bee2d57a65 script: update flake8 to 6.1.0 (Jon Atack)
38c3fd846b test: python E721 updates (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Update our functional tests per [E721](https://www.flake8rules.com/rules/E721.html) enforced by [flake8 6.1.0](https://flake8.pycqa.org/en/latest/release-notes/6.1.0.html), and update our CI lint task to use that release. This makes the following linter output on current master with flake8 6.1.0 green.
```
$ ./test/lint/lint-python.py ; ./test/lint/lint-spelling.py
test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py:35:16: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use `is` / `is not`, for instance checks use `isinstance()`
test/functional/test_framework/siphash.py:34:12: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use `is` / `is not`, for instance checks use `isinstance()`
test/functional/test_framework/siphash.py:64:12: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use `is` / `is not`, for instance checks use `isinstance()`
src/test/fuzz/descriptor_parse.cpp:88: occurences ==> occurrences
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK bee2d57a65
Tree-SHA512: f3788a543ca98e44eeeba1d06c32f1b11eec95d4aef068aa1b6b5c401261adfa3fb6c6d6c769f3fe6839d78e74a310d5c926867e7c367d6513a53d580fd376f3
a733dd79e2 Remove unused function `reliesOnAssumedValid` (Suhas Daftuar)
d4a11abb19 Cache block index entry corresponding to assumeutxo snapshot base blockhash (Suhas Daftuar)
3556b85022 Move CheckBlockIndex() from Chainstate to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)
0ce805b632 Documentation improvements for assumeutxo (Ryan Ofsky)
768690b7ce Fix initialization of setBlockIndexCandidates when working with multiple chainstates (Suhas Daftuar)
d43a1f1a2f Tighten requirements for adding elements to setBlockIndexCandidates (Suhas Daftuar)
d0d40ea9a6 Move block-storage-related logic to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)
3cfc75366e test: Clear block index flags when testing snapshots (Suhas Daftuar)
272fbc370c Update CheckBlockIndex invariants for chains based on an assumeutxo snapshot (Suhas Daftuar)
10c05710ce Add wrapper for adding entries to a chainstate's block index candidates (Suhas Daftuar)
471da5f6e7 Move block-arrival information / preciousblock counters to ChainstateManager (Suhas Daftuar)
1cfc887d00 Remove CChain dependency in node/blockstorage (Suhas Daftuar)
fe86a7cd48 Explicitly track maximum block height stored in undo files (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR proposes a clean up of the relationship between block storage and the chainstate objects, by moving the decision of whether to store a block on disk to something that is not chainstate-specific. Philosophically, the decision of whether to store a block on disk is related to validation rules that do not require any UTXO state; for anti-DoS reasons we were using some chainstate-specific heuristics, and those have been reworked here to achieve the proposed separation.
This PR also fixes a bug in how a chainstate's `setBlockIndexCandidates` was being initialized; it should always have all the HAVE_DATA block index entries that have more work than the chain tip. During startup, we were not fully populating `setBlockIndexCandidates` in some scenarios involving multiple chainstates.
Further, this PR establishes a concept that whenever we have 2 chainstates, that we always know the snapshotted chain's base block and the base block's hash must be an element of our block index. Given that, we can establish a new invariant that the background validation chainstate only needs to consider blocks leading to that snapshotted block entry as potential candidates for its tip. As a followup I would imagine that when writing net_processing logic to download blocks for the background chainstate, that we would use this concept to only download blocks towards the snapshotted entry as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a733dd79e2
jamesob:
reACK a733dd79e2 ([`jamesob/ackr/27746.5.sdaftuar.rework_validation_logic`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/27746.5.sdaftuar.rework_validation_logic))
Sjors:
Code review ACK a733dd79e2.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a733dd79e2. Just suggested changes since the last review. There are various small things that could be followed up on, but I think this is ready for merge.
