3b70f7b615 doc: fix broken doc/design/multiprocess.md links after #24352 (Ryan Ofsky)
6d43aad742 span: Make Span template deduction guides work in SFINAE context (Ryan Ofsky)
8062c3bdb9 util: Add ArgsManager SetConfigFilePath method (Ryan Ofsky)
441d00c60f interfaces: Rename CalculateBumpFees methods to be compatible with capn'proto (Ryan Ofsky)
156f49d682 interfaces: Change getUnspentOutput return type to avoid multiprocess segfault (Ryan Ofsky)
4978754c00 interfaces: Add schedulerMockForward method so mockscheduler RPC can work across processes (Ryan Ofsky)
924327eaf3 interfaces: Fix const virtual method that breaks multiprocess support (Ryan Ofsky)
82a379eca8 streams: Add SpanReader ignore method (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a collection of small changes to interfaces and code which were needed as part of multiprocess PR #10102, but have been moved here to make that PR smaller.
All of these changes are refactoring changes which do not affect behavior of current code
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28722).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3b70f7b615
naumenkogs:
ACK 3b70f7b615
maflcko:
re-ACK 3b70f7b615🎆
Tree-SHA512: 2368772b887056ad8a9f84c299cfde76ba45943770e3b5353130580900afa9611302195b899ced7b6e303b11f053ff204cae7c28ff4e12c55562fcc81119ba4c
4dd94ca18f [refactor] remove access to mapTx in validation_block_tests (TheCharlatan)
d0cd2e804e [refactor] rewrite BlockAssembler inBlock and failedTx as sets of txids (glozow)
55b0939cab scripted-diff: rename vTxHashes to txns_randomized (TheCharlatan)
a03aef9cec [refactor] rewrite vTxHashes as a vector of CTransactionRef (glozow)
938643c3b2 [refactor] remove access to mapTx in validation.cpp (glozow)
333367a940 [txmempool] make CTxMemPoolEntry::lockPoints mutable (glozow)
1bf4855016 [refactor] use CheckPackageLimits for checkChainLimits (glozow)
dbc5bdbf59 [refactor] remove access to mapTx.find in mempool_tests.cpp (glozow)
f80909e7a3 [refactor] remove access to mapTx in blockencodings_tests.cpp (glozow)
8892d6b744 [refactor] remove access to mapTx from rpc/mempool.cpp (glozow)
fad61aa561 [refactor] get wtxid from entry instead of vTxHashes (glozow)
9cd8cafb77 [refactor] use exists() instead of mapTx.find() (glozow)
14804699e5 [refactor] remove access to mapTx from policy/rbf.cpp (glozow)
1c6a73abbd [refactor] Add helper for retrieving mempool entry (TheCharlatan)
453b4813eb [refactor] Add helper for iterating through mempool entries (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Motivation
* It seems preferable to use stdlib data structures instead of boost if they can achieve close to the same thing.
* Code external to mempool should ideally use its public helper methods instead of accessing `mapTx` or its iterators directly.
* Reduce the number of complex boost multi index type interactions
* Also see #28335 for further context/motivation. This PR together with #28385 simplifies that one.
Overview of things done in this PR:
* Make `vTxHashes` a vector of transaction references instead of a pair of transaction hash and iterator. The trade off here is that the data is retrieved on the fly with `GetEntry` instead of being cached in `vTxHashes`.
