fa0d9211ef refactor: Remove chainparams arg from CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
fa38947125 refactor: Remove ::Params() global from inside CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `::Params()` global is verbose and confusing. Also it makes tests a bit harder to write because they'd have to mock a global.
Fix all issues by simply using a member variable that points to the right params.
(Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=.`)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa0d9211ef
kiminuo:
utACK fa0d9211
theStack:
ACK fa0d9211ef🍉
Tree-SHA512: 44676b19c9ed471ccb536331d3029bad192d7d50f394fd7b8527ec431452aeec8c4494164b9cf8e16e0123c4463b16be864366c6b599370032c17262625a0356
Save the banlist in `banlist.json` instead of `banlist.dat`.
This makes it possible to store Tor v3 entries in the banlist on disk
(and any other addresses that cannot be serialized in addrv1 format).
Only read `banlist.dat` if it exists and `banlist.json` does not
exist (first start after an upgrade).
Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20904
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19748
1b1088d52f test: add combined I2P/onion/localhost eviction protection tests (Jon Atack)
7c2284eda2 test: add tests for inbound eviction protection of I2P peers (Jon Atack)
ce02dd1ef1 p2p: extend inbound eviction protection by network to I2P peers (Jon Atack)
70bbc62711 test: add combined onion/localhost eviction protection coverage (Jon Atack)
045cb40192 p2p: remove unused m_is_onion member from NodeEvictionCandidate struct (Jon Atack)
310fab4928 p2p: remove unused CompareLocalHostTimeConnected() (Jon Atack)
9e889e8a5c p2p: remove unused CompareOnionTimeConnected() (Jon Atack)
787d46bb2a p2p: update ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio() doxygen docs (Jon Atack)
1e15acf478 p2p: make ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio() fully ratio-based (Jon Atack)
3f8105c4d2 test: remove combined onion/localhost eviction protection tests (Jon Atack)
38a81a8e20 p2p: add CompareNodeNetworkTime() comparator struct (Jon Atack)
4ee7aec47e p2p: add m_network to NodeEvictionCandidate struct (Jon Atack)
7321e6f2fe p2p, refactor: rename vEvictionCandidates to eviction_candidates (Jon Atack)
ec590f1d91 p2p, refactor: improve constness in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio() (Jon Atack)
4a19f501ab test: add ALL_NETWORKS to test utilities (Jon Atack)
519e76bb64 test: speed up and simplify peer_eviction_test (Jon Atack)
1cde800523 p2p, refactor: rm redundant erase_size calculation in SelectNodeToEvict() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Continuing the work in #20197 and #20685, this pull updates and abstracts our inbound eviction protection to make it fully ratio-based and easily extensible to peers connected via high-latency privacy networks that we newly support, like I2P and perhaps others soon, as these peers are disadvantaged by the latency criteria of our eviction logic.
It then adds eviction protection for peers connected over I2P. As described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20685#issuecomment-767486499, we've observed over the past few months that I2P peers have a min ping latency similar to or greater than that of onion peers.
The algorithm is a basically a multi-pass knapsack:
- Count the number of eviction candidates in each of the disadvantaged
privacy networks.
- Sort the networks from lower to higher candidate counts, so that
a network with fewer candidates will have the first opportunity
for any unused slots remaining from the previous iteration. In
the case of a tie in candidate counts, priority is given by array
member order from first to last, guesstimated to favor more unusual
networks.
- Iterate through the networks in this order. On each iteration,
allocate each network an equal number of protected slots targeting
a total number of candidates to protect, provided any slots remain
in the knapsack.
- Protect the candidates in that network having the longest uptime,
if any in that network are present.
- Continue iterating as long as we have non-allocated slots
remaining and candidates available to protect.
The goal of this logic is to favorise the diversity of our peer connections.
The individual commit messages describe each change in more detail.
