29029df5c7 [doc] v3 signaling in mempool-replacements.md (glozow)
e643ea795e [fuzz] v3 transactions and sigop-adjusted vsize (glozow)
1fd16b5c62 [functional test] v3 transaction submission (glozow)
27c8786ba9 test framework: Add and use option for tx-version in MiniWallet methods (MarcoFalke)
9a1fea55b2 [policy/validation] allow v3 transactions with certain restrictions (glozow)
eb8d5a2e7d [policy] add v3 policy rules (glozow)
9a29d470fb [rpc] return full string for package_msg and package-error (glozow)
158623b8e0 [refactor] change Workspace::m_conflicts and adjacent funcs/structs to use Txid (glozow)
Pull request description:
See #27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Delving Bitcoin discussion thread: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/v3-transaction-policy-for-anti-pinning/340
Delving Bitcoin discussion for LN usage: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/lightning-transactions-with-v3-and-ephemeral-anchors/418
Rationale:
- There are various pinning problems with RBF and our general ancestor/descendant limits. These policies help mitigate many pinning attacks and make package RBF feasible (see #28984 which implements package RBF on top of this). I would focus the most here on Rule 3 pinning. [1][2]
- Switching to a cluster-based mempool (see #27677 and #28676) requires the removal of CPFP carve out, which applications depend on. V3 + package RBF + ephemeral anchors + 1-parent-1-child package relay provides an intermediate solution.
V3 policy is for "Priority Transactions." [3][4] It allows users to opt in to more restrictive topological limits for shared transactions, in exchange for the more robust fee-bumping abilities that offers. Even though we don't have cluster limits, we are able to treat these transactions as having as having a maximum cluster size of 2.
Immediate benefits:
- You can presign a transaction with 0 fees (not just 1sat/vB!) and add a fee-bump later.
- Rule 3 pinning is reduced by a significant amount, since the attacker can only attach a maximum of 1000vB to your shared transaction.
This also enables some other cool things (again see #27463 for overall roadmap):
- Ephemeral Anchors
- Package RBF for these 1-parent-1-child packages. That means e.g. a commitment tx + child can replace another commitment tx using the child's fees.
- We can transition to a "single anchor" universe without worrying about package limit pinning. So current users of CPFP carve out would have something else to use.
- We can switch to a cluster-based mempool [5] (#27677#28676), which removes CPFP carve out [6].
[1]: Original mailing list post and discussion about RBF pinning problems https://gist.github.com/glozow/25d9662c52453bd08b4b4b1d3783b9ff, https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019817.html
[2]: A FAQ is "we need this for cluster mempool, but is this still necessary afterwards?" There are some pinning issues that are fixed here and not fully fixed in cluster mempool, so we will still want this or something similar afterward.
[3]: Mailing list post for v3 https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-September/020937.html
[4]: Original PR #25038 also contains a lot of the discussion
[5]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393/7
[6]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393#the-cpfp-carveout-rule-can-no-longer-be-supported-12
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 29029df5c7
achow101:
ACK 29029df5c7
instagibbs:
ACK 29029df5c7 modulo that
Tree-SHA512: 9664b078890cfdca2a146439f8835c9d9ab483f43b30af8c7cd6962f09aa557fb1ce7689d5e130a2ec142235dbc8f21213881baa75241c5881660f9008d68450
Ensure we are checking sigop-adjusted virtual size by creating setups
and packages where sigop cost is larger than bip141 vsize.
Co-authored-by: Gregory Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
91504cbe0d rpc: `SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue` on fee estimation RPC's (ismaelsadeeq)
714523918b tx fees, policy: CBlockPolicyEstimator update from `CValidationInterface` notifications (ismaelsadeeq)
dff5ad3b99 CValidationInterface: modify the parameter of `TransactionAddedToMempool` (ismaelsadeeq)
91532bd382 tx fees, policy: update `CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlock` parameter (ismaelsadeeq)
bfcd401368 CValidationInterface, mempool: add new callback to `CValidationInterface` (ismaelsadeeq)
0889e07987 tx fees, policy: cast with static_cast instead of C-Style cast (ismaelsadeeq)
a0e3eb7549 tx fees, policy: bugfix: move `removeTx` into reason != `BLOCK` condition (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This is an attempt to #11775
This Pr will enable fee estimator to listen to ValidationInterface notifications to process new transactions added and removed from the mempool.
