a9716c53f0 rpc: call IsInitialBlockDownload via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
dda0b0834f rpc: minize getTipHash() calls in gbt (Sjors Provoost)
7b4d3249ce rpc: call processNewBlock via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
9e228351e7 rpc: getTransactionsUpdated via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
64ebb0f971 Always pass options to BlockAssembler constructor (Sjors Provoost)
4bf2e361da rpc: call CreateNewBlock via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
404b01c436 rpc: getblocktemplate getTipHash() via Miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
d8a3496b5a rpc: call TestBlockValidity via miner interface (Sjors Provoost)
8ecb681678 Introduce Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Introduce a `Mining` interface for the `getblocktemplate`, `generateblock` and other mining RPCs to use now, and for Stratum v2 to use later.
Suggested here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29346#issuecomment-2108528652
The selection of methods added to the interface is mostly based on what the Template Provider in #29432 uses. It could be expanded further so that `rpc/mining.cpp` no longer needs `EnsureMemPool` and `EnsureChainman`.
This PR should be a pure refactor.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
re ACK a9716c53f0
itornaza:
Code review and std-tests ACK a9716c53f0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a9716c53f0 with one minor suggestion in case you update. Only changes since last review were other small changes to the interface.
Tree-SHA512: cf97f87d6e9ed89da3835a0730da3b24a7b14c8605ea221149103a5915e79598cf082a95f2bc88e33f1c450e3d4aad88aed1163a29195acca88bcace055af724
1245d1388b netbase: extend CreateSock() to support creating arbitrary sockets (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Allow the callers of `CreateSock()` to pass all 3 arguments to the `socket(2)` syscall. This makes it possible to create sockets of any domain/type/protocol. In addition to extending arguments, some extra safety checks were put in place.
The need for this came up during the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#discussion_r1618837102
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1245d1388b
tdb3:
re ACK 1245d1388b
theStack:
re-ACK 1245d1388b
Tree-SHA512: cc86b56121293ac98959aed0ed77812d20702ed7029b5a043586f46e74295779c5354bb0d5f9e80be6c29e535df980d34c1dbf609064fb7ea3e5ca0f0ed54d6b
6eecba475e net_processing: make MaybePunishNodeFor{Block,Tx} return void (Pieter Wuille)
ae60d485da net_processing: remove Misbehavior score and increments (Pieter Wuille)
6457c31197 net_processing: make all Misbehaving increments = 100 (Pieter Wuille)
5120ab1478 net_processing: drop 8 headers threshold for incoming BIP130 (Pieter Wuille)
944c54290d net_processing: drop Misbehavior for unconnecting headers (Pieter Wuille)
9f66ac7cf1 net_processing: do not treat non-connecting headers as response (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
So far, discouragement of peers triggers when their misbehavior score exceeds 100 points. Most types of misbehavior increment the score by 100, triggering immediate discouragement, but some types do not. This PR makes all increments equal to either 100 (meaning any misbehavior will immediately cause disconnection and discouragement) or 0 (making the behavior effectively unconditionally allowed), and then removes the logic for score accumulation.
This simplifies the code a bit, but also makes protocol expectations clearer: if a peer misbehaves, they get disconnected. There is no good reason why certain types of protocol violations should be permitted 4 times (howmuch=20) or 9 times (howmuch=10), while many others are never allowed. Furthermore, the distinction between these looks arbitrary.
The specific types of misbehavior that are changed to 100 are:
* Sending us a `block` which does not connect to our header tree (which necessarily must have been unsollicited). [used to be score 10]
* Sending us a `headers` with a non-continuous headers sequence. [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 1000 addresses in a single `addr` or `addrv2` message [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 50000 invs in a single `inv` message [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 2000 headers in a single `headers` message [used to be score 20]
The specific types of misbehavior that are changed to 0 are:
* Sending us 10 (*) separate BIP130 headers announcements that do not connect to our block tree [used to be score 20]
* Sending us more than 8 headers in a single `headers` message (which thus does not get treated as a BIP130 announcement) that does not connect to our block tree. [used to be score 10]
I believe that none of these behaviors are unavoidable, except for the one marked (*) which can in theory happen still due to interaction between BIP130 and variations in system clocks (the max 2 hour in the future rule). This one has been removed entirely. In order to remove the impact of the bug it was designed to deal with, without relying on misbehavior, a separate improvement is included that makes `getheaders`-tracking more accurate.
