0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-23 12:33:26 -05:00
Commit graph

663 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andrew Chow
8e0cf4f90c
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27846: [coinselection] Increase SRD target by change_fee
1771daa815 [fuzz] Show that SRD budgets for non-dust change (Murch)
941b8c6539 [bug] Increase SRD target by change_fee (Murch)

Pull request description:

  I discovered via fuzzing of another coin selection approach that at extremely high feerates SRD may find input sets that lead to transactions without change outputs. This is an unintended outcome since SRD is meant to always produce a transaction with a change output—we use other algorithms to specifically search for changeless solutions.

  The issue occurs when the flat allowance of 50,000 ṩ for change is insufficient to pay for the creation of a change output with a non-dust amount, at and above 1,613 ṩ/vB. Increasing the change budget by `change_fee` makes SRD behave as expected at any feerates.

  Note: The intermittent failures of `test/functional/interface_usdt_mempool.py` are a known issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27380

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 1771daa815
  S3RK:
    ACK 1771daa815

Tree-SHA512: 3f36a3e317ef0a711d0e409069c05032bff1d45403023f3728bf73dfd55ddd9e0dc2a9969d4d69fe0a426807ebb0bed1f54abfc05581409bfe42c327acf766d4
2023-06-23 16:57:11 -04:00
fanquake
2880bb588a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27889: test: Kill BOOST_ASSERT and update the linter
28fff06afe test: Make linter to look for `BOOST_ASSERT` macros (Hennadii Stepanov)
47fe551e52 test: Kill `BOOST_ASSERT` (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  One of the goals of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27783 was to get rid of the `BOOST_ASSERT` macros instead of including the `boost/assert.hpp` headers. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27783#discussion_r1210612717.

  It turns out that a couple of those macros sneaked into the codebase in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27790.

  This PR makes the linter guard against new instances of the `BOOST_ASSERT` macros and replaces the current ones.

ACKs for top commit:
  kevkevinpal:
    ACK [28fff06](28fff06afe)
  stickies-v:
    ACK 28fff06af
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 28fff06afe

Tree-SHA512: 371f613592cf677afe0196d18c83943c6c8f1e998f57b4ff3ee58bfeff8636e4dac1357840d8611b4f7b197def94df10fe1a8ca3282b00b7b4eff4624552dda8
2023-06-22 12:33:35 +01:00
Murch
1771daa815
[fuzz] Show that SRD budgets for non-dust change
Adding this assert to the fuzz test without increasing the change target
by the change_fee resulted in a crash within a few seconds.
2023-06-21 16:19:26 -04:00
Murch
941b8c6539
[bug] Increase SRD target by change_fee
I discovered via fuzzing of another coin selection approach that at
extremely high feerates SRD may find input sets that lead to
transactions without change outputs. This is an unintended outcome since
SRD is meant to always produce a transaction with a change output—we use
other algorithms to specifically search for changeless solutions.

The issue occures when the flat allowance of 50,000 ṩ for change is
insufficient to pay for the creation of a change output with a non-dust
amount, at and above 1,613 ṩ/vB. Increasing the change budget by
change_fees makes SRD behave as expected at any feerates.
2023-06-21 16:19:19 -04:00
MarcoFalke
faa05d1965
fuzz: Fix implicit-integer-sign-change in wallet/fees fuzz target 2023-06-20 12:05:09 +02:00
Ayush Singh
40b333e21f fuzz: wallet, add target for CoinControl 2023-06-17 23:55:16 +05:30
Hennadii Stepanov
47fe551e52
test: Kill BOOST_ASSERT 2023-06-14 16:00:27 +01:00
jonatack
1b246fdd14 test: move remaining random test util code from setup_common to random
and drop the util/random dependency on util/setup_common.