Special thank you to Vasil Dimov for the excellent review feedback and the algorithm improvement that made this change much better than it would have been otherwise. Thanks also to Antoine Riard, whose review feedback nudged this change to protect disadvantaged networks having fewer, rather than more, eviction candidates.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 1b1088d52f
vasild:
ACK 1b1088d52f
Tree-SHA512: 722f790ff11f2969c79e45a5e0e938d94df78df8687e77002f32e3ef5c72a9ac10ebf8c7a9eb7f71882c97ab0e67b2778191effdb747d9ca54d7c23c2ed19a90
6f994882de validation: Farewell, global Chainstate! (Carl Dong)
972c5166ee qt/test: Reset chainman in ~ChainstateManager instead (Carl Dong)
6c3b5dc0c1 scripted-diff: tree-wide: Remove all review-only assertions (Carl Dong)
3e82abb8dd tree-wide: Remove stray review-only assertion (Carl Dong)
f323248aba qt/test: Use existing chainman in ::TestGUI (can be scripted-diff) (Carl Dong)
6c15de129c scripted-diff: wallet/test: Use existing chainman (Carl Dong)
ee0ab1e959 fuzz: Initialize a TestingSetup for test_one_input (Carl Dong)
0d61634c06 scripted-diff: test: Use existing chainman in unit tests (Carl Dong)
e197076219 test: Pass in CoinsTip to ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags (Carl Dong)
4d99b61014 test/miner_tests: Pass in chain tip to CreateBlockIndex (Carl Dong)
f0dd5e6bb4 test/util: Use existing chainman in ::PrepareBlock (Carl Dong)
464c313e30 init: Use existing chainman (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #21767
à la Mr. Sandman
```
Mr. Chainman, bring me a tip (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Make it the most work that I've ever seen (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Rewind old tip till we're at the fork point (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Then tell it that it's time to call Con-nectTip
Chainman, I'm so alone (bung, bung, bung, bung)
No local objects to call my own (bung, bung, bung, bung)
Please make sure I have a ref
Mr. Chainman, bring me a tip!
```
This is the last bundle in the #20158 series. Thanks everyone for their diligent review.
I would like to call attention to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21766, where a few leftover improvements were collated.
- Remove globals:
- `ChainstateManager g_chainman`
- `CChainState& ChainstateActive()`
- `CChain& ChainActive()`
- Remove all review-only assertions.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
reACK 6f994882de based on the contents of
ariard:
Code Review ACK 6f99488.
jnewbery:
utACK 6f994882de
achow101:
Code Review ACK 6f994882de
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 6f994882de.
Tree-SHA512: 4052ea79360cf0efd81ad0ee3f982e1d93aab1837dcec75f875a56ceda085de078bb3099a2137935d7cc2222004ad88da94b605ef5efef35cb6bc733725debe6
7a799c9c2b index: refactor-only: Reuse CChain ref (Carl Dong)
db33cde80f index: Add chainstate member to BaseIndex (Carl Dong)
f4a47a1feb bench: Use existing chainman in AssembleBlock (Carl Dong)
91226eb917 bench: Use existing NodeContext in DuplicateInputs (Carl Dong)
e6b4aa6eb5 miner: Pass in chainman to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
9ecade1425 rest: Add GetChainman function and use it (Carl Dong)
fc1c282845 rpc/blockchain: Use existing blockman in gettxoutsetinfo (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
The first 2 commits are fixups addressing review for the last bundle: #21391
NEW note:
1. I have opened #21766 which keeps track of potential improvements where the flaws already existed before the de-globalization work, please post on that issue about these improvements, thanks!
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 7a799c9
ariard:
Code Review ACK 7a799c9
fjahr:
re-ACK 7a799c9c2b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 7a799c9c2b🌠
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7a799c9c2b. Basically no change since last review except fixed rebase conflicts and a new comment about REST Ensure()
jamesob:
conditional ACK 7a799c9c2b ([`jamesob/ackr/21767.1.dongcarl.bundle_6_n_prune_g_chai`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21767.1.dongcarl.bundle_6_n_prune_g_chai))
Tree-SHA512: 531c00ddcb318817457db2812d9a9d930bc664e58e6f7f1c746350732b031dd624270bfa6b9f49d8056aeb6321d973f0e38e4ff914acd6768edd8602c017d10e
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes #18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close #21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
Pass in chainman instead of prev_block so that we can enforce the
block.hashPrevBlock refers to prev_block invariant in the function
itself.
