P2PK scripts are not PKHash destinations, they should have their own
type.
This also results in no longer showing a p2pkh address for p2pk outputs.
However for backwards compatibility, ListCoinst will still do this
conversion.
Make sure that nothing else can change WitnessUnknown's data members by
making them private. Also change the program to use a vector rather than
C-style array.
as string_view is optimized to be trivially copiable, and in these use cases we
only perform read operations on the passed object.
These utility methods are called by quite a few RPCs and tests, as well as by each other.
$ git grep "ParseHashV\|ParseHashO\|ParseHexV\|ParseHexO" | wc -l
61
b3a93b409e test: add functional test for deadlock situation (Martin Zumsande)
3557aa4d0a test: add basic tests for sendmsgtopeer to rpc_net.py (Martin Zumsande)
a9a1d69391 rpc: add test-only sendmsgtopeer rpc (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This adds a `sendmsgtopeer` rpc (for testing only) that allows a node to send a message (provided in hex) to a peer.
While we would usually use a `p2p` object instead of a node for this in the test framework, that isn't possible in situations where this message needs to trigger an actual interaction of multiple nodes.
Use this rpc to add test coverage for the bug fixed in #27981 (that just got merged):
The test lets two nodes (almost) simultaneously send a single large (4MB) p2p message to each other, which would have caused a deadlock previously (making this test fail), but succeeds now.
As can be seen from the discussion in #27981, it was not easy to reproduce this bug without `sendmsgtopeer`. I would imagine that `sendmsgtopeer` could also be helpful in various other test constellations.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK b3a93b409e
sipa:
ACK b3a93b409e
achow101:
ACK b3a93b409e
Tree-SHA512: 6e22e72402f3c4dd70cddb9e96ea988444720f7a164031df159fbdd48056c8ac77ac53def045d9208a3ca07437c7c8e34f8b4ebc7066c0a84d81cd53f2f4fa5f
This rpc can be used when we want a node to send a message, but
cannot use a python P2P object, for example for testing of low-level
net transport behavior.
This change makes IsInitialBlockDownload and NotifyHeaderTip functions no
longer tied to individual Chainstate objects. It makes them work with the
ChainstateManager object instead so code is simpler and it is no longer
possible to call them incorrectly with an inactive Chainstate.
This change also makes m_cached_finished_ibd caching easier to reason about,
because now there is only one cached value instead of two (for background and
snapshot chainstates) so the cached IBD state now no longer gets reset when a
snapshot is loaded.
There should be no change in behavior because these functions were always
called on the active ChainState objects.
These changes were discussed previously
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27746#discussion_r1246868905 and
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27746#discussion_r1237552792 as
possible followups for that PR.
5e3e83b005 RPC/Mining: Document template_request better for getblocktemplate (Luke Dashjr)
de319c6175 RPC/rpcdoccheck: Error if a oneline_description has a quote for a non-string (Luke Dashjr)
7c61e9df90 Bugfix: RPC: Remove quotes from non-string oneline descriptions (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Various JSON Object parameters had a `oneline_description` with quote characters. Fix those, and extend `rpcdoccheck` to detect them.
Also, slightly improve GBT's oneline description for template_request.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e3e83b005
Tree-SHA512: 363d1669a661d0acfc19fddb57e777d781c7246f330cf62160e77dde10a6adcb0249db748127067da1afe1b7d17c71cf611d9fdc3664d6bf5b3f30105637769a
91d924ede1 Rename script/standard.{cpp/h} to script/solver.{cpp/h} (Andrew Chow)
bacdb2e208 Clean up script/standard.{h/cpp} includes (Andrew Chow)
f3c9078b4c Clean up things that include script/standard.h (Andrew Chow)
8bbe257bac MOVEONLY: Move datacarrier defaults to policy.h (Andrew Chow)
7a172c76d2 Move CTxDestination to its own file (Andrew Chow)
145f36ec81 Move Taproot{SpendData/Builder} to signingprovider.{h/cpp} (Andrew Chow)
86ea8bed54 Move CScriptID to script.{h/cpp} (Andrew Chow)
b81ebff0d9 Remove ScriptHash from CScriptID constructor (Andrew Chow)
cba69dda3d Move MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS from script/standard.h to policy/policy.h (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Some future work needs to touch things in script/standard.{h/cpp}, however it is unclear if it is safe to do so as they are included in several different places that could effect standardness and consensus. It contains a mix of policy parameters, consensus parameters, and utilities only used by the wallet. This PR breaks up the various components and renames the files to clearly separate everything.