This improves code separation and avoids creating a circular dependency if
setup_common needs to call the util/random functions.
2023-06-14 08:28:33 -06:00
brunoerg
162602b208 fuzz: wallet, add target for fees 2023-06-14 11:20:39 -03:00
fanquake
361a0c00b3
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27783: Add public Boost headers explicitly
2484cacb7a Add public Boost headers explicitly (Hennadii Stepanov)
fade2adb5b test: Avoid `BOOST_ASSERT` macro (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  To check symbols in the code base, run:
  ```
  git grep boost::multi_index::identity
  git grep boost::multi_index::indexed_by
  git grep boost::multi_index::tag
  git grep boost::make_tuple
  ```

  Hoping on the absence of conflicts with top-prio PRs :)

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    lgtm ACK 2484cacb7a
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 2484cacb7a

Tree-SHA512: d122ab028eee76ee1c4609ed51ec8db0c8c768edcc2ff2c0e420a48e051aa71e99748cdb5d22985ae6d97c808c77c1a27561f0715f77b256f74c1c310b37694c
2023-06-12 16:53:16 +01:00
fanquake
7f2019755d
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27790: walletdb: Add PrefixCursor
ba616b932c wallet: Add GetPrefixCursor to DatabaseBatch (Andrew Chow)
1d858b055d walletdb: Handle when database keys are empty (Ryan Ofsky)
84b2f353bb walletdb: Consistently clear key and value streams before writing (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  Split from #24914 as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24914#pullrequestreview-1442091917

  This PR adds a wallet database cursor that gives a view over all of the records beginning with the same prefix.

ACKs for top commit:
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK ba616b932c. Just suggested changes since last review
  furszy:
    ACK ba616b93

Tree-SHA512: 38a61849f108d8003d28c599b1ad0421ac9beb3afe14c02f1253e7b4efc3d4eef483e32647a820fc6636bca3f9efeff9fe062b6b602e0cded69f21f8b26af544
2023-06-02 17:00:19 +01:00
Andrew Chow
ba616b932c wallet: Add GetPrefixCursor to DatabaseBatch
In order to get records beginning with a prefix, we will need a cursor
specifically for that prefix. So add a GetPrefixCursor function and
DatabaseCursor classes for dealing with those prefixes.

Tested on each supported db engine.

1) Write two different key->value elements to db.
2) Create a new prefix cursor and walk-through every returned element,
   verifying that it gets parsed properly.
3) Try to move the cursor outside the filtered range: expect failure
   and flag complete=true.

Co-Authored-By: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Co-Authored-By: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
2023-06-01 13:09:08 -04:00
Andrew Chow
84b2f353bb walletdb: Consistently clear key and value streams before writing
Before writing data to the output key and value streams, make sure they
are cleared.
2023-05-31 15:17:05 -04:00
Hennadii Stepanov
fade2adb5b
test: Avoid BOOST_ASSERT macro
The `BOOST_ASSERT` macro is defined in the `boost/assert.hpp` header.
This change allows to skip `#include <boost/assert.hpp>`.
2023-05-31 15:42:40 +01:00
furszy
a10f032115
fuzz: fix wallet notifications.cpp
As the fuzzer test requires all blocks to be
scanned by the wallet (because it is asserting
the wallet balance at the end), we need to
ensure that no blocks are skipped by the recently
added wallet birth time functionality.