In another unrelated improvement, this also gets rid of the 8 header limit heuristic to determine whether an incoming non-connecting `headers` is a potential BIP130 announcement, as this rule is no longer needed to prevent spurious Misbehavior. Instead, any non-connecting `headers` is now treated as a potential announcement.
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
ACK [6eecba4](6eecba475e)
achow101:
ACK 6eecba475e
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 6eecba475e
glozow:
light code review / concept ACK 6eecba475e
Tree-SHA512: e11e8a652c4ec048d8961086110a3594feefbb821e13f45c14ef81016377be0db44b5311751ef635d6e026def1960aff33f644e78ece11cfb54f2b7daa96f946
This makes the options argument for BlockAssembler constructor mandatory,
dropping implicit use of ArgsManager. The caller i.e. the Mining
interface implementation now handles this.
In a future Stratum v2 change the Options object needs to be
mofified after arguments have been processed. Specifically
the pool communicates how many extra bytes it needs for
its own outputs (payouts, extra commitments, etc). This will need
to be substracted from what the user set as -blockmaxweight.
Such a change can be implemented in createNewBlock, after
ApplyArgsManOptions.
The fuzz target is generating a large amount of
transactions, but the core of the logic is
ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry making the mempool
entries for adding to the mempool. Since
ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry generates its own transaction
"vsize", we can improve efficiency of the target
by explicitly creating very small transactions,
reducing the hashing and memory burden.
94ed4fbf8e Add release note for size 2 package rbf (Greg Sanders)
afd52d8e63 doc: update package RBF comment (Greg Sanders)
6e3c4394cf mempool: Improve logging of replaced transactions (Greg Sanders)
d3466e4cc5 CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult: Check package rbf invariants (Greg Sanders)
316d7b63c9 Fuzz: pass mempool to CheckPackageMempoolAcceptResult (Greg Sanders)
4d15bcf448 [test] package rbf (glozow)
dc21f61c72 [policy] package rbf (Suhas Daftuar)
5da3967815 PackageV3Checks: Relax assumptions (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Allows any 2 transaction package with no in-mempool ancestors to do package RBF when directly conflicting with other mempool clusters of size two or less.
Proposed validation steps:
1) If the transaction package is of size 1, legacy rbf rules apply.
2) Otherwise the transaction package consists of a (parent, child) pair with no other in-mempool ancestors (or descendants, obviously), so it is also going to create a cluster of size 2. If larger, fail.
3) The package rbf may not evict more than 100 transactions from the mempool(bip125 rule 5)
4) The package is a single chunk
5) Every directly conflicted mempool transaction is connected to at most 1 other in-mempool transaction (ie the cluster size of the conflict is at most 2).
6) Diagram check: We ensure that the replacement is strictly superior, improving the mempool
7) The total fee of the package, minus the total fee of what is being evicted, is at least the minrelayfee * size of the package (equivalent to bip125 rule 3 and 4)
Post-cluster mempool this will likely be expanded to general package rbf, but this is what we can safely support today.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 94ed4fbf8e
glozow:
reACK 94ed4fbf8e via range-diff
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 94ed4fbf8e
theStack:
Code-review ACK 94ed4fbf8e
murchandamus:
utACK 94ed4fbf8e
Tree-SHA512: 9bd383e695964f362f147482bbf73b1e77c4d792bda2e91d7f30d74b3540a09146a5528baf86854a113005581e8c75f04737302517b7d5124296bd7a151e3992
Allow the callers of `CreateSock()` to pass all 3 arguments to the
`socket(2)` syscall. This makes it possible to create sockets of
any domain/type/protocol.
Instead of having separate warning functions (and globals) for each
different warning that can be raised, encapsulate this logic into
a single class and allow to (un)set any number of warnings.
