0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-22 12:23:34 -05:00
Commit graph

1289 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
0xb10c
b2ad6ede95
tracing: add misbehaving conn tracepoint 2025-02-04 10:25:22 +01:00
Ava Chow
1d6c6e98c1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31633: net: Disconnect message follow-ups to #28521
551a09486c net: Switch to DisconnectMsg in CConnman (Hodlinator)
bbac17608d net: Bring back log message when resetting socket (Hodlinator)
04b848e482 net: Specify context in disconnecting log message (Hodlinator)
0c4954ac7d net_processing: Add missing use of DisconnectMsg (Hodlinator)

Pull request description:

  - Add missing calls to `DisconnectMsg()` - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28521#discussion_r1890824361
  - Specify context when stopping nodes - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28521#discussion_r1890780754
  - Bring back log message when resetting socket in case new entrypoints are added - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28521#discussion_r1890795074
  - Use `DisconnectMsg()` in `CConnman` as well - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28521#discussion_r1791797716

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    re-utACK 551a09486c
  l0rinc:
    utACK 551a09486c
  davidgumberg:
    Tested and Review ACK 551a09486c
  achow101:
    ACK 551a09486c
  danielabrozzoni:
    ACK 551a09486c

Tree-SHA512: 95ab8e7436e20ca3abc949ea09697facb6fbeb19981ddc7e0bf294e7ec914e72cbf836c21184a2a887f04cb264f26daf5b0cbcbebc9db633a7b1672b4e488063
2025-01-29 15:26:53 -05:00
Ryan Ofsky
5d6f6fd00d
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31490: refactor: inline UndoWriteToDisk and WriteBlockToDisk to reduce serialization calls
223081ece6 scripted-diff: rename block and undo functions for consistency (Lőrinc)
baaa3b2846 refactor,blocks: remove costly asserts and modernize affected logs (Lőrinc)
fa39f27a0f refactor,blocks: deduplicate block's serialized size calculations (Lőrinc)
dfb2f9d004 refactor,blocks: inline `WriteBlockToDisk` (Lőrinc)
42bc491465 refactor,blocks: inline `UndoWriteToDisk` (Lőrinc)
86b85bb11f bench: add SaveBlockBench (Lőrinc)
34f9a0157a refactor,bench: rename bench/readblock.cpp to bench/readwriteblock.cpp (Lőrinc)

Pull request description:

  `UndoWriteToDisk` and `WriteBlockToDisk` were delegating a subset of their functionality to single-use methods that didn't optimally capture a meaningful chunk of the algorithm, resulting in calculating things twice (serialized size, header size).
  This change inlines the awkward methods (asserting that all previous behavior was retained), and in separate commits makes the usages less confusing.
  Besides making the methods slightly more intuitive, the refactorings reduce duplicate calculations as well.

  The speed difference is insignificant for now (~0.5% for the new `SaveBlockToDiskBench`), but are a cleanup for follow-ups such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31539

ACKs for top commit:
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 223081ece6. Since last review, "Save" was renamed to "Write", uint32_t references were dropped, some log statements and comments were improved as suggested, and a lot of tweaks made to commits and commit messages which should make this easier to review.
  hodlinator:
    ACK 223081ece6
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 223081ece6
  andrewtoth:
    ACK 223081ece6

Tree-SHA512: 951bc8ad3504c510988afd95c561e3e259c6212bd14f6536fe56e8eb5bf5c35c32a368bbdb1d5aea1acc473d7e5bd9cdcde02008a148b05af1f955e413062d5c
2025-01-22 12:28:18 -05:00
merge-script
335798c496
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31397: p2p: track and use all potential peers for orphan resolution
86d7135e36 [p2p] only attempt 1p1c when both txns provided by the same peer (glozow)
f7658d9b14 [cleanup] remove p2p_inv from AddTxAnnouncement (glozow)
063c1324c1 [functional test] getorphantxs reflects multiple announcers (glozow)
0da693f7e1 [functional test] orphan handling with multiple announcers (glozow)
b6ea4a9afe [p2p] try multiple peers for orphan resolution (glozow)
1d2e1d709c [refactor] move creation of unique_parents to helper function (glozow)
c6893b0f0b [txdownload] remove unique_parents that we already have (glozow)
163aaf285a [fuzz] orphanage multiple announcer functions (glozow)
22b023b09d [unit test] multiple orphan announcers (glozow)
96c1a822a2 [unit test] TxOrphanage EraseForBlock (glozow)
04448ce32a [txorphanage] add GetTx so that orphan vin can be read (glozow)
e810842acd [txorphanage] support multiple announcers (glozow)
62a9ff1870 [refactor] change type of unique_parents to Txid (glozow)
6951ddcefd [txrequest] GetCandidatePeers (glozow)

Pull request description:

  Part of #27463.

