of irrelevant blocks | w/o filters | with filters | speed gain
--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------|--------------|-------------
~ 10 minutes (every block) | 0% | 56.806s | 63.554s | ~0.9x
~ 20 minutes (every 2nd block) | 50% (1/2) | 58.896s | 36.076s | ~1.6x
~ 30 minutes (every 3rd block) | 66.67% (2/3) | 56.781s | 25.430s | ~2.2x
~ 1 hour (every 6th block) | 83.33% (5/6) | 58.193s | 15.786s | ~3.7x
~ 6 hours (every 36th block) | 97.22% (35/36) | 57.500s | 6.935s | ~8.3x
~ 1 day (every 144th block) | 99.31% (143/144) | 68.881s | 6.107s | ~11.3x
(no txs) | 100% | 58.529s | 5.630s | ~10.4x
Since even the (rather unrealistic) worst-case scenario of having wallet-related txs in _every_ block of the rescan range obviously doesn't take significantly longer, I'd argue it's reasonable to always take advantage of block filters if they are available and there's no need to provide an option for the user.
Feedback about the general approach (but also about details like naming, where I struggled a lot) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks fly out to furszy for discussing this subject and patiently answering basic question about descriptor wallets!
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0582932260
Sjors:
re-utACK 0582932260
aureleoules:
ACK 0582932260 - minor changes, documentation and updated test since last review
w0xlt:
re-ACK 0582932260
Tree-SHA512: 3289ba6e4572726e915d19f3e8b251d12a4cec8c96d041589956c484b5575e3708b14f6e1e121b05fe98aff1c8724de4564a5a9123f876967d33343cbef242e1