* Introduce `GetEntry` helper method to replace the more involved `GetIter` where applicable
* Replace `mapTx` access with `CTxMemPool` helper methods
* Simplify `checkChainLimits` call in `node/interfaces.cpp`
* Make `CTxMemPoolEntry`s `lockPoints`mutable such that they can be changed with a const iterator directly instead of going through `mapTx`
* Make `BlockAssembler`'s `inBlock` and `failedTx` sets of transaction hashes.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 4dd94ca
maflcko:
re-ACK 4dd94ca18f👝
stickies-v:
re-ACK 4dd94ca18f
Tree-SHA512: c4d043f2186e4fde337591883fac66cade3058173987b49502bd65cecf69207a3df1077f6626809652ab63230013167b7f39a2b39f1c5166959e5495df57065f
0420f99f42 Create net_peer_connection unit tests (Jon Atack)
4b834f6499 Allow unit tests to access additional CConnman members (Jon Atack)
34b9ef443b net/rpc: Makes CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo able to return only non-connected address on request (Sergi Delgado Segura)
94e8882d82 rpc: Prevents adding the same ip more than once when formatted differently (Sergi Delgado Segura)
2574b7e177 net/rpc: Check all resolved addresses in ConnectNode rather than just one (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
## Rationale
Currently, `addnode` has a couple of corner cases that allow it to either connect to the same peer more than once, hence wasting outbound connection slots, or add redundant information to `m_added_nodes`, hence making Bitcoin iterate through useless data on a regular basis.
### Connecting to the same node more than once
In general, connecting to the same node more than once is something we should try to prevent. Currently, this is possible via `addnode` in two different ways:
1. Calling `addnode` more than once in a short time period, using two equivalent but distinct addresses
2. Calling `addnode add` using an IP, and `addnode onetry` after with an address that resolved to the same IP
For the former, the issue boils down to `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections` calling `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo` once, and iterating over the result to open connections (`CConman::OpenNetworkConnection`) on the same loop for all addresses.`CConnman::ConnectNode` only checks a single address, at random, when resolving from a hostname, and uses it to check whether we are already connected to it.
An example to test this would be calling:
```
bitcoin-cli addnode "127.0.0.1:port" add
bitcoin-cli addnode "localhost:port" add
```
And check how it allows us to perform both connections some times, and some times it fails.
The latter boils down to the same issue, but takes advantage of `onetry` bypassing the `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections` logic and calling `CConnman::OpenNetworkConnection` straightaway. A way to test this would be:
```
bitcoin-cli addnode "127.0.0.1:port" add
bitcoin-cli addnode "localhost:port" onetry
```
### Adding the same peer with two different, yet equivalent, addresses
The current implementation of `addnode` is pretty naive when checking what data is added to `m_added_nodes`. Given the collection stores strings, the checks at `CConnman::AddNode()` basically check wether the exact provided string is already in the collection. If so, the data is rejected, otherwise, it is accepted. However, ips can be formatted in several ways that would bypass those checks.
Two examples would be `127.0.0.1` being equal to `127.1` and `[::1]` being equal to `[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]`. Adding any pair of these will be allowed by the rpc command, and both will be reported as connected by `getaddednodeinfo`, given they map to the same `CService`.
This is less severe than the previous issue, since even tough both nodes are reported as connected by `getaddednodeinfo`, there is only a single connection to them (as properly reported by `getpeerinfo`). However, this adds redundant data to `m_added_nodes`, which is undesirable.
### Parametrize `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo`
Finally, this PR also parametrizes `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo` so it returns either all added nodes info, or only info about the nodes we are **not** connected to. This method is used both for `rpc`, in `getaddednodeinfo`, in which we are reporting all data to the user, so the former applies, and to check what nodes we are not connected to, in `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections`, in which we are currently returning more data than needed and then actively filtering using `CService.fConnected()`
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 0420f99f42
kashifs:
> > tACK [0420f9](0420f99f42)
sr-gi:
> > > tACK [0420f9](0420f99f42)
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 0420f99f42
Tree-SHA512: a3a10e748c12d98d439dfb193c75bc8d9486717cda5f41560f5c0ace1baef523d001d5e7eabac9fa466a9159a30bb925cc1327c2d6c4efb89dcaf54e176d1752
bbb68ffdbd refactor: drop protocol.h include header in rpc/util.h (Jon Atack)
1dd62c5295 refactor: move GetServicesNames from rpc/util.{h,cpp} to rpc/net.cpp (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Move `GetServicesNames()` from `rpc/util` to `rpc/net.cpp`, as it is only called from that compilation unit and there is no reason for other ones to need it.