  (Transaction) **orphan resolution** is a process that kicks off when we are missing UTXOs to validate an unconfirmed transaction. We currently request missing parents by txid; BIP 331 also defines a way to [explicitly request ancestors](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0331.mediawiki#handle-orphans-better).

  Currently, when we find that a transaction is an orphan, we only try to resolve it with the peer who provided the `tx`. If this doesn't work out (e.g. they send a `notfound` or don't respond), we do not try again. We actually can't, because we've already forgotten who else could resolve this orphan (i.e. all the other peers who announced the transaction).

  What is wrong with this? It makes transaction download less reliable, particularly for 1p1c packages which must go through orphan resolution in order to be downloaded.

  Can we fix this with BIP 331 / is this "duct tape" before the real solution?
  BIP 331 (receiver-initiated ancestor package relay) is also based on the idea that there is an orphan that needs resolution, but it's just a new way of communicating information. It's not inherently more honest; you can request ancestor package information and get a `notfound`. So ancestor package relay still requires some kind of procedure for retrying when an orphan resolution attempt fails. See the #27742 implementation which builds on this orphan resolution tracker to keep track of what packages to download (it just isn't rebased on this exact branch). The difference when using BIP 331 is that we request `ancpkginfo` and then `pkgtxns` instead of the parent txids.

  Zooming out, we'd like orphan handling to be:
  - Bandwidth-efficient: don't have too many requests out at once. As already implemented today, transaction requests for orphan parents and regular download both go through the `TxRequestTracker` so that we don't have duplicate requests out.
  - Not vulnerable to censorship: don't give up too easily, use all candidate peers. See e.g. https://bitcoincore.org/en/2024/07/03/disclose_already_asked_for/
  - Load-balance between peers: don't overload peers; use all peers available. This is also useful for when we introduce per-peer orphan protection, since each peer will have limited slots.

  The approach taken in this PR is to think of each peer who announces an orphan as a potential "orphan resolution candidate." These candidates include:
  - the peer who sent us the orphan tx
  - any peers who announced the orphan prior to us downloading it
  - any peers who subsequently announce the orphan after we have started trying to resolve it
  For each orphan resolution candidate, we treat them as having "announced" all of the missing parents to us at the time of receipt of this orphan transaction (or at the time they announced the tx if they do so after we've already started tracking it as an orphan). We add the missing parents as entries to `m_txrequest`, incorporating the logic of typical txrequest processing, which means we prefer outbounds, try not to have duplicate requests in flight, don't overload peers, etc.

ACKs for top commit:
  marcofleon:
    Code review ACK 86d7135e36
  instagibbs:
    reACK 86d7135e36
  dergoegge:
    Code review ACK 86d7135e36
  mzumsande:
    ACK 86d7135e36

Tree-SHA512: 618d523b86e60c3ea039e88326d50db4e55e8e18309c6a20e8f2b10ed9e076f1de0315c335fd3b8abdabcc8b53cbceb66fb59147d05470ea25b83a2b4bd9c877
2025-01-16 13:42:26 +00:00
Hodlinator
0c4954ac7d
net_processing: Add missing use of DisconnectMsg
Makes it easier to grep logs for "disconnecting" when investigating disconnections.
2025-01-10 11:25:08 +01:00
Lőrinc
223081ece6 scripted-diff: rename block and undo functions for consistency
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Co-authored-by: Hodlinator <172445034+hodlinator@users.noreply.github.com>