This just means setting the chain accumulated time
to the maximum value, so the wallet birth time is
always below it, and the block is always processed.
2023-05-30 17:46:46 -03:00
Andrew Chow
846b2fe67e tests: Move ADDRESS_BCRT1_UNSPENDABLE to wallet/test/util.h
This static address is usable for other wallet tests and benchmarks, so
make it available to them.
2023-05-25 14:40:42 -04:00
Andrew Chow
c61d3f02f5 tests, bench: Consolidate {Test,Bench}Un/LoadWallet helper
The wallet tests and benchmarks both had helper functions for loading
and unloading the wallet for the test that were almost identical.
These functions are consolidated and reused.
2023-05-25 14:40:26 -04:00
furszy
69d43905b7
test: add coverage for wallet read write db deadlock 2023-05-15 12:29:38 -03:00
fanquake
d02df7db6b
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26715: Introduce MockableDatabase for wallet unit tests
33e2b82a4f wallet, bench: Remove unused database options from WalletBenchLoading (Andrew Chow)
80ace042d8 tests: Modify records directly in wallet ckey loading test (Andrew Chow)
b3bb17d5d0 tests: Update DuplicateMockDatabase for MockableDatabase (Andrew Chow)
f0eecf5e40 scripted-diff: Replace CreateMockWalletDB with CreateMockableWalletDB (Andrew Chow)
075962bc25 wallet, tests: Include wallet/test/util.h (Andrew Chow)
14aa4cb1e4 wallet: Move DummyDatabase to salvage (Andrew Chow)
f67a385556 wallet, tests: Replace usage of dummy db with mockable db (Andrew Chow)
33c6245ac1 Introduce MockableDatabase for wallet unit tests (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  For the wallet's unit tests, we currently use either `DummyDatabase` or memory-only versions of either BDB or SQLite. The tests that use `DummyDatabase` just need a `WalletDatabase` so that the `CWallet` can be constructed, while the tests using the memory-only databases just need a backing data store. There is also a `FailDatabase` that is similar to `DummyDatabase` except it fails be default or can have a configured return value. Having all of these different database types can make it difficult to write tests, particularly tests that work when either BDB or SQLite is disabled.

  This PR unifies all of these different unit test database classes into a single `MockableDatabase`. Like `DummyDatabase`, most functions do nothing and just return true. Like `FailDatabase`, the return value of some functions can be configured on the fly to test various failure cases. Like the memory-only databases, records can actually be written to the `MockableDatabase` and be retrieved later, but all of this is still held in memory. Using `MockableDatabase` completely removes the need for having BDB or SQLite backed wallets in the unit tests for the tests that are not actually testing specific database behaviors.

  Because `MockableDatabase`s can be created by each unit test, we can also control what records are stored in the database. Records can be added and removed externally from the typical database modification functions. This will give us greater ability to test failure conditions, particularly those involving corrupted records.

  Possible alternative to #26644

ACKs for top commit:
  furszy:
    ACK 33e2b82
  TheCharlatan:
    ACK 33e2b82a4f

Tree-SHA512: c2b09eff9728d063d2d4aea28a0f0e64e40b76483e75dc53f08667df23bd25834d52656cd4eafb02e552db0b9e619cfdb1b1c65b26b5436ee2c971d804768bcc
2023-05-15 11:39:43 +01:00
TheCharlatan
f0bb1021f0
refactor: Move functions to BlockManager methods
This is a commit in preparation for the next few commits. The functions
are moved to methods to avoid their re-declaration for the purpose of
passing in BlockManager options.

The functions that were now moved into the BlockManager should no longer
use the params as an argument, but instead use the member variable.

In the moved ReadBlockFromDisk and UndoReadFromDisk, change
the function signature to accept a reference to a CBlockIndex instead of
a raw pointer. The pointer is expected to be non-null, so reflect that
in the type.

To allow for the move of functions to BlockManager methods all call
sites require an instantiated BlockManager, or a callback to one.
2023-05-10 19:06:53 +02:00
TheCharlatan
ba8fc7d788
refactor: Replace string chain name constants with ChainTypes
This commit effectively moves the definition of these constants
out of the chainparamsbase to their own file.

Using the ChainType enums provides better type safety compared to
passing around strings.

The commit is part of an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel
library from the ArgsManager and other functionality that should not be
part of the kernel library.
2023-05-09 15:49:14 +02:00
Andrew Chow
80ace042d8 tests: Modify records directly in wallet ckey loading test
In the wallet ckey loading test, we modify various ckey records to test
corruption handling. As the database is now a mockable database, we can
modify the records that the database will be initialized with. This
avoids having to use the verbose database reading and writing functions.
2023-05-03 10:45:10 -04:00
Andrew Chow
b3bb17d5d0 tests: Update DuplicateMockDatabase for MockableDatabase 2023-05-03 10:45:10 -04:00
Andrew Chow
f0eecf5e40 scripted-diff: Replace CreateMockWalletDB with CreateMockableWalletDB
Since we have a mockable wallet database, we don't really need to be
using BDB or SQLite's in-memory database capabilities. It doesn't really
help us to be using those as we aren't doing anything that requires one
type of db over the other, and will just prefer SQLite if it's
available.

