fa780e1c25 build: Remove --enable-gprof (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is unclear what benefit this option has, given that:
* `gprof` requires re-compilation (`perf` and other tools can instead be used on existing executables)
* `gprof` requires hardening to be disabled
* `gprof` doesn't work with `clang`
* `perf` is documented in the dev-notes, and test notes, and embedded into the functional test framework; `gprof` isn't
* Anyone really wanting to use it could pass the required flags to `./configure`
* I couldn't find any mention of the use of `gprof` in the discussions in this repo, apart from the initial pull request adding it (cfaac2a60f)
* Keeping it means that it needs to be maintained and ported to CMake
Fix all issues by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa780e1c25
hebasto:
ACK fa780e1c25, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
willcl-ark:
crACK fa780e1c25
Tree-SHA512: 0a9ff363ac2bec8b743878a4e3147f18bc16823d00c5007568432c36320bd0199b13b6d0ce828a9a83c2cc434c058afaa64eb2eccfbd93ed85b81ce10c41760c
15796d4b61 build: warn on self-assignment (Cory Fields)
53372f2176 refactor: disable self-assign warning for tests (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Belt-and suspenders after #30234. Self-assignment should be safe _and_ discouraged.
We used to opt out of this warning because something deep in our serialization/byteswapping code could self-assign, but that doesn't appear to be the case anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 15796d4b61
fanquake:
ACK 15796d4b61 - not a huge fan of inline pragma usage, but this seems fine, given it's to work around an already-fixed compiler bug, and we'll only be carrying it for a shortish time in any case.
Tree-SHA512: 1f95f7c730b974ad1da55ebd381040bac312f2f380fff9d569ebab91d7c1963592a84d1613d81d96238c6f5a66aa40deebba68a76f6b24b02150d0a77c769654
1f6ab1215b minor: remove unnecessary semicolons from RPC content type examples (Matthew Zipkin)
b225295298 test: use json-rpc 2.0 in all functional tests by default (Matthew Zipkin)
391843b029 bitcoin-cli: use json-rpc 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
d39bdf3397 test: remove unused variable in interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
0ead71df8c doc: update and link for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to #27101.
- Addresses [post-merge comments ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27101#discussion_r1606723428)
- bitcoin-cli uses JSON-RPC 2.0
- functional tests use JSON-RPC 2.0 by default (exceptions are in the regression tests added by #27101)
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
cbergqvist:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
Tree-SHA512: 49bf14c70464081280216ece538a2f5ec810bac80a86a83ad3284f0f1b017edf755a1a74a45be279effe00218170cafde7c2de58aed07097a95c2c6b837a6b6c
30a01134cd [doc] update bips.md for 431 (glozow)
9dbe6a03f0 [test] wallet uses CURRENT_VERSION which is 2 (glozow)
539404fe0f [policy] make v3 transactions standard (glozow)
052ede75af [refactor] use TRUC_VERSION in place of 3 (glozow)
Pull request description:
Make `nVersion=3` (which is currently nonstandard on mainnet) standard.
Note that we will treat these transactions as Topologically Restricted Until Confirmation (TRUC). Spec is in BIP 431 and implementation is in #28948, #29306, and #29873
See #27463 for overall project tracking, and #29319 for information about relevance to cluster mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK 30a01134c
achow101:
ACK 30a01134cd
instagibbs:
utACK 30a01134cd
murchandamus:
ACK 30a01134cd
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 30a01134cd🛰️
Tree-SHA512: 2a4aec0442c860e792a061d83e36483c1f1b426f946efbdf664c8db97a596e498b535707e1d3a900218429486ea69fd4552e3d476526a6883cbd5556c6534b48
This is an STL-like container that interface-wise looks like std::deque, but
is backed by a (fixed size, with vector-like capacity/reserve) circular buffer.
8801e319d5 refactor: remove unused `CKey::Negate` method (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and it's also unlikely that for any other proposal we'd ever need to negate private keys at this abstraction level. I'd argue that this operation is usually something that should happen within a secp256k1 module (like e.g. done in MuSig2, Silent Payments...).