We should probably rethink BlockAssembler's API and somehow include
commitment regeneration functionality in there. Something like a variant
of CreateNewBlock that takes in a std::vector<TxRef> and return a CBlock
instead of CBlockTemplate. That could avoid reaching for
LookupBlockIndex at all.
This allows us to easily create transaction chains for package
validation. We don't test_accept if submit=false because we want to be
able to make transactions that wouldn't pass ATMP (i.e. a child
transaction in a package would fail due to missing inputs).
- drop redundant PF_ permission flags prefixes
- drop ALL_CAPS naming per https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Renum-caps
- rename IsImplicit to Implicit
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s 'PF_NONE' 'None'
s 'PF_BLOOMFILTER' 'BloomFilter'
s 'PF_RELAY' 'Relay'
s 'PF_FORCERELAY' 'ForceRelay'
s 'PF_DOWNLOAD' 'Download'
s 'PF_NOBAN' 'NoBan'
s 'PF_MEMPOOL' 'Mempool'
s 'PF_ADDR' 'Addr'
s 'PF_ISIMPLICIT' 'Implicit'
s 'PF_ALL' 'All'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
792be53d3e refactor: Replace std::bind with lambdas (Hennadii Stepanov)
a508f718f3 refactor: Use appropriate thread constructor (Hennadii Stepanov)
30e4448215 refactor: Make TraceThread a non-template free function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR does not change behavior.
Its goal is to improve readability and maintainability of the code.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 792be53d3e
jonatack:
tACK 792be53d3e
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 792be53d3e
Tree-SHA512: a03142f04f370f6bc02bd3ddfa870819b51740fcd028772241d68c84087f95a2d78207cbd5edb3f7c636fcf2d76192d9c59873f8f0af451d3b05c0cf9cf234df
586190f0b4 rpc/rest: Take and reuse local Chain/ChainState obj (Carl Dong)
bc3bd36902 rpc: style: Improve BuriedForkDescPushBack signature (Carl Dong)
f99913969f rpc: Remove unnecessary casting of block height (Carl Dong)
6a3d192020 rpc: Tidy up local references (see commit message) (Carl Dong)
038854f31e rest/rpc: Remove now-unused old Ensure functions (Carl Dong)
6fb65b49f4 scripted-diff: rest/rpc: Use renamed EnsureAny*() (Carl Dong)
1570c7ee98 rpc: Add renamed EnsureAny*() functions (Carl Dong)
306b1cd3ee rpc: Add alt Ensure* functions acepting NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d7824acdb9 rest: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
3f08934799 rest: Pass in NodeContext to rest_block (Carl Dong)
7be0671b95 rpc/rawtx: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
60dc05afc6 rpc/mining: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d485e815e2 rpc/blockchain: Use existing NodeContext (Carl Dong)
d0abf0bf42 rpc/*,rest: Add review-only assertion to EnsureChainman (Carl Dong)
cced0f46c9 miner: Pass in previous CBlockIndex to RegenerateCommitments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #21270 | [Bundle 4/n] Prune g_chainman usage in validation-adjacent modules
- [x] #21525 | [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 586190f0b4. Since last review, no changes to existing commits, just some simple new commits added: three new commits renaming std::any Ensure functions (scripted diff commit and manual pre/post commits), and one new commit factoring out a repeated `ActiveChain()` call made in a loop. Thanks for the updates!
jnewbery:
utACK 586190f0b4
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 586190f0b4🍯
Tree-SHA512: 64b677fb50141805b55c3f1afe68fcd298f9a071a359bdcd63256d52e334f83e462f31fb3ebee9b630da8f1d912a03a128cfc38179e7aaec29a055744a98478c
fa40d6a1c4 test: Reset mocktime in the common setup (MarcoFalke)
fa78590a8f test: Use mocktime to avoid intermittent failure (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21602#discussion_r611176103
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK fa40d6a1c4
jarolrod:
ACK fa40d6a1c4
Tree-SHA512: 4967e006f3d2c4eb92f03c9086a6abe3190ad54755d251c30d20422c574bb1a154c06f3d5bcb0d4deaa3c4abfd3864d743b71d84897edd358e829bb42233ad12
fadcd3f78e doc: Remove irrelevant link to GitHub (MarcoFalke)
fa121b628d blockstorage: [refactor] Use chainman reference where possible (MarcoFalke)
fa0c7d9ad2 move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa91b2b2b3 move-only: Move AbortNode to shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fa413f07a1 move-only: Move ThreadImport to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
faf843c07f refactor: Move load block thread into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This picks up the closed pull request #21030 and is the first step toward fixing #21220.