Remove the `protocol.h` include in `rpc/util.h`, as it was only needed for `GetServicesNames()`, drop an unneeded forward declaration (the other IWYU suggestions would require more extensive changes in other files), and add 3 already-missing include headers in other translation units that are needed to compile without `protocol.h` in `rpc/util.h`, as `protocol.h` includes `netaddress.h`, which in turn includes `util/strencodings.h`.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
lgtm ACK [bbb68ff](bbb68ffdbd)
ns-xvrn:
ACK bbb68ff
achow101:
ACK bbb68ffdbd
Tree-SHA512: fcbe195874dd4aa9e86548685b6b28595a2c46f9869b79b6e2b3835f76b49cab4bef6a59c8ad6428063a41b7bb6f687229b06ea614fbd103e0531104af7de55d
bb91131d54 doc: remove out-of-date external link in src/util/strencodings.h (Jon Atack)
7d494a48dd refactor: use string_view to pass string literals to Parse{Hash,Hex} (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as `string_view` is optimized to be trivially copiable, whereas the current code creates a `std::string` copy at each call.
These utility methods are called by quite a few RPCs and tests, as well as by each other.
```
$ git grep "ParseHashV\|ParseHashO\|ParseHexV\|ParseHexO" | wc -l
61
```
Also remove an out-of-date external link.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Rebased per `git range-diff c9273f6 b94581a bb91131` for an include header from the merge of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28230. Should be trivial to re-ACK.
maflcko:
lgtm ACK bb91131d54
ns-xvrn:
ACK bb91131d54
achow101:
ACK bb91131d54
brunoerg:
crACK bb91131d54
Tree-SHA512: 9734fe022c9e43fd93c23a917770d332dbbd3132c80a234059714c32faa6469391e59349954749fc86c4ef0b18d5fd99bf8f4b7b82d9f799943799c1253272ae
`CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo` is used both to get a list of addresses to manually connect to
in `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections`, and to report about manually added connections in
`getaddednodeinfo`. In both cases, all addresses added to `m_added_nodes` are returned, however
the nodes we are already connected to are only relevant to the latter, in the former they are
actively discarded.
Parametrizes `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo` so we can ask for only addresses we are not connected to,
to avoid passing useless information around.
faa769db5a Fix bugprone-lambda-function-name errors (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Inside a lambda, `__func__` will evaluate to something like `"operator()"`. Fix this by either removing it, or by using the real name.
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone/lambda-function-name.html
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK faa769db5a
darosior:
utACK faa769db5a
Tree-SHA512: 0b562bd4ebd7f46ca3ebabeee67851ad30bd522fa57e5010e833b163664e51f5df645ff9ca35d22c3479fb27d9267d4e5d0d417d42729bf3ccf80d7944970e4e
fb3e812277 p2p: return `CSubNet` in `LookupSubNet` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Analyzing the usage of `LookupSubNet`, noticed that most cases uses check if the subnet is valid by calling `subnet.IsValid()`, and the boolean returned by `LookupSubNet` hasn't been used so much, see:
29d540b7ad/src/httpserver.cpp (L172-L174)29d540b7ad/src/net_permissions.cpp (L114-L116)
It makes sense to return `CSubNet` instead of `bool`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fb3e812277
vasild:
ACK fb3e812277
theStack:
Code-review ACK fb3e812277
stickies-v:
Concept ACK, but Approach ~0 (for now). Reviewed the code (fb3e812277) and it all looks good to me.