* `CTxDestination` is moved to a new file `src/addresstype.{cpp/h}`
* `TaprootSpendData` and `TaprootBuilder` (and their utility functions and structs) are moved to `SigningProvider` as these are used only during signing.
* `CScriptID` is moved to `script/script.h` to be next to `CScript`.
* `MANDATORY_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS` is moved to `interpreter.h`
* The parameters `DEFAULT_ACCEPT_DATACARRIER` and `MAX_OP_RETURN_RELAY` are moved to `policy.h`
* `standard.{cpp/h}` is renamed to `solver.{cpp/h}` since that's all that's left in the file after the above moves
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 91d924ede1
ajtowns:
ACK 91d924ede1
MarcoFalke:
ACK 91d924ede1😇
murchandamus:
ACK 91d924ede1
darosior:
Code review ACK 91d924ede1.
theStack:
Code-review ACK 91d924ede1
Tree-SHA512: d347439890c652081f6a303d99b2bde6c371c96e7f4127c5db469764a17d39981f19884679ba883e28b733fde6142351dd8288c7bc61c379b7eefe7fa7acca1a
fa776e61cd Add importmempool RPC (MarcoFalke)
fa20d734a2 refactor: Add and use kernel::ImportMempoolOptions (MarcoFalke)
fa8866990d doc: Clarify the getmempoolinfo.loaded RPC field documentation (MarcoFalke)
6888886cec Remove Chainstate::LoadMempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently it is possible to import a mempool by placing it in the datadir and starting the node. However this has many issues:
* Users aren't expected to fiddle with the datadir, possibly corrupting it
* An existing mempool file in the datadir may be overwritten
* The node needs to be restarted
* Importing an untrusted file this way is dangerous, because it can corrupt the mempool
Fix all issues by adding a new RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
utACK fa776e61cd
achow101:
ACK fa776e61cd
glozow:
reACK fa776e61cd
Tree-SHA512: fcb1a92d6460839283c546c47a2d930c363ac1013c4c50dc5215ddf9fe5e51921d23fe0abfae0a5a7631983cfc7e2fff3788b70f95937d0a989a203be4d67546
d8f1222ac5 refactor: Correct dbwrapper key naming (TheCharlatan)
be8f159ac5 build: Remove leveldb from BITCOIN_INCLUDES (TheCharlatan)
c95b37d641 refactor: Move CDBWrapper leveldb members to their own context struct (TheCharlatan)
c534a615e9 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBWrapper::EstimateSize implementation (TheCharlatan)
586448888b refactor: Move HandleError to dbwrapper implementation (TheCharlatan)
dede0eef7a refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBWrapper::Exists implementation (TheCharlatan)
a5c2eb5748 refactor: Fix logging.h includes (TheCharlatan)
84058e0eed refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBWrapper::Read implementation (TheCharlatan)
e4af2408f2 refactor: Pimpl leveldb::Iterator for CDBIterator (TheCharlatan)
ef941ff128 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBIterator::GetValue implementation (TheCharlatan)
b7a1ab5cb4 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBIterator::GetKey implementation (TheCharlatan)
d7437908cd refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBIterator::Seek implementation (TheCharlatan)
ea8135de7e refactor: Pimpl leveldb::batch for CDBBatch (TheCharlatan)
b9870c920d refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBatch::Erase implementation (TheCharlatan)
532ee812a4 refactor: Split dbwrapper CDBBatch::Write implementation (TheCharlatan)
afc534df9a refactor: Wrap DestroyDB in dbwrapper helper (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Leveldb headers are currently included in the `dbwrapper.h` file and thus available to many of Bitcoin Core's source files. However, leveldb-specific functionality should be abstracted by the `dbwrapper` and does not need to be available to the rest of the code. Having leveldb included in a widely-used header such as `dbwrapper.h` bloats the entire project's header tree.
