Seeking to make the `CoinControl` option less confusing/redundant.
In #16377 the `CoinControl` flag ‘m_add_inputs’ was added to tell the coin filtering and selection process two things:
- Coin Filtering: Only use the provided inputs. Skip the Rest.
- Coin Selection: Search the wtxs-outputs and append all the `CoinControl` selected outpoints to the selection result (skipping all the available output checks). Nothing else.
Meanwhile, in `CoinControl` we already have a flag ‘fAllowOtherInputs’ which is already saying:
- Coin Filtering: Only use the provided inputs. Skip the Rest.
- Coin Selection: If false, no selection process -> append all the `CoinControl` selected outpoints to the selection result (while they passed all the `AvailableCoins` checks and are available in the 'vCoins' vector).
As can notice, the first point in the coin filtering process is duplicated in the two option flags. And the second one, is slightly different merely because it takes into account whether the coin is on the `AvailableCoins` vector or not.
So it makes sense to merge ‘m_add_inputs’ and ‘fAllowOtherInputs’ into a single field for the coin filtering process while introduce other changes to add the missing/skipped coins into 'vCoins' vector if they were manually selected by the user (follow-up commits).
fd5c996d16 wallet: GetAvailableBalance, remove double walk-through every available coin (furszy)
162d4ad10f wallet: add 'only_spendable' filter to AvailableCoins (furszy)
cdf185ccfb wallet: remove unused IsSpentKey(hash, index) method (furszy)
4b83bf8dbc wallet: avoid extra IsSpentKey -> GetWalletTx lookups (furszy)
3d8a282257 wallet: decouple IsSpentKey(scriptPubKey) from IsSpentKey(hash, n) (furszy)
a06fa94ff8 wallet: IsSpent, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) (furszy)
91902b7720 wallet: IsLockedCoin, 'COutPoint' arg instead of (hash, index) (furszy)
9472ca0a65 wallet: AvailableCoins, don't call 'wtx.tx->vout[i]' multiple times (furszy)
4ce235ef8f wallet: return 'CoinsResult' struct in `AvailableCoins` (furszy)
Pull request description:
This started in #24845 but grew out of scope of it.
So, points tackled:
1) Avoid extra `GetWalletTx` lookups inside `AvailableCoins -> IsSpentKey`.
`IsSpentKey` was receiving the tx hash and index to internally lookup the tx inside the wallet's map. As all the `IsSpentKey` function callers already have the wtx available, them can provide the `scriptPubKey` directly.
2) Most of the time, we call `Wallet::AvailableCoins`, and later on the process, skip the non-spendable coins from the result in subsequent for-loops. So to speedup the process: introduced the ability to filter by "only_spendable" coins inside `Wallet::AvailableCoins` directly.
(the non-spendable coins skip examples are inside `AttemptSelection->GroupOutputs` and `GetAvailableBalance`).
4) Refactored `AvailableCoins` in several ways:
a) Now it will return a new struct `CoinsResult` instead of receiving the vCoins vector reference (which was being cleared at the beginning of the method anyway). --> this is coming from #24845 but cherry-picked it here too to make the following commits look nicer.
b) Unified all the 'wtx.tx->vout[I]' calls into a single call (coming from this comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24699#discussion_r854163032).
5) The wallet `IsLockedCoin` and `IsSpent` methods now accept an `OutPoint` instead of a hash:index. Which let me cleanup a bunch of extra code.
6) Speeded up the wallet 'GetAvailableBalance': filtering `AvailableCoins` by spendable outputs only and using the 'AvailableCoins' retrieved `total_amount` instead of looping over all the retrieved coins once more.
-------------------------------------------------------
Side topic, all this process will look even nicer with #25218
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fd5c996d16
brunoerg:
crACK fd5c996d16
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK fd5c996d16
Tree-SHA512: 376a85476f907f4f7d1fc3de74b3dbe159b8cc24687374d8739711ad202ea07a33e86f4e66dece836da3ae6985147119fe584f6e672f11d0450ba6bd165b3220
7832e9438f test: fundrawtransaction preset input weight calculation (S3RK)
c3981e379f wallet: do not count wallet utxos as external (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Correctly differentiating between external vs non-external utxos in coin control produces more accurate weight and fee estimations.