MockableDatabase is suitable for these uses, so use
CreateMockableWalletDatabase to use that.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)/CreateMockableWalletDatabase()/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase(options)" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
sed -i "s/CreateMockWalletDatabase/CreateMockableWalletDatabase/" $(git grep -l "CreateMockWalletDatabase" -- ":(exclude)src/wallet/walletdb.*")
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2023-05-03 10:45:10 -04:00
Andrew Chow
075962bc25 wallet, tests: Include wallet/test/util.h
This will be needed for the following scripted-diff to work.
2023-05-03 10:45:10 -04:00
Andrew Chow
f67a385556 wallet, tests: Replace usage of dummy db with mockable db 2023-05-03 10:45:10 -04:00
Andrew Chow
33c6245ac1 Introduce MockableDatabase for wallet unit tests
MockableDatabase is a WalletDatabase that allows us to interact with the
records to change them independently from the wallet, as well as
changing the return values from within the tests. This will give us
greater flexibility in testing the wallet.
2023-05-03 10:45:10 -04:00
Andrew Chow
5325a61167
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27224: refactor: Remove CAddressBookData::destdata
a5986e82dd refactor: Remove CAddressBookData::destdata (Ryan Ofsky)
5938ad0bdb wallet: Add DatabaseBatch::ErasePrefix method (Ryan Ofsky)

Pull request description:

  This is cleanup that doesn't change external behavior. Benefits of the cleanup are:

  - Removes awkward `StringMap` intermediate representation for wallet address metadata.
  - Simplifies `CWallet`, deals with used address and received request serialization in `walletdb.cpp` instead of higher level wallet code
  - Adds test coverage and documentation

  This PR doesn't change externally observable behavior. Internally, the only change in behavior is that `EraseDestData` deletes rows directly from the database because they are no longer stored in memory. This is more direct and efficient because it uses a single lookup and scan instead of multiple lookups.

  Motivation for this cleanup is making changes like #18550, #18192, #13756 easier to reason about and less likely to result in unintended behavior and bugs

  ---

  This PR is a rebased copy of #18608. For some reason that PR is locked and couldn't be reopened or commented on.

  This PR is an alternative to #27215 with differences described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27215#pullrequestreview-1329028143

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK a5986e82dd
  furszy:
    Code ACK a5986e82

Tree-SHA512: 6bd3e402f1f60263fbd433760bdc29d04175ddaf8307207c4a67d59f6cffa732e176ba57886e02926f7a1615dce0ed9cda36c8cbc6430aa8e5b56934c23f3fe7
2023-05-01 08:16:54 -04:00
fanquake
669af32632
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27419: move-only: Extract common/args from util/system
be55f545d5 move-only: Extract common/args and common/config.cpp from util/system (TheCharlatan)

Pull request description:

  This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel". It is part of a series of patches splitting up the `util/system` files. Its preceding pull request is https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254.

  The pull request contains an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system into their own common/ file.

  The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on it. See [doc/design/libraries.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/design/libraries.md) for more information on this rationale.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK be55f545d5  🚲
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK be55f545d5. Just small cleanups since the last review.
  hebasto:
    ACK be55f545d5, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: 90eb03334af0155b823030b4f2ecf286d35058d700ee2ddbbaa445be19e31eb0fe982656f35bd14ecee3ad2c3d0db3746855cb8f3777eff7253713e42873e111
2023-04-21 11:19:08 +01:00
Andrew Chow
395b932807
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26720: wallet: coin selection, don't return results that exceed the max allowed weight
25ab14712b refactor: coinselector_tests, unify wallet creation code (furszy)
ba9431c505 test: coverage for bnb max weight (furszy)
5a2bc45ee0 wallet: clean post coin selection max weight filter (furszy)
2d112584e3 coin selection: BnB, don't return selection if exceeds max allowed tx weight (furszy)
d3a1c098e4 test: coin selection, add coverage for SRD (furszy)
9d9689e5a6 coin selection: heap-ify SRD, don't return selection if exceeds max tx weight (furszy)
6107ec2229 coin selection: knapsack, select closest UTXO above target if result exceeds max tx size (furszy)
1284223691 wallet: refactor coin selection algos to return util::Result (furszy)

Pull request description:

  Coming from the following comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729#discussion_r1029324367.

