foster/bitcoin-bitcoin-core
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-03 09:56:38 -05:00
Code Issues Activity
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
25209 commits 6 branches 321 tags 2.3 GiB
C++ 56.4%
C 22.8%
Python 17.6%
CMake 1%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.1%
Find a file
Wladimir J. van der Laan 14ceddd290
Merge #18991: Cache responses to GETADDR to prevent topology leaks 
3bd67ba5a4 Test addr response caching (Gleb Naumenko)
cf1569e074 Add addr permission flag enabling non-cached addr sharing (Gleb Naumenko)
acd6135b43 Cache responses to addr requests (Gleb Naumenko)
7cc0e8101f Remove useless 2500 limit on AddrMan queries (Gleb Naumenko)
ded742bc5b Move filtering banned addrs inside GetAddresses() (Gleb Naumenko)

Pull request description:

  This is a very simple code change with a big p2p privacy benefit.

  It’s currently trivial to scrape any reachable node’s AddrMan (a database of all nodes known to them along with the timestamps).
  We do have a limit of one GETADDR per connection, but a spy can disconnect and reconnect even from the same IP, and send GETADDR again and again.

  Since we respond with 1,000 random records at most, depending on the AddrMan size it takes probably up to 100 requests for an spy to make sure they scraped (almost) everything.
  I even have a script for that. It is totally doable within couple minutes.

  Then, with some extra protocol knowledge a spy can infer the direct peers of the victim, and other topological stuff.

  I suggest to cache responses to GETADDR on a daily basis, so that an attacker gets at most 1,000 records per day, and can’t track the changes in real time. I will be following up with more improvements to addr relay privacy, but this one alone is a very effective. And simple!

  I doubt any of the real software does *reconnect to get new addrs from a given peer*, so we shouldn’t be cutting anyone.
  I also believe it doesn’t have any negative implications on the overall topology quality. And the records being “outdated” for at most a day doesn’t break any honest assumptions either.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    reACK 3bd67ba5a4
  promag:
    Code review ACK 3bd67ba5a4.
  ariard:
    Code Review ACK 3bd67ba

Tree-SHA512: dfa5d03205c2424e40a3f8a41af9306227e1ca18beead3b3dda44aa2a082175bb1c6d929dbc7ea8e48e01aed0d50f0d54491caa1147471a2b72a46c3ca06b66f
2020-08-03 14:48:52 +02:00
.github doc: Add redirect for GUI issues and pull requests 2020-06-08 10:06:02 -04:00
.tx tx: Bump transifex slug to 020x 2020-03-16 10:52:55 +01:00
build-aux/m4 Merge #18297: build: Use pkg-config in BITCOIN_QT_CONFIGURE for all hosts including Windows 2020-06-13 15:41:39 +08:00
build_msvc Updates msvc build to use ISO standard C++17. 2020-07-04 16:03:18 +01:00
ci Merge #19519: ci: Increase CCACHE_SIZE in some builds on Travis 2020-07-28 10:25:11 +02:00
contrib Merge #18011: Replace current benchmarking framework with nanobench 2020-07-30 15:34:17 +02:00
depends doc: Clang 8 or later is required with FORCE_USE_SYSTEM_CLANG 2020-07-29 10:49:54 +08:00
doc doc: Add historical release notes for 0.20.1 2020-08-01 14:17:14 +02:00
share doc: Use precise permission flags where possible 2020-07-10 15:37:42 +02:00
src Merge #18991: Cache responses to GETADDR to prevent topology leaks 2020-08-03 14:48:52 +02:00
test Merge #18991: Cache responses to GETADDR to prevent topology leaks 2020-08-03 14:48:52 +02:00
.appveyor.yml Merge #18011: Replace current benchmarking framework with nanobench 2020-07-30 15:34:17 +02:00
.cirrus.yml ci: Run tsan ci config on cirrus 2020-07-02 12:22:39 -04:00
.fuzzbuzz.yml ci: Add fuzzbuzz integration 2020-04-14 16:38:26 +00:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore Fix .gitignore for src/test/fuzz directory 2020-07-27 00:56:37 +03:00
.python-version .python-version: Specify full version 3.5.6 2019-03-02 12:06:26 -05:00
.style.yapf test: .style.yapf: Set column_limit=160 2019-03-04 18:28:13 -05:00
.travis.yml travis: Re-enable s390x 2020-07-28 16:01:53 +02:00
autogen.sh scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 2019-12-30 10:42:20 +13:00
configure.ac build: add -Wl,-z,separate-code to hardening flags 2020-07-28 12:57:35 +08:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: CONTRIBUTING.md improvements 2020-07-12 07:52:28 +02:00
COPYING doc: Update license year range to 2020 2019-12-26 23:11:21 +01:00
INSTALL.md Update INSTALL landing redirection notice for build instructions. 2016-10-06 12:27:23 +13:00
libbitcoinconsensus.pc.in build: remove libcrypto as internal dependency in libbitcoinconsensus.pc 2019-11-19 15:03:44 +01:00
Makefile.am tests: run test-security-check.py in CI 2020-06-16 19:52:30 +08:00
README.md doc: Mention repo split in the READMEs 2020-06-08 10:06:14 -04:00
SECURITY.md doc: Remove explicit mention of version from SECURITY.md 2019-06-14 06:39:17 -04:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

What is Bitcoin?

Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin Core is the name of open source software which enables the use of this currency.

For more information, as well as an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, or read the original whitepaper.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python, that are run automatically on the build server. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The Travis CI system makes sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Translators should also subscribe to the mailing list.