The `dbwrapper` is a key component of the libbitcoinkernel library. Future users of this library would not want to contend with having the leveldb headers exposed and potentially polluting their project's namespace.
For these reasons, the leveldb headers are removed from the `dbwrapper` by moving leveldb-specific code to the implementation file and creating a [pimpl](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/pimpl) where leveldb member variables are indispensable. As a final step, the leveldb include flags are removed from the `BITCOIN_INCLUDES` and moved to places where the dbwrapper is compiled.
---
This pull request is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587), and more specifically its stage 1 step 3 "Decouple most non-consensus headers from libbitcoinkernel".
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK d8f1222ac5
MarcoFalke:
ACK d8f1222ac5🔠
Tree-SHA512: 0f58309be165af0162e648233451cd80fda88726fc10c0da7bfe4ec2ffa9afe63fbf7ffae9493698d3f39653b4ad870c372eee652ecc90ab1c29d86c387070f3
1. Use const where possible;
2. Rename variables to make them clearer;
3. There is no need to check whether `command` is null since it's a non-optional field.
fabef121b0 refactor: Use EnsureAnyNodeContext (MarcoFalke)
fa1640617e test: Add SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue to mockscheduler RPC (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There should be no risk or downside in adding a call to `SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue` here. In fact, it will make tests less brittle. For example,
* If one sets the timeouts in `test/functional/feature_fee_estimation.py` to `0`, on `master` the test will fail and here it will pass.
* It may avoid a rare (theoretic) intermittent issue in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28108/files#r1268966663
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fabef121b0
furszy:
Code review ACK fabef121. Convinced by checking all current tests usages.
Tree-SHA512: c9e9a536a8721d1b3f267a66b40578b34948892301affdcad121ef8e02bf17037305d0dd53aa94b1b064753e66f9cfb31823b916b707a9d812627f502b818003
This check is already done by the rpc parser. Re-doing it is adding dead
code. Instead, throwing an exception when the assumption does not hold
is the already correct behavior.
To make the fuzz test more accurate and not swallow all runtime errors,
add a check that the passed in UniValue sighash argument is either a
string or null.
Co-authored-by: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
6960c81cbf kernel: Remove Univalue from kernel library (TheCharlatan)
10eb3a9faa kernel: Split ParseSighashString (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Besides the build system changes, this is a mostly move-only change for moving the few UniValue-related functions out of kernel files.
UniValue is not required by any of the kernel components and a JSON library should not need to be part of a consensus library.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6960c81cbf
theuni:
Re-ACK 6960c81cbf
stickies-v:
re-ACK 6960c81cbf
Tree-SHA512: d92e4cb4e12134c94b517751bd746d39f9b8da528ec3a1c94aaedcce93274a3bae9277832e8a7c0243c13df0397ca70ae7bbb24ede200018c569f8d81103c1da
node_context is never null, but if it was, it would lead to a nullptr
dereference in node_context->scheduler. Just use EnsureAnyNodeContext
everywhere for more robust, consistent, and correct code.
e8c31f135c tests: Test for bumping single output transaction (Andrew Chow)
4f4d4407e3 test: Test bumpfee reduce_output (Andrew Chow)
7d83502d3d bumpfee: Allow original change position to be specified (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When bumping the transaction fee, we will try to find the change output of the transaction in order to have an output whose value we can modify so that we can meet the target feerate. However we do not always find the change output which can cause us to unnecessarily add an additional output to the transaction. We can avoid this issue by outsourcing the determination of change to the user if they so desire.
This PR adds a `orig_change_pos` option to bumpfee which the user can use to specify the index of the change output.