Tree-SHA512: 9ec17746f22b9c27082743ee581b8adceb2bd322fceafa507b428bdcc3ffb8b4c6601fc61cc7bb1161f890c3d38503e8b49474da7b5ab1b1f38bda7aa8668675
ecfe507e07 fuzz: use `ConnmanTestMsg` in `connman` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes #27980
Using `ConnmanTestMsg` we can add nodes and be
more effective fuzzing functions like `DisconnectNode`,
`FindNode`, `GetNodeStats` and other ones.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ecfe507e07
dergoegge:
utACK ecfe507e07
Tree-SHA512: 97c363b422809f2e9755c082d1102237347abfab72c7baca417bd8975f8a595ddf3a085f8353dbdb9f17fb98fbfe830792bfc0b83451168458018faf6c239efa
06199a995f refactor: Revert addition of univalue sighash string check (TheCharlatan)
0b47c16215 doc: Correct release-notes for sighashtype exceptions (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
This is a follow up for #28113.
The string type check is already done by the rpc parser / RPCHelpMan. Re-doing it is adding dead code. Instead, throwing an exception when the assumption does not hold is the already correct behavior. Pointed out in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28113/files#r1274568557).
Also correct the release note for the correct sighashtype exception change. There is no change in the handling of non-string sighashtype arugments. Pointed out in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28113/files#r1274567555).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 06199a995f
jonatack:
Tested ACK 06199a995f
stickies-v:
ACK 06199a995f
Tree-SHA512: 3faa6b3d2247624c0973df8d79c09fbf1f90ffb99f1be484e359b528f485c31affea45976759bd206e4c81cbb54ebba5ad0ef4127d1deacbfe2a58153fcc94ee
fa940f41ea Remove unused raw-pointer read helper from univalue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The helpers are unused outside of tests and redundant with the existing `bool read(std::string_view raw);`.
Fix both issues by removing them.
Also, simplify the tests code by removing a `std::string` constructor where possible.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
utACK fa940f41ea
TheCharlatan:
tACK fa940f41ea
Tree-SHA512: 60c154c1046f01551335af79bf820a6104844f63e89977271b4336b3cd06ac3bab1379e18b7bc61d12bef7446029e91c16541ddecf9e88bc8bc897fc1f6ee2c8
131314b62e fuzz: increase coverage of the descriptor targets (Antoine Poinsot)
90a24741e7 fuzz: add a new, more efficient, descriptor parsing target (Antoine Poinsot)
d60229ede5 fuzz: make the parsed descriptor testing into a function (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
The current descriptor parsing fuzz target requires valid public or private keys to be provided. This is unnecessary as we are only interested in fuzzing the descriptor parsing logic here (other targets are focused on fuzzing keys serializations). And it's pretty inefficient, especially for formats that need a checksum (`xpub`, `xprv`, WIF).
This introduces a new target that mocks the keys as an index in a list of precomputed keys. Keys are represented as 2 hex characters in the descriptor. The key type (private, public, extended, ..) is deterministically based on this one-byte value. Keys are deterministically generated at target initialization. This is much more efficient and also largely reduces the size of the seeds.
TL;DR: for instance instead of requiring the fuzzer to generate a `pk(xpub6DdBu7pBoyf7RjnUVhg8y6LFCfca2QAGJ39FcsgXM52Pg7eejUHLBJn4gNMey5dacyt4AjvKzdTQiuLfRdK8rSzyqZPJmNAcYZ9kVVEz4kj)` to parse a valid descriptor, it just needs to generate a `pk(03)`.
Note we only mock the keys themselves, not the entire descriptor key expression. As we want to fuzz the real code that parses the rest of the key expression (origin, derivation paths, ..).