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
grep -r -wE 'WriteBlock|ReadRawBlock|ReadBlock|WriteBlockUndo|ReadBlockUndo' $(git ls-files src/ ':!src/leveldb') && \
    echo "Error: One or more target names already exist!" && exit 1
sed -i \
    -e 's/\bSaveBlockToDisk/WriteBlock/g' \
    -e 's/\bReadRawBlockFromDisk/ReadRawBlock/g' \
    -e 's/\bReadBlockFromDisk/ReadBlock/g' \
    -e 's/\bWriteUndoDataForBlock/WriteBlockUndo/g' \
    -e 's/\bUndoReadFromDisk/ReadBlockUndo/g' \
    $(git ls-files src/ ':!src/leveldb')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2025-01-09 15:17:02 +01:00
glozow
f7658d9b14 [cleanup] remove p2p_inv from AddTxAnnouncement
This param is no longer needed since orphan parent requests are added to
the TxRequestTracker directly.
2025-01-06 09:02:05 -05:00
glozow
62a9ff1870 [refactor] change type of unique_parents to Txid 2025-01-06 09:02:05 -05:00
Sjors Provoost
1d01ad4d73
net: add LogIP() helper, use in net_processing 2024-11-26 13:22:55 +01:00
Sjors Provoost
937ef9eb40
net_processing: use CNode::DisconnectMsg helper
This is not a pure refactor:
1. It slightly changes the log messages, as reflected in the test changes
2. It adds the IP address to all disconnect logging (when fLogIPs is set)
2024-11-26 13:22:55 +01:00
merge-script
69c0313444
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31269: validation: Remove RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE validation result
e80e4c6ff9 validation: Remove RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE validation result (TheCharlatan)

Pull request description:

  The *_RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE variants in the validation result enumerations were always unused. They seem to have been kept around speculatively for a soft fork after segwit, however they were never used for taproot either. This points at them not having a clear purpose. Based on the original pull requests' comments their usage was never entirely clear:
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11639#issuecomment-370234133 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15141#discussion_r271039747

  Since they are part of the validation interface and need to be exposed by the kernel library keeping them around may also be confusing to future users of the library.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK e80e4c6ff9
  naumenkogs:
    ACK e80e4c6ff9
  dergoegge:
    ACK e80e4c6ff9
  ajtowns:
    ACK e80e4c6ff9

Tree-SHA512: 0af17c4435bb1b5a4f43600da30545cbbe95a7d642419cabdefabfb82b9335d92262c1c48be7ca2f2a024078ae9447161228b6f951d2f508a51159a31947fb54
2024-11-14 09:43:47 +00:00
merge-script
19f277711e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26593: tracing: Only prepare tracepoint arguments when actually tracing
0de3e96e33 tracing: use bitcoind pid in bcc tracing examples (0xb10c)
411c6cfc6c tracing: only prepare tracepoint args if attached (0xb10c)
d524c1ec06 tracing: dedup TRACE macros & rename to TRACEPOINT (0xb10c)

Pull request description:

  Currently, if the tracepoints are compiled (e.g. in depends and release builds), we always prepare the tracepoint arguments regardless of the tracepoints being used or not. We made sure that the argument preparation is as cheap as possible, but we can almost completely eliminate any overhead for users not interested in the tracepoints (the vast majority), by gating the tracepoint argument preparation with an `if(something is attached to this tracepoint)`. To achieve this, we use the optional semaphore feature provided by SystemTap.

  The first commit simplifies and deduplicates our tracepoint macros from 13 TRACEx macros to a single TRACEPOINT macro. This makes them easier to use and also avoids more duplicate macro definitions in the second commit.

  The Linux tracing tools I'm aware of (bcc, bpftrace, libbpf, and systemtap) all support the semaphore gating feature. Thus, all existing tracepoints and their argument preparation is gated in the second commit. For details, please refer to the commit messages and the updated documentation in `doc/tracing.md`.

  Also adding unit tests that include all tracepoint macros to make sure there are no compiler problems with them (e.g. some varadiac extension not supported).

  Reviewers might want to check:
  - Do the tracepoints still work for you? Do the examples in `contrib/tracing/` run on your system (as bpftrace frequently breaks on every new version, please test master too if it should't work for you)? Do the CI interface tests still pass?
  - Is the new documentation clear?
  - The `TRACEPOINT_SEMAPHORE(event, context)` macros places global variables in our global namespace. Is this something we strictly want to avoid or maybe move to all `TRACEPOINT_SEMAPHORE`s to a separate .cpp file or even namespace? I like having the `TRACEPOINT_SEMAPHORE()` in same file as the `TRACEPOINT()`, but open for suggestion on alternative approaches.
  - Are newly added tracepoints in the unit tests visible when using `readelf -n build/src/test/test_bitcoin`? You can run the new unit tests with `./build/src/test/test_bitcoin --run_test=util_trace_tests* --log_level=all`.
  <details><summary>Two of the added unit tests demonstrate that we are only processing the tracepoint arguments when attached by having a test-failure condition in the tracepoint argument preparation. The following bpftrace script can be used to demonstrate that the tests do indeed fail when attached to the tracepoints.</summary>