Tree-SHA512: ba50d6bd5d58dfdbe1ce1faebd80dd8cf8c92ac53ef33519860b83399afffab482d5658cb6921b849d7a3df6d5cea911412850e08f3f4e27f7af510fbde4b254
0e6f6ebc06 net: remove unused CConnman::FindNode(const CSubNet&) (Vasil Dimov)
9482cb780f netbase: possibly change the result of LookupSubNet() to CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
53afa68026 net: move MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS() from net to netbase (Vasil Dimov)
6e308651c4 net: move IsReachable() code to netbase and encapsulate it (Vasil Dimov)
c42ded3d9b fuzz: ConsumeNetAddr(): avoid IPv6 addresses that look like CJDNS (Vasil Dimov)
64d6f77907 net: put CJDNS prefix byte in a constant (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`LookupSubNet()` would treat addresses that start with `fc` as IPv6 even if `-cjdnsreachable` is set. This creates the following problems where it is called:
* `NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse()`: otherwise `-whitelist=` fails to white list CJDNS addresses: when a CJDNS peer connects to us, it will be matched against IPv6 `fc...` subnet and the match will never succeed.
* `BanMapFromJson()`: CJDNS bans are stored as just IPv6 addresses in `banlist.json`. Upon reading from disk they have to be converted back to CJDNS, otherwise, after restart, a ban entry like (`fc00::1`, IPv6) would not match a peer (`fc00::1`, CJDNS).
* `RPCConsole::unbanSelectedNode()`: in the GUI the ban entries go through `CSubNet::ToString()` and back via `LookupSubNet()`. Then it must match whatever is stored in `BanMan`, otherwise it is impossible to unban via the GUI.
These were uncovered by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26859.
Thus, flip the result of `LookupSubNet()` to CJDNS if the network base address starts with `fc` and `-cjdnsreachable` is set. Since subnetting/masking does not make sense for CJDNS (the address is "random" bytes, like Tor and I2P, there is no hierarchy) treat `fc.../mask` as an invalid `CSubNet`.
To achieve that, `MaybeFlipIPv6toCJDNS()` has to be moved from `net` to `netbase` and thus also `IsReachable()`. In the process of moving `IsReachable()`, `SetReachable()` and `vfLimited[]` encapsulate those in a class.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK 0e6f6ebc06
achow101:
ACK 0e6f6ebc06
mzumsande:
re-ACK 0e6f6ebc06
Tree-SHA512: 4767a60dc882916de4c8b110ce8de208ff3f58daaa0b560e6547d72e604d07c4157e72cf98b237228310fc05c0a3922f446674492e2ba02e990a272d288bd566
9620cb4493 assumeutxo: fail early if snapshot block hash doesn't match AssumeUTXO parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Right now the `loadtxoutset` RPC call treats literally all files with a minimum size of 40 bytes (=size of metadata) as potential valid snapshot candidates and the waiting loop for seeing the metadata block hash in the headers chain is always entered, e.g.:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadtxoutset ~/.vimrc
<wait>
bitcoind log:
...
2023-10-15T14:55:45Z [snapshot] waiting to see blockheader 626174207465730a7265626d756e207465730a656c62616e65207861746e7973 in headers chain before snapshot activation
...
```
There is no point in doing any further action though if we already know from the start that the UTXO snapshot loading won't be successful. This PR adds an assumeutxo parameter check immediately after the metadata is read in, so we can fail immediately on a mismatch:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli loadtxoutset ~/.vimrc
error code: -32603
error message:
Unable to load UTXO snapshot, assumeutxo block hash in snapshot metadata not recognized (626174207465730a7265626d756e207465730a656c62616e
65207861746e7973)
```
This way, users who mistakenly try to load files that are not snapshots don't have to wait 10 minutes (=the block header waiting timeout) anymore to get a negative response. If a file is loaded which is a valid snapshot (referencing to an existing block hash), but one which doesn't match the parameters, the feedback is also faster, as we don't have to wait anymore to see the hash in the headers chain before getting an error.
This is also partially fixes #28621.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 9620cb4493
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9620cb4493. This should fix an annoyance and bad UX.