This is a target i used for reviewing #17190 and #27255, and figured it was worth PR'ing on its own since the added complexity for mocking the keys is minimal and it could help prevent introducing bugs to the descriptor parsing logic much more efficiently.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 131314b62e🐓
achow101:
ACK 131314b62e
Tree-SHA512: 485a8d6a0f31a3a132df94dc57f97bdd81583d63507510debaac6a41dbbb42fa83c704ff3f2bd0b78c8673c583157c9a3efd79410e5e79511859e1470e629118
This check is already done by the rpc parser. Re-doing it is adding dead
code. Instead, throwing an exception when the assumption does not hold
is the already correct behavior.
To make the fuzz test more accurate and not swallow all runtime errors,
add a check that the passed in UniValue sighash argument is either a
string or null.
Co-authored-by: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
This adds the FSChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD as specified in BIP324, a wrapper
around the ChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD (as specified in RFC8439 section 2.8) which
automatically rekeys every N messages, and automatically increments the nonce
every message.
This adds the FSChaCha20 stream cipher as specified in BIP324, a
wrapper around the ChaCha20 stream cipher (specified in RFC8439
section 2.4) which automatically rekeys every N messages, and
manages the nonces used for encryption.
Co-authored-by: dhruv <856960+dhruv@users.noreply.github.com>
This adds an implementation of the ChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD exactly matching
the version specified in RFC8439 section 2.8, including tests and official
test vectors.
Remove the variant of ChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD that was previously added in
anticipation of BIP324 using it. BIP324 was updated to instead use rekeying
wrappers around otherwise unmodified versions of the ChaCha20 stream cipher
and the ChaCha20Poly1305 AEAD as specified in RFC8439.
fa9108f85a refactor: Use reinterpret_cast where appropriate (MarcoFalke)
3333f950d4 refactor: Avoid casting away constness (MarcoFalke)
fa6394dd10 refactor: Remove unused C-style casts (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using a C-style cast to convert pointer types to a byte-like pointer type has many issues:
* It may accidentally and silently throw away `const`.
* It forces reviewers to check that it doesn't accidentally throw away `const`.
For example, on current master a `const char*` is cast to `unsigned char*` (without `const`), see d23fda0584/src/span.h (L273) . This can lead to UB, and the only reason why it didn't lead to UB is because the return type added back the `const`. (Obviously this would break if the return type was deduced via `auto`)
Fix all issues by adding back the `const` and using `reinterpret_cast` where appropriate.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
re-utACK fa9108f85a
hebasto:
re-ACK fa9108f85a.
john-moffett:
ACK fa9108f85a
Tree-SHA512: 87f6e4b574f9bd96d4e0f2a0631fd0a9dc6096e5d4f1b95042fe9f197afc2fe9a24e333aeb34fed11feefcdb184a238fe1ea5aff10d580bb18d76bfe48b76a10
faca9a3d5a test: Avoid intermittent issues due to async events in validationinterface_tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the tests have many issues:
* They setup the genesis block, even though it is not needed
* They queue an async `UpdatedBlockTip` even, which causes intermittent issues: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28146#issuecomment-1650064645
Fix all issues by trimming down the setup to just `ChainTestingSetup`.
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
tACK faca9a3d5a
Tree-SHA512: 4449040330f89bbaf5ce5b2052417c160b451c373987fdf1069596c07834ed81f0aea1506d53c7d2cd21062b27332d30679285dae194b272fd0cb9ce5ded32cf
6960c81cbf kernel: Remove Univalue from kernel library (TheCharlatan)
10eb3a9faa kernel: Split ParseSighashString (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Besides the build system changes, this is a mostly move-only change for moving the few UniValue-related functions out of kernel files.
UniValue is not required by any of the kernel components and a JSON library should not need to be part of a consensus library.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6960c81cbf
theuni:
Re-ACK 6960c81cbf
stickies-v:
re-ACK 6960c81cbf
Tree-SHA512: d92e4cb4e12134c94b517751bd746d39f9b8da528ec3a1c94aaedcce93274a3bae9277832e8a7c0243c13df0397ca70ae7bbb24ede200018c569f8d81103c1da
When using assumeutxo and multiple chainstates are active, the background
chainstate should consider all HAVE_DATA blocks that are ancestors of the
snapshotted block and that have more work than the tip as potential candidates.
