3405f3eed5 test: Test that an unconfirmed not-in-mempool chain is rebroadcast (Andrew Chow)
10d91c5abe wallet: Deduplicate Resend and ReacceptWalletTransactions (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently `ResendWalletTransactions` (used for normal rebroadcasts) will attempt to rebroadcast all of the transactions in the wallet in the order they are stored in `mapWallet`. This ends up being random as `mapWallet` is a `std::unordered_map`. However `ReacceptWalletTransactions` (used for adding to the mempool on loading) first sorts the txs by wallet insertion order, then submits them. The result is that `ResendWalletTranactions` will fail to rebroadcast child transactions if their txids happen to be lexicographically less than their parent's txid. This PR resolves this issue by combining `ReacceptWalletTransactions` and `ResendWalletTransactions` into a new `ResubmitWalletTransactions` so that the iteration code and basic checks are shared.
A test has also been added that checks that such transaction chains are rebroadcast correctly.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 3405f3eed5
1440000bytes:
reACK 3405f3eed5
furszy:
Late code review ACK 3405f3ee
stickies-v:
ACK 3405f3eed5
Tree-SHA512: 1240d9690ecc2ae8d476286b79e2386f537a90c41dd2b8b8a5a9c2a917aa3af85d6aee019fbbb05e772985a2b197e2788305586d9d5dac78ccba1ee5aa31d77a
53e7ed075c doc: Release notes and other docs for migration (Andrew Chow)
9c44bfe244 Test migratewallet (Andrew Chow)
0b26e7cdf2 descriptors: addr() and raw() should return false for ToPrivateString (Andrew Chow)
31764c3f87 Add migratewallet RPC (Andrew Chow)
0bf7b38bff Implement MigrateLegacyToDescriptor (Andrew Chow)
e7b16f925a Implement MigrateToSQLite (Andrew Chow)
5b62f095e7 wallet: Refactor SetupDescSPKMs to take CExtKey (Andrew Chow)
22401f17e0 Implement LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::DeleteRecords (Andrew Chow)
35f428fae6 Implement LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::MigrateToDescriptor (Andrew Chow)
ea1ab390e4 scriptpubkeyman: Implement GetScriptPubKeys in Legacy (Andrew Chow)
e664af2976 Apply label to all scriptPubKeys of imported combo() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `migratewallet` RPC which migrates a legacy wallet to a descriptor wallet. Migrated wallets will need a new backup. If a wallet has watchonly stuff in it, a new watchonly descriptor wallet will be created containing those watchonly things. The related transactions, labels, and descriptors for those watchonly things will be removed from the original wallet. Migrated wallets will not have any of the legacy things be available for fetching from `getnewaddress` or `getrawchangeaddress`. Wallets that have private keys enabled will have newly generated descriptors. Wallets with private keys disabled will not have any active `ScriptPubKeyMan`s.
For the basic HD wallet case of just generated keys, in addition to the standard descriptor wallet descriptors using the master key derived from the pre-existing hd seed, the migration will also create 3 descriptors for each HD chain in: a ranged combo external, a ranged combo internal, and a single key combo for the seed (the seed is a valid key that we can receive coins at!). The migrated wallet will then have newly generated descriptors as the active `ScriptPubKeyMan`s. This is equivalent to creating a new descriptor wallet and importing the 3 descriptors for each HD chain. For wallets containing non-HD keys, each key will have its own combo descriptor.
There are also tests.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 53e7ed075c
w0xlt:
reACK 53e7ed075c
Tree-SHA512: c0c003694ca2e17064922d08e8464278d314e970efb7df874b4fe04ec5d124c7206409ca701c65c099d17779ab2136ae63f1da2a9dba39b45f6d62cf93b5c60a
50996241f2 rpc: sort listdescriptors result (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This puts receive and change descriptors directly below each other.