(If there is really demand in the future, it's also trivial to reintroduce the method.)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 8801e319d5
sipa:
ACK 8801e319d5
achow101:
ACK 8801e319d5
Tree-SHA512: 7bc1566399635c5c6e4940a2724c865d5443eb190024379099330c023c516f1e4f423ed9e8c42bc93413b723a5464ec79d3f879f58c0e598fe24f495238df4ec
2451a217dd test: addmultisigaddress, coverage for script size limits (furszy)
53302a0981 bugfix: addmultisigaddress, add unsupported operation for redeem scripts over 520 bytes (furszy)
9be6065cc0 test: coverage for 16-20 segwit multisig scripts (furszy)
9d9a91c4ea rpc: bugfix, incorrect segwit redeem script size used in signrawtransactionwithkey (furszy)
0c9fedfc45 fix incorrect multisig redeem script size limit for segwit (furszy)
f7a173b578 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_sortedmulti_descriptors_bip67' (furszy)
4f33dbd8f8 test: rpc_createmultisig, decouple 'test_mixing_uncompressed_and_compressed_keys' (furszy)
25a81705d3 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove unnecessary checkbalances() (furszy)
b5a3289433 test: refactor, multiple cleanups in rpc_createmultisig.py (furszy)
3635d43268 test: rpc_createmultisig, remove manual wallet initialization (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28250#issuecomment-1674830104 and more.
Currently, redeem scripts longer than 520 bytes, which are technically valid under segwit rules, have flaws in the following processes:
1) The multisig creation process fails to deduce the output descriptor, resulting in the generation of an incorrect descriptor. Additionally, the accompanying user warning is also inaccurate.
2) The `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC command fail to sign them.
3) The legacy wallet `addmultisigaddress` wrongly discards them.
The issue arises because most of these flows are utilizing the legacy spkm keystore, which imposes
the [p2sh max redeem script size rule](ded6873340/src/script/signingprovider.cpp (L160)) on all scripts. Which blocks segwit redeem scripts longer than
the max element size in all the previously mentioned processes (`createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, and
`signrawtransactionwithkey`).
This PR fixes the problem, enabling the creation of multisig output descriptors involving more than 15 keys and
allowing the signing of these scripts, along with other post-segwit redeem scripts that surpass the 520-byte
p2sh limit.
Important note:
Instead of adding support for these longer redeem scripts in the legacy wallet, an "unsupported operation"
error has been added. The reasons behind this decision are:
1) The introduction of this feature brings about a compatibility-breaking change that requires downgrade
protection; older wallets would be unable to interact with these "new" legacy wallets.
2) Considering the ongoing deprecation of the legacy spkm, this issue provides another compelling
reason to transition towards descriptors.
Testing notes:
To easily verify each of the fixes, I decoupled the tests into standalone commits. So they can be
cherry-picked on top of master. Where `rpc_createmultisig.py` (with and without the `--legacy-wallet`
arg) will fail without the bugs fixes commits.
Extra note:
The initial commits improves the `rpc_createmultisig.py` test in many ways. I found this test very
antiquated, screaming for an update and cleanup.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK 2451a217dd
theStack:
Code-review ACK 2451a217dd
achow101:
ACK 2451a217dd
Tree-SHA512: 71794533cbd46b3a1079fb4e9d190d3ea3b615de0cbfa443466e14f05e4616ca90e12ce2bf07113515ea8113e64a560ad572bb9ea9d4835b6fb67b6ae596167f
d7290d662f fuzz: wallet, add target for Crypter (Ayush Singh)
Pull request description:
This PR adds fuzz coverage for `wallet/crypter`.
Motivation: Issue [27272](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27272#issue-1628327906)
I ran this for a long time with Sanitizers on and had no crashes; the average `exec/sec` also looks good to me. However, I would really appreciate it if some of the reviewers could try it on their machines too, and give their feedback.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK d7290d662f
achow101:
ACK d7290d662f
brunoerg:
utACK d7290d662f
Tree-SHA512: f5c496cabdd3263a7e1ad49eeff702725336f76bf19a82e5dbbead082e990889dd43c851d0d2d6ab740f44b8ec2aa06defd9ff6b02be68b5f8b4eaf963f88599
7f3f6c6dc8 refactor: replace hardcoded numbers (Lőrinc)
5676aec1e1 refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as an Enum (josibake)
Pull request description:
Broken out from #28122
---
Bech32(m) was defined with a 90 character limit so that certain guarantees for error detection could be made for segwit addresses (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki#checksum-design).
However, there is nothing about the encoding scheme itself that requires a limit of 90 and in practice bech32(m) is being used without the 90 char limit (e.g. lightning invoices, silent payments). Further, increasing the character limit doesn't do away with error detection, it simply changes the guarantee.
The primary motivation for this change is for being able to parse BIP352 v0 silent payment addresses (see 622c7a98b9), which require up to 118 characters. In addition to BIP352, modeling the character limit as an enum allows us to easily support new address types that use bech32m and specify their own character limit.