When using assumeutxo, we only need the background chainstate to consider
blocks that are on the chain leading to the snapshotted block.
Note that this introduces the new invariant that we can only have an assumeutxo
snapshot where the snapshotted blockhash is in our block index. Unknown block
hashes that are somehow passed in will cause assertion failures when processing
new blocks.
Includes test fixes and improvements by Andrew Chow and Fabian Jahr.
Once a descriptor is successfully parsed, execute more of its methods.
There is probably still room for improvements by checking for some
invariants, but this is a low hanging fruit that significantly increases
the code coverage of these targets.
This new target focuses on fuzzing the actual descriptor parsing logic
by not requiring the fuzzer to produce valid keys (nor a valid checksum
for that matter).
This should make it much more efficient to find bugs we could introduce
moving forward.
Using a character as a marker (here '%') to be able to search and
replace in the string without having to mock the actual descriptor
parsing logic was an insight from Pieter Wuille.
Separate the notion of which blocks are stored on disk, and what data is in our
block index, from what tip a chainstate might be able to get to. We can use
chainstate-agnostic data to determine when to store a block on disk (primarily,
an anti-DoS set of criteria) and let the chainstates figure out for themselves
when a block is of interest for being a candidate tip.
Note: some of the invariants in CheckBlockIndex are modified, but more work is
needed (ie to move CheckBlockIndex to ChainstateManager, as most of what
CheckBlockIndex is doing is checking the consistency of the block index, which
is outside of Chainstate).
7d92b1430a refactor: use Span for SipHash::Write (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This simple refactoring PR changes the interface for the `SipHash` arbitrary-data `Write` method to take a `Span<unsigned char>` instead of having to pass data and length. (`Span<std::byte>` seems to be more modern, but vectors of `unsigned char` are still used prety much everywhere where SipHash is called, and I didn't find it very appealing having to clutter the code with `Make(Writable)ByteSpan` helpers).
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 7d92b1430a
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 7d92b1430a
achow101:
ACK 7d92b1430a
Tree-SHA512: f17a27013c942aead4b09f5a64e0c3ff8dbc7e83fe63eb9a2e3ace8be9921c9cbba3ec67e3e83fbe3332ca941c42370efd059e702c060f9b508307e9657c66f2
1cd45d4e08 test: move random.h include header from setup_common.h to cpp (Jon Atack)
1b246fdd14 test: move remaining random test util code from setup_common to random (jonatack)
Pull request description:
and drop the `util/random` dependency on `util/setup_common`. This improves code separation and allows `util/setup_common` to call `util/random` functions without creating a circular dependency, thereby addressing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26940#issuecomment-1497266140 by glozow (thanks!)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 1cd45d4e08🌂
Tree-SHA512: 6ce63d9103ba9b04eebbd8ad02fe9aa79e356296533404034a1ae88e9b7ca0bc9a5c51fd754b71cf4e7b55b18bcd4d5474b2d588edee3851e3b3ce0e4d309a93
c7db88af71 descriptor: assert we never parse a sane miniscript with no pubkey (Antoine Poinsot)
a49402a9ec qa: make sure we don't let unspendable Miniscript descriptors be imported (Antoine Poinsot)
639e3b6c97 descriptor: refuse to parse unspendable miniscript descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
e3280eae1b miniscript: make GetStackSize() and GetOps() return optionals (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
`IsSane()` in Miniscript does not ensure a Script is actually spendable. This is an issue as we would accept any sane Miniscript when parsing a descriptor. Fix this by explicitly checking a Miniscript descriptor is both sane and spendable when parsing it.
This bug was exposed due to a check added in #22838 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#discussion_r1226859880) that triggered a fuzz crash (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22838#issuecomment-1612510057).