The change would be simpler if `UniValue` arrays were sortable.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 50996241f2
S3RK:
reACK 50996241f2
furszy:
utACK 50996241
w0xlt:
reACK 50996241f2
Tree-SHA512: 71246a48ba6f97c3e7c76ee32ff9e958227a14ca5a6eec638215dbfee57264d4e918ea5837f4d030eddc9c797c93df1791ddd55b5a499522ce2a35bcf380670b
Both of these functions do almost the exact same thing. They can be
deduplicated so that their behavior matches except for the filtering
aspect. As this function will now always be called on wallet loading,
nNextResend will also always be initialized, so
wallet_resendwallettransactions.py is updated to account for that.
This also resolves a bug where ResendWalletTransactions would fail to
rebroadcast txs in insertion order thereby potentially rebroadcasting a
child transaction before its parent and causing the child to not
actually get rebroadcast.
Also names the combined function to ResubmitWalletTransactions as the
function just submits the transactions to the mempool rather than doing
any sending by itself.
There is no RPC call named `rescanwallet`, i.e. fix this by renaming to
the actual RPC called `rescanblockchain`.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i s/rescanwallet/rescanblockchain/ $(git grep -l rescanwallet)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
1dc03dda05 [doc] remove non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (glozow)
32024d40f0 scripted-diff: remove mention of BIP125 from non-signaling var names (glozow)
Pull request description:
We have pretty thorough documentation of our RBF policy in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md. It enumerates each rule with several sentences of rationale. Also, each rule pretty much has its own function (3 and 4 share one), with extensive comments. The doc states explicitly that our rules are similar but differ from BIP125, and contains a record of historical changes to RBF policy.
We should not use "BIP125" as synonymous with our RBF policy because:
- Our RBF policy is different from what is specified in BIP125, for example:
- the BIP does not mention our rule about the replacement feerate being higher (our Rule 6)
- the BIP uses minimum relay feerate for Rule 4, while we have used incremental relay feerate since #9380
- the "inherited signaling" question (CVE-2021-31876). Call it discrepancy, ambiguous wording, doc misinterpretation, or implementation details, I would recommend users refer to doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md
- the signaling policy is configurable, see #25353
- Our RBF policy may change further
- We have already marked BIP125 as only "partially implemented" in docs/bips.md since 1fd49eb498
- See comments from people who are not me recently:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r909507429
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25575#issuecomment-1179519204
This PR removes all non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (if people feel strongly, we can remove all mentions of BIP125 period). It may be useful to refer to the concept of "tx opts in to RBF if it has at least one nSequence less than (0xffffffff - 1)" as "BIP125 signaling" because:
- It is succint.
- It has already been widely marketed as BIP125 opt-in signaling.
- Our API uses it when referring to signaling (e.g. getmempoolentry["bip125-replaceable"] and wallet error message "not BIP 125 replaceable"). Changing those is more invasive.
- If/when we have other ways to signal in the future, we can disambiguate them this way. See #25038 which proposes another way of signaling, and where I pulled these commits from.
Alternatives:
- Changing our policy to match BIP125. This doesn't make sense as, for example, we would have to remove the requirement that a replacement tx has a higher feerate (Rule 6).
- Changing BIP125 to match what we have. This doesn't make sense as it would be a significant change to a BIP years after it was finalized and already used as a spec to implement RBF in other places.
- Document our policy as a new BIP and give it a number. This might make sense if we don't expect things to change a lot, and can be done as a next step.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 1dc03dda05
ariard:
ACK 1dc03dda
t-bast:
ACK 1dc03dda05
Tree-SHA512: a3adc2039ec5785892d230ec442e50f47f7062717392728152bbbe27ce1c564141f85253143f53cb44e1331cf47476d74f5d2f4b3cd873fc3433d7a0aa783e02
fa3f15f2dd refactor: Avoid copies in FlatSigningProvider Merge (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
`Merge` will create several copies unconditionally:
* To initialize the args `a`, and `b`
* `ret`, which is the merge of the two args
So change the code to let the caller decide how many copies they need/want:
* `a`, and `b` must be explicitly moved or copied by the caller
* `ret` is no longer needed, as `a` can be used for it in place "for free"
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa3f15f2dd
furszy:
looks good, ACK fa3f15f2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3f15f2dd. Confirmed that all the places `std::move` was added the argument actually did seem safe to move from. Compiler enforces that temporary copies are explicitly created in non-move cases.
