0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-08 10:31:50 -05:00
bitcoin-bitcoin-core/CONTRIBUTING.md
fanquake 29fde0223a Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 199d27cea3..efe85c70a2
efe85c70a2 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1466: release cleanup: bump version after 0.4.1
4b2e06f460 release cleanup: bump version after 0.4.1
1ad5185cd4 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1465: release: prepare for 0.4.1
672053d801 release: prepare for 0.4.1
1a81df826e Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1380: Add ABI checking tool for release process
74a4d974d5 doc: Add ABI checking with `check-abi.sh` to the Release Process
e7f830e32c Add `tools/check-abi.sh`
77af1da9f6 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1455: doc: improve secp256k1_fe_set_b32_mod doc
3928b7c383 doc: improve secp256k1_fe_set_b32_mod doc
5e9a4d7aec Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#990: Add comment on length checks when parsing ECDSA sigs
4197d667ec Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1431: Add CONTRIBUTING.md
0e5ea62207 CONTRIBUTING: add some coding and style conventions
e2c9888eee Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1451: changelog: add entry for "field: Remove x86_64 asm"
d2e36a2b81 changelog: add entry for "field: Remove x86_64 asm"
1a432cb982 README: update first sentence
0922a047fb docs: move coverage report instructions to CONTRIBUTING
76880e4015 Add CONTRIBUTING.md including scope and guidelines for new code
d3e29db8bb Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1450: Add group.h ge/gej equality functions
04af0ba162 Replace ge_equals_ge[,j] calls with group.h equality calls
60525f6c14 Add unit tests for group.h equality functions
a47cd97d51 Add group.h ge/gej equality functions
10e6d29b60 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1446: field: Remove x86_64 asm
07687e811d Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1393: Implement new policy for VERIFY_CHECK and #ifdef VERIFY (issue #1381)
bb4672342e remove VERIFY_SETUP define
a3a3e11acd remove unneeded VERIFY_SETUP uses in ECMULT_CONST_TABLE_GET_GE macro
a0fb68a2e7 introduce and use SECP256K1_SCALAR_VERIFY macro
cf25c86d05 introduce and use SECP256K1_{FE,GE,GEJ}_VERIFY macros
5d89bc031b remove superfluous `#ifdef VERIFY`/`#endif` preprocessor conditions
c2688f8de9 redefine VERIFY_CHECK to empty in production (non-VERIFY) mode
5814d8485c Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1438: correct assertion for secp256k1_fe_mul_inner
c1b4966410 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1445: bench: add --help option to bench_internal
f07cead0ca build: Don't call assembly an optimization
2f0762fa8f field: Remove x86_64 asm
1ddd76af0a bench: add --help option to bench_internal
e72103932d Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1441: asm: add .note.GNU-stack section for non-exec stack
ea47c82e01 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1442: Return temporaries to being unsigned in secp256k1_fe_sqr_inner
dcdda31f2c Tighten secp256k1_fe_mul_inner's VERIFY_BITS checks
10271356c8 Return temporaries to being unsigned in secp256k1_fe_sqr_inner
33dc7e4d3e asm: add .note.GNU-stack section for non-exec stack
c891c5c2f4 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1437: ci: Ignore internal errors of snapshot compilers
8185e72d29 ci: Ignore internal errors in snapshot compilers
40f50d0fbd Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1184: Signed-digit based ecmult_const algorithm
8e2a5fe908 correct assertion for secp256k1_fe_mul_inner
355bbdf38a Add changelog entry for signed-digit ecmult_const algorithm
21f49d9bec Remove unused secp256k1_scalar_shr_int
115fdc7232 Remove unused secp256k1_wnaf_const
aa9f3a3c00 ecmult_const: add/improve tests
4d16e90111 Signed-digit based ecmult_const algorithm
ba523be067 make SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST reduce modulo exhaustive group order
2140da9cd5 Add secp256k1_scalar_half for halving scalars (+ tests/benchmarks).
1f1bb78b7f Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1430: README: remove CI badge
5dab0baa80 README: remove CI badge
b314cf2833 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1426: ci/cirrus: Add native ARM64 jobs
fa4d6c76b6 ci/cirrus: Add native ARM64 persistent workers
ee7aaf213e Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1395: tests: simplify `random_fe_non_zero` (remove loop limit and unneeded normalize)
ba9cb6f378 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1424: ci: Bump major versions for docker actions
d9d80fd155 ci: Bump major versions for docker actions
4fd00f4bfe Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1422: cmake: Install `libsecp256k1.pc` file
421d84855a ci: Align Autotools/CMake `CI_INSTALL` directory names
9f005c60d6 cmake: Install `libsecp256k1.pc` file
2262d0eaab ci/cirrus: Bring back skeleton .cirrus.yml without jobs
b10ddd2bd2 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1416: doc: Align documented scripts with CI ones
49be5be9e8 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1390: tests: Replace counting_illegal_callbacks with CHECK_ILLEGAL_VOID
cbf3053ff1 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1417: release cleanup: bump version after 0.4.0
9b118bc7fb release cleanup: bump version after 0.4.0
70303643cf tests: add CHECK_ERROR_VOID and use it in scratch tests
f8d7ea68df tests: Replace counting_illegal_callbacks with CHECK_ILLEGAL_VOID
b0f7bfedc9 doc: Do not mention soname in CHANGELOG.md "ABI Compatibility" section
bd9d98d353 doc: Align documented scripts with CI ones
a1d52e3e12 tests: remove unnecessary test in run_ec_pubkey_parse_test
875b0ada25 tests: remove unnecessary set_illegal_callback
c45b7c4fbb refactor: introduce testutil.h (deduplicate `random_fe_`, `ge_equals_` helpers)
dc5514144f tests: simplify `random_fe_non_zero` (remove loop limit and unneeded normalize)
e02f313b1f Add comment on length checks when parsing ECDSA sigs

git-subtree-dir: src/secp256k1
git-subtree-split: efe85c70a2e357e3605a8901a9662295bae1001f
2024-01-04 14:40:28 +00:00