Weight for external utxos is estimated based on the maximum signature size, while for the wallet utxos we expect minimal signature due to signature grinding.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 7832e9438f
Xekyo:
re-ACK 7832e9438f
furszy:
ACK 7832e943
Tree-SHA512: bb5635b0bd85fa9a76922a53ad3fa062286424c06a695a0e87407c665713e80a33555b644fbb13bcc1ab503dcd7f53aacbdc368d69ac0ecff8005603623ac94f
Instead of accepting a `vCoins` reference that is cleared at the beginning of the method.
Note:
This new struct, down the commits line, will contain other `AvailableCoins` useful results.
3a9b9bb38e test: ensure createmultisig and addmultisigaddress are not returning any warning for expected cases (brunoerg)
eaf6f630c0 rpc: fix inappropriate warning for address type p2sh-segwit in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes #25127
If there are any uncompressed keys when calling `AddAndGetMultisigDestination`, it will just default to a legacy address regardless of the chosen `address_type`. So, #23113 added a warnings field which will warn the user why their address format is different.
However, when creating a multisig (p2sh-segwit), it is returning an inappropriate warning, because when getting the output type from destination (`OutputTypeFromDestination`), it returns `ScriptHash` for both legacy and `P2SH_SEGWIT`. So, since `P2SH_SEGWIT` is different from `ScriptHash`, it returns the warning:
192d639a6b/src/rpc/output_script.cpp (L166-L169)
So, to avoid this mistake I changed `OutputTypeFromDestination` to `descriptor->GetOutputType()` to get the appropriate output type.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 3a9b9bb38e
laanwj:
Code review ACK 3a9b9bb38e
Tree-SHA512: 49f717479c2b8906277e7591ddd4747f7961c2d5c77494b5124045de9036a4277d46b9ad99279d51f0c4484284c445f1e1d3c55c49bbf0716741bad426a89369
6fbb0edac2 Set effective_value when initializing a COutput (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously in COutput, effective_value was initialized as the absolute value of the txout and the fee as 0. effective_value along with the fee was calculated outside of the COutput constructor and set after the object had been initialized.
These changes will allow either the fee or the feerate to be passed in a COutput constructor and the fee and effective_value are calculated and set in the constructor. As a result, AvailableCoins also needs to be passed the feerate when utxos are being spent. When balance is calculated or the coins are being listed and feerate is neither available nor required, AvailableCoinsListUnspent is used instead, which runs AvailableCoins while providing the default value for `feerate`. Unit tests for the calculation of effective value have also been added.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 6fbb0edac2
Xekyo:
re-ACK 6fbb0edac2
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK 6fbb0edac2
furszy:
Looks good, have been touching this area lately, code review ACK 6fbb0eda.
Tree-SHA512: 5943ee4f4b0c1dcfe146f2fc22853e607259d6d53156b80a8a8f4baa70760a8b25ab822777b7f5d21ecb02dac08bdee704a9a918d5660276d6994b19a284b256
baa3ddc49c doc: add release notes about `getreceivedbylabel` returning an error if the label is not in the address book. (furszy)
8897a21658 rpc: getreceivedbylabel, don't loop over the entire wallet txs map if no destinations were found for the input label. (furszy)
Pull request description:
Built on top of #23662, coming from comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23662#pullrequestreview-971407999.
