Also signal m_tip_block_cv when StopRPC is called, for
consistency with g_best_block_cv. This is handled in
StopRPC instead of OnRPCStopped() because the latter
is deleted in a later commit.
Co-authored-by: TheCharlatan <seb.kung@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
6a1aa510e3 rpc: check block index before reading block / undo data (Martin Zumsande)
6cbf2e5f81 rpc: Improve gettxoutproof error when only header is available. (Martin Zumsande)
69fc867ea1 test: add coverage to getblock and getblockstats (Martin Zumsande)
5290cbd585 rpc: Improve getblock / getblockstats error when only header is available. (Martin Zumsande)
e5b537bbdf rest: improve error when only header of a block is available. (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes #20978
If a block was pruned, `getblock` already returns a specific error: "Block not available (pruned data)".
But if we haven't received the full block yet (e.g. in a race with block downloading after a new block was received headers-first, or during IBD) we just return an unspecific "Block not found on disk" error and log
`ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk: OpenBlockFile failed for FlatFilePos(nFile=-1, nPos=0) `
which suggest something went wrong even though this is a completely normal and expected situation.
This PR improves the error message and stops calling `ReadRawBlockFromDisk()`, when we already know from the header that the block is not available on disk.
Similarly, it prevents all other rpcs from calling blockstorage read functions unless we expect the data to be there, so that `LogError()` will only be thrown when there is an actual file system problem.
I'm not completely sure if the cause is important enough to change the wording of the rpc error, that some scripts may rely on.
If reviewers prefer it, an alternative solution would be to keep returning the current "Block not found on disk" error, but return it immediately instead of calling `ReadRawBlockFromDisk`, which would at least prevent the log error and also be an improvement in my opinion.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 6a1aa510e3
achow101:
ACK 6a1aa510e3
andrewtoth:
re-ACK 6a1aa510e3
Tree-SHA512: 491aef880e8298a05841c4bf8eb913ef84820d1ad5415fd17d9b441bff181959ebfdd432b5eb8347dc9c568433f9a2384ca9d84cd72c79d8a58323ca117538fe
This avoids low-level log errors that are supposed to only occur when
there is an actual problem with the block on disk missing unexpectedly,
but not in the case where the block and/or undo data are expected not to be there.
It changes behavior such that in the first case (block index indicates
data is available but retrieving it fails) an error is thrown.
It also adjusts a functional tests that tried to simulate not
having undo data (but having block data) by deleting the undo file.
This situation should occur reality because block and undo data are pruned together.
Instead, test this situation with a block that hasn't been connected.
This improves the error message of the getblock and getblockstats rpc and prevents calls to
ReadRawBlockFromDisk(), which are unnecessary if we know
from the header nStatus field that the block is not available.
An external program that uses the Mining interface may need quick access to some information in the block template, while it can wait a bit longer for the full raw transaction data.
This would be the case for a Stratum v2 Template Provider which needs to send a NewTemplate message (which doesn't include transactions) as quickly as possible.
992f83bb6f test: add coverage for assumeUTXO honest peers disconnection (furszy)
6d5812e5c8 assumeUTXO: fix peers disconnection during sync (furszy)
Pull request description:
Because AssumeUTXO nodes prioritize tip synchronization, they relay their local
address through the network before completing the background chain sync.
This, combined with the advertising of full-node service (`NODE_NETWORK`), can
result in an honest peer in IBD connecting to the AssumeUTXO node (while syncing)
and requesting an historical block the node does not have. This behavior leads to
an abrupt disconnection due to perceived unresponsiveness from the AssumeUTXO
node.
This lack of response occurs because nodes ignore `getdata` requests when they do
not have the block data available (further discussion can be found in #30385).
Fix this by refraining from signaling full-node service support while the
background chain is being synced. During this period, the node will only
signal `NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED` support. Then, full-node (`NODE_NETWORK`)
support will be re-enabled once the background chain sync is completed.
Thanks mzumsande for a post-#30385 convo too.