5.9 KiB

Contributing to libsecp256k1

Scope

libsecp256k1 is a library for elliptic curve cryptography on the curve secp256k1, not a general-purpose cryptography library. The library primarily serves the needs of the Bitcoin Core project but provides additional functionality for the benefit of the wider Bitcoin ecosystem.

Adding new functionality or modules

The libsecp256k1 project welcomes contributions in the form of new functionality or modules, provided they are within the project's scope.

It is the responsibility of the contributors to convince the maintainers that the proposed functionality is within the project's scope, high-quality and maintainable. Contributors are recommended to provide the following in addition to the new code:

  • Specification: A specification can help significantly in reviewing the new code as it provides documentation and context. It may justify various design decisions, give a motivation and outline security goals. If the specification contains pseudocode, a reference implementation or test vectors, these can be used to compare with the proposed libsecp256k1 code.
  • Security Arguments: In addition to a defining the security goals, it should be argued that the new functionality meets these goals. Depending on the nature of the new functionality, a wide range of security arguments are acceptable, ranging from being "obviously secure" to rigorous proofs of security.
  • Relevance Arguments: The relevance of the new functionality for the Bitcoin ecosystem should be argued by outlining clear use cases.

These are not the only factors taken into account when considering to add new functionality. The proposed new libsecp256k1 code must be of high quality, including API documentation and tests, as well as featuring a misuse-resistant API design.

We recommend reaching out to other contributors (see Communication Channels) and get feedback before implementing new functionality.

Communication channels

Most communication about libsecp256k1 occurs on the GitHub repository: in issues, pull request or on the discussion board.

Additionally, there is an IRC channel dedicated to libsecp256k1, with biweekly meetings (see channel topic). The channel is #secp256k1 on Libera Chat. The easiest way to participate on IRC is with the web client, web.libera.chat. Chat history logs can be found at https://gnusha.org/secp256k1/.

Contributor workflow & peer review

The Contributor Workflow & Peer Review in libsecp256k1 are similar to Bitcoin Core's workflow and review processes described in its CONTRIBUTING.md.

Coding conventions

In addition, libsecp256k1 tries to maintain the following coding conventions:

  • No runtime heap allocation (e.g., no malloc) unless explicitly requested by the caller (via secp256k1_context_create or secp256k1_scratch_space_create, for example). Morever, it should be possible to use the library without any heap allocations.
  • The tests should cover all lines and branches of the library (see Test coverage).
  • Operations involving secret data should be tested for being constant time with respect to the secrets (see src/ctime_tests.c).
  • Local variables containing secret data should be cleared explicitly to try to delete secrets from memory.
  • Use secp256k1_memcmp_var instead of memcmp (see #823).

Style conventions

  • Commits should be atomic and diffs should be easy to read. For this reason, do not mix any formatting fixes or code moves with actual code changes. Make sure each individual commit is hygienic: that it builds successfully on its own without warnings, errors, regressions, or test failures.
  • New code should adhere to the style of existing, in particular surrounding, code. Other than that, we do not enforce strict rules for code formatting.
  • The code conforms to C89. Most notably, that means that only /* ... */ comments are allowed (no // line comments). Moreover, any declarations in a { ... } block (e.g., a function) must appear at the beginning of the block before any statements. When you would like to declare a variable in the middle of a block, you can open a new block:
    void secp256k_foo(void) {
        unsigned int x;              /* declaration */
        int y = 2*x;                 /* declaration */
        x = 17;                      /* statement */
        {
            int a, b;                /* declaration */
            a = x + y;               /* statement */
            secp256k_bar(x, &b);     /* statement */
        }
    }
    
  • Use unsigned int instead of just unsigned.
  • Use void *ptr instead of void* ptr.
  • Arguments of the publicly-facing API must have a specific order defined in include/secp256k1.h.
  • User-facing comment lines in headers should be limited to 80 chars if possible.
  • All identifiers in file scope should start with secp256k1_.
  • Avoid trailing whitespace.

Tests

Coverage

This library aims to have full coverage of reachable lines and branches.

To create a test coverage report, configure with --enable-coverage (use of GCC is necessary):

$ ./configure --enable-coverage

Run the tests:

$ make check

To create a report, gcovr is recommended, as it includes branch coverage reporting:

$ gcovr --exclude 'src/bench*' --print-summary

To create a HTML report with coloured and annotated source code:

$ mkdir -p coverage
$ gcovr --exclude 'src/bench*' --html --html-details -o coverage/coverage.html

Exhaustive tests

There are tests of several functions in which a small group replaces secp256k1. These tests are exhaustive since they provide all elements and scalars of the small group as input arguments (see src/tests_exhaustive.c).

Benchmarks

See src/bench*.c for examples of benchmarks.