Tree-SHA512: 7c027ccdea1549cd9f37403344ecbb76e008adf545f6ce52996bf95e89eb7dc89af6cb31435a9289d6f2eea1c416961b2fb96348bc8a211d550728f1d99ac49c
8cd21bb279 refactor: improve readability for AttemptSelection (josibake)
f47ff71761 test: only run test for descriptor wallets (josibake)
0760ce0b9e test: add missing BOOST_ASSERT (josibake)
db09aec937 wallet: switch to new shuffle, erase, push_back (josibake)
b6b50b0f2b scripted-diff: Uppercase function names (josibake)
3f27a2adce refactor: add new helper methods (josibake)
f5649db9d5 refactor: add UNKNOWN OutputType (josibake)
Pull request description:
This PR is to address follow-ups for #24584, specifically:
* Remove redundant, hard-to-read code by adding a new `OutputType` and adding shuffle, erase, and push_back methods for `CoinsResult`
* Add missing `BOOST_ASSERT` to unit test
* Ensure functional test only runs if using descriptor wallets
* Improve readability of `AttemptSelection` by removing triple-nested if statement
Note for reviewers: commit `refactor: add new helper methods` should throw an "unused function warning"; the function is used in the next commit. Also, commit `wallet: switch to new shuffle, erase, push_back` will fail to compile, but this is fixed in the next commit with a scripted-diff. the commits are separate like this (code change then scripted-diff) to improve legibility.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8cd21bb279
aureleoules:
ACK 8cd21bb279.
LarryRuane:
Concept, code review ACK 8cd21bb279
furszy:
utACK 8cd21bb2. Left a small, non-blocking, comment.
Tree-SHA512: a1bbc5962833e3df4f01a4895d8bd748cc4c608c3f296fd94e8afd8797b8d2e94e7bd44d598bd76fa5c9f5536864f396fcd097348fa0bb190a49a86b0917d60e
a6b0c1fcc0 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d14454 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087e rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91 wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK a6b0c1fcc0
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc0
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
It's useful for an external application tracking coins to not be limited
by our change detection. For instance, for a watchonly wallet with two
descriptors a transaction from one to the other would be considered a
change output and not be included in the result (if the address was not
generated by this wallet).
db10cf8ae3 rpc/wallet: add simulaterawtransaction RPC (Karl-Johan Alm)
701a64f548 test: add support for Decimal to assert_approx (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
(note: this was originally titled "add analyzerawtransaction RPC")
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
I originally proposed this to Elements (https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/pull/1016) and it was suggested that I propose this upstream.
There is an alternative #22776 to instead add this info to `getbalances` when providing an optional transaction as argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK db10cf8ae3
achow101:
re-ACK db10cf8ae3
Tree-SHA512: adf222ec7dcdc068d007ae6f465dbc35b692dc7bb2db337be25340ad0c2f9c64cfab4124df23400995c700f41c83c29a2c34812121782c26063b100c7969b89d
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
Our RBF policy is different from the rules specified in BIP125. For
example, the BIP does not mention Rule 6, and our Rule 4 uses the
(configurable) incremental relay feerate (distinct from the
minimum relay feerate). Those interested in our policy should refer to
doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md instead. These rules may also
continue to diverge with package RBF and other RBF improvements. Keep
references to the BIP125 signaling wrt sequence numbers, since that is
still correct and widely used. It is helpful to refer to this as "BIP125
signaling" since it is unambiguous and succint, especially if we have
multiple ways to signal replaceability in the future.
The rule numbers in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md correspond
largely to those of BIP 125, so we can still refer to them like "Rule 5."
Rename `BResult` class to `util::Result` and update the class interface to be
more compatible with `std::optional` and with a full-featured result class
implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25665. Motivation for
this change is to update existing `BResult` usages now so they don't have to
change later when more features are added in #25665.