Testing notes:
Just cherry-pick the second commit (bb08c22) on master.
It will fail there, due to the IBD node requesting historical blocks to the snapshot
node - which is bad because the snapshot node will ignore the requests and
stall + disconnect after some time.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 992f83bb6f
naumenkogs:
ACK 992f83bb6f
mzumsande:
ACK 992f83bb6f
Tree-SHA512: fef525d1cf3200c2dd89a346be9c82d77f2e28ddaaea1f490a435e180d1a47a371cadea508349777d740ab56e94be536ad8f7d61cc81f6550c58b609b3779ed3
Because AssumeUTXO nodes prioritize tip synchronization, they relay their local
address through the network before completing the background chain sync.
This, combined with the advertising of full-node service (NODE_NETWORK), can
result in an honest peer in IBD connecting to the AssumeUTXO node (while syncing)
and requesting an historical block the node does not have. This behavior leads to
an abrupt disconnection due to perceived unresponsiveness (lack of response)
from the AssumeUTXO node.
This lack of response occurs because nodes ignore getdata requests when they do
not have the block data available (further discussion can be found in PR 30385).
Fix this by refraining from signaling full-node service support while the
background chain is being synced. During this period, the node will only
signal 'NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED' support. Then, full-node ('NODE_NETWORK')
support will be re-enabled once the background chain sync is completed.
43cd83b0c7 test: move uint256_tests/operator_with_self to arith_uint256_tests (stickies-v)
c6c994cb2b test: remove test-only uint160S (stickies-v)
62cc4656e2 test: remove test-only uint256S (stickies-v)
adc00ad728 test: remove test-only arith_uint256S (stickies-v)
f51b237723 refactor: rpc: use uint256::FromHex for ParseHashV (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
_Continuation of #30569._
Since fad2991ba0, `uint256S()` has been [deprecated](fad2991ba0 (diff-800776e2dda39116e889839f69409571a5d397de048a141da7e4003bc099e3e2R138)) because it is less robust than the `base_blob::FromHex()` introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30482. Specifically, it tries to recover from length-mismatches, recover from untrimmed whitespace, 0x-prefix and garbage at the end, instead of simply requiring exactly 64 hex-only characters. (see also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30532)
This PR removes `uint256S()` (and `uint160S()`) completely, with no non-test behaviour change.
Specifically, the main changes in this PR are:
- the (minimal) last non-test usage of `uint256S()` in `ParseHashV()` is removed without behaviour change, which can partially be verified by cherry-picking and/or modifying [this test commit](1f2b0fa86d)).
- the test usage of `uint{160,256}S()` is removed, largely replacing it with `uint{160,256}::FromHex()` where applicable, potentially modifying the test by removing non-hex characters or dropping the test entirely if removing non-hex characters makes it redundant
- the now unused `uint{160,256}S()` functions are removed completely.
- unit test coverage on converting `uint256` <-> `arith_uint256` through `UintToArith256()` and `ArithToUint256()` is beefed up, and `arith_uint256` tests are moved to `arith_uint256_tests.cpp`, removing the `uint256_tests.cpp` dependency on `uint256h`, mirroring how the code is structured.
_Note: `uint256::FromUserHex()` exists to more leniently construct uint256 from user input, allowing "0x" prefixes and too-short-input, as safer alternative to `uint256S()` where necessary._
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
reACK 43cd83b0c7
hodlinator:
re-ACK 43cd83b0c7
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 43cd83b0c7. Only code change is a small refactoring which looks good. The rest of the PR is all test changes, which I only lightly reviewed, but seem to be positive and do what's described
Tree-SHA512: 48147a4c6af671597df0f72c1b477ae4631cd2cae4645ec54d0e327611ff302c9899e344518c81242cdde82930f6ad23a3a7e6e0b80671816e9f457b9de90a5c
a3108a7c56 rpc: Manage dumptxoutset rollback with RAII class (Fabian Jahr)
c5eaae3b89 doc: Add -rpcclienttimeout=0 to loadtxoutset examples (Fabian Jahr)
598b9bba5a rpc: Don't re-enable previously disabled network after dumptxoutset (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
First, this addresses two left-over comments in #29553:
- When running `dumptxoutset` the network gets disabled in the beginning and then re-enabled at the end. The network would be re-enabled even if the user had already disabled the network themself before running `dumptxoutset`. The network is now not re-enabled anymore since that might not be what the user wants.