This PR includes the following changes:
- Added a new callback to the Validation Interface `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForConnectedBlock`, which notifies listeners about the transactions that have been removed due to a new block being connected, along with the height at which the transactions were removed.
- Modified the `TransactionAddedToMempool` callback parameter to include additional information about the transaction needed for fee estimation.
- Updated `CBlockPolicyEstimator` to process transactions using` CTransactionRef` instead of `CTxMempoolEntry.`
- Implemented the `CValidationInterface` interface in `CBlockPolicyEstimater` and overridden the `TransactionAddedToMempool`, `TransactionRemovedFromMempool`, and `MempoolTransactionsRemovedForConnectedBlock` methods to receive updates from their notifications.
Prior to this PR, the fee estimator updates from the mempool, i.e whenever a new block is connected all transactions in the block that are in our mempool are going to be removed using the `removeForBlock` function in `txmempool.cpp`.
This removal triggered updates to the fee estimator. As a result, the fee estimator would block mempool's `cs` until it finished updating every time a new block was connected.
Instead of being blocked only on mempool tx removal, we were blocking on both tx removal and fee estimator updating.
If we want to further improve fee estimation, or add heavy-calulation steps to it, it is currently not viable as we would be slowing down block relay in the process
This PR is smaller in terms of the changes made compared to #11775, as it focuses solely on enabling fee estimator updates from the validationInterface/cscheduler thread notifications.
I have not split the validation interface because, as I understand it, the rationale behind the split in #11775 was to have `MempoolInterface` signals come from the mempool and `CValidationInterface` events come from validation. I believe this separation can be achieved in a separate refactoring PR when the need arises.
Also left out some commits from #11775
- Some refactoring which are no longer needed.
- Handle reorgs much better in fee estimator.
- Track witness hash malleation in fee estimator
I believe they are a separate change that can come in a follow-up after this.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 91504cbe0d
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 91504cbe0d
willcl-ark:
ACK 91504cbe0d
Tree-SHA512: 846dfb9da57a8a42458827b8975722d153907fe6302ad65748d74f311e1925557ad951c3d95fe71fb90ddcc8a3710c45abb343ab86b88780871cb9c38c72c7b1
`CBlockPolicyEstimator` will implement `CValidationInterface` and
subscribe to its notification to process transactions added and removed
from the mempool.
Re-delegate calculation of `validForFeeEstimation` from validation to fee estimator.
Also clean up the validForFeeEstimation arg thats no longer needed in `CTxMempool`.
Co-authored-by: Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
With subpackage evaluation and de-duplication, it's not always the
entire package that is used in CheckFeerate. To be more helpful to the
caller, specify which transactions were included in the evaluation and
what the feerate was.
Instead of PCKG_POLICY (which is supposed to be for package-wide
errors), use PCKG_TX.
It is part of the node library. Also, it won't be moved to the kernel
lib, as it will be pruned of ArgsManager.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# Move module
git mv src/mempool_args.cpp src/node/
git mv src/mempool_args.h src/node/
# Replacements
sed -i 's:mempool_args\.h:node/mempool_args.h:g' $(git grep -l mempool_args)
sed -i 's:mempool_args\.cpp:node/mempool_args.cpp:g' $(git grep -l mempool_args)
sed -i 's:MEMPOOL_ARGS_H:NODE_MEMPOOL_ARGS_H:g' $(git grep -l MEMPOOL_ARGS_H)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Not only does this increase coverage, it is also more correct in that
when ::LoadMempool is called with a mempool and chainstate, it calls
AcceptToMemoryPool with just the chainstate.