This change makes the following improvements originally implemented in #25665:
- More explicit API. Drops potentially misleading `BResult` constructor that
treats any bilingual string argument as an error. Adds `util::Error`
constructor so it is never ambiguous when a result is being assigned an error
or non-error value.
- Better type compatibility. Supports `util::Result<bilingual_str>` return
values to hold translated messages which are not errors.
- More standard and consistent API. `util::Result` supports most of the same
operators and methods as `std::optional`. `BResult` had a less familiar
interface with `HasRes`/`GetObj`/`ReleaseObj` methods. The Result/Res/Obj
naming was also not internally consistent.
- Better code organization. Puts `src/util/` code in the `util::` namespace so
naming reflects code organization and it is obvious where the class is coming
from. Drops "B" from name because it is undocumented what it stands for
(bilingual?)
- Has unit tests.
71d1d13627 test: add unit test for AvailableCoins (josibake)
da03cb41a4 test: functional test for new coin selection logic (josibake)
438e04845b wallet: run coin selection by `OutputType` (josibake)
77b0707206 refactor: use CoinsResult struct in SelectCoins (josibake)
2e67291ca3 refactor: store by OutputType in CoinsResult (josibake)
Pull request description:
# Concept
Following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23789, Bitcoin Core wallet will now generate a change address that matches the payment address type. This improves privacy by not revealing which of the outputs is the change at the time of the transaction in scenarios where the input address types differ from the payment address type. However, information about the change can be leaked in a later transaction. This proposal attempts to address that concern.
## Leaking information in a later transaction
Consider the following scenario:
1. Alice has a wallet with bech32 type UTXOs and pays Bob, who gives her a P2SH address
2. Alice's wallet generates a P2SH change output, preserving her privacy in `txid: a`
3. Alice then pays Carol, who gives her a bech32 address
4. Alice's wallet combines the P2SH UTXO with a bech32 UTXO and `txid: b` has two bech32 outputs
From a chain analysis perspective, it is reasonable to infer that the P2SH input in `txid: b` was the change from `txid: a`. To avoid leaking information in this scenario, Alice's wallet should avoid picking the P2SH output and instead fund the transaction with only bech32 Outputs. If the payment to Carol can be funded with just the P2SH output, it should be preferred over the bech32 outputs as this will convert the P2SH UTXO to bech32 UTXOs via the payment and change outputs of the new transaction.
**TLDR;** Avoid mixing output types, spend non-default `OutputTypes` when it is economical to do so.
# Approach
`AvailableCoins` now populates a struct, which makes it easier to access coins by `OutputType`. Coin selection tries to find a funding solution by each output type and chooses the most economical by waste metric. If a solution can't be found without mixing, coin selection runs over the entire wallet, allowing mixing, which is the same as the current behavior.
I've also added a functional test (`test/functional/wallet_avoid_mixing_output_types.py`) and unit test (`src/wallet/test/availablecoins_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 71d1d13627
aureleoules:
ACK 71d1d13627.
Xekyo:
reACK 71d1d13627 via `git range-diff master 6530d19 71d1d13`
LarryRuane:
ACK 71d1d13627
Tree-SHA512: 2e0716efdae5adf5479446fabc731ae81d595131d3b8bade98b64ba323d0e0c6d964a67f8c14c89c428998bda47993fa924f3cfca1529e2bd49eaa4e31b7e426
This is required for removing the UniValue copy constructor.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/return NullUniValue/return UniValue::VNULL/g' $(git grep -l NullUniValue ':(exclude)src/univalue')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
fa23c19750 univalue: Avoid narrowing and verbose int constructors (MacroFake)
fa3a9a1e8d rpc: Select int-UniValue constructor for enum value in upgradewallet RPC (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
As UniValue provides several constructors for integral types, the
compiler is unable to select one if the passed type does not exactly
match. This is unintuitive for developers and forces them to write
verbose and brittle code. (Refer to `-Wnarrowing` compiler warning)
For example, there are many places where an unsigned int is cast to a
signed int. While the cast is safe in practice, it is still needlessly
verbose and confusing as the value can never be negative. In fact it
might even be unsafe if the unsigned value is large enough to map to a
negative signed one.