  `fail_tests.bt`:

  ```c
  #!/usr/bin/env bpftrace

  usdt:./build/src/test/test_bitcoin:test:check_if_attached {
    printf("the 'check_if_attached' test should have failed\n");
  }

  usdt:./build/src/test/test_bitcoin:test:expensive_section {
    printf("the 'expensive_section' test should have failed\n");
  }
  ```

  Run the unit tests with `./build/src/test/test_bitcoin` and start `bpftrace fail_tests.bt -p $(pidof test_bitcoin)` in a separate terminal. The unit tests should fail with:

  ```
  Running 594 test cases...
  test/util_trace_tests.cpp(31): error: in "util_trace_tests/test_tracepoint_check_if_attached": check false has failed
  test/util_trace_tests.cpp(51): error: in "util_trace_tests/test_tracepoint_manual_tracepoint_active_check": check false has failed

  *** 2 failures are detected in the test module "Bitcoin Core Test Suite"
  ```

  </details>

  These links might provide more contextual information for reviewers:
  - [How SystemTap Userspace Probes Work by eklitzke](https://eklitzke.org/how-sytemtap-userspace-probes-work) (actually an example on Bitcoin Core; mentions that with semaphores "the overhead for an untraced process is effectively zero.")
  - [libbpf comment on USDT semaphore handling](1596a09b5d/src/usdt.c (L83-L92)) (can recommend the whole comment for background on how the tracepoints and tracing tools work together)
  - https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation#Semaphore_Handling

ACKs for top commit:
  willcl-ark:
    utACK 0de3e96e33
  laanwj:
    re-ACK 0de3e96e33
  jb55:
    utACK 0de3e96e33
  vasild:
    ACK 0de3e96e33

Tree-SHA512: 0e5e0dc5e0353beaf5c446e4be03d447e64228b1be71ee9972fde1d6fac3fac71a9d73c6ce4fa68975f87db2b2bf6eee2009921a2a145e24d83a475d007a559b
2024-11-11 10:33:28 +00:00
TheCharlatan
e80e4c6ff9
validation: Remove RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE validation result
The *_RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE variants in the validation result
enumerations were always unused. They seem to have been kept around
speculatively for a soft fork after segwit, however they were never used
for taproot either. This points at them not having a clear purpose.
Based on the original pull requests' comments their usage was never
entirely clear:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11639#issuecomment-370234133
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15141#discussion_r271039747

Since they are part of the validation interface and need to exposed by
the kernel library keeping them around may also be confusing to future
users of the library.
2024-11-11 10:24:38 +01:00
0xb10c
411c6cfc6c
tracing: only prepare tracepoint args if attached
Before this commit, we would always prepare tracepoint arguments
regardless of the tracepoint being used or not. While we already made
sure not to include expensive arguments in our tracepoints, this
commit introduces gating to make sure the arguments are only prepared
if the tracepoints are actually used. This is a win-win improvement
to our tracing framework. For users not interested in tracing, the
overhead is reduced to a cheap 'greater than 0' compare. As the
semaphore-gating technique used here is available in bpftrace, bcc,
and libbpf, users interested in tracing don't have to change their
tracing scripts while profiting from potential future tracepoints
passing slightly more expensive arguments. An example are mempool
tracepoints that pass serialized transactions. We've avoided the
serialization in the past as it was too expensive.

Under the hood, the semaphore-gating works by placing a 2-byte
semaphore in the '.probes' ELF section. The address of the semaphore
is contained in the ELF note providing the tracepoint information
(`readelf -n ./src/bitcoind | grep NT_STAPSDT`). Tracing toolkits
like bpftrace, bcc, and libbpf increase the semaphore at the address
upon attaching to the tracepoint. We only prepare the arguments and
reach the tracepoint if the semaphore is greater than zero. The
semaphore is decreased when detaching from the tracepoint.

This also extends the "Adding a new tracepoint" documentation to
include information about the semaphores and updated step-by-step
instructions on how to add a new tracepoint.
2024-10-28 14:27:47 +01:00
0xb10c
d524c1ec06
tracing: dedup TRACE macros & rename to TRACEPOINT
This deduplicates the TRACEx macros by using systemtaps STAP_PROBEV[0]
variadic macro instead of the DTrace compability DTRACE_PROBE[1] macros.
Bitcoin Core never had DTrace tracepoints, so we don't need to use the
drop-in replacement for it. As noted in pr25541[2], these macros aren't
compatibile with DTrace on macOS anyway.

