The process currently fails to sign redeem scripts that are longer than
520 bytes. Even when it shouldn't. The 520 bytes redeem scripts limit
is a legacy p2sh rule, and not a segwit limitation.
Segwit redeem scripts are not restricted by the script item size limit.
The reason why this occurs, is the usage of the same keystore used by
the legacy spkm. Which contains blockage for any redeem scripts longer
than the script item size limit.
The multisig script generation process currently fails when
the user exceeds 15 keys, even when it shouldn't. The maximum
number of keys allowed for segwit redeem scripts (p2sh-segwit
and bech32) is 20 keys.
This is because the redeem script placed in the witness is not
restricted by the item size limit.
The reason behind this issue is the utilization of the legacy
p2sh redeem script restrictions on segwit ones. Redeem scripts
longer than 520 bytes are blocked from being inserted into the
keystore, which causes the signing process and the descriptor
inference process to fail.
This occurs because the multisig generation flow uses the same
keystore as the legacy spkm (FillableSigningProvider), which
contains the 520-byte limit.
The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and
`getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and
blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning is returned.
Fix that by returning all warnings as an array.
As a side benefit, cleans up the GetWarnings() logic.
c6be144c4b Remove timedata (stickies-v)
92e72b5d0d [net processing] Move IgnoresIncomingTxs to PeerManagerInfo (dergoegge)
7d9c3ec622 [net processing] Introduce PeerManagerInfo (dergoegge)
ee178dfcc1 Add TimeOffsets helper class (stickies-v)
55361a15d1 [net processing] Use std::chrono for type-safe time offsets (stickies-v)
038fd979ef [net processing] Move nTimeOffset to net_processing (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
[An earlier approach](1d226ae1f9/) in #28956 involved simplifying and refactoring the network-adjusted time calculation logic, but this was eventually [left out](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28956#issuecomment-1904214370) of the PR to make it easier for reviewers to focus on consensus logic changes.
Since network-adjusted time is now only used for warning/informational purposes, cleaning up the logic (building on @dergoegge's approach in #28956) should be quite straightforward and uncontroversial. The main changes are:
- Previously, we would only calculate the time offset from the first 199 outbound peers that we connected to. This limitation is now removed, and we have a proper rolling calculation. I've reduced the set to 50 outbound peers, which seems plenty.
- Previously, we would automatically use the network-adjusted time if the difference was < 70 mins, and warn the user if the difference was larger than that. Since there is no longer any automated time adjustment, I've changed the warning threshold to ~~20~~ 10 minutes (which is an arbitrary number).
- Previously, a warning would only be raised once, and then never again until node restart. This behaviour is now updated to 1) warn to log for every new outbound peer for as long as we appear out of sync, 2) have the RPC warning toggled on/off whenever we go in/out of sync, and 3) have the GUI warn whenever we are out of sync (again), but limited to 1 messagebox per 60 minutes
- no more globals
- remove the `-maxtimeadjustment` startup arg
Closes #4521
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
Re-ACK [c6be144](c6be144c4b)
achow101:
reACK c6be144c4b
dergoegge:
utACK c6be144c4b
Tree-SHA512: 1063d639542e882186cdcea67d225ad1f97847f44253621a8c4b36c4d777e8f5cb0efe86bc279f01e819d33056ae4364c3300cc7400c087fb16c3f39b3e16b96
30a6c99935 rpc: access some args by name (stickies-v)
bbb31269bf rpc: add named arg helper (stickies-v)
13525e0c24 rpc: add arg helper unit test (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Adds string overloads for the `RPCHelpMan::Arg` and `RPCHelpMan::MaybeArg` helpers to be able to access RPC arguments by name instead of index number. Especially in RPCs with a large number of parameters, this can be quite helpful.
Example usage:
```cpp
const auto action{self.Arg<std::string>("action")};
```
Most of the LoC is adding test coverage and documentation updates. No behaviour change.
An alternative approach to #27788 with significantly less overhaul.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 30a6c99935
maflcko:
ACK 30a6c99935🥑
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 30a6c99935. Nice change! Implementation is surprisingly simple and additional unit test coverage is welcome, too.