Fix this issue and other (minor) type issues.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fa23c19750.
Tree-SHA512: 7d99b5b90c7d8eed2e3448167255a59e817dd6b8fcfc1b17c69ddefd0db33d1bf4344fbcd8b7f8685b58182c0f572ab9ffa99467afa666ac21843df7ea645033
The descriptor wallets allow an application to track coins of multiple
descriptors in a single wallet. However, such an application would not
previously be able to (easily) tell what received coin "belongs" to what
descriptor.
This commit tackles this issues by adding a "wallet_desc" entry to the
entries for received coins in 'listsinceblock'.
1be7964189 test, wallet: Add mempool rescan test for import RPCs (Fabian Jahr)
833ce76df7 rpc, wallet: Document mempool rescan after importdescriptor, importwallet (Fabian Jahr)
0e396d1ba7 rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importmulti (Fabian Jahr)
e6d3ef8586 rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importpubkey (Fabian Jahr)
6d3db52e66 rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importprivkey (João Barbosa)
3abdbbb90a rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importaddress (João Barbosa)
236239bd40 wallet: Rescan mempool for transactions as well (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up the work from #18964 and closes #18954.
It should incorporate all the unaddressed feedback from the PR:
- Mempool rescan now expanded to all relevant import* RPCs
- Added documentation in the help of each RPC
- More tests
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 1be7964189 (only a test change)
achow101:
ACK 1be7964189
w0xlt:
reACK 1be7964189
Tree-SHA512: b62fed5f97c6c242b2af417b41c9696a1f18878483d9e1c9429791f9c05257f57a00540a9a84df23c49faf6a61c3109c22972de81540083f38b506217804fcc5
UniValue does not have a constructor for enum values, however the
compiler will decay the enum into an int and select that constructor.
Avoid this compiler magic and clarify the code by explicitly selecting
the int-constructor.
This is needed for the next commit.
fa8a1c0696 rpc: Fix Univalue push_backV OOM in listtransactions (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Related to, but not intended as a fix for #25229.
Currently the RPC will have the same data stored thrice:
* `UniValue ret` (memory filled by `ListTransactions`)
* `std::vector<UniValue> vec` (constructed by calling `push_backV`)
* `UniValue result` (the actual result, memory filled by `push_backV`)
Fix this by filling the memory only once:
* `std::vector<UniValue> ret` (memory filled by `ListTransactions`)
* Pass iterators to `push_backV` instead of creating a full copy
* Move memory into `UniValue result` instead of copying it
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa8a1c0696
Tree-SHA512: 1c3ca40fc8497134a4141195160e4aa9fe72b3c00c5998c972b58ad0eb498ebea05013f9105bb80e7264c9db1d0e7a2032396a8a4af1f326d831fbee20f32ea3
111ea3ab71 wallet: refactor GetNewDestination, use BResult (furszy)
22351725bc send: refactor CreateTransaction flow to return a BResult<CTransactionRef> (furszy)
198fcca162 wallet: refactor, include 'FeeCalculation' inside 'CreatedTransactionResult' (furszy)
7a45c33d1f Introduce generic 'Result' class (furszy)
Pull request description:
Based on a common function signature pattern that we have all around the sources:
```cpp
bool doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, &result_obj, &error_string) {
// do something...
if (error) {
error_string = "something bad happened";
return false;
}
result = goodResult;
return true;
}
```
Introduced a generic class `BResult` that encapsulate the function boolean result, the result object (in case of having it) and, in case of failure, the string error reason.