Introduces behaviour change:
- the `-alertnotify` command is executed for all
`KernelNotifications::warningSet` calls, which now also covers the
`LARGE_WORK_INVALID_CHAIN` warning.
- previously, warnings were returned based on a predetermined order,
e.g. with the "pre-release test build" warning always first. This
is no longer the case, and Warnings::GetMessages() will return
messages sorted by the id of the warning.
Removes warnings.cpp from kernel.
c7376babd1 doc: Clarify distinction between util and common libraries in libraries.md (Ryan Ofsky)
4f74c59334 util: Move util/string.h functions to util namespace (Ryan Ofsky)
4d05d3f3b4 util: add TransactionError includes and namespace declarations (Ryan Ofsky)
680eafdc74 util: move fees.h and error.h to common/messages.h (Ryan Ofsky)
02e62c6c9a common: Add PSBTError enum (Ryan Ofsky)
0d44c44ae3 util: move error.h TransactionError enum to node/types.h (Ryan Ofsky)
9bcce2608d util: move spanparsing.h to script/parsing.h (Ryan Ofsky)
6dd2ad4792 util: move spanparsing.h Split functions to string.h (Ryan Ofsky)
23cc8ddff4 util: move HexStr and HexDigit from util to crypto (TheCharlatan)
6861f954f8 util: move util/message to common/signmessage (Ryan Ofsky)
cc5f29fbea build: move memory_cleanse from util to crypto (Ryan Ofsky)
5b9309420c build: move chainparamsbase from util to common (Ryan Ofsky)
ffa27af24d test: Add check-deps.sh script to check for unexpected library dependencies (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Remove `fees.h`, `errors.h`, and `spanparsing.h` from the util library. Specifically:
- Move `Split` functions from `util/spanparsing.h` to `util/string.h`, using `util` namespace for clarity.
- Move remaining spanparsing functions to `script/parsing.h` since they are used for descriptor and miniscript parsing.
- Combine `util/fees.h` and `util/errors.h` into `common/messages.h` so there is a place for simple functions that generate user messages to live, and these functions are not part of the util library.
Motivation for this change is that the util library is a dependency of the kernel, and we should remove functionality from util that shouldn't be called by kernel code or kernel applications. These changes should also improve code organization and make functions easier to discover. Some of these same moves are (or were) part of #28690, but did not help with code organization, or made it worse, so it is better to move them and clean them up in the same PR so code only has to change one time.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c7376babd1
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK c7376babd1
hebasto:
re-ACK c7376babd1.
Tree-SHA512: 5bcef16c1255463b1b69270548711e7ff78ca0dd34e300b95e3ca1ce52ceb34f83d9ddb2839e83800ba36b200de30396e504bbb04fa02c6d0c24a16d06ae523d
faa41e29d5 fuzz: Use std::span in FuzzBufferType (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The use of `Span` is problematic, because it lacks methods such as `rbegin`, leading to compile failures when used:
```
error: no member named 'rbegin' in 'Span<const unsigned char>'
```
One could fix `Span`, but it seems better to use `std::span`, given that `Span` will be removed anyway in the long term.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
utACK faa41e29d5
Tree-SHA512: 54bcaf51c83a1b48739cd7f1e8445c6eba0eb04231bce5c35591a47dddb3890ffcaf562cf932930443c80ab0e66950c4619560e6692240de0c52aeef3214facd
193c748e44 fuzz: add I2P harness (marcofleon)
Pull request description:
Addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28803. This updated harness sets mock time at the beginning of each iteration and deletes the private key file at the end of each iteration. Mock time is used to make the fuzz test more stable, as `GetTime` is called at points in `i2p`. Deleting the private key file ensures that each iteration is independent from the last. Now, a new key is generated in `i2p` every time, so the fuzzer can eventually make progress through the target code.
Re-working this harness also led me and dergoegge to resolve a couple of issues in `FuzzedSock`, which allows for full coverage of the `i2p` code. Those changes can be seen in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30211.
The SAM protocol for interacting with I2P requires some specifc inputs so it's best to use a dictionary when running this harness.