Tree-SHA512: 4904f5f914fe1d421d32f60edb7c5a028c8ea0f140a2f207a106b4752d441164e073066a6bf2e17693f859fe847815a96609d3cf521e0ac4178d8cd09362ea3d
746b6d8839 test: Add test for createwalletdescriptor (Ava Chow)
2402b63062 wallet: Test upgrade of pre-taproot wallet to have tr() descriptors (Ava Chow)
460ae1bf67 wallet, rpc: Add createwalletdescriptor RPC (Ava Chow)
8e1a475062 wallet: Be able to retrieve single key from descriptors (Ava Chow)
85b1fb19dd wallet: Add GetActiveHDPubKeys to retrieve xpubs from active descriptors (Ava Chow)
73926f2d31 wallet, descspkm: Refactor wallet descriptor generation to standalone func (Andrew Chow)
54e74f46ea wallet: Refactor function for single DescSPKM setup (Andrew Chow)
3b09d0eb7f tests: Test for gethdkeys (Ava Chow)
5febe28c9e wallet, rpc: Add gethdkeys RPC (Ava Chow)
66632e5c24 wallet: Add IsActiveScriptPubKeyMan (Ava Chow)
fa6a259985 desc spkm: Add functions to retrieve specific private keys (Ava Chow)
fe67841464 descriptor: Be able to get the pubkeys involved in a descriptor (Ava Chow)
ef6745879d key: Add constructor for CExtKey that takes CExtPubKey and CKey (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a `createwalletdescriptor` RPC which allows users to add new automatically generated descriptors to their wallet, e.g. to upgrade a 0.21.x wallet to contain a taproot descriptor. This RPC takes 3 arguments: the output type to create a descriptor for, whether the descriptor will be internal or external, and the HD key to use if the user wishes to use a specific key. The HD key is an optional parameter. If it is not specified, the wallet will use the key shared by the active descriptors, if they are all single key. For most users in the expected upgrade scenario, this should be sufficient. In more advanced cases, the user must specify the HD key to use.
Currently, specified HD keys must already exist in the wallet. To make it easier for the user to know, `gethdkeys` is also added to list out the HD keys in use by all of the descriptors in the wallet. This will include all HD keys, whether we have the private key, for it, which descriptors use it and their activeness, and optionally the extended private key. In this way, users with more complex wallets will be still be able to get HD keys from their wallet for use in other scenarios, and if they want to use `createwalletdescriptor`, they can easily get the keys that they can specify to it.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26728#issuecomment-1866961865
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 746b6d8839
furszy:
ACK 746b6d8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 746b6d8839, and this looks ready to merge. There were various suggested changes since last review where main change seems to be switching `gethdkeys` output to use normalized descriptors (removing hardened path components).
Tree-SHA512: f2849101e6fbf1f59cb031eaaaee97af5b1ae92aaab54c5716940d210f08ab4fc952df2725b636596cd5747b8f5beb1a7a533425bc10d09da02659473516fbda
When trying to add an address to the IP address manager tried table,
it's first added to the new table and then moved to the tried table.
Previously, adding a conflicting address to the address manager's
tried table with test-only `addpeeraddress tried=true` RPC would
return `{ "success": true }`. However, the address would not be added
to the tried table, but would remain in the new table. This caused,
e.g., issue 28964.
This is fixed by returning `{ "success": false, "error":
"failed-adding-to-tried" }` for failed tried table additions. Since
the address remaining in the new table can't be removed (the address
manager interface does not support removing addresses at the moment
and adding this seems to be a bigger effort), an error message is
returned. This indicates to a user why the RPC failed and allows
accounting for the extra address in the new table.
Also:
To check the number of addresses in each addrman table,
the addrman checks were re-run and the log output of this check
was asserted. Ideally, logs shouldn't be used as an interface
in automated tests. To avoid asserting the logs, use the getaddrmaninfo
and getrawaddrman RPCs (which weren't implemented when the test was added).
Removing the "getnodeaddress" calls would also remove the addrman checks
from the test, which could reduce the test coverage. To avoid this,
these are kept.
38f70ba6ac RPC: Add maxfeerate and maxburnamount args to submitpackage (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28949
I couldn't manage to do it very cleanly outside of (sub)package evaluation itself, since it would change the current interface very heavily. Instead I threaded through the max fee argument and used that directly via ATMPArgs. From that perspective, this is somewhat a reversion from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19339. In a post-cluster mempool world, these checks could be consolidated to right after the given (ancestor) package is linearized/chunked, by just checking the feerate of the top chunk and rejecting the submission entirely if the top chunk is too high.
The implication here is that subpackages can be submitted to the mempool prior to hitting this new fee-based error condition.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
Re-ACK 38f70ba6ac👍🏾
glozow:
ACK 38f70ba6ac with some non-blocking nits
murchandamus:
LGTM, code review ACK 38f70ba6ac
Tree-SHA512: 38212aa9de25730944cee58b0806a3d37097e42719af8dd7de91ce86bb5d9770b6f7c37354bf418bd8ba571c52947da1dcdbb968bf429dd1dbdf8715315af18f
And thread the feerate value through ProcessNewPackage to
reject individual transactions that exceed the given
feerate. This allows subpackage processing, and is
compatible with future package RBF work.