This also renames the TRACEx macro to TRACEPOINT to clarify what the
macro does: inserting a tracepoint vs tracing (logging) something.

[0]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=systemtap.git;a=blob;f=includes/sys/sdt.h;h=24d5e01c37805e55c36f7202e5d4e821b85167a1;hb=ecab2afea46099b4e7dfd551462689224afdbe3a#l407
[1]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=systemtap.git;a=blob;f=includes/sys/sdt.h;h=24d5e01c37805e55c36f7202e5d4e821b85167a1;hb=ecab2afea46099b4e7dfd551462689224afdbe3a#l490
[2]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25541/files#diff-553886c5f808e01e3452c7b21e879cc355da388ef7680bf310f6acb926d43266R30-R31

Co-authored-by: Martin Leitner-Ankerl <martin.ankerl@gmail.com>
2024-10-28 14:23:47 +01:00
glozow
fa584cbe72 [p2p] add TxDownloadOptions bool to make TxRequestTracker deterministic
Forward this bool to the TxRequestTracker ctor. This is needed for
stablity in TxDownloadManager fuzzers
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
fa7027d0fc [refactor] add CheckIsEmpty and GetOrphanTransactions, remove access to TxDownloadMan internals 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
969b07237b [refactor] wrap {Have,Get}TxToReconsider in txdownload 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
1e08195135 [refactor] move new tx logic to txdownload
Also delete external RecentRejectsReconsiderableFilter() access since it
is no longer necessary.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
257568eab5 [refactor] move invalid package processing to TxDownload 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
c4ce0c1218 [refactor] move invalid tx processing to TxDownload
Move-only. Also delete external RecentRejectsFilter() access since it is
no longer necessary.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
c6b21749ca [refactor] move valid tx processing to TxDownload 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
a8cf3b6e84 [refactor] move Find1P1CPackage to txdownload
Move-only.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
f497414ce7 [refactor] put peerman tasks at the end of ProcessInvalidTx 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
6797bc42a7 [p2p] restrict RecursiveDynamicUsage of orphans added to vExtraTxnForCompact
There does not appear to be any reason why orphan transactions should be
given special treatment.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
798cc8f5aa [refactor] move Find1P1CPackage into ProcessInvalidTx 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
416fbc952b [refactor] move new orphan handling to ProcessInvalidTx 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
c8e67b9169 [refactor] move ProcessInvalidTx and ProcessValidTx definitions down
ProcessInvalidTx will return a PackageToValidate, so it needs to be
defined afterward.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
3a41926d1b [refactor] move notfound processing to txdownload 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
042a97ce7f [refactor] move tx inv/getdata handling to txdownload 2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
58e09f244b [p2p] don't log tx invs when in IBD
These invs are ignored anyway, and this allows us to more easily move
the inv handling to TxDownloadManager in the next commit.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
288865338f [refactor] rename maybe_add_extra_compact_tx to first_time_failure
The usage of this bool will increase in scope in the next commit.
For this commit, the value of this bool is accurate at each
ProcessInvalidTx callsite:
- ProcessOrphanTx -> this tx is an orphan i.e. has been rejected before
- ProcessPackageResult -> 1p1c only, each transaction is either an
  orphan or in m_lazy_recent_rejects_reconsiderable
- ProcessMessage -> tx was received over p2p and validated for the first
  time
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
f48d36cd97 [refactor] move peer (dis)connection logic to TxDownload
The information stored in TxDownloadConnectionInfo isn't used until the
next commit.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
f61d9e4b4b [refactor] move AlreadyHaveTx to TxDownload
This is move-only.
Also delete external RecentConfirmedTransactionsFilter() access since it
is no longer necessary.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
84e4ef843d [txdownload] add read-only reference to mempool
This will become necessary in later commits that query mempool. We also
introduce the TxDownloadOptions in this commit to make the later diff
easier to review.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
af918349de [refactor] move ValidationInterface functions to TxDownloadManager
This is move-only.
2024-10-24 21:23:56 -04:00
glozow
5f9004e155 [refactor] add TxDownloadManager wrapping TxOrphanage, TxRequestTracker, and bloom filters
This module is going to be responsible for managing everything related
to transaction download, including txrequest, orphan transactions and
package relay. It will be responsible for managing usage of the
TxOrphanage and instructing PeerManager:
- what tx or package-related messages to send to which peer
- whether a tx or package-related message is allowed or useful
- what transactions are available to try accepting to mempool