<details>
<summary>I2P dict</summary>
```
"HELLO VERSION"
"HELLO REPLY RESULT=OK VERSION="
"HELLO REPLY RESULT=NOVERSION"
"HELLO REPLY RESULT=I2P_ERROR"
"SESSION CREATE"
"SESSION STATUS RESULT=OK DESTINATION="
"SESSION STATUS RESULT=DUPLICATED_ID"
"SESSION STATUS RESULT=DUPLICATED_DEST"
"SESSION STATUS RESULT=INVALID_ID"
"SESSION STATUS RESULT=INVALID_KEY"
"SESSION STATUS RESULT=I2P_ERROR MESSAGE="
"SESSION ADD"
"SESSION REMOVE"
"STREAM CONNECT"
"STREAM STATUS RESULT=OK"
"STREAM STATUS RESULT=INVALID_ID"
"STREAM STATUS RESULT=INVALID_KEY"
"STREAM STATUS RESULT=CANT_REACH_PEER"
"STREAM STATUS RESULT=I2P_ERROR MESSAGE="
"STREAM ACCEPT"
"STREAM FORWARD"
"DATAGRAM SEND"
"RAW SEND"
"DEST GENERATE"
"DEST REPLY PUB= PRIV="
"DEST REPLY RESULT=I2P_ERROR"
"NAMING LOOKUP"
"NAMING REPLY RESULT=OK NAME= VALUE="
"DATAGRAM RECEIVED DESTINATION= SIZE="
"RAW RECEIVED SIZE="
"NAMING REPLY RESULT=INVALID_KEY NAME="
"NAMING REPLY RESULT=KEY_NOT_FOUND NAME="
"MIN"
"MAX"
"STYLE"
"ID"
"SILENT"
"DESTINATION"
"NAME"
"SIGNATURE_TYPE"
"CRYPTO_TYPE"
"SIZE"
"HOST"
"PORT"
"FROM_PORT"
"TRANSIENT"
"STREAM"
"DATAGRAM"
"RAW"
"MASTER"
"true"
"false"
```
</details>
I'll add this dict to qa-assets later on.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
tACK 193c748e44
brunoerg:
ACK 193c748e44
vasild:
ACK 193c748e44
Tree-SHA512: 09ae4b3fa0738aa6f159f4d920493bdbce786b489bc8148e7a135a881e9dba93d727b40f5400c9510e218dd2cfdccc7ce2d3ac9450654fb29c78aac59af92ec3
429ec1aaaa refactor: Rename CTransaction::nVersion to version (Ava Chow)
27e70f1f5b consensus: Store transaction nVersion as uint32_t (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Given that the use of a transaction's nVersion is always as an unsigned int, it doesn't make sense to store it as signed and then cast it to unsigned everywhere it is used and displayed.
Since a few alternative implementations have recently been revealed to have made an error with this signedness that would have resulted in consensus failure, I think it makes sense for us to just make this always unsigned to make it clear that the version is treated as unsigned. This would also help us avoid future potential issues with signedness of this value.
I believe that this is safe and does not actually change what transactions would or would not be considered both standard and consensus valid. Within consensus, the only use of the version in consensus is in BIP68 validation which was already casting it to uint32_t. Within policy, although it is used as a signed int for the transaction version number check, I do not think that this change would change standardness. Standard transactions are limited to the range [1, 2]. Negative numbers would have fallen under the < 1 condition, but by making it unsigned, they are still non-standard under the > 2 condition.
Unsigned and signed ints are serialized and unserialized the same way so there is no change in serialization.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 429ec1aaaa 🐿
glozow:
ACK 429ec1aaaa
shaavan:
ACK 429ec1aaaa💯
Tree-SHA512: 0bcd92a245d7d16c3665d2d4e815a4ef28207ad4a1fb46c6f0203cdafeab1b82c4e95e4bdce7805d80a4f4a46074f6542abad708e970550d38a00d759e3dcef1
47f705b33f tests: add fuzz tests for BitSet (Pieter Wuille)
59a6df6bd5 util: add BitSet (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #30126.
