0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-09 10:43:19 -05:00
bitcoin-bitcoin-core/src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp
David Reikher 4455949d6f Make test DoS_mapOrphans deterministic
The RandomOrphan function and the function ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax
in pubkey.cpp were causing non-deterministic test coverage.

Force seed in the beginning of the test to make it deterministic.
The seed is selected carefully so that all branches of the function
ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax are executed. Prior to this fix, the test
was exhibiting non-deterministic coverage since none of the ECDSA
signatures that were generated during the test had leading zeroes in
either R, S, or both, resulting in some branches of said function not
being executed. The seed ensures that both conditions are hit.

Removed denialofservice_tests test entry from the list of non-deterministic
tests in the coverage script.
2020-07-21 09:18:57 +03:00

416 lines
14 KiB
C++

// Copyright (c) 2011-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
// Unit tests for denial-of-service detection/prevention code
#include <arith_uint256.h>
#include <banman.h>
#include <chainparams.h>
#include <net.h>
#include <net_processing.h>
#include <pubkey.h>
#include <script/sign.h>
#include <script/signingprovider.h>
#include <script/standard.h>
#include <serialize.h>
#include <util/memory.h>
#include <util/string.h>
#include <util/system.h>
#include <util/time.h>
#include <validation.h>
#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
struct CConnmanTest : public CConnman {
using CConnman::CConnman;
void AddNode(CNode& node)
{
LOCK(cs_vNodes);
vNodes.push_back(&node);
}
void ClearNodes()
{
LOCK(cs_vNodes);
for (CNode* node : vNodes) {
delete node;
}
vNodes.clear();
}
};
// Tests these internal-to-net_processing.cpp methods:
extern bool AddOrphanTx(const CTransactionRef& tx, NodeId peer);
extern void EraseOrphansFor(NodeId peer);
extern unsigned int LimitOrphanTxSize(unsigned int nMaxOrphans);
extern void Misbehaving(NodeId nodeid, int howmuch, const std::string& message="");
struct COrphanTx {
CTransactionRef tx;
NodeId fromPeer;
int64_t nTimeExpire;
};
extern std::map<uint256, COrphanTx> mapOrphanTransactions GUARDED_BY(g_cs_orphans);
static CService ip(uint32_t i)
{
struct in_addr s;
s.s_addr = i;
return CService(CNetAddr(s), Params().GetDefaultPort());
}
static NodeId id = 0;
void UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(NodeId node, int64_t time_in_seconds);
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(denialofservice_tests, TestingSetup)
// Test eviction of an outbound peer whose chain never advances
// Mock a node connection, and use mocktime to simulate a peer
// which never sends any headers messages. PeerLogic should
// decide to evict that outbound peer, after the appropriate timeouts.
// Note that we protect 4 outbound nodes from being subject to
// this logic; this test takes advantage of that protection only
// being applied to nodes which send headers with sufficient
// work.
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
{
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
// Mock an outbound peer
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false);
dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
// This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work.
{
LOCK(cs_main);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip() != nullptr);
BOOST_CHECK(::ChainActive().Tip()->nChainWork > 0);
}
// Test starts here
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in getheaders
}
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend);
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0);
dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear();
}
int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
// Wait 21 minutes
SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60);
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in getheaders
}
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_vSend);
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0);
}
// Wait 3 more minutes
SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60);
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1)); // should result in disconnect
}
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true);
SetMockTime(0);
bool dummy;
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
}
static void AddRandomOutboundPeer(std::vector<CNode *> &vNodes, PeerLogicValidation &peerLogic, CConnmanTest* connman)
{
CAddress addr(ip(g_insecure_rand_ctx.randbits(32)), NODE_NONE);
vNodes.emplace_back(new CNode(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false));
CNode &node = *vNodes.back();
node.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic.InitializeNode(&node);
node.nVersion = 1;
node.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
connman->AddNode(node);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(stale_tip_peer_management)
{
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnmanTest>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), nullptr, *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
const Consensus::Params& consensusParams = Params().GetConsensus();
constexpr int max_outbound_full_relay = MAX_OUTBOUND_FULL_RELAY_CONNECTIONS;
CConnman::Options options;
options.nMaxConnections = DEFAULT_MAX_PEER_CONNECTIONS;
options.m_max_outbound_full_relay = max_outbound_full_relay;
options.nMaxFeeler = MAX_FEELER_CONNECTIONS;
connman->Init(options);
std::vector<CNode *> vNodes;
// Mock some outbound peers
for (int i=0; i<max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) {
AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get());
}
peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
// No nodes should be marked for disconnection while we have no extra peers
for (const CNode *node : vNodes) {
BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false);
}
SetMockTime(GetTime() + 3*consensusParams.nPowTargetSpacing + 1);
// Now tip should definitely be stale, and we should look for an extra
// outbound peer
peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
BOOST_CHECK(connman->GetTryNewOutboundPeer());
// Still no peers should be marked for disconnection
for (const CNode *node : vNodes) {
BOOST_CHECK(node->fDisconnect == false);
}
// If we add one more peer, something should get marked for eviction
// on the next check (since we're mocking the time to be in the future, the
// required time connected check should be satisfied).
AddRandomOutboundPeer(vNodes, *peerLogic, connman.get());
peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
for (int i=0; i<max_outbound_full_relay; ++i) {
BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false);
}
// Last added node should get marked for eviction
BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == true);