Future commits will consolidate the interface and re-delegate
interactions from PeerManager to TxDownloadManager.
2024-10-24 21:23:55 -04:00
tdb3
532491faf1
net: add GetOrphanTransactions() to PeerManager
Updates PeerManager (and Impl) to provide
orphans with metadata
2024-10-01 21:55:18 -04:00
glozow
2bf721e76a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30661: fuzz: Test headers pre-sync through p2p
a97f43d63a fuzz: Add harness for p2p headers sync (marcofleon)
a0eaa4749f Add FUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION in PoW check (marcofleon)
a3f6f5acd8 build: Automatically define FUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION for fuzz builds (marcofleon)
0c02d4b2bd net_processing: Make MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS a PeerManager option (marcofleon)

Pull request description:

  This PR reopens https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28043. It's a regression fuzz test for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26355 and [a couple bugs](ed6cddd98e) that were addressed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25717. This should help us move forward with the [removal of mainnet checkpoints](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25725).

  It seems like the main concern in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28043 was the global mock function for proof of work. This PR aims to be an improvement by replacing the previous approach with a fuzz build configured using `FUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION`. This ensures that the simplified test code will never be in a release binary. If we agree this is the way to go, there are some other places (for future targets) where this method could be used.

  In this target, PoW isn't being tested, so the goal is to bypass the check and let the fuzzer do its thing. In the other harnesses where PoW is actually being fuzzed, `CheckProofOfWork` is now `CheckProofOfWorkImpl`. So, the only change to that function is in the name.

  More about `FUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION` can be found at https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#fuzzer-friendly-build-mode and https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/stable/docs/fuzzing_in_depth.md#d-modifying-the-target.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    ACK a97f43d63a
  dergoegge:
    reACK a97f43d63a
  instagibbs:
    tested ACK a97f43d63a
  brunoerg:
    ACK a97f43d63a

Tree-SHA512: 60b0bc6aadd8ca4c39db9cbba2da2debaaf68afcb6a8dd75c1ce48ca9e3996948fda8020930b6771a424e0f7c41b0b1068db4aa7dbe517f8fc152f1f712058ad
2024-09-16 13:59:22 -04:00
Sergi Delgado Segura
07f4cebe57 refactor: move m_is_inbound out of CNodeState
`m_is_inbound` cannot be changed throughout the life of a `Peer`. However, we
are currently storing it in `CNodeState`, which requires locking `cs_main` in
order to access it. This can be moved to the outside scope and only require
`m_peer_mutex`.

This is a refactor in preparation for Erlay reworks.
2024-09-12 11:20:44 -04:00
Ava Chow
d4b5553849
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30742: kernel: Use spans instead of vectors for passing block headers to validation functions
a2955f0979 validation: Use span for ImportBlocks paths (TheCharlatan)
20515ea3f5 validation: Use span for CalculateClaimedHeadersWork (TheCharlatan)
52575e96e7 validation: Use span for ProcessNewBlockHeaders (TheCharlatan)

Pull request description:

  Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee contiguous memory.

  Take this opportunity to also change the argument of ImportBlocks previously taking a `std::vector` to a `std::span`.

ACKs for top commit:
  stickies-v:
    re-ACK a2955f0979 - no changes except further walking the ~file~ path of modernizing variable names.
  maflcko:
    ACK a2955f0979 🕑
  achow101:
    ACK a2955f0979
  danielabrozzoni:
    ACK a2955f0979

Tree-SHA512: 8b07f4ad26e270b65600d1968cd78847b85caca5bfbb83fd9860389f26656b1d9a40b85e0990339f50403d18cedcd2456990054f3b8b0bedce943e50222d2709
2024-09-03 15:40:40 -04:00
marcofleon
0c02d4b2bd net_processing: Make MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS a PeerManager option 2024-09-02 15:42:44 +01:00
merge-script
d4cc0c6845
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30750: scripted-diff: LogPrint -> LogDebug
fa09cb41f5 refactor: Remove unused LogPrint (MarcoFalke)
3333415890 scripted-diff: LogPrint -> LogDebug (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  `LogPrint` has many issues:

  * It seems to indicate that something is being "printed", however config options such as `-printtoconsole` actually control what and where something is logged.
  * It does not mention the log severity (debug).
  * It is a deprecated alias for `LogDebug`, according to the dev notes.
  * It wastes review cycles, because reviewers sometimes point out that it is deprecated.
  * It makes the code inconsistent, when both are used, possibly even in lines right next to each other (like in `InitHTTPServer`)

  Fix all issues by removing the deprecated alias.