This introduces the `BitSet` data structure, inspired by `std::bitset`, but with a few features that cannot be implemented on top without efficiency loss:
* Finding the first set bit (`First`)
* Finding the last set bit (`Last`)
* Iterating over all set bits (`begin` and `end`).
And a few other operators/member functions that help readability for #30126:
* `operator-` for set subtraction
* `Overlaps()` for testing whether intersection is non-empty
* `IsSupersetOf()` for testing (non-strict) supersetness
* `IsSubsetOf()` for testing (non-strict) subsetness
* `Fill()` to construct a set with all numbers from 0 to n-1, inclusive
* `Singleton()` to construct a set with one specific element.
Everything is tested through a simulation-based fuzz test that compares the behavior with normal `std::bitset` equivalent operations.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 47f705b33f
achow101:
ACK 47f705b33f
cbergqvist:
re-ACK 47f705b33f
theStack:
Code-review ACK 47f705b33f
Tree-SHA512: e451bf4b801f193239ee434b6b614f5a2ac7bb49c70af5aba24c2ac0c54acbef4672556800e4ac799ae835632bdba716209c5ca8c37433a6883dab4eb7cd67c1
5bc2077e8f validation: allow to specify frequency for -checkblockindex (Martin Zumsande)
d5a631b959 validation: improve performance of CheckBlockIndex (Martin Zumsande)
32c80413fd bench: add benchmark for checkblockindex (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
`CheckBlockIndex() ` are consistency checks that are currently enabled by default on regtest.
The function is rather slow, which is annoying if you
* attempt to run it on other networks, especially if not fully synced
* want to generate a long chain on regtest and see block generation slow down because you forgot to disable `-checkblockindex` or don't know it existed.
One reason why it's slow is that in order to be able to traverse the block tree depth-first from genesis, it inserts pointers to all block indices into a `std::multimap` - for which inserts and lookups become slow once there are hundred thousands of entries.
However, typically the block index is mostly chain-like with just a few forks so a multimap isn't really needed for the most part. This PR suggests to store the block indices of the chain ending in the best header in a vector instead, and store only the rest of the indices in a multimap. This does not change the actual consistency checks that are being performed for each index, just the way the block index tree is stored and traversed.
This adds a bit of complication to make sure each block is visited (note that there are asserts that check it), making sure that the two containers are traversed correctly, but it speeds up the function considerably:
On master, a single invocation of `CheckBlockIndex` takes ~1.4s on mainnet for me (4.9s on testnet which has >2.4 million blocks).
With this branch, the runtime goes down to ~0.27s (0.85s on testnet).This is a speedup by a factor ~5.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5bc2077e8f
furszy:
ACK 5bc2077e8f
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 5bc2077e8f. Just added suggested assert and simplification since last review
Tree-SHA512: 6b9c3e3e5069d6152b45a09040f962380d114851ff0f9ff1771cf8cad7bb4fa0ba25cd787ceaa3dfa5241fb249748e2ee6987af0ccb24b786a5301b2836f8487
09ef322acc [[refactor]] Check CTxMemPool options in constructor (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
The tests should run the same checks on the mempool options that the init code also applies. The downside to this patch is that the log line may now be printed more than once in the for loop.
This was originally noticed here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25290#discussion_r900272797.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 09ef322acc . Fixed unreachable assert and updated docstring, and also added an exception for "-maxmempool must be at least " in the `tx_pool` fuzz test, which makes sense when looking at how the mempool options are constructed in `SetMempoolConstraints`.