Fixes #11233
Fixes #20795
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
re ACK e8c31f135c
pinheadmz:
re-ACK e8c31f135c
furszy:
Code review ACK e8c31f13
Tree-SHA512: 3a230655934af17f7c1a5953fafb5ef0d687c21355cf284d5e98fece411f589cd69ea505f06d6bdcf82836b08d268c366ad2dd30ae3d71541c9cdf94d1f698ee
f6a26196cf Added `longpollid` and `data` params to `template_request` #27998 (Rhythm Garg)
Pull request description:
This PR will add the optional parameters `longpollid` and `data` to `template_request` as they were missing when calling `help getblocktemplate` in RPCHelpMan.
I request the maintainers to review this and let me know about any mistakes in the descriptions of the parameters.
This PR refers to the issue #27998
ACKs for top commit:
ItIsOHM:
> tACK [f6a2619](f6a26196cf)
russeree:
tACK f6a26196cf
stickies-v:
tACK f6a26196cf
Tree-SHA512: 6c592db59cb11b2d031ce5265c547fa296266278f6c25f96afe18a420e0d547f4d483e0f66de75d52c0c319ac1585f3558b9f70c12ef208c96ec96a51f786c6a
And transfer the responsibility of verifying whether 'start_block'
has data or not to the caller.
This is because the 'GetFirstStoredBlock' function responsibility
is to return the first block containing data. And the current
implementation can return 'start_block' when it has no data!. Which
is misleading at least.
Edge case behavior change:
Previously, if the block tip lacked data but all preceding blocks
contained data, there was no prune violation. And now, such
scenario will result in a prune violation.
32e2ffc393 Remove the syscall sandbox (fanquake)
Pull request description:
After initially being merged in #20487, it's no-longer clear that an internal syscall sandboxing mechanism is something that Bitcoin Core should have/maintain, especially when compared to better maintained/supported alterantives, i.e [firejail](https://github.com/netblue30/firejail).
There is more related discussion in #24771.
Note that given where it's used, the sandbox also gets dragged into the kernel.
If it's removed, this should not require any sort of deprecation, as this was only ever an opt-in, experimental feature.
Closes #24771.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
crACK 32e2ffc393
achow101:
ACK 32e2ffc393
dergoegge:
ACK 32e2ffc393
Tree-SHA512: 8cf71c5623bb642cb515531d4a2545d806e503b9d57bfc15a996597632b06103d60d985fd7f843a3c1da6528bc38d0298d6b8bcf0be6f851795a8040d71faf16
If the user used a custom change address, it may not be detected as a
change output, resulting in an additional change output being added to
the bumped transaction. We can avoid this issue by allowing the user to
specify the position of the change output.
Any identifier starting with two _, or one _ followed by a capital letter is reserved for the compiler and thus must not be used. See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/228797/7130273
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s '__pushKV' 'pushKVEnd'
s '_EraseTx' 'EraseTxNoLock'
s '_Other' 'Other'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
After initially being merged in #20487, it's no-longer clear that an
internal syscall sandboxing mechanism is something that Bitcoin Core
should have/maintain, especially when compared to better
maintained/supported alterantives, i.e firejail.
Note that given where it's used, the sandbox also gets dragged into the
kernel.
There is some related discussion in #24771.
This should not require any sort of deprecation, as this was only ever
an opt-in, experimental feature.
Closes #24771.
67b7fecacd [mempool] clear mapDeltas entry if prioritisetransaction sets delta to 0 (glozow)
c1061acb9d [functional test] prioritisation is not removed during replacement and expiry (glozow)
0e5874f0b0 [functional test] getprioritisedtransactions RPC (glozow)
99f8046829 [rpc] add getprioritisedtransactions (glozow)
9e9ca36c80 [mempool] add GetPrioritisedTransactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Add an RPC to get prioritised transactions (also tells you whether the tx is in mempool or not), helping users clean up `mapDeltas` manually. When `CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction` sets a delta to 0, remove the entry from `mapDeltas`.