567cec9a05 doc: add release notes and help text for unix sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
bfe5192891 test: cover UNIX sockets in feature_proxy.py (Matthew Zipkin)
c65c0d0163 init: allow UNIX socket path for -proxy and -onion (Matthew Zipkin)
c3bd43142e gui: accomodate unix socket Proxy in updateDefaultProxyNets() (Matthew Zipkin)
a88bf9dedd i2p: construct Session with Proxy instead of CService (Matthew Zipkin)
d9318a37ec net: split ConnectToSocket() from ConnectDirectly() for unix sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
ac2ecf3182 proxy: rename randomize_credentials to m_randomize_credentials (Matthew Zipkin)
a89c3f59dc netbase: extend Proxy class to wrap UNIX socket as well as TCP (Matthew Zipkin)
3a7d6548ef net: move CreateSock() calls from ConnectNode() to netbase methods (Matthew Zipkin)
74f568cb6f netbase: allow CreateSock() to create UNIX sockets if supported (Matthew Zipkin)
bae86c8d31 netbase: refactor CreateSock() to accept sa_family_t (Matthew Zipkin)
adb3a3e51d configure: test for unix domain sockets (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27252
UNIX domain sockets are a mechanism for inter-process communication that are faster than local TCP ports (because there is no need for TCP overhead) and potentially more secure because access is managed by the filesystem instead of serving an open port on the system.
There has been work on [unix domain sockets before](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9979) but for now I just wanted to start on this single use-case which is enabling unix sockets from the client side, specifically connecting to a local Tor proxy (Tor can listen on unix sockets and even enforces strict curent-user-only access permission before binding) configured by `-onion=` or `-proxy=`
I copied the prefix `unix:` usage from Tor. With this patch built locally you can test with your own filesystem path (example):
`tor --SocksPort unix:/Users/matthewzipkin/torsocket/x`
`bitcoind -proxy=unix:/Users/matthewzipkin/torsocket/x`
Prep work for this feature includes:
- Moving where and how we create `sockaddr` and `Sock` to accommodate `AF_UNIX` without disturbing `CService`
- Expanding `Proxy` class to represent either a `CService` or a UNIX socket (by its file path)
Future work:
- Enable UNIX sockets for ZMQ (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27679)
- Enable UNIX sockets for I2P SAM proxy (some code is included in this PR but not tested or exposed to user options yet)
- Enable UNIX sockets on windows where supported
- Update Network Proxies dialog in GUI to support UNIX sockets
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK 567cec9a05
tdb3:
re ACK for 567cec9a05.
achow101:
ACK 567cec9a05
vasild:
ACK 567cec9a05
Tree-SHA512: de81860e56d5de83217a18df4c35297732b4ad491e293a0153d2d02a0bde1d022700a1131279b187ef219651487537354b9d06d10fde56225500c7e257df92c1
Note that for speed this commit also removes the proof of work and
signet signature checks before returning the block in getblock.
It is assumed if a block is stored it will be valid.
d5228efb53 kernel: Remove dependency on CScheduler (TheCharlatan)
06069b3913 scripted-diff: Rename MainSignals to ValidationSignals (TheCharlatan)
0d6d2b650d scripted-diff: Rename SingleThreadedSchedulerClient to SerialTaskRunner (TheCharlatan)
4abde2c4e3 [refactor] Make MainSignals RAII styled (TheCharlatan)
84f5c135b8 refactor: De-globalize g_signals (TheCharlatan)
473dd4b97a [refactor] Prepare for g_signals de-globalization (TheCharlatan)
3fba3d5dee [refactor] Make signals optional in mempool and chainman (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
By defining a virtual interface class for the scheduler client, users of the kernel can now define their own event consuming infrastructure, without having to spawn threads or rely on the scheduler design.
Removing `CScheduler` also allows removing the thread and exception modules from the kernel library.
To make the `CMainSignals` class easier to use from a kernel library perspective, remove its global instantiation and adopt RAII practices.
Renames `CMainSignals` to `ValidationSignals`, which more accurately describes its purpose and scope.
Also make the `ValidationSignals` in the `ChainstateManager` and CTxMemPool` optional. This could be useful in the future for using or testing these classes without having to instantiate any form of signal handling.
---
This PR is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587). It improves the kernel API and removes two modules from the kernel library.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK d5228efb53🌄
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d5228efb53. Just comment change since last review.
vasild:
ACK d5228efb53
furszy:
diff ACK d5228ef
Tree-SHA512: e93a5f10eb6182effb84bb981859a7ce750e466efd8171045d8d9e7fe46e4065631d9f6f533c5967c4d34c9bb7d7a67e9f4593bd4c5b30cd7b3bbad7be7b331b
faa30a4c56 rpc: Do not wait for headers inside loadtxoutset (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
While the `loadtxoutset` default 10 minute timeout is convenient when it is sufficient, it may cause hassle where it is not. For example:
* When P2P connections are missing, it seems better to abort early than wait for the timeout.