vNodes.back()->fDisconnect = false;
// Update the last announced block time for the last
// peer, and check that the next newest node gets evicted.
UpdateLastBlockAnnounceTime(vNodes.back()->GetId(), GetTime());
peerLogic->CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers(consensusParams);
for (int i=0; i<max_outbound_full_relay-1; ++i) {
BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[i]->fDisconnect == false);
}
BOOST_CHECK(vNodes[max_outbound_full_relay-1]->fDisconnect == true);
BOOST_CHECK(vNodes.back()->fDisconnect == false);
bool dummy;
for (const CNode *node : vNodes) {
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(node->GetId(), dummy);
}
connman->ClearNodes();
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
banman->ClearBanned();
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode1(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", true);
dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
Misbehaving(dummyNode1.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); // Should be discouraged
}
{
LOCK(dummyNode1.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1));
}
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1));
BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(ip(0xa0b0c001|0x0000ff00))); // Different IP, not discouraged
CAddress addr2(ip(0xa0b0c002), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode2(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr2, 1, 1, CAddress(), "", true);
dummyNode2.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode2);
dummyNode2.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode2.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD - 1);
}
{
LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
}
BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr2)); // 2 not discouraged yet...
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); // ... but 1 still should be
{
LOCK(cs_main);
Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 1); // 2 reaches discouragement threshold
}
{
LOCK(dummyNode2.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2));
}
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr1)); // Expect both 1 and 2
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr2)); // to be discouraged now
bool dummy;
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2.GetId(), dummy);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
{
auto banman = MakeUnique<BanMan>(GetDataDir() / "banlist.dat", nullptr, DEFAULT_MISBEHAVING_BANTIME);
auto connman = MakeUnique<CConnman>(0x1337, 0x1337);
auto peerLogic = MakeUnique<PeerLogicValidation>(connman.get(), banman.get(), *m_node.scheduler, *m_node.chainman, *m_node.mempool);
banman->ClearBanned();
int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
SetMockTime(nStartTime); // Overrides future calls to GetTime()
CAddress addr(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
CNode dummyNode(id++, NODE_NETWORK, 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr, 4, 4, CAddress(), "", true);
dummyNode.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode);
dummyNode.nVersion = 1;
dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
{
LOCK(cs_main);
Misbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD);
}
{
LOCK(dummyNode.cs_sendProcessing);
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode));
}
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr));
bool dummy;
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy);
}
static CTransactionRef RandomOrphan()
{
std::map<uint256, COrphanTx>::iterator it;
LOCK2(cs_main, g_cs_orphans);
it = mapOrphanTransactions.lower_bound(InsecureRand256());
if (it == mapOrphanTransactions.end())
it = mapOrphanTransactions.begin();
return it->second.tx;
}
static void MakeNewKeyWithFastRandomContext(CKey& key)
{
std::vector<unsigned char> keydata;
keydata = g_insecure_rand_ctx.randbytes(32);
key.Set(keydata.data(), keydata.data() + keydata.size(), /*fCompressedIn*/ true);
assert(key.IsValid());
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_mapOrphans)
{
// This test had non-deterministic coverage due to
// randomly selected seeds.
// This seed is chosen so that all branches of the function
// ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax are executed during this test.
// Specifically branches that run only when an ECDSA
// signature's R and S values have leading zeros.
g_insecure_rand_ctx = FastRandomContext(ArithToUint256(arith_uint256(33)));
CKey key;
MakeNewKeyWithFastRandomContext(key);
FillableSigningProvider keystore;
BOOST_CHECK(keystore.AddKey(key));
// 50 orphan transactions:
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
{
CMutableTransaction tx;
tx.vin.resize(1);
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = InsecureRand256();
tx.vin[0].scriptSig << OP_1;
tx.vout.resize(1);
tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(PKHash(key.GetPubKey()));
AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i);
}
// ... and 50 that depend on other orphans:
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
{
CTransactionRef txPrev = RandomOrphan();
CMutableTransaction tx;
tx.vin.resize(1);
tx.vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
tx.vin[0].prevout.hash = txPrev->GetHash();
tx.vout.resize(1);
tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(PKHash(key.GetPubKey()));
BOOST_CHECK(SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL));
AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i);
}
// This really-big orphan should be ignored:
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
CTransactionRef txPrev = RandomOrphan();
CMutableTransaction tx;
tx.vout.resize(1);
tx.vout[0].nValue = 1*CENT;
tx.vout[0].scriptPubKey = GetScriptForDestination(PKHash(key.GetPubKey()));
tx.vin.resize(2777);
for (unsigned int j = 0; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
{
tx.vin[j].prevout.n = j;
tx.vin[j].prevout.hash = txPrev->GetHash();
}
BOOST_CHECK(SignSignature(keystore, *txPrev, tx, 0, SIGHASH_ALL));
// Re-use same signature for other inputs
// (they don't have to be valid for this test)
for (unsigned int j = 1; j < tx.vin.size(); j++)
tx.vin[j].scriptSig = tx.vin[0].scriptSig;
BOOST_CHECK(!AddOrphanTx(MakeTransactionRef(tx), i));
}
LOCK2(cs_main, g_cs_orphans);
// Test EraseOrphansFor:
for (NodeId i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
size_t sizeBefore = mapOrphanTransactions.size();
EraseOrphansFor(i);
BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.size() < sizeBefore);
}
// Test LimitOrphanTxSize() function:
LimitOrphanTxSize(40);
BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.size() <= 40);
LimitOrphanTxSize(10);
BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.size() <= 10);
LimitOrphanTxSize(0);
BOOST_CHECK(mapOrphanTransactions.empty());
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()