ACKs for top commit:
paplorinc:
re-ACK 7f3f6c6dc8
achow101:
ACK 7f3f6c6dc8
theuni:
utACK 7f3f6c6dc8
Tree-SHA512: 9c793d657448c1f795093b9f7d4d6dfa431598f48d54e1c899a69fb2f43aeb68b40ca2ff08864eefeeb6627d4171877234b5df0056ff2a2b84415bc3558bd280
fa3169b073 rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The index-based Arg accessor is redundant with the name-based one. It does not provide any benefit to the code reader, or otherwise, so remove it.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa3169b073, addressed doc nits
achow101:
ACK fa3169b073
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3169b073. One changes since last review are some documentation improvements
Tree-SHA512: f9da1c049dbf38c3b47a8caf8d24d195c2d4b88c7ec45a9ccfb78f1e39f29cb86869f84b308f6e49856b074c06604ab634c90eb89c9c93d2a8169e070aa1bd40
71aae72e1f test: test sendall does ancestor aware funding (ishaanam)
36757941a0 wallet, rpc: implement ancestor aware funding for sendall (ishaanam)
544131f3fb rpc, test: test sendall spends unconfirmed change and unconfirmed inputs when specified (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends unconfirmed change
- Adds a functional test that `sendall` spends regular unconfirmed inputs when specified by user
- Adds ancestor aware funding to `sendall` by using `calculateCombinedBumpFee` and adjusting the effective value accordingly
- Adds a functional test for ancestor aware funding in `sendall`
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK 71aae72e1f
achow101:
ACK 71aae72e1f
furszy:
ACK 71aae72e1f
Tree-SHA512: acaeb7c65166ce53123a1d6cb5012197202246acc02ef9f37a28154cc93afdbd77c25e840ab79bdc7e0b88904014a43ab1ddea79d5337dc310ea210634ab61f0
bd34dd85e7 Use `exact_target` shorthand in coinselector_tests (Murch)
7aa7e30441 Fold GetSelectionWaste() into ComputeAndSetWaste() (Murch)
Pull request description:
PR #26152 moved waste calculation into SelectionResult to be able to correct the waste score on basis of the bump_fee_group_discount for overlapping ancestries. This left two functions with largely overlapping purpose, where one was simply a wrapper of the other. This PR cleans up the overlap, and fixes the double-meaning of `change_cost` where the `GetChange()` function assumed that no change was created when `change_cost` was set to 0. This behavior was exploited in a bunch of tests, but is problematic, because a `change_cost` of 0 is permitted with custom settings for feerate and discard_feerate (i.e. when they’re both 0).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK bd34dd85e7
furszy:
Code ACK bd34dd85e7
ismaelsadeeq:
Code Review ACK bd34dd85e7
Tree-SHA512: 83a2688d45d719dc61a64b5180fe136107faccf401a59df65245c05d701748a03e85ed56fde8c9b7ef39a3ab54374dd3718c559bda5b3f55dafedfd7fed25161
22d0f1a27e [fuzz] Avoid endless waiting in FuzzedSock::{Wait,WaitMany} (marcofleon)
a7fceda68b [fuzz] Make peeking through FuzzedSock::Recv fuzzer friendly (dergoegge)
865cdf3692 [fuzz] Use fuzzer friendly ConsumeRandomLengthByteVector in FuzzedSock::Recv (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
`FuzzedSock` has a few issues that block a fuzzer from making progress. See commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
Tested ACK 22d0f1a27e
brunoerg:
utACK 22d0f1a27e
Tree-SHA512: 2d66fc94ba58b6652ae234bd1dcd33b7d685b5054fe83e0cd624b053dd51519c23148f43a865ab8c8bc5fc2dc25e701952831b99159687474978a90348faa4c5
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport
protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still
BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and
it's also unlikely that any other proposal would need to negate private
keys at this abstraction level.
(If there is really demand, it's trivial to reintroduce the method.)
3c08e11c3e doc: JSON-RPC request Content-Type is application/json (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Specify json content type in RPC examples.
Picks up #29946. Which needed rebasing and the commit message fixing,
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3c08e11c3e
tdb3:
ACK for 3c08e11c3e
Tree-SHA512: 770bbbc0fb324cb63628980b13583cabf02e75079851850170587fb6eca41a70b01dcedaf1926bb6488eb9816a3cc6616fe8cee8c4b7e09aa39b7df5834ca0ec
e3249f2111 fuzz: add more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds more coverage for `ScriptPubKeyMan`:
- Check `GetKey` and `HasPrivKey` after adding descriptor key.
- Cover `GetEndRange` and `GetKeyPoolSize`.