- The `-rpcclienttimeout=0` option is added to `loadtxoutset` examples in documentation
Additionally, pablomartin4btc notified me that he found his node stuck at the invalidated height after some late testing after #29553 was merged. We could not find the actual source of the issue since his logs got lost. However, it seems likely that some kind of disruption stopped the process before the node could roll forward again. We fixed this issue for network disablement with a RAII class previously and it seems logical that this can happen the same way for the rollback part so I suggest to also fix it the same way.
An example to reproduce the issue described above as I think it happened: Remove the `!` in the following line in `PrepareUTXOSnapshot()` to simulate an issue occurring during `GetUTXOStats()`.
```
if (!maybe_stats) {
```
This leaves the node in the following state on master:
```
$ build/src/bitcoin-cli -rpcclienttimeout=0 -named dumptxoutset utxo-859750.dat rollback=859750
error code: -32603
error message:
Unable to read UTXO set
$ build/src/bitcoin-cli getchaintips
[
{
"height": 859762,
"hash": "00000000000000000002ec7a0fcca3aeca5b35545b52eb925766670aacc704ad",
"branchlen": 12,
"status": "headers-only"
},
{
"height": 859750,
"hash": "0000000000000000000010897b6b88a18f9478050200d8d048013c58bfd6229e",
"branchlen": 0,
"status": "active"
},
```
(Note that the first tip is `headers-only` and not `invalid` only because I started `dumptxoutset` before my node had fully synced to the tip. pablomartin4btc saw it as `invalid`.)
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK a3108a7c56🐸
achow101:
ACK a3108a7c56
pablomartin4btc:
cr ACK a3108a7c56
Tree-SHA512: d2ab32f62de2253312e27d7d753ec0995da3fe7a22ffc3d6c7cfa3b68a4a144c59210aa82b7a704c2a29c3b2aad6ea74972e3e8bb979ee4b7082a20f4bfddc9c
b31a0cd037 log: expand BCLog::LogFlags (categories) to 64 bits (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
Increase the maximum number of logging categories from 32 to 64.
We're currently using 29 of the 32 available logging categories (there are only 3 remaining). It would be good to increase the limit soon; the fourth PR to be merged that adds a new logging category will be blocked until something like this is done.
This PR also adds a `TEST` category that uses the new range (`1ULL << 63`) in case there's a hidden assumption somewhere that the `BCLog::LogFlags` type is 32 bits. (Also added a test for this test category.) It also provides an example showing that the expression must be `1ULL << <shift>` for shift value 31 and beyond.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b31a0cd037
vasild:
ACK b31a0cd037
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b31a0cd037, just dropping mask_bit constant since last review. I still think
theStack:
Code-review ACK b31a0cd037
Tree-SHA512: de422dbeb479848d370aed42d415f42461457ab0eda62b245dc7ff9f0e111626e7d4c0d62ff13082ec664d05fbb0db04c71eb4b6f22eb8f19198826a67c4035e
a2955f0979 validation: Use span for ImportBlocks paths (TheCharlatan)
20515ea3f5 validation: Use span for CalculateClaimedHeadersWork (TheCharlatan)
52575e96e7 validation: Use span for ProcessNewBlockHeaders (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee contiguous memory.