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 9620cb4493
Tree-SHA512: f88b865e9d46254858e57c024463f389cd9d8760a7cb30c190aa1723a931e159987dfc2263a733825d700fa612e7416691e4d8aab64058f1aeb0a7fa9233ac9c
fa05a726c2 tidy: modernize-use-emplace (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Constructing a temporary unnamed object only to copy or move it into a container seems both verbose in code and a strict performance penalty.
Fix both issues via the `modernize-use-emplace` tidy check.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK fa05a726c2
hebasto:
ACK fa05a726c2.
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa05a726c2
Tree-SHA512: 4408a094f406e7bf6c1468c2b0798f68f4d952a1253cf5b20bdc648ad7eea4a2c070051fed46d66fd37bce2ce6f85962484a1d32826b7ab8c9baba431eaa2765
All callers of `LookupSubNet()` need the result to be of CJDNS type if
`-cjdnsreachable` is set and the address begins with `fc`:
* `NetWhitelistPermissions::TryParse()`: otherwise `-whitelist=` fails
to white list CJDNS addresses: when a CJDNS peer connects to us, it
will be matched against IPv6 `fc...` subnet and the match will never
succeed.
* `BanMapFromJson()`: CJDNS bans are stored as just IPv6 addresses in
`banlist.json`. Upon reading from disk they have to be converted back
to CJDNS, otherwise, after restart, a ban entry like (`fc00::1`, IPv6)
would not match a peer (`fc00::1`, CJDNS).
* `setban()` (in `rpc/net.cpp`): otherwise `setban fc.../mask add` would
add an IPv6 entry to BanMan. Subnetting does not make sense for CJDNS
addresses, thus treat `fc.../mask` as invalid `CSubNet`. The result of
`LookupHost()` has to be converted for the case of banning a single
host.
* `InitHTTPAllowList()`: not necessary since before this change
`-rpcallowip=fc...` would match IPv6 subnets against IPv6 peers even
if they started with `fc`. But because it is necessary for the above,
`HTTPRequest::GetPeer()` also has to be adjusted to return CJDNS peer,
so that now CJDNS peers are matched against CJDNS subnets.
5b878be742 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a5 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
Current getchainstates RPC returns "normal" and "snapshot" fields which are not
ideal because it requires new "normal" and "snapshot" terms to be defined, and
the definitions are not really consistent with internal code. (In the RPC
interface, the "snapshot" chainstate becomes the "normal" chainstate after it
is validated, while in internal code there is no "normal chainstate" and the
"snapshot chainstate" is still called that temporarily after it is validated).
The current getchainstatees RPC is also awkward to use if you to want
information about the most-work chainstate because you have to look at the
"snapshot" field if it exists, and otherwise fall back to the "normal" field.
Fix these issues by having getchainstates just return a flat list of
chainstates ordered by work, and adding new chainstate "validated" field
alongside the existing "snapshot_blockhash" so it is explicit if a chainstate
was originally loaded from a snapshot, and whether the snapshot has been
validated.
`vfLimited`, `IsReachable()`, `SetReachable()` need not be in the `net`
module. Move them to `netbase` because they will be needed in
`LookupSubNet()` to possibly flip the result to CJDNS (if that network
is reachable).
In the process, encapsulate them in a class.
`NET_UNROUTABLE` and `NET_INTERNAL` are no longer ignored when adding
or removing reachable networks. This was unnecessary.
- make `getaddrmaninfo` RPC public since it's not for development
purposes only and regular users might find it useful
- add missing `all_networks` key to RPC help
- use clang format spacing
352d5eb2a9 test: getrawaddrman RPC (0xb10c)
da384a286b rpc: getrawaddrman for addrman entries (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Inspired by `getaddrmaninfo` (#27511), this adds a hidden/test-only `getrawaddrman` RPC. The RPC returns information on all addresses in the address manager new and tried tables. Addrman table contents can be used in tests and during development.
The RPC result encodes the `bucket` and `position`, the internal location of addresses in the tables, in the address object's string key. This allows users to choose to consume or to ignore the location information. If the internals of the address manager implementation change, the location encoding might change too.