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK c7db88af71
achow101:
ACK c7db88af71
Tree-SHA512: e79bc9f7842e98a4e8f358f05811fca51b15b4b80a171c0d2b17cf4bb1f578a18e4397bc2ece9817d392e0de0196ee6a054b7318441fd3566dd22e1f03eb64a5
4e5c933f6a Switch all callers from poly1305_auth to Poly1305 class (Pieter Wuille)
8871f7d1ae tests: add more Poly1305 test vectors (Pieter Wuille)
40e6c5b9fc crypto: add Poly1305 class with std::byte Span interface (Pieter Wuille)
50269b391f crypto: switch poly1305 to incremental implementation (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Our current Poly1305 code (src/crypto/poly1305.*) only supports computing the entire tag in one go (the `poly1305_auth` function takes a key and message, and outputs the tag). However, the RFC8439 authenticated encryption (as used in BIP324, see #27634) scheme makes use of Poly1305 in a way where the message consists of 3 different pieces:
* The additionally authenticated data (AAD), padded to 16 bytes.
* The ciphertext, padded to 16 bytes.
* The length of the AAD and the length of the ciphertext, together another 16 bytes.
Implementing RFC8439 using the existing `poly1305_auth` function requires creating a temporary copy with all these pieces of data concatenated just for the purpose of computing the tag (the approach used in #25361).
This PR replaces the poly1305 code with new code from https://github.com/floodyberry/poly1305-donna (with minor adjustments to make it match our coding style and use our utility functions, documented in the commit) which supports incremental operation, and then adds a C++ wrapper interface using std::byte Spans around it, and adds tests that incremental and all-at-once computation match.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4e5c933f6a
theStack:
ACK 4e5c933f6a
stratospher:
tested ACK 4e5c933.
Tree-SHA512: df6e9a2a4a38a480f9e4360d3e3def5311673a727a4a85b008a084cf6843b260dc82cec7c73e1cecaaccbf10f3521a0ae7dba388b65d0b086770f7fbc5223e2a
fa6dfaaf45 scripted-diff: Use new FUZZ_TARGET macro everywhere (MarcoFalke)
fa36ad8b09 fuzz: Accept options in FUZZ_TARGET macro (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `FUZZ_TARGET` macros have many issues:
* The developer will have to pick the right macro to pass the wanted option.
* Adding a new option requires doubling the number of existing macros in the worst case.
Fix all issues by using only a single macro.
This refactor does not change behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fa6dfaaf45
Tree-SHA512: 49a34553867a1734ce89e616b2d7c29b784a67cd8990db6573f0c7b18957636ef0c81d3d0d444a04c12cdc98bc4c4aa7a2ec94e6232dc363620a746e28416444
When simulating a snapshot, remove the HAVE_DATA status for blocks below the
snapshot height, to simulate never having downloaded them at all. This makes
tests more realistic (and more closely match what will happen when using
assumeutxo).
Block arrival information (and the preciousblock RPC, a related concept) are
both chainstate-agnostic, so these are moved to ChainstateManager. This should
just be a refactor, without any observable behavior changes.
35a2175ad8 fuzz: addrman, add coverage for `network` field in `Select()`, `Size()` and `GetAddr()` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds fuzz coverage for `network` field in `Select()`, `Size()` and `GetAddr()`, there was only call to them without passing a network.
https://marcofalke.github.io/b-c-cov/fuzz.coverage/src/addrman.cpp.gcov.html
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
for the record, ACK 35a2175ad8 - only small changes from the version (previously) proposed in 27213
achow101:
ACK 35a2175ad8
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 35a2175ad8, haven't tested this yet, but I will let the fuzzer run for a while now.