Take this opportunity to also change the argument of ImportBlocks previously taking a `std::vector` to a `std::span`.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK a2955f0979 - no changes except further walking the ~file~ path of modernizing variable names.
maflcko:
ACK a2955f0979🕑
achow101:
ACK a2955f0979
danielabrozzoni:
ACK a2955f0979
Tree-SHA512: 8b07f4ad26e270b65600d1968cd78847b85caca5bfbb83fd9860389f26656b1d9a40b85e0990339f50403d18cedcd2456990054f3b8b0bedce943e50222d2709
94b0adcc37 rpc, refactor: Prevent potential race conditions in dumptxoutset (Fabian Jahr)
e868a6e070 doc: Improve assumeutxo guide and add more docs/comments (Fabian Jahr)
b29c21fc92 assumeutxo: Remove devtools/utxo_snapshot.sh (Fabian Jahr)
20a1c77aa7 contrib: Remove test_utxo_snapshots.sh (Fabian Jahr)
8426850352 test: Test for dumptxoutset at specific height (Fabian Jahr)
993cafe7e4 RPC: Add type parameter to dumptxoutset (Fabian Jahr)
fccf4f91d2 RPC: Extract ReconsiderBlock helper (Fabian Jahr)
446ce51c21 RPC: Extract InvalidateBlock helper (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This adds a height parameter to the `dumptxoutset` RPC. This internalizes the workflow that was previously done by scripts: roll back the chain to the height we actually want the snapshot from, create the snapshot, roll forward to the real tip again.
The nice thing about internalizing this functionality is that we can write tests for the code and it gives us more options to make the functionality robust. The shell scripts we have so far will be more cumbersome to maintain in the long run, especially since we will only notice later when we have broken them. I think it's safe to remove these `test_utxo_snapshots.sh` as well when we have this option in `dumptxoutset` because we have also added some good additional functional test coverage for this functionality.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 94b0adcc37
achow101:
ACK 94b0adcc37
mzumsande:
ACK 94b0adcc37
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK 94b0adcc37
Tree-SHA512: a4c9af5f687d1ca7bfb579a36f363882823386b5fa80c05de531b05a2782b5da6ff5baf3ada4bca8f32f63975d86f1948175abed9affe51fc958472b5f838dab
Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if
they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee
contiguous memory.
a0abcbd382 doc: Mention multipath specifier (Ava Chow)
0019f61fc5 tests: Test importing of multipath descriptors (Ava Chow)
f97d5c137d wallet, rpc: Allow importdescriptors to import multipath descriptors (Ava Chow)
32dcbca3fb rpc: Allow importmulti to import multipath descriptors correctly (Ava Chow)
64dfe3ce4b wallet: Move internal to be per key when importing (Ava Chow)
1692245525 tests: Multipath descriptors for scantxoutset and deriveaddresses (Ava Chow)
cddc0ba9a9 rpc: Have deriveaddresses derive receiving and change (Ava Chow)
360456cd22 tests: Multipath descriptors for getdescriptorinfo (Ava Chow)
a90eee444c tests: Add unit tests for multipath descriptors (Ava Chow)
1bbf46e2da descriptors: Change Parse to return vector of descriptors (Ava Chow)
0d640c6f02 descriptors: Have ParseKeypath handle multipath specifiers (Ava Chow)
a5f39b1034 descriptors: Change ParseScript to return vector of descriptors (Ava Chow)
0d55deae15 descriptors: Add DescriptorImpl::Clone (Ava Chow)
7e86541f72 descriptors: Add PubkeyProvider::Clone (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
It is convenient to have a descriptor which specifies both receiving and change addresses in a single string. However, as discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17190#issuecomment-895515768, it is not feasible to use a generic multipath specification like BIP 88 due to combinatorial blow up and that it would result in unexpected descriptors.
To resolve that problem, this PR proposes a targeted solution which allows only a single pair of 2 derivation indexes to be inserted in the place of a single derivation index. So instead of two descriptor `wpkh(xpub.../0/0/*)` and `wpkh(xpub.../0/1/*)` to represent receive and change addresses, this could be written as `wpkh(xpub.../0/<0;1>/*)`. The multipath specifier is of the form `<NUM;NUM>`. Each `NUM` can have its own hardened specifier, e.g. `<0;1h>` is valid. The multipath specifier can also only appear in one path index in the derivation path.