- Cover `MarkUnusedAddresses` with the scripts from ScriptPubKeys and `GetMetadata` with the destinations from them.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
Tested ACK e3249f2111. I ran the updated harness for ~9 hours on an empty corpus, generated a coverage report, and checked that the new functions mentioned were hit. Coverage of `scriptpubkeyman.cpp` increased.
murchandamus:
Tested ACK e3249f2111
Tree-SHA512: cfab91f6c8401174842e79209c0e9225c08f011fe9b41d0a58bcec716ae4545eaf803867f899ed7b5fbcefea45711f91894e36df082ba19732dd310cd9e61a79
Currently, when the FuzzedDataProvider of a FuzzedSock runs out of data,
FuzzedSock::Wait and WaitMany will simulate endless waiting as the
requested events are never simulated as occured.
Fix this by simulating event occurence when ConsumeBool() returns false
(e.g. when the data provider runs out).
Co-authored-by: dergoegge <n.goeggi@gmail.com>
FuzzedSock only supports peeking at one byte at a time, which is not
fuzzer friendly when trying to receive long data.
Fix this by supporting peek data of arbitrary length instead of only one
byte.
8defc182a3 scripted-diff: Replace nNextSweep with m_next_sweep (marcofleon)
0048680467 increase txorphan harness stability (marcofleon)
Pull request description:
This moves `nNextSweep` from being a static variable in `LimitOrphans` to being a member of the `TxOrphanage` class. This improves the stability of the `txorphan` fuzz harness, as each orphanage (created every iteration) now has its own value for `nNextSweep`.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK 8defc182a3
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 8defc182a3
glozow:
utACK 8defc182a3, I can rebase on this pretty easily
Tree-SHA512: 54d4a5074def764f6c895308b94e417662d2f21f157925421131745f22743907df59971f4ce545063658cd74ec133792cdd8df96ae3e69af8314e9b0ff899d48
5deb0b024e build, test, doc: Temporarily remove Android-related stuff (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Previously, our Android builds were geared towards generating APKs, which relied on Qt. However, after migrating to C++20, compiling for Android became unfeasible due to Qt 5.15's compatibility limitations with NDK only up to r25, which includes an outdated embedded libc++ (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29360).
All removed stuff will be reinstated after migrating the build system to CMake and upgrading Qt to version 6.x.
This PR makes possible a clean migration to the CMake-based build system as it removes code, which is not used at this moment.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 5deb0b024e
fanquake:
ACK 5deb0b024e - given none of this is currently tested/wont compile. Can be revisted in future.
Tree-SHA512: 3bc2ccfe881e11cc1d78c27acd6f1d86cfba86821ef3bb5eca2e80d978fdfa13659ec82284dcaadc507e2394524dea91d4b8f81d0030c1cef9708df8be76bf07
7c8abf3c20 bench: bugfix, properly release wallet before erasing directory (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple fix for #29816.
Since the wallet is appended to the global `WalletContext` during
creation, merely calling `reset()` on the benchmark shared_pointer
is insufficient to destruct the wallet. This no destruction of the
wallet object results in keeping the db connection open, which
was causes the `fs::remove_all()` failure on Windows.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK 7c8abf3c20
kevkevinpal:
utACK [7c8abf3](7c8abf3c20)
hebasto:
re-ACK 7c8abf3c20, I agree with changes since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30122#pullrequestreview-2061694682).
Tree-SHA512: 279df65bea8f7aa02af0a2efed62dca9bf9b29cb748eb369c602d223e08a8a907dea7b1bffbd3dab91b1656c1d91b18a9a0534bc3f153bd751414b0e6230b3a4
9ddf39dd87 fuzz: Handle missing BDBRO errors (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds error messages that were not being handled. Also removes error messages that no longer exist.
Fixes #30166
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
reACK 9ddf39dd87
TheCharlatan:
ACK 9ddf39dd87
Tree-SHA512: 2597536a1e5d030653dfcb02fd892f7492f5a091def787f6cbd421b8bca9544847684a498e9458ea99ae7de5a8a6d91532ff904d1e39222d324939d31d2eb3f0
949abebea0 [fuzz] Avoid collecting initialization coverage (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
Our coverage reports include coverage of initialization code, which can be misleading when trying to evaluate the coverage a fuzz harness achieves through fuzzing alone.
This PR proposes to make fuzz coverage reports more accurate by resetting coverage counters after initialization code has been run. This makes it easier to evaluate which code was actually reached through fuzzing (e.g. to spot fuzz blockers).