  The reason why we are adding hundreds of UTXO from different sources when the target
  amount is covered only by one of them is because only SRD returns a usable result.

  Context:
  In the test, we create 1515 UTXOs with 0.033 BTC each, and 1 UTXO with 50 BTC. Then
  perform Coin Selection to fund 49.5 BTC.

  As the selection of the 1515 small UTXOs exceeds the max allowed tx size, the
  expectation here is to receive a selection result that only contain the big UTXO.
  Which is not happening for the following reason:

  Knapsack returns a result that exceeds the max allowed transaction size, when
  it should return the closest utxo above the target, so we fallback to SRD who
  selects coins randomly up until the target is met. So we end up with a selection
  result with lot more coins than what is needed.

ACKs for top commit:
  S3RK:
    ACK 25ab14712b
  achow101:
    ACK 25ab14712b
  Xekyo:
    reACK 25ab14712b
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK 25ab14712b

Tree-SHA512: 2425de4cc479b4db999b3b2e02eb522a2130a06379cca0418672a51c4076971a1d427191173820db76a0f85a8edfff100114e1c38fb3b5dc51598d07cabe1a60
2023-04-20 16:33:39 -04:00
TheCharlatan
be55f545d5
move-only: Extract common/args and common/config.cpp from util/system
This is an extraction of ArgsManager related functions from util/system
into their own common file.

Config file related functions are moved to common/config.cpp.

The background of this commit is an ongoing effort to decouple the
libbitcoinkernel library from the ArgsManager. The ArgsManager belongs
into the common library, since the kernel library should not depend on
it. See doc/design/libraries.md for more information on this rationale.
2023-04-19 10:48:30 +02:00
Ryan Ofsky
a5986e82dd refactor: Remove CAddressBookData::destdata
This is cleanup that doesn't change external behavior.

- Removes awkward `StringMap` intermediate representation
- Simplifies CWallet code, deals with used address and received request
  serialization in walletdb.cpp
- Adds test coverage and documentation
- Reduces memory usage

This PR doesn't change externally observable behavior. Internally, only change
in behavior is that EraseDestData deletes directly from database because the
`StringMap` is gone. This is more direct and efficient because it uses a single
btree lookup and scan instead of multiple lookups

Motivation for this cleanup is making changes like #18550, #18192, #13756
easier to reason about and less likely to result in unintended behavior and
bugs

Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
2023-04-12 05:30:43 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
5938ad0bdb wallet: Add DatabaseBatch::ErasePrefix method
This new function is not used yet this commit, but next commit adds usages and
test coverage for both BDB and sqlite.
2023-04-12 05:30:43 -04:00
Ryan Ofsky
8741522e6c wallet: Add wallet/types.h for simple public enum and struct types
Move isminetype and isminefilter there this commit, add WalletPurpose type next
commit.
2023-04-11 15:52:25 -04:00
Andrew Chow
27dcc07c08
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26699: wallet, gui: bugfix, getAvailableBalance skips selected coins
68eed5df86 test,gui: add coverage for PSBT creation on legacy watch-only wallets (furszy)
306aab5bb4 test,gui: decouple widgets and model into a MiniGui struct (furszy)
2f76ac0383 test,gui: decouple chain and wallet initialization from test case (furszy)
cd98b71739 gui: 'getAvailableBalance', include watch only balance (furszy)
74eac3a82f test: add coverage for 'useAvailableBalance' functionality (furszy)
dc1cc1c359 gui: bugfix, getAvailableBalance skips selected coins (furszy)

Pull request description:

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/688 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26687.