If `wallet.GetLabelAddresses()` returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have stored destinations with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
Otherwise, we are walking through all the wallet txs + outputs for no reason (`output_scripts` is empty).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK baa3ddc49c
theStack:
re-ACK baa3ddc49c
w0xlt:
ACK baa3ddc49c
Tree-SHA512: 00e10365b179bf008da2f3ef8fbb3ee04a330426374020e3f2d0151b16991baba4ef2b944e4659452f3e4d6cb20f128d0918ddf0453933a25a4d9fd8414a1911
Previously in COutput, effective_value was initialized as the absolute
value of the txout, and fee as 0. effective_value along with fee were
calculated outside of the COutput constructor and set after the
object had been initialized. These changes will allow either the fee
or the feerate to be passed in a COutput constructor. If either are
provided, fee and effective_value are calculated and set in the
constructor. As a result, AvailableCoins also needs to be passed the
feerate when utxos are being spent. When balance is calculated or the
coins are being listed and feerate is neither available nor required,
AvailableCoinsListUnspent is used instead, which runs AvailableCoins
while providing the default value for feerate. Unit tests for the
calculation of effective value have also been added.
If wallet.GetLabelAddresses() returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have addresses with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
a4703ce9d7 doc: add release notes about removal of the `deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ef0aa74836 rpc: wallet: remove `-deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase` logic (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Including coinbase transactions in `receivedby` RPCs and adding the `-deprecatedrpc=exclude_coinbase` was done in PR #14707 (released in v23.0). For the next release v24.0, this configuration option can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a4703ce9d7
Tree-SHA512: 97cd4e78501e64f678c78d2ebb5be5376688c023e34fced71dd24e432d27aa31a74b5483545f49ba0bdf48656d8b8b7bee74e3db26cf6daf112613f1caa4dfa4
fa9af21878 scripted-diff: Use getInt<T> over get_int/get_int64 (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems better to see the return type directly and be able to modify it easier, as the return type is used for exceptions (in-range checking and parsing feedback).
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa9af21878
Tree-SHA512: 284aa2527d0f663ca01550115025c9c64c787531d595f866c718f6ad09b9b0cac1e683a7d77f8009b75de990fd37166b44063ffa83fba8a04e9a31600b4c2725
ac6fbf2c83 tidy: use modernize-use-default-member-init (fanquake)
7aa40f5563 refactor: use C++11 default initializers (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Refactor and then enable [`modernize-use-default-member-init`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-default-member-init.html) in our `clang-tidy` job.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 536b406f20639f8c588fe9e96175ec60c7bb825506b2670b562370b2f572801c24203c483443be3c199e1b958c0765d4532e57c57a4e78689162a1dd422d844f
a55db4ea1c Add more proper thread safety annotations (Hennadii Stepanov)
8cfe93e3fc Add proper thread safety annotation to `CWallet::GetTxConflicts()` (Hennadii Stepanov)
ca446f2c59 Add proper thread safety annotation to `CachedTxGetAvailableCredit()` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
In non-test/benchmarking code, there are three cases of the `NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS` annotation which are accompanied with `TODO` comments.
This PR adds proper thread safety annotations instead of `NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a55db4ea1c
Tree-SHA512: 806d72eebc1edf088bfa435c8cd11465be0de6789798dd92abd008425516768acb864a73d834a49d412bb10f7fccfb47473f998cb72739dab6caeef6bcfaf191
4c5ceb040c wallet: CreateTransaction(): return out-params as (optional) struct (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c9fdaa5e3a wallet: CreateTransactionInternal(): return out-params as (optional) struct (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The method `CWallet::CreateTransaction` currently returns several values in the form of out-parameters:
* the actual newly created transaction (`CTransactionRef& tx`)
* its required fee (`CAmount& nFeeRate`)
* the position of the change output (`int& nChangePosInOut`) -- as the name suggests, this is both an in- and out-param
By returning these values in an optional structure (which returns no value a.k.a. `std::nullopt` if an error occured), the interfaces is shorter, cleaner (requested change position is now in-param and can be passed by value) and callers don't have to create dummy variables for results that they are not interested in.