AcceptToMemoryPool will then act on the chainstate's mempool via
CChainState::GetMempool, which may be different from the mempool
originally passed to ::LoadMempool. (In this fuzz test's case, it
definitely is different)
Also, move DummyChainstate to its own file since it's now used by the
validation_load_mempool fuzz test to replace CChainState's m_mempool.
Reviewers: Note that CTxMemPool now requires a non-defaulted
CTxMemPool::Options for its constructor. Meaning that there's no need to
worry about a stray CTxMemPool constructor somewhere defaulting to
something incorrect. All instances of CTxMemPool construction are
addressed here in this commit.
We set options for CTxMemPool and construct it in many different ways. A
good example can be seen in how we determine CTxMemPool's check_ratio in
AppInitMain(...).
1. We first set the default based on chainparams's
DefaultConsistencyChecks()
2. Then, we apply the ArgsManager option on top of that default
3. Finally, we clamp the result of that between 0 and 1 Million
With this patch, most CTxMemPool construction are along the lines of:
MemPoolOptions mempool_opts{...default overrides...};
ApplyArgsManOptions(argsman, mempool_opts);
...hard overrides...
CTxMemPool pool{mempool_opts};
This "compositional" style of building options means that we can omit
unnecessary/irrelevant steps wherever we want but also maintain full
customizability.
For example:
- For users of libbitcoinkernel, where we eventually want to remove
ArgsManager, they simply won't call (or even know about)
ApplyArgsManOptions.
- See src/init.cpp to see how the check_ratio CTxMemPool option works
after this change.
A MemPoolOptionsForTest helper was also added and used by tests/fuzz
tests where a local CTxMemPool needed to be created.
The change in src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp seemingly changes behaviour by
applying ArgsManager options on top of the CTxMemPool::Options defaults.
However, in future commits where we introduce flags like -maxmempool,
the call to ApplyArgsManOptions is actually what preserves the existing
behaviour. Previously, although it wasn't obvious, our CTxMemPool would
consult gArgs for flags like -maxmempool when it needed it, so it
already relied on ArgsManager information. This patchset just laid bare
the obfuscatory perils of globals.
[META] As this patchset progresses, we will move more and more
CTxMemPool-relevant options into MemPoolOptions and add their
ArgsMan-related logic to ApplyArgsManOptions.
...also adjust callers
Changes:
- In BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock, we now only lock m_mempool->cs and
call addPackageTxs if m_mempool is not nullptr
- BlockAssembler::addPackageTxs now takes in a mempool reference, and is
annotated to require that mempool's lock.
- In TestChain100Setup::CreateBlock and generateblock, don't construct
an empty mempool, just pass in a nullptr for mempool
fa00447442 scripted-diff: Use clang-tidy syntax for C++ named arguments (MarcoFalke)
fae13c3989 doc: Use clang-tidy comments in crypto_tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Incorrect named args are source of bugs, like #22979.
To allow them being checked by `clang-tidy`, use a format it can understand.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK fa00447442
rajarshimaitra:
ACK fa00447442
jonatack:
ACK fa00447442
fanquake:
ACK fa00447442
Tree-SHA512: 4d23a8363da81dfea21a4cd8516ab5e0dc70119e4d503f3f240f38573218b2c2e84083b97e956c62942d78b2f17490f8b3b2e8077d257644fda1d901e2b80507
fa4e09924b refactor: Replace validation.h include with forward-decl in miner.h (MarcoFalke)
fa0739a7d3 style: Sort file list after rename (MarcoFalke)
fa53e3a58c scripted-diff: Move miner to src/node (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is impossible to run the miner without a node (validation, chainstate, mempool, rpc, ...). Also, the module is in the node library. Thus, it should be moved to `src/node`.
Also, replace the `validation.h` include in the header with a forward-declaration.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa4e09924b
Tree-SHA512: 791e6caa5839d8dc83b0f58f3f49bc0a7e3c1710822e8a44dede254c87b6f7531a0586fb95e8a067c181457a3895ad6041718aa2a2fac64cfc136bf04bb851d5
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes #18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close #21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