Tree-SHA512: dddb8322298d6c373c8e68d57538470b11825a9a310a355828c351d5c0b19ff6779d024a800e3ea90126d0c050e86f71fd22cd23d1a306c784cef0f82c45e3ca
e7cf8657e1 test: add unit test for local address advertising (Martin Zumsande)
f4754b9dfb net: restrict self-advertisements with privacy networks (Martin Zumsande)
e4d541c7cf net, refactor: pass reference for peer address in GetReachabilityFrom (Martin Zumsande)
62d73f5370 net, refactor: pass CNode instead of CNetAddr to GetLocalAddress (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The current logic for self-advertisements works such that we detect as many local addresses as we can, and then, using the scoring matrix from `CNetAddr::GetReachabilityFrom()`, self-advertise with the address that fits best to our peer.
It is in general not hard for our peers to distinguish our self-advertisements from other addrs we send them, because we self-advertise every ~24h and because the first addr we send over a connection is likely our self-advertisement.
`GetReachabilityFrom()` currently only takes into account actual reachability, but not whether we'd _want_ to announce our identity for one network to peers from other networks, which is not straightforward in connection with privacy networks.
While the general approach is to prefer self-advertising with the address for the network our peer is on, there are several special situations in which we don't have one, and as a result could allow self-advertise other local addresses, for example:
A) We run i2p and clearnet, use `-i2pacceptincoming=0` (so we have no local i2p address), and we have a local ipv4 address. In this case, we'd advertise the ipv4 address to our outbound i2p peers.
B) Our `-discover` logic cannot detect any local clearnet addresses in our network environment, but we are actually reachable over clearnet. If we ran bitcoind clearnet-only, we'd always advertise the address our peer sees us with instead, and could get inbound peers this way. Now, if we also have an onion service running (but aren't using tor as a proxy for clearnet connections), we could advertise our onion address to clearnet peers, so that they would be able to connect our clearnet and onion identities.
This PR tries to avoid these situations by
1.) never advertising our local Tor or I2P address to peers from other networks.
2.) never advertising local addresses from non-anonymity networks to peers from Tor or I2P
Note that this affects only our own self-advertisements, the rules to forward other people's addrs are not changed.
[Edit] after Initial [discussion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27411#issuecomment-1497176155): CJDNS is not being treated like Tor and I2P at least for now, because it has different privacy properties and for the practical reason that it has still very few bitcoin nodes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e7cf8657e1
vasild:
ACK e7cf8657e1
luke-jr:
utACK e7cf8657e1
Tree-SHA512: 3db8415dea6f82223d11a23bd6cbb3b8cf68831321280e926034a1f110cbe22562570013925f6fa20d8f08e41d0202fd69c733d9f16217318a660d2a1a21b795
This also removes the old poly1305_auth interface, as it no longer serves any
function. The new Poly1305 class based interface is more modern and safe.
0bf87476f5 test: add ChaCha20 test triggering 32-bit block counter overflow (Sebastian Falbesoner)
7f2a985147 tests: improve ChaCha20 unit tests (Pieter Wuille)
511a8d406e crypto: Implement RFC8439-compatible variant of ChaCha20 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Based on and replaces part of #25361, part of the BIP324 project (#27634). See also #19225 for background.
There are two variants of ChaCha20 in use. The currently implemented one uses a 64-bit nonce and a 64-bit block counter, while the one used in RFC8439 (and thus BIP324) uses a 96-bit nonce and 32-bit block counter. This PR changes the logic to use the 96-bit nonce variant, though in a way that's compatible with >256 GiB output (by automatically incrementing the first 32-bit part of the nonce when the block counter overflows).
For those who reviewed the original PR, the biggest change is here that the 96-bit nonce is passed as a Nonce96 type (pair of 32-bit + 64-bit integer) rather than a 12-byte array.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0bf87476f5
theStack:
Code-review ACK 0bf87476f5
Tree-SHA512: 62e4cbd5388b8d50ef1a0dc99b6f4ad36c7b4419032035f8e622dda63a62311dd923032217e20054bcd836865d4be5c074f9e5538ca158f94f08eab75c5519c1