achow101:
ACK 09ef322acc
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 09ef322acc. Just fuzz test error checking fix and updated comment since last review
Tree-SHA512: eb3361411c2db70be17f912e3b14d9cb9c60fb0697a1eded952c3b7e8675b7d783780d45c52e091931d1d80fe0f0280cee98dd57a3100def13af20259d9d1b9e
d1581c6048 test: doc: fix units in tx size standardness test (s/vbytes/weight units) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small fixup PR is a late follow-up for #17947 (commit 4537ba5f21), where the wrong units has been used in the comments for the large tx composition.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK d1581c6048
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK d1581c6048
glozow:
ACK d1581c6048
Tree-SHA512: ea2de42174f9dca0608275ea377c852ebddc5a04a2b32248ce808aea33d7e00cdee3a225b24c0cf426c69646cccbbc31273c62f7bc1647bb3443a61de3b15670
f68cba29b3 blockman: Replace m_reindexing with m_blockfiles_indexed (Ryan Ofsky)
1b1c6dcca0 test: Add functional test for continuing a reindex (TheCharlatan)
201c1a9282 indexes: Don't wipe indexes again when already reindexing (TheCharlatan)
804f09dfa1 kernel: Add less confusing reindex options (Ryan Ofsky)
e172553223 validation: Remove needs_init from LoadBlockIndex (TheCharlatan)
533eab7d67 bugfix: Streamline setting reindex option (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
When restarting `bitcoind` during an ongoing reindex without setting the `-reindex` flag again, the block and coins db is left intact, but any data from the optional indexes is discarded. While not a bug per se, wiping the data again is
wasteful, both in terms of having to write it again, as well as potentially leading to longer startup times. So keep the index data instead when continuing a prior reindex.
Also includes a bugfix and smaller code cleanups around the reindexing code. The bug was introduced in b47bd95920: "kernel: De-globalize fReindex".
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK f68cba29b3
fjahr:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3
furszy:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f68cba29b3. Only changes since last review were cherry-picking suggested commits that rename variables, improving comments, and making some tweaks to test code.
Tree-SHA512: b252228cc76e9f1eaac56d5bd9e4eac23408e0fc04aeffd97a85417f046229364673ee1ca7410b9b6e7b692b03f13ece17c42a10176da0d7e975a8915deb98ca
15796d4b61 build: warn on self-assignment (Cory Fields)
53372f2176 refactor: disable self-assign warning for tests (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Belt-and suspenders after #30234. Self-assignment should be safe _and_ discouraged.
We used to opt out of this warning because something deep in our serialization/byteswapping code could self-assign, but that doesn't appear to be the case anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 15796d4b61
fanquake:
ACK 15796d4b61 - not a huge fan of inline pragma usage, but this seems fine, given it's to work around an already-fixed compiler bug, and we'll only be carrying it for a shortish time in any case.
Tree-SHA512: 1f95f7c730b974ad1da55ebd381040bac312f2f380fff9d569ebab91d7c1963592a84d1613d81d96238c6f5a66aa40deebba68a76f6b24b02150d0a77c769654
1f6ab1215b minor: remove unnecessary semicolons from RPC content type examples (Matthew Zipkin)
b225295298 test: use json-rpc 2.0 in all functional tests by default (Matthew Zipkin)
391843b029 bitcoin-cli: use json-rpc 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
d39bdf3397 test: remove unused variable in interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
0ead71df8c doc: update and link for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to #27101.
- Addresses [post-merge comments ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27101#discussion_r1606723428)
- bitcoin-cli uses JSON-RPC 2.0
- functional tests use JSON-RPC 2.0 by default (exceptions are in the regression tests added by #27101)
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
cbergqvist:
ACK 1f6ab1215b
Tree-SHA512: 49bf14c70464081280216ece538a2f5ec810bac80a86a83ad3284f0f1b017edf755a1a74a45be279effe00218170cafde7c2de58aed07097a95c2c6b837a6b6c
In order to ensure that the change of nVersion to a uint32_t in the
previous commit has no effect, rename nVersion to version in this commit
so that reviewers can easily spot if a spot was missed or if there is a
check somewhere whose semantics have changed.
Drop confusing kernel options:
BlockManagerOpts::reindex
ChainstateLoadOptions::reindex
ChainstateLoadOptions::reindex_chainstate
Replacing them with more straightforward options:
ChainstateLoadOptions::wipe_block_tree_db
ChainstateLoadOptions::wipe_chainstate_db
Having two options called "reindex" which did slightly different things
was needlessly confusing (one option wiped the block tree database, and
the other caused block files to be rescanned). Also the previous set of
options did not allow rebuilding the block database without also
rebuilding the chainstate database, when it should be possible to do
those independently.