  First Issue Description (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/688):

  The previous behavior for `getAvailableBalance`, when the coin control had selected coins, was to return the sum of them. Instead, we are currently returning the wallet's available total balance minus the selected coins total amount.

  Reason:
  Missed to update the `GetAvailableBalance` function to include the coin control selected coins on #25685.

  Context:
  Since #25685 we skip the selected coins inside `AvailableCoins`, the reason is that there is no need to waste resources walking through the entire wallet's txes map just to get coins that could have gotten by just doing a simple `mapWallet.find`).

  Places Where This Generates Issues (only when the user manually select coins via coin control):
  1) The GUI balance check prior the transaction creation process.
  2) The GUI "useAvailableBalance" functionality.

  Note 1:
  As the GUI uses a balance cache since https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/598, this issue does not affect the regular spending process. Only arises when the user manually select coins.

  Note 2:
  Added test coverage for the `useAvailableBalance` functionality.

  ----------------------------------

  Second Issue Description (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26687):

  As we are using a cached balance on `WalletModel::getAvailableBalance`,
  the function needs to include the watch-only available balance for wallets
  with private keys disabled.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    tACK 68eed5df86
  achow101:
    ACK 68eed5df86
  theStack:
    ACK 68eed5df86

Tree-SHA512: 674f3e050024dabda2ff4a04b9ed3750cf54a040527204c920e1e38bd3d7f5fd4d096e4fd08a0fea84ee6abb5070f022b5c0d450c58fd30202ef05ebfd7af6d3
2023-04-11 14:05:55 -04:00
furszy
25ab14712b
refactor: coinselector_tests, unify wallet creation code
same lines of code repeated across the entire file over and over.
2023-04-05 09:32:39 -03:00
furszy
ba9431c505
test: coverage for bnb max weight
Basic positive and negative scenarios
2023-04-05 09:32:39 -03:00
furszy
2d112584e3
coin selection: BnB, don't return selection if exceeds max allowed tx weight 2023-04-05 09:32:39 -03:00
furszy
d3a1c098e4
test: coin selection, add coverage for SRD 2023-04-05 09:32:39 -03:00
furszy
9d9689e5a6
coin selection: heap-ify SRD, don't return selection if exceeds max tx weight
Uses a min-effective-value heap, so we can remove the least valuable input/s
while the selected weight exceeds the maximum allowed weight.

Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
2023-04-05 09:32:39 -03:00
furszy
6107ec2229
coin selection: knapsack, select closest UTXO above target if result exceeds max tx size
The simplest scenario where this is useful is on the 'check_max_weight' unit test
already:

We create 1515 UTXOs with 0.033 BTC each, and 1 UTXO with 50 BTC. Then perform
Coin Selection.

As the selection of the 1515 small UTXOs exceeds the max allowed tx size, the
expectation here is to receive a selection result that only contain the big
UTXO (which is not happening for the reasons stated below).

As knapsack returns a result that exceeds the max allowed transaction size, we
fallback to SRD, which selects coins randomly up until the target is met. So
we end up with a selection result with lot more coins than what is needed.
2023-04-05 09:32:39 -03:00
furszy
dc1cc1c359
gui: bugfix, getAvailableBalance skips selected coins
The previous behavior for getAvailableBalance when coin control
has selected coins was to return the sum of them. Instead, we
are currently returning the wallet's available total balance minus
the selected coins total amount.

This turns into a GUI-only issue for the "use available balance"
button when the user manually select coins in the send screen.

Reason:
We missed to update the GetAvailableBalance function to include
the coin control selected coins on #25685.

Context:
Since #25685 we skip the selected coins inside `AvailableCoins`,
the reason is that there is no need to traverse the wallet's
txes map just to get coins that can directly be fetched by
their id.
2023-04-03 17:23:42 -03:00
TheCharlatan
00e9b97f37
refactor: Move fs.* to util/fs.*
The fs.* files are already part of the libbitcoin_util library. With the
introduction of the fs_helpers.* it makes sense to move fs.* into the
util/ directory as well.
2023-03-23 12:55:18 +01:00
furszy
6a302d40df
wallet: single output groups filtering and grouping process
Optimizes coin selection by performing the "group outputs"
procedure only once, outside the "attempt selection" process.