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK 949abebea0
brunoerg:
nice, utACK 949abebea0
Tree-SHA512: c8579bda4f3d71d199b9331fbe6316fce375a906743d0bc216bb94958dc03fdc9a951ea50cfeb487494a75668ae3c16471a82f7e5fdd912d781dc29d063e2c5b
fa6d4891c7 refactor: Use type-safe time in txorphanage (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This allows to remove manual conversions like multiplication by `60`, and uses a type-safe type instead of a raw `int64_t`.
ACKs for top commit:
epiccurious:
utACK fa6d4891c7.
dergoegge:
Code review ACK fa6d4891c7
brunoerg:
utACK fa6d4891c7
Tree-SHA512: c187d0e579b1131afcef8c901f5662c18ab867fa2a99fbb13b67bb1e10b2047128194bfef8329cde0d51e1c35d6227ae292b823968f37ea9422975e46e01846a
Both `GetSelectionWaste()` and `ComputeAndSetWaste()` now are part of
`SelectionResult`. Instead of `ComputeAndSetWaste()` being a wrapper for
`GetSelectionWaste()`, we combine them to a new function
`RecalculateWaste()`.
As I was combining the logic of the two functions, I noticed that
`GetSelectionWaste()` was making the odd assumption that the
`change_cost` being set to zero means that no change is created.
However, if we build transactions at a feerate of zero with the
`discard_feerate` also set to zero, we'd organically have a
`change_cost` of zero, even when we create change on a transaction.
This commit cleans up this duplicate meaning of `change_cost` and relies
on `GetChange()` to figure out whether there is change on basis of the
`min_viable_change` and whatever is left after deducting fees.
Since this broke a bunch of tests that relied on the double-meaning of
`change_cost` a bunch of tests had to be fixed.
fac7298529 fuzz: Fix wallet_bdb_parser stdlib error matching (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The stdlib error string is an implementation detail and can not be relied upon.
Ref: `libc++abi: terminating due to uncaught exception of type std::runtime_error: AutoFile::read: end of file: unspecified iostream_category error`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fac7298529
Tree-SHA512: 588acc71a05d97855d6bb65380411e8486692536434eadee7697de09f80b128ff2f90a31fd0e8384d084b554d2f3978efd076082e070e721cf05b07c94cc83b1
2fd34ba504 Add sanity checks for various ATMPArgs booleans (Greg Sanders)
20d8936d8b [refactor] make some members MemPoolAccept-wide (glozow)
cbbfe719b2 cpfp carveout is excluded in packages (glozow)
69f7ab05ba Add m_allow_sibling_eviction as separate ATMPArgs flag (Greg Sanders)
57ee3029dd Add description for m_test_accept (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
First few commits of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28984 to set the stage for the package RBF logic.
These refactors are preparation for evaluating an RBF in a multi-proposed-transaction context instead of only a single proposed transaction. Also, carveouts and sibling evictions only should work in single RBF cases so add logic to preclude multi-tx cases in the future.
No behavior changes aside from bailing earlier from failed carve-outs.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 2fd34ba504 via range-diff
sr-gi:
utACK [2fd34ba](2fd34ba504)
theStack:
re-ACK 2fd34ba504
Tree-SHA512: 5071c5b8d9b8d2c9faa278c8c4df31de288cb407a68e4d55544c588caff6c86160cce7825453549c6ed69e29d9ccb5ee2d4a518b18f563bfb12f2ced073fe42a
542e13b293 rpc: Enhance metadata of the dumptxoutset output (Fabian Jahr)
4d8e5edbaa assumeutxo: Add documentation on dumptxoutset serialization format (Fabian Jahr)
c14ed7f384 assumeutxo: Add test for changed coin size value (Fabian Jahr)
de95953d87 rpc: Optimize serialization disk space of dumptxoutset (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The second attempt at implementing the `dumptxoutset` space optimization as suggested in #25675. Closes #25675.
This builds on the work done in #26045, addresses open feedback, adds some further improvements (most importantly usage of compact size), documentation, and an additional test.
The [original snapshot at height 830,000](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29551) came in at 10.82 GB. With this change, the same snapshot is 8.94 GB, a reduction of 17.4%.
This also enhances the metadata of the output file and adds the following data to allow for better error handling and make future upgrades easier:
- A newly introduced utxo set magic
- A version number
- The network magic
- The block height
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 542e13b293
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 542e13b293
theStack:
ACK 542e13b293
Tree-SHA512: 0825d30e5c3c364062db3c6cbca4e3c680e6e6d3e259fa70c0c2b2a7020f24a47406a623582040988d5c7745b08649c31110df4c10656aa25f3f27eb35843d99