30a01134cd [doc] update bips.md for 431 (glozow)
9dbe6a03f0 [test] wallet uses CURRENT_VERSION which is 2 (glozow)
539404fe0f [policy] make v3 transactions standard (glozow)
052ede75af [refactor] use TRUC_VERSION in place of 3 (glozow)
Pull request description:
Make `nVersion=3` (which is currently nonstandard on mainnet) standard.
Note that we will treat these transactions as Topologically Restricted Until Confirmation (TRUC). Spec is in BIP 431 and implementation is in #28948, #29306, and #29873
See #27463 for overall project tracking, and #29319 for information about relevance to cluster mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK 30a01134c
achow101:
ACK 30a01134cd
instagibbs:
utACK 30a01134cd
murchandamus:
ACK 30a01134cd
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 30a01134cd🛰️
Tree-SHA512: 2a4aec0442c860e792a061d83e36483c1f1b426f946efbdf664c8db97a596e498b535707e1d3a900218429486ea69fd4552e3d476526a6883cbd5556c6534b48
8801e319d5 refactor: remove unused `CKey::Negate` method (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and it's also unlikely that for any other proposal we'd ever need to negate private keys at this abstraction level. I'd argue that this operation is usually something that should happen within a secp256k1 module (like e.g. done in MuSig2, Silent Payments...).
(If there is really demand in the future, it's also trivial to reintroduce the method.)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 8801e319d5
sipa:
ACK 8801e319d5
achow101:
ACK 8801e319d5
Tree-SHA512: 7bc1566399635c5c6e4940a2724c865d5443eb190024379099330c023c516f1e4f423ed9e8c42bc93413b723a5464ec79d3f879f58c0e598fe24f495238df4ec
fa3169b073 rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The index-based Arg accessor is redundant with the name-based one. It does not provide any benefit to the code reader, or otherwise, so remove it.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa3169b073, addressed doc nits
achow101:
ACK fa3169b073
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3169b073. One changes since last review are some documentation improvements
Tree-SHA512: f9da1c049dbf38c3b47a8caf8d24d195c2d4b88c7ec45a9ccfb78f1e39f29cb86869f84b308f6e49856b074c06604ab634c90eb89c9c93d2a8169e070aa1bd40
22d0f1a27e [fuzz] Avoid endless waiting in FuzzedSock::{Wait,WaitMany} (marcofleon)
a7fceda68b [fuzz] Make peeking through FuzzedSock::Recv fuzzer friendly (dergoegge)
865cdf3692 [fuzz] Use fuzzer friendly ConsumeRandomLengthByteVector in FuzzedSock::Recv (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
`FuzzedSock` has a few issues that block a fuzzer from making progress. See commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
Tested ACK 22d0f1a27e
brunoerg:
utACK 22d0f1a27e
Tree-SHA512: 2d66fc94ba58b6652ae234bd1dcd33b7d685b5054fe83e0cd624b053dd51519c23148f43a865ab8c8bc5fc2dc25e701952831b99159687474978a90348faa4c5
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport
protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still
BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and
it's also unlikely that any other proposal would need to negate private
keys at this abstraction level.
(If there is really demand, it's trivial to reintroduce the method.)
3c08e11c3e doc: JSON-RPC request Content-Type is application/json (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Specify json content type in RPC examples.
Picks up #29946. Which needed rebasing and the commit message fixing,
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3c08e11c3e
tdb3:
ACK for 3c08e11c3e
Tree-SHA512: 770bbbc0fb324cb63628980b13583cabf02e75079851850170587fb6eca41a70b01dcedaf1926bb6488eb9816a3cc6616fe8cee8c4b7e09aa39b7df5834ca0ec
Currently, when the FuzzedDataProvider of a FuzzedSock runs out of data,
FuzzedSock::Wait and WaitMany will simulate endless waiting as the
requested events are never simulated as occured.
Fix this by simulating event occurence when ConsumeBool() returns false
(e.g. when the data provider runs out).
Co-authored-by: dergoegge <n.goeggi@gmail.com>
FuzzedSock only supports peeking at one byte at a time, which is not
fuzzer friendly when trying to receive long data.
Fix this by supporting peek data of arbitrary length instead of only one
byte.