* When the 10 minute timeout is not sufficient, the RPC will have to be called again, so a check or loop is needed outside the RPC either way. So might as well remove the loop inside the RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
ACK faa30a4c56
theStack:
Code-review ACK faa30a4c56
pablomartin4btc:
tACK faa30a4c56
TheCharlatan:
ACK faa30a4c56
Tree-SHA512: 9167c7d8b2889bb3fd369de4acd2cc4d24a2fe225018d82bd9568ecd737093f6e19be7cc62815b574137b61076a6f773c29bff75398991b5cd702423aab2322b
9d1dbbd4ce scripted-diff: Fix bitcoin_config_h includes (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26924#issuecomment-1403449932 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29263#issuecomment-1922334399, it is currently not safe to remove `bitcoin-config.h` includes from headers because some unrelated file might be depending on it.
See also #26972 for discussion.
Solve this by including the file directly everywhere it's required, regardless of whether or not it's already included by another header.
There should be no functional change here, but it will allow us to safely remove includes from headers in the future.
~I'm afraid it's a bit tedious to reproduce these commits, but it's reasonably straightforward:~
Edit: See note below
```bash
# All commands executed from the src/ subdir.
# Collect all tokens from bitcoin-config.h.in
# Isolate the tokens and remove blank lines
# Replace newlines with | and remove the last trailing one
# Collect all files which use these tokens
# Filter out subprojects (proper forwarding can be verified from Makefiles)
# Filter out .rc files
# Save to a text file
git grep -E -l `grep undef config/bitcoin-config.h.in | cut -d" " -f2 | grep -v '^$' | tr '\n' '|' | sed 's/|$//'` | grep -v -e "^leveldb/" -e "^secp256k1/" -e "^crc32c/" -e "^minisketch/" -e "^Makefile" -e "\.rc$" > files-with-config-include.txt
# Find all files from the above list which don't include bitcoin-config.h
git grep -L -E "config/bitcoin-config.h" -- `cat files-with-config-include.txt`
# Include them manually with the exception of some files in crypto:
# crypto/sha256_arm_shani.cpp crypto/sha256_avx2.cpp crypto/sha256_sse41.cpp crypto/sha256_x86_shani.cpp
# These are exceptions which don't use bitcoin-config.h, rather the Makefile.am adds these cppflags manually.
# Commit changes. This should match the first commit of this PR.
# Use the same search as above to find all files which DON'T use any config tokens
git grep -E -L `grep undef config/bitcoin-config.h.in | cut -d" " -f2 | grep -v '^$' | tr '\n' '|' | sed 's/|$//'` | grep -v -e "^leveldb/" -e "^secp256k1/" -e "^crc32c/" -e "^minisketch/" -e "^Makefile" -e "\.rc$" > files-without-config-include.txt
# Manually remove the includes and commit changes. This should match the second commit of this PR.
```
Edit: I'll keep this old description for posterity, but the manual approach has been replaced with a scripted diff from TheCharlatan
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK 9d1dbbd4ce🚪
TheCharlatan:
ACK 9d1dbbd4ce
hebasto:
ACK 9d1dbbd4ce, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
fanquake:
ACK 9d1dbbd4ce
Tree-SHA512: f11ddc4ae6a887f96b954a6b77f310558ddb271088a3fda3edc833669c4251b7f392515224bbb8e5f67eb2c799b4ffed3b07d96454e82ec635c686d0df545872
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