Motivation / Background
- `mapDeltas` entries are never removed from mapDeltas except when the tx is mined in a block or conflicted.
- Mostly it is a feature to allow `prioritisetransaction` for a tx that isn't in the mempool {yet, anymore}. A user can may resbumit a tx and it retains its priority, or mark a tx as "definitely accept" before it is seen.
- Since #8448, `mapDeltas` is persisted to mempool.dat and loaded on restart. This is also good, otherwise we lose prioritisation on restart.
- Note the removal due to block/conflict is only done when `removeForBlock` is called, i.e. when the block is received. If you load a mempool.dat containing `mapDeltas` with transactions that were mined already (e.g. the file was saved prior to the last few blocks), you don't delete them.
- Related: #4818 and #6464.
- There is no way to query the node for not-in-mempool `mapDeltas`. If you add a priority and forget what the value was, the only way to get that information is to inspect mempool.dat.
- Calling `prioritisetransaction` with an inverse value does not remove it from `mapDeltas`, it just sets the value to 0. It disappears on a restart (`LoadMempool` checks if delta is 0), but that might not happen for a while.
Added together, if a user calls `prioritisetransaction` very regularly and not all those transactions get mined/conflicted, `mapDeltas` might keep lots of entries of delta=0 around. A user should clean up the not-in-mempool prioritisations, but that's currently difficult without keeping track of what those txids/amounts are.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 67b7fecacd
theStack:
Code-review ACK 67b7fecacd
instagibbs:
code review ACK 67b7fecacd
ajtowns:
ACK 67b7fecacd code review only, some nits
Tree-SHA512: 9df48b622ef27f33db1a2748f682bb3f16abe8172fcb7ac3c1a3e1654121ffb9b31aeaad5570c4162261f7e2ff5b5912ddc61a1b8beac0e9f346a86f5952260a
2cd28e9fef rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
5c832c3820 p2p, refactor: return `std::optional<CNetAddr>` in `LookupHost` (brunoerg)
34bcdfc6a6 p2p, refactor: return vector/optional<CService> in `Lookup` (brunoerg)
7799eb125b p2p, refactor: return `std::vector<CNetAddr>` in `LookupHost` (brunoerg)
5c1774a563 p2p, refactor: return `std::vector<CNetAddr>` in `LookupIntern` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Continuation of #26078.
To improve readability instead of returning a bool and passing stuff by reference, this PR changes:
- `LookupHost` to return `std::vector<CNetAddr>`
- `LookupHost` to return `std::optional<CNetAddr>`
- `Lookup` to return `std::vector<CService>`
- `Lookup` to return `std::optional<CService>`.
- `LookupIntern` to return `std::vector<CNetAddr>`
As discussed in #26078, it would be better to avoid using `optional` in some cases, but for specific `Lookup` and `LookupHost` functions it's necessary to use `optional` to verify if they were able to catch some data from their overloaded function.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5c832c3820
stickies-v:
re-ACK 5c832c3820 - just addressing two nits, no other changes
theStack:
re-ACK 5c832c3820
Tree-SHA512: ea346fdc54463999646269bd600cd4a1590ef958001d2f0fc2be608ca51e1b4365efccca76dd4972b023e12fcc6e67d226608b0df7beb901bdeadd19948df840
7d3b35004b refactor: Move system from util to common library (TheCharlatan)
7eee356c0a refactor: Split util::AnyPtr into its own file (TheCharlatan)
44de325d95 refactor: Split util::insert into its own file (TheCharlatan)
9ec5da36b6 refactor: Move ScheduleBatchPriority to its own file (TheCharlatan)
f871c69191 kernel: Add warning method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
4452707ede kernel: Add progress method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
84d71457e7 kernel: Add headerTip method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
447761c822 kernel: Add notification interface (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel".
---
It removes the kernel library's dependency on `util/system` and `interface_ui`. `util/system` contains networking and shell-related code that should not be part of the kernel library. The following pull requests prepared `util/system` for this final step: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27419https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27238.