This results in the parser returning two descriptors. The first descriptor uses the first `NUM` in all pairs present, and the second uses the second `NUM`. In our implementation, if a multipath descriptor is not provided, a pair is still returned, but the second element is just `nullptr`.
The wallet will not output the multipath descriptors (yet). Furthermore, when a multipath descriptor is imported, it is expanded to the two descriptors and each imported on its own, with the second descriptor being implicitly for internal (change) addresses. There is no change to how the wallet stores or outputs descriptors (yet).
Note that the path specifier is different from what was proposed. It uses angle brackets and the semicolon because these are unused characters available in the character set and I wanted to avoid conflicts with characters already in use in descriptors.
Closes #17190
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
re-ACK a0abcbd382
mjdietzx:
reACK a0abcbd382
pythcoiner:
reACK a0abcbd
furszy:
Code review ACK a0abcbd
glozow:
light code review ACK a0abcbd382
Tree-SHA512: 84ea40b3fd1b762194acd021cae018c2f09b98e595f5e87de5c832c265cfe8a6d0bc4dae25785392fa90db0f6301ddf9aea787980a29c74f81d04b711ac446c2
The following bitcoind parameters / RPC calls missed the "testnet4"
network string:
- `-chain=` parameter
- `getblockchaininfo` RPC, "chain" result
- `getmininginfo` RPC, "chain" result
fa5755b0a8 doc: rpc: Use "output script" consistently (2/2) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Small follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30408 to fixup the RPCs that were forgotten.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
lgtm ACK fa5755b0a8
Tree-SHA512: f1fc0aabb59017da216d6fe0f08a2274336d04db332ad6ce3d9608cd6f03667be1c76423f24a489ac8e7d536011a129dca752ab64b4621b7bc1d4d53f68602e4
00618e8745 assumeutxo: Drop block height from metadata (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30514 which has more context and shows how the issue can be reproduced. Since the value in question is removed, there is no test to add to reproduce anything.
This is an alternative approach to #30516 with much of the [code being suggested there](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30516#discussion_r1689146902).
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK 00618e8745🎌
achow101:
ACK 00618e8745
theStack:
Code-review ACK 00618e8745
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK 00618e8745
mzumsande:
ACK 00618e8745
Tree-SHA512: db9575247bae838ad7742a27a216faaf55bb11e022f9afdd05752bb09bbf9614717d0ad64304ff5722a16bf41d8dea888af544e4ae26dcaa528c1add0269a4a8
When given a multipath descriptor, derive all of the descriptors.
The derived addresses will be returned in an object
consisting of multiple arrays. For compatibility, when given a single path
descriptor, the addresses are provided in a single array as before.
When using `sendrawtransaction` the ALREADY_IN_CHAIN error help string
may be confusing.
Rename TransactionError::ALREADY_IN_CHAIN to
TransactionError::ALREADY_IN_UTXO_SET and update the rpc help string.
Remove backwards compatibility alias as no longer required.
bf0efb4fc7 scripted-diff: Modernize naming of nChainTx and nTxCount (Fabian Jahr)
72e5d1be1f test: Add basic check for nChainTx type (Fabian Jahr)
dc2938e979 chainparams: Change nChainTx to uint64_t (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This picks up the work from #29331 and closes #29258.
This simply changes the type and addresses the comments from #29331 by changing the type in all relevant places and removing unnecessary casts. This also adds an extremely simple unit test.
Additionally this modernizes the name of `nChainTx` which helps reviewers check all use of the symbol and can make silent merge conflicts.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
only rebase in scripted-diff, re-ACK bf0efb4fc7🔈
glozow:
reACK bf0efb4fc7 via range-diff
Tree-SHA512: ee4020926d0800236fe655d0c7b127215ab36b553b04d5f91494f4b7fac6e1cfe7ee298b07c0983db5a3f4786932acaa54f5fd2ccd45f2fcdcfa13427358dc3b
a7432dd6ed logging: clarify -debug and -debugexclude descriptions (Anthony Towns)
74dd33cb0a rpc: make logging method reject "0" category and correct the help text (Vasil Dimov)
8c6f3bf163 logging, refactor: minor encapsulation improvement and use BCLog::NONE instead of 0 (Vasil Dimov)
160706aa38 logging, refactor: make category special cases explicit (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
* Move special cases from `LOG_CATEGORIES_BY_STR` to `GetLogCategory()` (suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29419#discussion_r1547990373)).