regex_string='^(?!//).*(AC_APPLE_UNIVERSAL_BUILD|BOOST_PROCESS_USE_STD_FS|CHAR_EQUALS_INT8|CLIENT_VERSION_BUILD|CLIENT_VERSION_IS_RELEASE|CLIENT_VERSION_MAJOR|CLIENT_VERSION_MINOR|COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS|COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS_FINAL|COPYRIGHT_HOLDERS_SUBSTITUTION|COPYRIGHT_YEAR|ENABLE_ARM_SHANI|ENABLE_AVX2|ENABLE_EXTERNAL_SIGNER|ENABLE_SSE41|ENABLE_TRACING|ENABLE_WALLET|ENABLE_X86_SHANI|ENABLE_ZMQ|HAVE_BOOST|HAVE_BUILTIN_CLZL|HAVE_BUILTIN_CLZLL|HAVE_BYTESWAP_H|HAVE_CLMUL|HAVE_CONSENSUS_LIB|HAVE_CXX20|HAVE_DECL_BE16TOH|HAVE_DECL_BE32TOH|HAVE_DECL_BE64TOH|HAVE_DECL_BSWAP_16|HAVE_DECL_BSWAP_32|HAVE_DECL_BSWAP_64|HAVE_DECL_FORK|HAVE_DECL_FREEIFADDRS|HAVE_DECL_GETIFADDRS|HAVE_DECL_HTOBE16|HAVE_DECL_HTOBE32|HAVE_DECL_HTOBE64|HAVE_DECL_HTOLE16|HAVE_DECL_HTOLE32|HAVE_DECL_HTOLE64|HAVE_DECL_LE16TOH|HAVE_DECL_LE32TOH|HAVE_DECL_LE64TOH|HAVE_DECL_PIPE2|HAVE_DECL_SETSID|HAVE_DECL_STRERROR_R|HAVE_DEFAULT_VISIBILITY_ATTRIBUTE|HAVE_DLFCN_H|HAVE_DLLEXPORT_ATTRIBUTE|HAVE_ENDIAN_H|HAVE_EVHTTP_CONNECTION_GET_PEER_CONST_CHAR|HAVE_FDATASYNC|HAVE_GETENTROPY_RAND|HAVE_GETRANDOM|HAVE_GMTIME_R|HAVE_INTTYPES_H|HAVE_LIBADVAPI32|HAVE_LIBCOMCTL32|HAVE_LIBCOMDLG32|HAVE_LIBGDI32|HAVE_LIBIPHLPAPI|HAVE_LIBKERNEL32|HAVE_LIBOLE32|HAVE_LIBOLEAUT32|HAVE_LIBSHELL32|HAVE_LIBSHLWAPI|HAVE_LIBUSER32|HAVE_LIBUUID|HAVE_LIBWINMM|HAVE_LIBWS2_32|HAVE_MALLOC_INFO|HAVE_MALLOPT_ARENA_MAX|HAVE_MINIUPNPC_MINIUPNPC_H|HAVE_MINIUPNPC_UPNPCOMMANDS_H|HAVE_MINIUPNPC_UPNPERRORS_H|HAVE_NATPMP_H|HAVE_O_CLOEXEC|HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE|HAVE_PTHREAD|HAVE_PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT|HAVE_STDINT_H|HAVE_STDIO_H|HAVE_STDLIB_H|HAVE_STRERROR_R|HAVE_STRINGS_H|HAVE_STRING_H|HAVE_STRONG_GETAUXVAL|HAVE_SYSCTL|HAVE_SYSCTL_ARND|HAVE_SYSTEM|HAVE_SYS_ENDIAN_H|HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H|HAVE_SYS_RESOURCES_H|HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H|HAVE_SYS_STAT_H|HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H|HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H|HAVE_SYS_VMMETER_H|HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL|HAVE_TIMINGSAFE_BCMP|HAVE_UNISTD_H|HAVE_VM_VM_PARAM_H|LT_OBJDIR|PACKAGE_BUGREPORT|PACKAGE_NAME|PACKAGE_STRING|PACKAGE_TARNAME|PACKAGE_URL|PACKAGE_VERSION|PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE|QT_QPA_PLATFORM_ANDROID|QT_QPA_PLATFORM_COCOA|QT_QPA_PLATFORM_MINIMAL|QT_QPA_PLATFORM_WINDOWS|QT_QPA_PLATFORM_XCB|QT_STATICPLUGIN|STDC_HEADERS|STRERROR_R_CHAR_P|USE_ASM|USE_BDB|USE_DBUS|USE_NATPMP|USE_QRCODE|USE_SQLITE|USE_UPNP|_FILE_OFFSET_BITS|_LARGE_FILES)'
exclusion_files=":(exclude)src/minisketch :(exclude)src/crc32c :(exclude)src/secp256k1 :(exclude)src/crypto/sha256_arm_shani.cpp :(exclude)src/crypto/sha256_avx2.cpp :(exclude)src/crypto/sha256_sse41.cpp :(exclude)src/crypto/sha256_x86_shani.cpp"
git grep --perl-regexp --files-with-matches "$regex_string" -- '*.cpp' $exclusion_files | xargs git grep -L "bitcoin-config.h" | while read -r file; do line_number=$(awk -v my_file="$file" '/\/\/ file COPYING or https?:\/\/www.opensource.org\/licenses\/mit-license.php\./ {line = NR} /^\/\// && NR == line + 1 {while(getline && /^\/\//) line = NR} END {print line+1}' "$file"); sed -i "${line_number}i\\\\n\#if defined(HAVE_CONFIG_H)\\n#include <config/bitcoin-config.h>\\n\#endif" "$file"; done;
git grep --perl-regexp --files-with-matches "$regex_string" -- '*.h' $exclusion_files | xargs git grep -L "bitcoin-config.h" | while read -r file; do sed -i "/#define.*_H/a \\\\n\#if defined(HAVE_CONFIG_H)\\n#include <config/bitcoin-config.h>\\n\#endif" "$file"; done;
for file in $(git grep --files-with-matches 'bitcoin-config.h' -- '*.cpp' '*.h' $exclusion_files); do if ! grep -q --perl-regexp "$regex_string" $file; then sed -i '/HAVE_CONFIG_H/{N;N;N;d;}' $file; fi; done;
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
The first command creates a regular expression for matching all bitcoin-config.h symbols in the following form: ^(?!//).*(AC_APPLE_UNIVERSAL_BUILD|BOOST_PROCESS_USE_STD_FS|...|_LARGE_FILES). It was generated with:
./autogen.sh && printf '^(?!//).*(%s)' $(awk '/^#undef/ {print $2}' src/config/bitcoin-config.h.in | paste -sd "|" -)
The second command holds a list of files and directories that should not be processed. These include subtree directories as well as some crypto files that already get their symbols through the makefile.