Avoiding the repeated execution of the 'GroupOutputs' operation
that occurs on each coin eligibility filters (up to 8 of them);
then for every coin vector type plus one for all the coins together.

This also let us not perform coin selection over coin eligibility
filtered groups that don't add new elements.
(because, if the previous round failed, and the subsequent one has
the same coins, then this new round will fail again).
2023-03-06 09:45:40 -03:00
furszy
bd91ed1cb2
wallet: unify outputs grouping process
The 'GroupOutputs()' function performs the same
calculations for only-positive and mixed groups,
the only difference is that when we look for
only-positive groups, we discard negative utxos.

So, instead of wasting resources calling GroupOutputs()
for positive-only first, then call it again to include
the negative ones in the result, we can execute
GroupOutputs() only once, including in the response
both group types (positive-only and mixed).
2023-03-06 09:45:40 -03:00
furszy
55962001da
test: coinselector_tests refactor, use CoinsResult instead of plain std::vector
No functional changes. Only cosmetic changes to simplify the follow-up commit.
2023-03-06 09:45:40 -03:00
furszy
461f0821a2
refactor: make OutputGroup::m_outputs field a vector of shared_ptr
Initial steps towards sharing COutput instances across all possible
OutputGroups (instead of copying them time after time).
2023-03-06 09:45:40 -03:00
furszy
d8e749bb84
test: wallet, add coverage for outputs grouping process
The following scenarios are covered:

1) 10 UTXO with the same script:
   partial spends is enabled --> outputs must not be grouped.

2) 10 UTXO with the same script:
   partial spends disabled --> outputs must be grouped.

3) 20 UTXO, 10 one from scriptA + 10 from scriptB:
   a) if partial spends is enabled --> outputs must not be grouped.
   b) if partial spends is not enabled --> 2 output groups expected (one per script).

3) Try to add a negative output (value - fee < 0):
   a) if "positive_only" is enabled --> negative output must be skipped.
   b) if "positive_only" is disabled --> negative output must be added.

4) Try to add a non-eligible UTXO (due not fulfilling the min depth target for
 "not mine" UTXOs) --> it must not be added to any group

5) Try to add a non-eligible UTXO (due not fulfilling the min depth target for
 "mine" UTXOs) --> it must not be added to any group

6) Surpass the 'OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES' size and verify that a second partial
group gets created.
2023-03-06 09:45:40 -03:00
furszy
06ec8f9928
wallet: make OutputGroup "positive_only" filter explicit
And not hide it inside the `OutputGroup::Insert` method.
This method does not return anything if insertion fails.

We can know before calling `Insert` whether the coin
will be accepted or not.
2023-03-03 18:18:03 -03:00
Andrew Chow
a245429d68
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26940: test: create random and coins utils, add amount helper, dedupe add_coin
4275195606 De-duplicate add_coin methods to a test util helper (Jon Atack)
9d92c3d7f4 Create InsecureRandMoneyAmount() test util helper (Jon Atack)
81f5ade2a3 Move random test util code from setup_common to random (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  - Move random test utilities from `setup_common` to a new `random` file, as many tests don't use this code.

  - Create a helper to generate semi-random CAmounts up to `MONEY_RANGE` rather than only uint32, and use the helper in the unit tests.

  - De-duplicate a shared `add_coin` method by extracting it to a `coins` test utility.

ACKs for top commit:
  pinheadmz:
    ACK 4275195606
  achow101:
    ACK 4275195606
  john-moffett:
    ACK 4275195606

Tree-SHA512: 3ed974251149c7417f935ef2f8865aa0dcc33b281b47522b0f96f1979dff94bb8527957f098fe4d210f40d715c00f29512f2ffe189097102229023b7284a3a27
2023-02-17 17:28:14 -05:00