Obtaining in this way cleaner function signatures and removing boilerplate code:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
// do something...
if (error) return "something bad happened";
return goodResult;
}
```
Same cleanup applies equally to the function callers' side as well. There is no longer need to add the error string and the result object declarations before calling the function:
Before:
```cpp
Obj result_obj;
std::string error_string;
if (!doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, result_obj, error_string)) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", error_string);
}
return result_obj;
```
Now:
```cpp
BResult<Obj> op_res = doSomething(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4);
if (!op_res) {
LogPrintf("Error: %s", op_res.GetError());
}
return op_res.GetObjResult();
```
### Initial Implementation:
Have connected this new concept to two different flows for now:
1) The `CreateTransaction` flow. --> 7ba2b87c
2) The `GetNewDestination` flow. --> bcee0912
Happy note: even when introduced a new class into the sources, the amount of lines removed is almost equal to added ones :).
Extra note: this work is an extended version (and a decoupling) of the work that is inside #24845 (which does not contain the `GetNewDestination` changes nor the inclusion of the `FeeCalculation` field inside `CreatedTransactionResult`).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 111ea3ab71
w0xlt:
reACK 111ea3ab71
theStack:
re-ACK 111ea3ab71
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 111ea3ab71🎏
Tree-SHA512: 6d84d901a4cb923727067f25ff64542a40edd1ea84fdeac092312ac684c34e3688a52ac5eb012717d2b73f4cb742b9d78e458eb0e9cb9d6d72a916395be91f69
230a2f4cc3 wallet test: Add unit test for wallet scan save_progress option (Ryan Ofsky)
a89ddfbe22 wallet: Save wallet scan progress (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from scratch on the next load.
This PR changes this and the progress is saved right after checking a block.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25010
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
re-ACK 230a2f4
achow101:
ACK 230a2f4cc3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 230a2f4cc3. Only change since last review is tweaking whitespace and adding log print
Tree-SHA512: 1a9dec207ed22b3443fb06a4daf967637bc02bcaf71c070b7dc33605d0cab959551e4014c9e92293a63f54c5cbcc98bb9f8844a8c60bc32a1482b1c4130fab32
d69045e291 test: add coverage for 'listreceivedbyaddress' no change addrs return (furszy)
324f00a642 refactor: 'ListReceived' use optional for filtered address (furszy)
b459fc122f refactor: RPC 'ListReceived', encapsulate m_address_book access (furszy)
fa9f2ab8fd refactor: RPC 'listlabels', encapsulate 'CWallet::ListAddrBookLabels' functionality (furszy)
83e42c4b94 refactor: use 'ForEachAddrBookEntry' in RPC 'getaddressesbylabel' (furszy)
2b48642499 refactor: use ForEachAddrBookEntry in interfaces::getAddresses (furszy)
032842ae41 wallet: implement ForEachAddrBookEntry method (furszy)
09649bc95d refactor: implement general 'ListAddrBookAddresses' for addressbook destinations lookup (furszy)
192eb1e61c refactor: getAddress don't access m_address_book, use FindAddressEntry function (furszy)
Pull request description:
### Context
The wallet's `m_address_book` field is being accessed directly from several places across the sources.
### Problem
Code structure wise, we shouldn't be accessing it directly. It could end up being modified by mistake (from a place that has nothing to do with the wallet like an RPC command or the GUI) and cause a bigger issue: like an address book entry 'purpose' string change, which if done badly (from 'send' to 'receive'), could end up in a user sharing a "receive" address that he/she doesn't own.
### Solution
Encapsulate `m_address_book` access inside the wallet.
-------------------------------------------------------
Extra Note:
This is the initial step towards decoupling the address book functionality from the wallet's sources. In other words, the creation of the `AddressBookManager` (which will be coming in a follow-up PR).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d69045e291
theStack:
ACK d69045e291✅
w0xlt:
ACK d69045e291
Tree-SHA512: dba17acd86f171b4e9af0223bbbcad380048570f6a2f6a92732a51f01abe8806debaf65c9e9e5569fa76a541903cbb50adcb5f56ef77858151c698ae6b218e2a
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from
scratch on the next load.
With this change, progress is saved every 60 seconds.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