The third command checks for missing bitcoin-config headers in .cpp files and adds the header if it is missing.
The fourth command checks for missing bitcoin-config headers in .h files and adds the header if it is missing.
The fifth command checks for unneeded bitcoin-config headers in sources files and removes the header if it is unneeded.
29029df5c7 [doc] v3 signaling in mempool-replacements.md (glozow)
e643ea795e [fuzz] v3 transactions and sigop-adjusted vsize (glozow)
1fd16b5c62 [functional test] v3 transaction submission (glozow)
27c8786ba9 test framework: Add and use option for tx-version in MiniWallet methods (MarcoFalke)
9a1fea55b2 [policy/validation] allow v3 transactions with certain restrictions (glozow)
eb8d5a2e7d [policy] add v3 policy rules (glozow)
9a29d470fb [rpc] return full string for package_msg and package-error (glozow)
158623b8e0 [refactor] change Workspace::m_conflicts and adjacent funcs/structs to use Txid (glozow)
Pull request description:
See #27463 for overall package relay tracking.
Delving Bitcoin discussion thread: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/v3-transaction-policy-for-anti-pinning/340
Delving Bitcoin discussion for LN usage: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/lightning-transactions-with-v3-and-ephemeral-anchors/418
Rationale:
- There are various pinning problems with RBF and our general ancestor/descendant limits. These policies help mitigate many pinning attacks and make package RBF feasible (see #28984 which implements package RBF on top of this). I would focus the most here on Rule 3 pinning. [1][2]
- Switching to a cluster-based mempool (see #27677 and #28676) requires the removal of CPFP carve out, which applications depend on. V3 + package RBF + ephemeral anchors + 1-parent-1-child package relay provides an intermediate solution.
V3 policy is for "Priority Transactions." [3][4] It allows users to opt in to more restrictive topological limits for shared transactions, in exchange for the more robust fee-bumping abilities that offers. Even though we don't have cluster limits, we are able to treat these transactions as having as having a maximum cluster size of 2.
Immediate benefits:
- You can presign a transaction with 0 fees (not just 1sat/vB!) and add a fee-bump later.
- Rule 3 pinning is reduced by a significant amount, since the attacker can only attach a maximum of 1000vB to your shared transaction.
This also enables some other cool things (again see #27463 for overall roadmap):
- Ephemeral Anchors
- Package RBF for these 1-parent-1-child packages. That means e.g. a commitment tx + child can replace another commitment tx using the child's fees.
- We can transition to a "single anchor" universe without worrying about package limit pinning. So current users of CPFP carve out would have something else to use.
- We can switch to a cluster-based mempool [5] (#27677#28676), which removes CPFP carve out [6].
[1]: Original mailing list post and discussion about RBF pinning problems https://gist.github.com/glozow/25d9662c52453bd08b4b4b1d3783b9ff, https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-January/019817.html
[2]: A FAQ is "we need this for cluster mempool, but is this still necessary afterwards?" There are some pinning issues that are fixed here and not fully fixed in cluster mempool, so we will still want this or something similar afterward.
[3]: Mailing list post for v3 https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-September/020937.html
[4]: Original PR #25038 also contains a lot of the discussion
[5]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393/7
[6]: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/an-overview-of-the-cluster-mempool-proposal/393#the-cpfp-carveout-rule-can-no-longer-be-supported-12
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 29029df5c7
achow101:
ACK 29029df5c7
instagibbs:
ACK 29029df5c7 modulo that
Tree-SHA512: 9664b078890cfdca2a146439f8835c9d9ab483f43b30af8c7cd6962f09aa557fb1ce7689d5e130a2ec142235dbc8f21213881baa75241c5881660f9008d68450
In the helper `HexToPubKey`, check for three different causes of legacy
public key parsing errors (in this order):
- pubkey is not a hex string
- pubkey doesn't have a valid length (33 or 65 bytes) [NEW]
- pubkey is cryptographically invalid, i.e. not on curve
(`IsFullyValid` check)
and throw a specific error message for each one. Note that the error
code is identical for all of them (-5), so this doesn't break RPC API
compatibility.
The helper is currently used for the RPCs `createmultisig` and
`addmultisigaddress`. The length checks can be removed from the
call-sites and error message checks in the functional tests are adapted.
e7fd70f4b6 [test] make v2transport arg in addconnection mandatory and few cleanups (stratospher)
Pull request description:
- make `v2transport` argument in `addconnection` regression-testing only RPC mandatory. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748#discussion_r1470738750
- previously it was an optional arg with default `false` value.