```
getrawaddrman
EXPERIMENTAL warning: this call may be changed in future releases.
Returns information on all address manager entries for the new and tried tables.
Result:
{ (json object)
"table" : { (json object) buckets with addresses in the address manager table ( new, tried )
"bucket/position" : { (json object) the location in the address manager table (<bucket>/<position>)
"address" : "str", (string) The address of the node
"port" : n, (numeric) The port number of the node
"network" : "str", (string) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p, cjdns) of the address
"services" : n, (numeric) The services offered by the node
"time" : xxx, (numeric) The UNIX epoch time when the node was last seen
"source" : "str", (string) The address that relayed the address to us
"source_network" : "str" (string) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p, cjdns) of the source address
},
...
},
...
}
Examples:
> bitcoin-cli getrawaddrman
> curl --user myusername --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getrawaddrman", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
```
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
reACK 352d5eb2a9
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 352d5eb2a9
stratospher:
reACK 352d5eb.
achow101:
ACK 352d5eb2a9
Tree-SHA512: cc462666b5c709617c66b0e3e9a17c4c81e9e295f91bdd9572492d1cb6466fc9b6d48ee805ebe82f9f16010798370effe5c8f4db15065b8c7c0d8637675d615e
Exposing address manager table entries in a hidden RPC allows to introspect
addrman tables in tests and during development.
As response JSON object the following FORMAT1 is choosen:
{
"table": {
"<bucket>/<position>": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
"<bucket>/<position>": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
"<bucket>/<position>": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
...
}
}
An alternative would be FORMAT2
{
"table": {
"bucket": {
"position": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
"position": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
..
},
"bucket": {
"position": { "address": "..", "port": .., ... },
..
},
}
}
FORMAT1 and FORMAT2 have different encodings for the location of the
address in the address manager. While FORMAT2 might be easier to process
for downstream tools, it also mimics internal addrman mappings, which
might change at some point. Users not interested in the address location
can ignore the location key. They don't have to adapt to a new RPC
response format, when the internal addrman layout changes. Additionally,
FORMAT1 is also slightly easier to to iterate in downstream tools. The
RPC response-building implemenation complexcity is lower with FORMAT1
as we can more easily build a "<bucket>/<position>" key than a multiple
"bucket" objects with multiple "position" objects (FORMAT2).
b3db8c9d5c rpc: bumpfee, improve doc for 'reduce_output' arg (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes #28180. Resulted from discussions with S3RK, achow101, and Murch.
The current argument name and description are dangerous as it don't
describe the case where the user selects the recipient output as the
change address. This one could end up been increased by the inputs
minus outputs remainder. Which, when `bumpfee` adds new inputs
to the transaction, leads the process to send more coins to the
recipient. Which is not what the user would expect from a
'reduce_output' param naming.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK b3db8c9d5c
achow101:
ACK b3db8c9d5c
murchandamus:
ACK b3db8c9d5c
Tree-SHA512: 91f607e2f5849041d7c099afdddae11af8bed5b1ac90c9d22921267f272e21b44e107d6968e037f05f958a61fe29e94e5fb44b224fb3606f197f83ec4ba3b1e7
The current argument name and description are dangerous as it don't
describe the case where the user selects the recipient output as the
change address. This one could end up been increased by the inputs
minus outputs remainder. Which, when bumpfee adds new inputs
to the transaction, leads the process to send more coins to the
recipient. Which is not what the user would expect from a
'reduce_output' param naming.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
a99e9e655a doc: add release note (ismaelsadeeq)
2b4edf889a test: check `descriptorprocesspsbt` return hex encoded tx (ismaelsadeeq)
c405207a18 rpc: `descriptorprocesspsbt` return hex encoded tx (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Coming from [#28414 comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28414#pullrequestreview-1618684391) Same thing also for `descriptorprocesspsbt`.