Note that the names of the replaced out-variables were kept in `CreateTransactionInternal` to keep the diff minimal. Also, the fee calculation data (`FeeCalculation& fee_calc_out`) would be another candidate to put into the structure, but `FeeCalculation` is currently an opaque data type in the wallet interface and I think it should stay that way.
As a potential follow-up, I think it would make sense to also do the same refactoring for `CWallet::FundTransaction`, which has a very similar parameter structure.
Suggested by laanwj in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20588#issuecomment-739838428.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 4c5ceb040c
Xekyo:
ACK 4c5ceb040c
w0xlt:
crACK 4c5ceb040c
Tree-SHA512: 27e5348bbf4f698713002d40c834dcda59c711c93207113e14522fc6d9ae7f4d8edf1ef6d214c5dd62bb52943d342878960ca333728828bf39b645a27d55d524
f336ff7f21 rpc: avoid expensive `IsMine` calls in `GetReceived` tally (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7b65af2a4 rpc: avoid scriptPubKey<->CTxDestination conversions in `GetReceived` tally (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The RPC calls `getreceivedbyaddress`/`getreceivedbylabel` both use the internal helper function `GetReceived` which was introduced in PR #17579 to deduplicate tallying code. For every wallet-related transaction output, the following unnecessary operations are currently performed in the tally loop, leading to a quite bad performance (as reported in #23645):
- converting from CScript -> TxDestination (`ExtractDestination(...)`), converting from TxDestination -> CScript (`CWallet::IsMine(const CTxDestination& dest)`); this can be avoided by directly using output scripts in the search set instead of addresses (first commit)
- checking if the iterated output script belongs to the wallet by calling `IsMine`; this can be avoided by only adding addresses to the search set which fulfil `IsMine` in the first place (second commit)
### Benchmark results
The functional test [wallet_pr23662.py](https://github.com/theStack/bitcoin/blob/pr23662_benchmarks/test/functional/wallet_pr23662.py) (not part of this PR) creates transactions with 15000 different addresses:
- 5000 outputs (500 txs with 10 outputs each) with label set, IsMine set (received)
- 5000 outputs (500 txs with 10 outputs each) with label set, IsMine not set (sent)
- 5000 outputs (500 txs with 10 outputs each) without label set, IsMine not set (sent)
Then, the time is measured for calling `getreceivedbyaddress` and `getreceivedbylabel`, the latter with two variants. Results on my machine:
| branch | `getreceivedbyaddress` (single) | `getreceivedbylabel` (single) | `getreceivedbylabel` (10000) |
|--------------------|---------------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|
| master | 406.13ms | 425.33ms | 446.58ms |
| PR (first commit) | 367.18ms | 365.81ms | 426.33ms |
| PR (second commit) | 3.96ms | 4.83ms | 339.69ms |
Fixes #23645.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f336ff7f21
w0xlt:
ACK f336ff7f21
furszy:
Code ACK f336ff7f
Tree-SHA512: 9cbf402b9e269713bd3feda9e31719d9dca8a0dfd526de12fd3d561711589195d0c50143432c65dae279c4eab90a4fc3f99e29fbc0452fefe05113e92d129b8f
4637bbe448 rpc: Explain active and internal in listdescriptors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The current help text for active and internal in listdescriptors is not particularly helpful. They require the reader to already know what those terms mean. This help text is updated to actually explain the definitions of those words in context of a descriptor wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK 4637bbe448
jarolrod:
ACK 4637bbe448
w0xlt:
ACK 4637bbe448
Tree-SHA512: 0af2c04f3b9920799cf616ad618bde9248eb9f74cc28f443b5b0f6646deba76e9b1415aca0865ad3bcc24aa6af0e9d07ad7b7cd80f0fe80838cf847f1b944426
fa870e3d4c Remove not needed clang-format off comments (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It seems odd to disable clang-format and force manual formatting when there is no need for it. So remove the clang-format comments and other unneeded comments.
Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space`
Looks like this was initially added in commit d9d79576f4 to accommodate a linter that has since been removed and replaced by a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa870e3d4c
fanquake:
ACK fa870e3d4c
Tree-SHA512: 0f8f97c12f5dbe517dd96c10b10ce1b8772d8daed33e6b41f73ea1040e89888cf3b8c0ad7b20319e366fe30c71e8b181c89098ae7f6a3deb8647e1b4731db815
a62e84438d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
4fad7e46d9 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo)
9cc8e876e4 refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled.
As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
Code review ACK a62e84438d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious.
Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
The current help text for active and internal in listdescriptors is not
particularly helpful. They require the reader to already know what those
terms mean. This help text is updated to actually explain the
definitions of those words in context of a descriptor wallet.
ee02c8bd9a util/check: Add CHECK_NONFATAL identity function, NONFATAL_UNREACHABLE AND UNREACHABLE macros (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces the macro `CHECK_NONFATAL` with an identity function.
I simplified the usage of `CHECK_NONFATAL` where applicable in `src/rpc`.
This function is useful in sanity checks for RPC and command-line interfaces.
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24804#discussion_r846182474.
Also adds `UNREACHABLE_NONFATAL` macro.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK ee02c8bd9a
MarcoFalke:
ACK ee02c8bd9a🍨
Tree-SHA512: 3cba09223cd7b22e62fe5d0b46c4a024c1d9957d4268ba6d3fb07fcc0a5854fc0886bb3266184e6a7df5df91373b3e84edd6adf6999c4e934aeef8c043b01aa2
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace
all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed.
Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
bb84b7145b add tests for no recipient and using send_max while inputs are specified (ishaanam)
49090ec402 Add sendall RPC née sweep (Murch)
902793c777 Extract FinishTransaction from send() (Murch)
6d2208a3f6 Extract interpretation of fee estimation arguments (Murch)
a31d75e5fb Elaborate error messages for outdated options (Murch)
35ed094e4b Extract prevention of outdated option names (Murch)
Pull request description:
Add sendall RPC née sweep
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _given UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _given budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending a given set of
UTXOs such as paying the value from one or more specific UTXOs, emptying
a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some cases in
which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual
computation of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific
subset of the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns
the funds to one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified
with a given amount or receive an equal share of the remaining
unassigned funds. At least one recipient must be provided without
assigned amount to collect the remainder. The `sendall` call will
never create change. The call has a `send_max` option that changes the
default behavior of spending all UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to
maximizing the output amount of the transaction by skipping uneconomic
UTXOs. The `send_max` option is incompatible with providing a specific
set of inputs.
---
Edit: Replaced OP with latest commit message to reflect my updated motivation of the proposal.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK bb84b7145b
Tree-SHA512: 20aaf75d268cb4b144f5d6437d33ec7b5f989256b3daeeb768ae1e7f39dc6b962af8223c5cb42ecc72dc38cecd921c53c077bc0ec300b994e902412213dd2cc3
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.
Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.
While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs,
emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some
cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation
of the appropriate change amount.
As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.
_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of
the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to
one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific
amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At
least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect
the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has
a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all
UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the
transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is
incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.
fc892c3a80 rpc: Fail to return undocumented or misdocumented JSON (MarcoFalke)
f4bc4a705a rpc: Add m_skip_type_check to RPCResult (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This avoids documentation shortcomings such as the ones fixed in commit e7b6272b30, 138d55e6a0, 577bd51a4b, f8c84e047c, 0ee9a00f90, 13f41855c5, or faecb2ee0a
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fc892c3a80 - tested that this catches issue, i.e #24691:
Tree-SHA512: 9d0d7e6291bfc6f67541a4ff746d374ad8751fefcff6d103d8621c0298b190ab1d209ce96cfc3a0d4a6a5460a9f9bb790eb96027b16e5ff91f2512e40c92ca84
The final step of send either produces a PSBT or the final transaction.
We extract these steps to a new helper function `FinishTransaction()` to
reuse them in `sendall`.