- only place this RPC is used is in the [functional tests](11b436a66a/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py (L742)) where we always pass the appropriate `v2transport` option to the RPC anyways. (and that too just for python dummy peer(`P2PInterface`) and bitcoind(`TestNode`) interactions)
- rename `v2_handshake()` to `_on_data_v2_handshake()` https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748#discussion_r1466958424
- more compact return statement in `wait_for_reconnect()` https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24748#discussion_r1466979708
- assertion to check that empty version packets are received from `TestNode`.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK e7fd70f4b6
theStack:
Code-review ACK e7fd70f4b6
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK e7fd70f4b6
Tree-SHA512: e66e29baccd91e1e4398b91f7d45c5fc7c2841d77d8a6178734586017bf2be63496721649da91848dec71da605ee31664352407d5bb896e624cc693767c61a1f
ff9039f6ea Remove GetAdjustedTime (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This picks up parts of #25908.
The use of adjusted time is removed from validation code while the warning to users if their clock is out of sync with the rest of the network remains.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK ff9039f6ea
achow101:
ACK ff9039f6ea
maflcko:
lgtm ACK ff9039f6ea🤽
stickies-v:
ACK ff9039f6ea
Tree-SHA512: d1f6b9445c236915503fd2ea828f0d3b92285a5dbc677b168453276115e349972edbad37194d8becd9136d8e7219b576af64ec51c72bdb1923e57e405c0483fc
`TestNode::add_outbound_p2p_connection()` is the only place where
addconnection test-only RPC is used. here, we always pass the
appropriate v2transport option to addconnection RPC.
currently the v2transport option for addconnection RPC is optional.
so simply make the v2transport option mandatory instead.
bc9283c441 [test] Add functional test to test early key response behaviour in BIP 324 (stratospher)
ffe6a56d75 [test] Check whether v2 TestNode performs downgrading (stratospher)
ba737358a3 [test] Add functional tests to test v2 P2P behaviour (stratospher)
4115cf9956 [test] Ignore BIP324 decoy messages (stratospher)
8c054aa04d [test] Allow inbound and outbound connections supporting v2 P2P protocol (stratospher)
382894c3ac [test] Reconnect using v1 P2P when v2 P2P terminates due to magic byte mismatch (stratospher)
a94e350ac0 [test] Build v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
bb7bffed79 [test] Use lock for sending P2P messages in test framework (stratospher)
5b91fb14ab [test] Read v2 P2P messages (stratospher)
05bddb20f5 [test] Perform initial v2 handshake (stratospher)
a049d1bd08 [test] Introduce EncryptedP2PState object in P2PConnection (stratospher)
b89fa59e71 [test] Construct class to handle v2 P2P protocol functions (stratospher)
8d6c848a48 [test] Move MAGIC_BYTES to messages.py (stratospher)
595ad4b168 [test/crypto] Add ECDH (stratospher)
4487b80517 [rpc/net] Allow v2 p2p support in addconnection (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR introduces support for v2 P2P encryption(BIP 324) in the existing functional test framework and adds functional tests for the same.
### commits overview
1. introduces a new class `EncryptedP2PState` to store the keys, functions for performing the initial v2 handshake and encryption/decryption.
3. this class is used by `P2PConnection` in inbound/outbound connections to perform the initial v2 handshake before the v1 version handshake. Only after the initial v2 handshake is performed do application layer P2P messages(version, verack etc..) get exchanged. (in a v2 connection)
- `v2_state` is the object of class `EncryptedP2PState` in `P2PConnection` used to store its keys, session-id etc.
- a node [advertising](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#advertising-to-support-v2-p2p) support for v2 P2P is different from a node actually [supporting v2 P2P](https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md#supporting-v2-p2p) (differ when false advertisement of services occur)
- introduce a boolean variable `supports_v2_p2p` in `P2PConnection` to denote if it supports v2 P2P.
- introduce a boolean variable `advertises_v2_p2p` to denote whether `P2PConnection` which mimics peer behaviour advertises V2 P2P support. Default option is `False`.
- In the test framework, you can create Inbound and Outbound connections to `TestNode`
1. During **Inbound Connections**, `P2PConnection` is the initiator [`TestNode` <--------- `P2PConnection`]
- Case 1:
- if the `TestNode` advertises/signals v2 P2P support (means `self.nodes[i]` set up with `"-v2transport=1"`), different behaviour will be exhibited based on whether:
1. `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P
2. `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P
- In a real world scenario, the initiator node would intrinsically know if they support v2 P2P based on whatever code they choose to run. However, in the test scenario where we mimic peer behaviour, we have no way of knowing if `P2PConnection` should support v2 P2P or not. So `supports_v2_p2p` boolean variable is used as an option to enable support for v2 P2P in `P2PConnection`.