* Remove `"none"` and `"0"` from RPC `logging` help because that help text was wrong. `"none"` resulted in an error and `"0"` was ignored itself (contrary to what the help text suggested).
* Remove unused `LOG_CATEGORIES_BY_STR[""]` (suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29419#discussion_r1548018694)).
This is a followup to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29419, addressing leftover suggestions + more.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK a7432dd6ed
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a7432dd6ed. Only changes since last review are removing dead if statement and adding AJ's suggested -debug and -debugexclude help improvements, which look accurate and much more clear.
Tree-SHA512: 41b997b06fccdb4c1d31f57d4752c83caa744cb3280276a337ef4a9b7012a04eb945071db6b8fad24c6a6cf8761f2f800fe6d8f3d8836f5b39c25e4f11c85bf0
Current logging RPC method documentation claims to accept "0" and "none"
categories, but the "none" argument is actually rejected and the "0"
argument is ignored. Update the implementation to refuse both
categories, and remove the help text claiming to support them.
75648cea5a test: add P2A ProduceSignature coverage (Greg Sanders)
7998ce6b20 Add release note for P2A output feature (Greg Sanders)
71c9b02a04 test: add P2A coverage for decodescript (Greg Sanders)
1349e9ec15 test: Add anchor mempool acceptance test (Greg Sanders)
9d89209937 policy: stop 3rd party wtxid malleability of anchor spend (Greg Sanders)
b60aaf8b23 policy: make anchor spend standard (Greg Sanders)
455fca86cf policy: Add OP_1 <0x4e73> as a standard output type (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
This is a sub-feature taken out of the original proposal for ephemeral anchors #30239
This PR makes *spending* of `OP_1 <0x4e73>` (i.e. `bc1pfeessrawgf`) standard. Creation of this output type is already standard.
Any future witness output types are considered relay-standard to create, but not to spend. This preserves upgrade hooks, such as a completely new output type for a softfork such as BIP341. It also gives us a bit of room to use a new output type for policy uses.
This particular sized witness program has no other known use-cases (https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/110664/17078), s it affords insufficient cryptographic security for a secure commitment to data, such as a script or a public key. This makes this type of output "keyless", or unauthenticated.
As a witness program, the `scriptSig` of the input MUST be blank, by BIP141. This helps ensure txid-stability of the spending transaction, which may be required for smart contracting wallets. If we do not use segwit, a miner can simply insert an `OP_NOP` in the `scriptSig` without effecting the result of program execution.
An additional relay restriction is to disallow non-empty witness data, which an adversary may use to penalize the "honest" transactor when RBF'ing the transaction due to the incremental fee requirement of RBF rules.
The intended use-case for this output type is to "anchor" the transaction with a spending child to bring exogenous CPFP fees into the transaction package, encouraging the inclusion of the package in a block. The minimal size of creation and spending of this output makes it an attractive contrast to outputs like `p2sh(OP_TRUE)` and `p2wsh(OP_TRUE)` which
are significantly larger in vbyte terms.
Combined with TRUC transactions which limits the size of child transactions significantly, this is an attractive option for presigned transactions that need to be fee-bumped after the fact.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
utACK 75648cea5a
theStack:
re-ACK 75648cea5a
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 75648cea5a via [diff](e7ce6dc070..75648cea5a)
glozow:
ACK 75648cea5a
tdb3:
ACK 75648cea5a
Tree-SHA512: d529de23d20857e6cdb40fa611d0446b49989eaafed06c28280e8fd1897f1ed8d89a4eabbec1bbf8df3d319910066c3dbbba5a70a87ff0b2967d5205db32ad1e
2e86f2b201 rpc: fix maybe-uninitialized compile warning in getchaintxstats (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
This resolves the compiler warning about potential uninitialized use of window_tx_count introduced in fa2dada.