  I checked all conflicting pull requests and at the time of writing there are no conflicts, except in pull requests that are marked as draft, are yet unreviewed, or are blocked on feedback for other reasons. So I think it is fine to do now.

ACKs for top commit:
  stickies-v:
    ACK fa09cb41f5
  danielabrozzoni:
    utACK fa09cb41f5
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK fa09cb41f5

Tree-SHA512: 14270f4cfa3906025a0b994cbb5b2e3c8c2427c0beb19c717a505a2ccbfb1fd1ecf2fd03f6c52d22cde69a8d057e50d2207119fab2c2bc8228db3f10d4288d0f
2024-09-02 11:59:56 +01:00
TheCharlatan
20515ea3f5
validation: Use span for CalculateClaimedHeadersWork
Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if
they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee
contiguous memory.
2024-08-30 10:17:26 +02:00
TheCharlatan
52575e96e7
validation: Use span for ProcessNewBlockHeaders
Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if
they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee
contiguous memory.
2024-08-30 10:17:09 +02:00
MarcoFalke
3333415890
scripted-diff: LogPrint -> LogDebug
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
 sed -i 's/\<LogPrint\>/LogDebug/g' $( git grep -l '\<LogPrint\>'  -- ./contrib/ ./src/ ./test/ ':(exclude)src/logging.h' )
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2024-08-29 13:49:57 +02:00
Hodlinator
50bc017040
refactor: Hand-replace some ParseHex -> ""_hex
The following scripted-diff commit will replace ParseHex("...") with "..."_hex_u8, but this replacement will not work in cases where vectors are needed instead of arrays, and is not ideal in cases where std::byte is accepted.

For example, it is currently necessary to use _hex_v_u8 when calling CScript operator<< because that operator does not currently support std::array or std::byte.

Conversely, it is incorrect to use _hex_v instead of _hex in net_processing.cpp for the MakeAndPushMessage argument, because if the argument is a std::vector it is considered variable-length and serialized with a size prefix, but if the argument is a std::array or Span is it considered fixed length and serialized without a prefix.

By the same logic, it is also safe to change the NUMS_H constant in pubkey.cpp from a std::vector to std::array because it is never serialized.
2024-08-28 19:11:59 +02:00
Ava Chow
c2d15d993e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29519: p2p: For assumeutxo, download snapshot chain before background chain
49d569cb1f p2p: For assumeutxo, download snapshot chain before background chain (Martin Zumsande)
7a885518d5 p2p: Restrict downloading of blocks for snapshot chain (Martin Zumsande)

Pull request description:

  After loading a snapshot, `pindexLastCommonBlock` is usually already set to some block for existing peers. That means we'd continue syncing the background chain from those peers instead of prioritising the snapshot chain, which defeats the purpose of doing assumeutxo in the first place. Only existing peers are affected by this bug.

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    re-ACK 49d569cb1f
  achow101:
    ACK 49d569cb1f
  Sjors:
    tACK 49d569cb1f

Tree-SHA512: 0eaebe1c29a8510d5ced57e14c09b128ccb34b491692815291df68bf12e2a15b52b1e7bf8d9f34808904e7f7bc20f70b0ad0f7e14df93bbdf456bd12cc02a5d2
2024-08-09 17:42:39 -04:00
Martin Zumsande
49d569cb1f p2p: For assumeutxo, download snapshot chain before background chain
After loading a snapshot, pindexLastCommonBlock is usually already set
to some block for existing peers. That means we'd continue syncing the
background chain from those peers instead of prioritising the snapshot
chain, which defeats the purpose of doing assumeutxo in the first place.
Only existing peers are affected by this bug.
2024-08-06 16:04:37 -04:00
Martin Zumsande
7a885518d5 p2p: Restrict downloading of blocks for snapshot chain
If the best chain of the peer doesn't include the snapshot
block, it is futile to download blocks from this chain,
because we couldn't reorg to it. We'd also crash
trying to reorg because this scenario is not handled.
2024-08-06 16:04:37 -04:00