- Since the `TestNode` advertises v2 P2P support (using "-v2transport=1"), our initiator `P2PConnection` would send:
1. (if the `P2PConnection` supports v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
2. (if the `P2PConnection` does not support v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Case 2:
- if the `TestNode` doesn't signal v2 P2P support; `P2PConnection` being the initiator would send version message to initiate a connection.
2. During **Outbound Connections** [TestNode --------> P2PConnection]
- initiator `TestNode` would send:
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) ellswift + garbage bytes to initiate the connection
- (if the `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P) version message to initiate the connection
- Suppose `P2PConnection` advertises v2 P2P support when it actually doesn't support v2 P2P (false advertisement scenario)
- `TestNode` sends ellswift + garbage bytes
- `P2PConnection` receives but can't process it and disconnects.
- `TestNode` then tries using v1 P2P and sends version message
- `P2PConnection` receives/processes this successfully and they communicate on v1 P2P
4. the encrypted P2P messages follow a different format - 3 byte length + 1-13 byte message_type + payload + 16 byte MAC
5. includes support for testing decoy messages and v2 connection downgrade(using false advertisement - when a v2 node makes an outbound connection to a node which doesn't support v2 but is advertised as v2 by some malicious
intermediary)
### run the tests
* functional test - `test/functional/p2p_v2_encrypted.py` `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py`
I'm also super grateful to @ dhruv for his really valuable feedback on this branch.
Also written a more elaborate explanation here - https://github.com/stratospher/blogosphere/blob/main/integration_test_bip324.md
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK bc9283c441
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK bc9283c441
theStack:
Code-review ACK bc9283c441
glozow:
ACK bc9283c441
Tree-SHA512: 9b54ed27e925e1775e0e0d35e959cdbf2a9a1aab7bcf5d027e66f8b59780bdd0458a7a4311ddc7dd67657a4a2a2cd5034ead75524420d58a83f642a8304c9811
18ad1b9142 refactor: pass CRecipient to FundTransaction (josibake)
5ad19668db refactor: simplify `CreateRecipients` (josibake)
47353a608d refactor: remove out param from `ParseRecipients` (josibake)
f7384b921c refactor: move parsing to new function (josibake)
6f569ac903 refactor: move normalization to new function (josibake)
435fe5cd96 test: add tests for fundrawtx and sendmany rpcs (josibake)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
The primary motivation for this PR is to enable `FundTransaction` to take a vector of `CRecipient` objects to allow passing BIP352 silent payment addresses to RPCs that use `FundTransaction` (e.g. `send`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`). To do that, SFFO logic needs to be moved out of `FundTransaction` so the `CRecipient` objects with the correct SFFO information can be created and then passed to `FundTransaction`.
As a secondary motivation, this PR moves the SFFO stuff closer to the caller, making the code cleaner and easier to understand. This is done by having a single function which parses RPC inputs for SFFO and consistently using the `set<int>` method for communicating SFFO.
I'm also not convinced we need to pass a full `CMutableTx` object to `FundTransaction`, but I'm leaving that for a follow-up PR/discussion, as its not a blocker for silent payments.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
reACK 18ad1b9142
josibake:
> According to my `range-diff` nothing changed. reACK [18ad1b9](18ad1b9142)
achow101:
ACK 18ad1b9142
Tree-SHA512: d61f017cf7d98489ef216475b68693fd77e7b53a26a6477dcd73e7e5ceff5036b2d21476e377839e710bb73644759d42c4f9f4b14ed96b3e56ed87b07aa6d1a7
This test-only RPC is required when a TestNode initiates
an outbound v2 p2p connection. Add a new arg `v2transport`
so that the node can attempt v2 connections.
282b12ddb0 refactor: remove CTxMemPool::queryHashes() (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
`CTxMemPool::queryHashes()` is only used in `MempoolToJSON()`, where it can just as easily be replaced with the more general `CTxMemPool::entryAll()`. No behaviour change, just cleans up the code.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 282b12ddb0
TheCharlatan:
ACK 282b12ddb0
glozow:
ACK 282b12ddb0. Looks like there's no conflicts.
Tree-SHA512: 16160dec8e1f2457fa0f62dc96d2d2efd92c4bab810ecdb0e08918b8e85a667702c8e41421eeb4ea6abe92a5956a2a39a7a6368514973b78be0d22de2ad299b2
Move the parsing and validation out of `AddOutputs` into its own function,
`ParseOutputs`. This allows us to re-use this logic in `ParseRecipients` in a
later commit, where the code is currently duplicated.
The new `ParseOutputs` function returns a CTxDestination,CAmount tuples.
This allows the caller to then translate the validated outputs into
either CRecipients or CTxOuts.