The warning:
```
CXX rpc/libbitcoin_node_a-blockchain.o
rpc/blockchain.cpp: In function ‘getchaintxstats()::<lambda(const RPCHelpMan&, const JSONRPCRequest&)>’:
rpc/blockchain.cpp:1742:38: warning: ‘*(std::_Optional_payload_base<unsigned int>::_Storage<unsigned int, true>*)((char*)&window_tx_count + offsetof(const std::optional<unsigned int>,std::optional<unsigned int>::<unnamed>.std::_Optional_base<unsigned int, true, true>::<unnamed>)).std::_Optional_payload_base<unsigned int>::_Storage<unsigned int, true>::_M_value’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
1742 | ret.pushKV("txrate", double(*window_tx_count) / nTimeDiff);
|
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 2e86f2b201
theStack:
ACK 2e86f2b201
tdb3:
ACK 2e86f2b201
Tree-SHA512: c087e8f1cd68dd8df734a8400d30a95abe57ebd56cd53aef4230e425b33a23aa55b3af42abfd162e3be8c937a4c27e56abb70a4fedb10e2df64d52d577e0f262
These outputs are called anchors, and allow
key-less anchor spends which are vsize-minimized
versus keyed anchors which require larger outputs
when creating and inputs when spending.
17845e7f21 rpc: add utxo's blockhash and number of confirmations to scantxoutset output (Luis Schwab)
Pull request description:
This PR resolves #30478 by adding two fields to the `scantxoutset` RPC:
- blockhash: the blockhash that an UTXO was created
- confirmations: the number of confirmations an UTXO has relative to the chaintip.
The rationale for the first field is that a blockhash is a much more reliable identifier than the height:
> When using the scantxoutset RPC, the current behaviour is to show the block height of the UTXO. This is not optimal, as block height is ambiguous, especially in the case of a block reorganization happening at the same instant of the query. In this case, an UTXO that does not exist would be assumed to exist, unless the chain's tip hash is recorded before the scan, and make sure it still exists after, as per https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/895#issuecomment-1475766797 comment by evanlinjin.
The second one was suggested by maflcko, and I agree it's useful for human users:
> While touching this, another thing to add could be the number of confirmations? I understand that this wouldn't help machine consumers of the interface, but human callers may find it useful?
This will yield an RPC output like so:
```diff
bitcoin-cli scantxoutset start "[\"addr(bc1q5q9344vdyjkcgv79ve3tldz4jmx4lf7knmnx6r)\"]"
{
"success": true,
"txouts": 185259116,
"height": 853622,
"bestblock": "00000000000000000002e97d9be8f0ddf31829cf873061b938c10b0f80f708b2",
"unspents": [
{
"txid": "fae435084345fe26e464994aebc6544875bca0b897bf4ce52a65901ae28ace92",
"vout": 0,
"scriptPubKey": "0014a00b1ad58d24ad8433c56662bfb45596cd5fa7d6",
"desc": "addr(bc1q5q9344vdyjkcgv79ve3tldz4jmx4lf7knmnx6r)#smk4xmt7",
"amount": 0.00091190,
"coinbase": false,
"height": 852741,
+ "blockhash": "00000000000000000002eefe7e7db44d5619c3dace4c65f3fdcd2913d4945c13",
+ "confirmations": 882
}
],
"total_amount": 0.00091190
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 17845e7f21
Eunovo:
ACK 17845e7f21
tdb3:
ACK 17845e7f21
Tree-SHA512: 02366d0004e5d547522115ef0efe6794a35978db53dda12c675cfae38197bf43f0bf89ca99a3d79e3d2cff95186015fe1ab764abb8ab82bda440ae9302ad973b