`interface_ui` defines functions for a more general node interface and has a dependency on `boost/signals2`. After applying the patches from this pull request, the kernel's reliance on boost is down to `boost::multiindex`.
The approach implemented here introduces some indirection, which makes the code a bit harder to read. Any suggestions for improving or reworking this pull request to make it more concise, or even reworking it into a more proper interface, are appreciated.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7d3b35004b (no change) 🎋
stickies-v:
Code Review ACK 7d3b35004b
hebasto:
re-ACK 7d3b35004b, only last two commits dropped since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27636#pullrequestreview-1435394620) review.
Tree-SHA512: c8cfc698dc9d78e20191c444708f2d957501229abe95e5806106d1126fb9c5fbcee686fb55645658c0107ce71f10646f37a2fdf7fde16bbf22cbf1ac885dd08d
d7f359b35e Add tests for parallel compact block downloads (Greg Sanders)
03423f8bd1 Support up to 3 parallel compact block txn fetchings (Greg Sanders)
13f9b20b4c Only request full blocks from the peer we thought had the block in-flight (Greg Sanders)
cce96182ba Convert mapBlocksInFlight to a multimap (Greg Sanders)
a90595478d Remove nBlocksInFlight (Greg Sanders)
86cff8bf18 alias BlockDownloadMap for mapBlocksInFlight (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
This is an attempt at mitigating https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25258 , which is a revival of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10984, which is a revival of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9447.
This PR attempts to mitigate a single case, where high bandwidth peers can bail us out of a flakey
peer not completing blocks for us. We allow up to 2 additional getblocktxns requests per unique block.
This would hopefully allow the chance for an honest high bandwidth peer to hand us the transactions
even if the first in flight peer stalls out.
In contrast to previous effort:
1) it will not help if subsequent peers send block headers only, so only high-bandwidth peers this time. See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10984/files#diff-6875de769e90cec84d2e8a9c1b962cdbcda44d870d42e4215827e599e11e90e3R1411
2) `MAX_GETBLOCKTXN_TXN_AFTER_FIRST_IN_FLIGHT` is removed, in favor of aiding recovery during turbulent mempools
3) We require one of the 3 block fetching slots to be an outbound peer. This can be the original offering peer, or subsequent compact blocks given by high bandwidth peers.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK d7f359b35e
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK d7f359b35e
Tree-SHA512: 54980eac179e30f12a0bd49df147b2c3d63cd8f9401abb23c7baf02f76eeb59f2cfaaa155227990d0d39384de9fa38663f88774e891600a3837ae927f04f0db3
A single outbound slot is required, so if the first two slots
are taken by inbound in-flights, the node will reject additional
unless they are coming from outbound.
This means in the case where a fast sybil peer is attempting to
stall out a node, a single high bandwidth outbound peer can
mitigate the attack.
1bce12acd3 test: add test for `descriptorprocesspsbt` RPC (ishaanam)
fb2a3a70e8 rpc: add descriptorprocesspsbt rpc (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This PR implements an RPC called `descriptorprocesspsbt`. This RPC is based off of `walletprocesspsbt`, but instead of interacting with the wallet to update, sign and finalize a psbt, it instead accepts an array of output descriptors and uses that information along with information from the mempool, txindex, and the utxo set to do so. `utxoupdatepsbt` also updates a psbt in this manner, but doesn't sign or finalize it. Because of this overlap, a helper function that is added in this PR is called by both `utxoupdatepsbt` and `descriptorprocesspsbt`. Whether or not the helper function signs a psbt is dictated by if the HidingSigningProvider passed to it contains any private information. There is also a test added in this PR for this new RPC that uses p2wsh, p2wpkh, and legacy outputs.
Edit: see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25796#issuecomment-1228830963
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 1bce12acd3
instagibbs:
reACK 1bce12acd3
Tree-SHA512: e1d0334739943e71f2ee68b4db7637ebe725da62e7aa4be071f71c7196d2a5970a31ece96d91e372d34454cde8509e95ab0eebd2c8edb94f7d5a781a84f8fc5d