Before this PR `descriptorprocesspsbt` returns a boolean `complete` which indicates that the psbt is final, users then have to call `finalizepsbt` to get the hex encoded network transaction.
In this PR if the psbt is complete the return object also has the hex encoded network transaction ready for broadcast with `sendrawtransaction`.
This save users calling `finalizepsbt` with the descriptor, if it is already complete.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a99e9e655a
pinheadmz:
ACK a99e9e655a
ishaanam:
ACK a99e9e655a
Tree-SHA512: c3f1b1391d4df05216c463127cd593f8703840430a99febb54890bc66fadabf9d9530860605f347ec54c1694019173247a0e7a9eb879d3cbb420f9e8d9839b75
f52cb02f70 doc: make it clear that `node` in `addnode` refers to the node's address (brunoerg)
effd1efefb test: `addnode` with an invalid command should throw an error (brunoerg)
56b27b8487 rpc, refactor: clean-up `addnode` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- Adds test coverage for an invalid `command` in `addnode`.
- Rename `test_getaddednodeinfo` to `test_addnode_getaddednodeinfo` and its log since this function also tests `addnode` and it doesn't worth to split into 2 ones.
- Makes it clear in docs that `node` in `addnode` refers to the node's address. It seemed a little weird for me "The node (see getpeerinfo for nodes)", it could mean a lot of things e.g. the node id.
- Some small improv/clean-up: use `const` where possible, rename some vars, and remove the check for nullance for `command` since it's a non-optional field.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f52cb02f70
jonatack:
ACK f52cb02f70
theStack:
re-ACK f52cb02f70
Tree-SHA512: e4a69e58b784e233463945b4d55a401957f9fe4562c129f59216a44f44fb3221d3449ac578fb35e665ca654c6ade2e741b72c3df78040f7527229c77b6c5b82e
28bac81a34 test: add functional test for getaddrmaninfo (stratospher)
c8eb8dae51 rpc: Introduce getaddrmaninfo for count of addresses stored in new/tried table (stratospher)
Pull request description:
implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26907. split off from #26988 to keep RPC, CLI discussions separate.
This PR introduces a new RPC `getaddrmaninfo`which returns the count of addresses in the new/tried table of a node's addrman broken down by network type. This would be useful for users who want to see the distribution of addresses from different networks across new/tried table in the addrman.
```jsx
$ getaddrmaninfo
Result:
{ (json object) json object with network type as keys
"network" : { (json object) The network (ipv4, ipv6, onion, i2p, cjdns)
"new" : n, (numeric) number of addresses in new table
"tried" : n, (numeric) number of addresses in tried table
"total" : n (numeric) total number of addresses in both new/tried tables from a network
},
...
}
```
### additional context from [original PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988)
1. network coverage tests were skipped because there’s a small chance that addresses from different networks could hash to the same bucket and cause count of different network addresses in the tests to fail. see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988#discussion_r1137596851.
2. #26988 uses this RPC in -addrinfo CLI. Slight preference for keeping the RPC hidden since this info will mostly be useful to only super users. see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26988#discussion_r1173964808.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 28bac81a34
willcl-ark:
reACK 28bac81a34
achow101:
ACK 28bac81a34
brunoerg:
reACK 28bac81a34
theStack:
Code-review ACK 28bac81a34
Tree-SHA512: 346390167e1ebed7ca5c79328ea452633736aff8b7feefea77460e04d4489059334ae78a3f757f32f5fb7827b309d7186bebab3c3760b3dfb016d564a647371a
as it was only needed for GetServicesNames(). This potentially avoids needlessly
compiling the 500 lines of protocol.h in the 35 files other than rpc/net.cpp
that include rpc/util.h.
Drop an unneeded CPubKey forward declaration. The other IWYU suggestions would
require more extensive changes in other files.
Add 3 already-missing include headers in other translation units that are needed
to compile without protocol.h in rpc/util.h, as it includes netaddress.h, which
in turn includes util/strencodings.h.