The basic idea is to move all disk access into a separate module with benefits:
* Breaking down the massive files init.cpp and validation.cpp into logical units
* Creating a standalone-module to reduce the mental complexity
* Pave the way to fix validation related circular dependencies
* Pave the way to mock disk access for testing, especially where it is performance critical (like fuzzing)
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e, checked (almost) moved only changes. This is a nice tidy up change and doesn't change behavior. Easily reviewed commit by commit.
jamesob:
ACK fadcd3f78e ([`jamesob/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto))
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e. New organization makes sense, moves extraneous things outside of validation.cpp. PR is also easy to review with helpfully split up moveonly commits.
Tree-SHA512: 917996592b6d8f9998289d8cb2b1b78b23d1fdb3b07216c9caec1380df33baa09dc2c1e706da669d440b497e79c9c62a01ca20dc202df5ad974a75f3ef7a143b
Seems odd to have an option for non-deterministic tests
when the goal should be for all tests to be deterministic.
Can be reviewed with `--ignore-all-space`.
fa4926cca6 fuzz: [refactor] Use IsValidFlagCombination in signature_checker fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
eeee8f5be1 fuzz: Removed unused try-catch in coins_view (MarcoFalke)
fa98f3f66e fuzz: [refactor] Use ConsumeScript in signature_checker fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Some small refactors to remove unused and redundant fuzz code
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr re-ACK fa4926cca6
Tree-SHA512: eb07a2140caad7b31495b76385fc7634cf5b6daa4947f430ebb127eb1375583dc11e541a0a42d0e5d93d430480b8a815b93974450fd5ed897528a2d47c752f86
40316a37cb test: add I2P test for a runaway SAM proxy (Vasil Dimov)
2d8ac77970 fuzz: add tests for the I2P Session public interface (Vasil Dimov)
9947e44de0 i2p: use pointers to Sock to accommodate mocking (Vasil Dimov)
82d360b5a8 net: change ConnectSocketDirectly() to take a Sock argument (Vasil Dimov)
b5861100f8 net: add connect() and getsockopt() wrappers to Sock (Vasil Dimov)
5a887d49b2 fuzz: avoid FuzzedSock::Recv() repeated errors with EAGAIN (Vasil Dimov)
3088f83d01 fuzz: extend FuzzedSock::Recv() to support MSG_PEEK (Vasil Dimov)
9b05c49ade fuzz: implement unimplemented FuzzedSock methods (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Change the networking code and the I2P code to be fully mockable and use `FuzzedSocket` to fuzz the I2P methods `Listen()`, `Accept()` and `Connect()`.
Add a mocked `Sock` implementation that returns a predefined data on reads and use it for a regression unit test for the bug fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21407.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 40316a37cb
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK 40316a37cb
jonatack:
re-ACK 40316a37cb reviewed `git range-diff 01bb3afb 23c861d 40316a3` and the new unit test commit, debug built, ran unit tests, ran bitcoind with an I2P service and network operation with seven I2P peers (2 in, 5 out) is looking nominal
laanwj:
Code review ACK 40316a37cb
Tree-SHA512: 7fc4f129849e16e0c7e16662d9f4d35dfcc369bb31450ee369a2b97bdca95285533bee7787983e881e5a3d248f912afb42b4a2299d5860ace7129b0b19623cc8
Add a regression test for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21407.
The test creates a socket that, upon read, returns some data, but never
the expected terminator `\n`, injects that socket into the I2P code and
expects `i2p::sam::Session::Connect()` to fail, printing a specific
error message to the log.
1a6323bdbe doc: update developer notes for removal of MakeUnique (fanquake)
3ba2840e7e scripted-diff: remove MakeUnique<T>() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Since requiring C++17, this is just pointless abstraction. I think we should just "tear the band-aid off" and remove it. Similar to the changes happening in #21366.
Also, having a comment saying this is deprecated doesn't prevent it's usage in new code. i.e : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20946#discussion_r561949731.
The repository is fairly quiet at the moment, so any potential complaints about having to rebase should be minimal. Might as well get this over and done with.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 1a6323bdbe
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1a6323bdbe: patch looks correct
ajtowns:
ACK 1a6323bdbe -- code review only
glozow:
ACK 1a6323bdbe looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 4a14b9611b60b9b3026b54d6f5a2dce4c5d9b63a7b93d7de1307512df736503ed84bac66e7b93372c76e3117f49bf9f29cd473d3a47cb41fb2775bc10234736f
e11b649650 validation: CVerifyDB::VerifyDB: Use locking annotation (Carl Dong)
03f75c42e1 validation: Use existing chain member in CChainState::LoadGenesisBlock (Carl Dong)
5e4af77380 validation: Use existing chain member in CChainState::AcceptBlock (Carl Dong)
fee73347c0 validation: Pass in chain to FindBlockPos+SaveBlockToDisk (Carl Dong)
a9d28bcd8d validation: Use *this in CChainState::ActivateBestChainStep (Carl Dong)
4744efc9ba validation: Pass in chainstate to CTxMemPool::check (Carl Dong)
1fb7b2c595 validation: Use *this in CChainState::InvalidateBlock (Carl Dong)
8cdb2f7e58 validation: Move LoadBlockIndexDB to CChainState (Carl Dong)
8b99efbcc0 validation: Move invalid block handling to CChainState (Carl Dong)
2bdf37fe18 validation: Pass in chainstate to CVerifyDB::VerifyDB (Carl Dong)
31eac50c72 validation: Remove global ::VersionBitsTip{State,SinceHeight,Statistics} (Carl Dong)
63e4c7316a validation: Pass in chainstate to ::PruneBlockFilesManual (Carl Dong)
4bada76237 validation: Pass in chainstate to UpdateTip (Carl Dong)
a3ba08ba7d validation: Remove global ::{{Precious,Invalidate}Block,ResetBlockFailureFlags} (Carl Dong)
4927c9e699 validation: Remove global ::LoadGenesisBlock (Carl Dong)
9da106be4d validation: Check chain tip is non-null in CheckFinalTx (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Overall PR: #20158 (tree-wide: De-globalize ChainstateManager)
Based on:
- [x] #20750 | [Bundle 2/n] Prune g_chainman usage in mempool-related validation functions
Note to reviewers:
1. This bundle may _apparently_ introduce usage of `g_chainman` or `::Chain(state|)Active()` globals, but these are resolved later on in the overall PR. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
2. There may be seemingly obvious local references to `ChainstateManager` or other validation objects which are not being used in callers of the current function in question, this is done intentionally to **_keep each commit centered around one function/method_** to ease review and to make the overall change systematic. We don't assume anything about our callers. Rest assured that once we are considering that particular caller in later commits, we will use the obvious local references. [Commits of overall PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20158/commits)
3. When changing a function/method that has many callers (e.g. `LookupBlockIndex` with 55 callers), it is sometimes easier (and less error-prone) to use a scripted-diff. When doing so, there will be 3 commits in sequence so that every commit compiles like so:
1. Add `new_function`, make `old_function` a wrapper of `new_function`, divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the local module only**
2. Scripted-diff to divert all calls to `old_function` to `new_function` **in the rest of the codebase**
3. Remove `old_function`
Note to self:
- [x] Address: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20750#discussion_r579400663
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e11b649650
Tree-SHA512: 205a451a741e32f17d5966de289f2f5a3f0817738c0087b70ff4755ddd217b53d01050ed396669bda2b1d216a88d927b9778777f9ff95ab1fe20e59c5f341776
